Posted by
rycK on Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:26:23 PM
Is it Time for Some Undocumented Capitalism Yet? Lots of ‘Persons’
Practice that in the US Now with Favors from Our Government.
Governments
prostrate themselves and dive into crime and worse when their survival depends
on culturing and supporting degeneracy, crime and sloth. All their wonderful promises and speechifying
tend to evaporate when they realize they might lose power. California is the latest example. The ‘glorious’
October Revolution in Russia produced
only chaos and a frantic search for a stable food supply and seemed to fail to association
of splendor and glory with the rule of the proletariat; cheap thugs ran
the government. The kulaks, frequently wealthy but not of the
aristocracy and closely identified with the bourgeoisie[or more accurately
petite bourgeoisie in this case], were summarily murdered when they refused to
just give their land, food and animals to the Bolsheviks so Lenin was forced to
conjure some plan to placate these ‘peasants’ and produced his New Economic
Policy (NEP). They were depicted as ruffians with
silk top hats in the 1919 Bolshevik posters plastered everywhere in public. This
failed movement, of course, as most far leftist plans do, and when food was
scarce capitalism flourished in the very faces of the Marxists when peasants were
encouraged to sell their food and wares openly in the market place thus
defeating the very principle of socialism. Liberals tend to try to perform a
similar trick with ‘education’…‘ejukashon’?? We eventually witnessed how the USSR
system of a command economy failed to produce even one quarter of the food
necessary and those who would ‘manage’ the economy and pick the correct time to
dig potatoes finally just ignored the kiosks that were providing most of the
food. Lenin would rather have shot these
people, but needed the food and other products. Duranty Papers would have sanctioned their holocaust as a necessary step to advance
socialism ["…liquidated or melted in the
hot fire of exile and labor into the proletarian mass]. Such poetic flair! Maureen Dowd
should study this example.
In our country
Poncho the Parasite has a cozy arrangement with the liberal whereby he can
enter the country illegally, work where he wants, supply false Social Security
numbers to employers (who are looking the other way any way) and then just not
submit state and federal tax returns because that would cause an interferences
at the federal and state levels anyway. But, registering to vote in states
where ID checking is as passé as virginity, Poncho can make money tax free by
working or hustling drugs and send back as much as he wants without
interference from our federal government.
But, our government
is stuck at this time as they cannot exactly raise taxes on the working stooges
who believe in their hokum and fluff so we just print money and tax whomever at
the highest rates possible. This doesn’t work well in either the long or short
terms for several reasons:
[1] Higher taxes
increase business costs and results in lower tax revenues.
[2] Government rules
and regulations do the same thing and discourage job creation by small
businesses.
[3] Big businesses
have more flexibility and if they are ‘too big to fail’ then they can ask for a
bailout with some consideration stuffed into the pockets of the politicians.
So, the squeeze is
on and what is left are those who can run efficient business operations and
keep people employed and pay their inordinate share of taxes to support the
habits of the politicians and their clients. That group is not responding well
to the Obama Fascism we hear all about on CBS and other in-the-tank state news
services.
One of the reasons
proffered to not go after Poncho and
his jolly friends is that it would cost too much to deport 10-20 million souls
and they are needed to scrub the toilets and pick berries anyway. Their obvious
crimes are thus ignored and we can then wonder what the equal protection clause actually means. What happened to the Rule of Law? The 14th
Amendment has limitations so we might look at the enumerated commerce clause listed directly but vaguely in the
United States Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, and Clause 3). These two
angles let the federal government sneak around the 9th and 10th
Amendments that would give states the basis to decide to accept [or not] all
unnumerated laws not reserved to the federal government. All this is
complicated but the words ‘regulation’ and ‘commerce’ have been so distorted
that several opportunities in the law exist for both the left and right to
continue to blowtorch the Constitution.
One then wonders if
some others are borrowing some of the
tactics of the California marijuana growers and wantonly flouting the narcotics laws and avoiding taxes
but serving the politicians all at the same time with dope and gifts. These Mary
Jane types successfully beat the federal law in Mexifornia, and now make big profits even thought
they are supposed to be non profit and such baloney and operate in cooperatives
and, we might suspect, be subject to taxation and extensive record keeping. There
eventually comes an encounter with a knife-edge decision where the risk of
being sent to jail for some ‘crime’ is balanced by the risk of losing your
possessions and career because of confiscatory taxes of the income, fee and
inheritance classes—particularly old white folks.
What we might expect would be a growing trend
where professionals would trade their respective services in a barter system
devoid of paper and 1099 forms. We have
seen recently that USB [Swiss Bank] has yielded only about 4500 names and account
numbers to the IRS of those felons would hide tax-avoidance monies and make good
profits with no tax burdens. Can I offer
a bet that no Democrat member of Congress is on that list? Out of a country of
310 million it seems that this number is inordinately small although it only
covers a bank in the original Dirty Money Country and avoids such places as
Luxemburg and the Cayman Islands and a few other spots. And, if
California wants to tax pot at 30% to save their budget and credit ratings we
can wonder why former criminals who are adept in evading such fates might want
to pay such a high tax and just break a few more laws as California may have to
furlough many of their drug enforcement yoyos anyway. The feds are busy hunting
down white terrorists anyway.
It is not clear how
much of a problem this is now or what it might be in the near future but when
unemployment is high and rising and the number of people who might be forced to
practice some ‘undocumented capitalism’ might ascend to several million while
our jails are already stuffed to the rafters with violent criminals now so
where would be put all these errant entrepreneurs? Or what do the federal and
state tax collectors do if people refuse to pay their fines? Seize their property
and bank accounts? What if they refused
like Gandhi?
An oppressive and
tax hungry government might compel a societal change in the average citizen’s
behaviour in this country and force people to conduct commerce underground like
they did in the USSR for 74 years until that wreckage
rotted away in a blizzard of worthless rubles. Then, like magic, the economy
flourished and a thousand new millionaires were created in Moscow alone all financed with US 100 dollar
bills. Their mattresses must have bulged as dollars were illegal in the good
old USSR. Are some of our more clever entrepreneurs
hiding gold bullion in safe places? If our currency crashed who would have
liquid assets? Certainly not the bank
account holders in frozen or defunct banks.
What would our
government do if modern ‘peasants’ just refused to ship their food and produce
to the cities and set up kiosks along the highways? Tear them down? Burn the
crops? What if the food supply was scarce? Seize farms and let government
officials perform honest work in the fields to produce milk and lettuce and
corn for the city crowd?
Big government is a
big failure on this planet so we wonder just how far the average citizen can be
pushed before he or she becomes interested in ‘undocumented capitalism’ because
the illegal aliens seem to be making this work very well and are the darlings
of the far left and they are certainly not being deported in great numbers and
are not fined and are not rotting in jails for 5 years. The current leftist
treatment of the Rule of Law is a joke.
If our economy
crashes we may get instant answers to many of these questions. Our society will
scarcely tolerate the notion that the government should own everything and just
give orders like they did in the old USSR. Only half of us are that stupid.
rycK
Comments:
ryckki@gmail.com