Posted by
rycK on Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:34:55 PM
The New York Times
Laments the Rule of Law and Weeps over Illegal Aliens and their Lost Jobs.
The rabid
left is quick to hack up and scatter the soggy sputum that signals some
unbending allegiance to the Rule of Law unless there is some political advantage
to be had. Sloth, sodomy and drug addiction as well as ballot-box stuffing
ceremonies may be practiced with outgoing pride [California] and song and these precious ‘rights’ must be kept above
the law. Historically, when we focus in on other criminals such as illegal
aliens who, according to the NYT ‘pay taxes’ we find some gaping hole
in the law and a host of lawyers and intellectuals who would explain to us why
no enforcement measures should apply. Illegal aliens do not routinely file
state and federal tax forms as the laws mandates because they have stolen the
numbers of honest citizens thus causing and interference at the IRS if they submit. They are compound
criminals as they break numerous laws just being here. They are thieves, liars
and worse, but they are loyal Democrats. As such, they claim the maximum number
of dependents when they lie on their job applications, probably at the urging
of ACORN and other parasitic leftist organizations that act as vultures upon
our society, and fail to follow the law. For their sake, the Rule of Law must
have a veil over her eyes such that ‘justice for all’ is just justice if it
favors the rabid left and excludes most whites.
The Object of the Lament:
“An immigration crackdown by the Obama
administration has led to the imminent firing of about 1,800 workers at
American Apparel, the trendy clothing company whose downtown factory is one of
the largest still left in Los Angeles.”--Broken in U.S.A.
NYT Editorial Published: September
30, 2009
[Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
The Sad Songs:
“The government has to enforce the law. But one has to ask
who benefits from a crackdown like this.”-- Broken in U.S.A.
NYT Editorial
This is a
peculiar statement and lends some form of self-aggrandizing conditionality to
the statement. There is no intent to
enforce these laws in places like San Francisco, Oakland, New York City, Baltimore and many more. We can safely translate this comment to
state, reading what is not written but actually appears
blatantly unwritten in the best traditions of the ‘Unspoken
Words Theorem’ so aptly invented by Maureen Dowd the Old Red Lady of
the Old Gray Lady
Using our
newly-designed literary skills, giving deference and full acknowledgement—not
to mention slobbering praise-- to Dowd, we can supply the missing words and meanings
in the rest of this ‘editorial.’
“President Obama and Ms. Napolitano inherited a failed immigration
policy. They have promised do better in setting priorities, hunting down abusive employers
and pressing for comprehensive immigration reform that will give workers hope
and a path to legalization.”--Broken in U.S.A.
NYT Editorial
The
system is NOT broken. The liars lie on
applications because they know that left-liberal politicos will help them and
need their illegal votes to win in the elections. This well-oiled system
dutifully supplies illegal aliens for votes. We are missing much from this
lament so why not add in what is missing al la Dowd:
“We hate gringos and will ‘punish them’ at
the polls every chance we get.”—The chant of the Hispanic Supremacy Groups
[Hispanic
Supremacy groups such as La Raza, La Mecha[7] ,
NCLR and MALDEF].
As for La
Mecha they advocate: "…as Mechistas,
we vow to work for the liberation of Aztlan." They are militant,
Marxist and their official icon:”is an eagle holding a machete-like weapon and
a stick of dynamite.”[8]
That
means a threat of violence and displacement of whites. Is it racist to call “Anglos” gringos? The NYT seems to be blissfully unaware of
this view, so we need to put in between the lines as Maureen would do.
Sobbing and more sobbing:
“A crackdown that
forces 1,800 taxpaying would-be Americans into
joblessness in a dismal economy is a law-enforcement victory only in the
bitterest, narrowest sense. As a solution to the problem of unauthorized
workers — 1,800 down, millions to go — it’s ludicrous.”--Broken in U.S.A.
NYT Editorial
A question:
Why
should these illegal aliens become citizens? Did the editors scramble words
when they put in would-be Americans into a
slot that should have read would-be Citizens
or do they have some inside information or premonition that many of these
criminals are not from the Western Hemisphere?
The
message here is clear: Illegal aliens are more than welcome in the US to fight shoulder-to-shoulder
against the hated Anglos and their capitalism.
We need to ignore these alleged ‘criminals’ as we increase taxes and
shift the wealth from whites to other colors.
As such, we can expect the editorial staff at the New York Times known
more accurately as the Walter Duranty Papers to
structure their propaganda pieces according to this goal.
This editorial was a poor example of progressive propaganda
and they can do better.
rycK
Comments
to: ryckki@gmail.com