Posted by
rycK on Monday, August 24, 2009 6:01:19 PM
The UK’s PM Brown Bows to
Islamo-Fascism like Obama. Disgrace Mixed and Served with Dishonour.
The moral
and economic threads of what used to be a proud nation started to corrode and decompose
shortly after they showed the world that they could pen up and starve whites in
concentration camps in the two Boer Wars. Apparently, they successfully
anticipated that the notion: “The death and suffering of the civilians,
according to many scholars, is what broke the guerrillas' will.”
Lacking little but the tattered and redacted remains of their strange history,
the English and their lackeys plodded onward in two world wars acting the part
of the beggar and worse and managed to bring their citizenry to the brink of
starvation from submarine warfare blockades no less than twice. Although the
recipients of gifts, favorable violations of neutrality treaties and the
lend-lease of ships and such from the distracted Americans they seem to remain
a bit churlish when it comes to the
Yanks. More than 516,000 American lives
were lost in military actions mostly at the feverish and frantic behest of the
Brits on several fronts although the numbers vary from source to source.
This time, events focus on the home front as they now prepare to surrender to
the Islamo-Fascists.
These
wars were fought, we must presume—at least from the British point of view—for
reasons of justice and liberty and all that. Mighty enemies on
the continent had to be dispatched and the notion that we must save the world
from Fascists or militarists was paramount. It seems they ignored the threats
to destroy the British society from Russian Communists and their Bolsheviks for
many decades after 1917. Did they miss
the message? It is always interesting to reflect upon the outcome of the two
big wars and wonder what they were thinking as the Soviets gained ground and
power in each episode and we brushed off the paperhanger only at the exorbitant
price of a several decades of very expensive cold war maneuvers with nuclear
threats that outdistanced even the tortured imagination of Goebbels. What was supposed to happen? Were the
Russians to simply retreat and forget their blood oaths to crush capitalism? According
to Wilson, the US got into that scrape because of German submarine warfare. That
partial truth, however, was actually based
on the German retaliation for the British blockade of Germany and other entente allies against international neutrality
treaties. The blockade was extended into 1919 after cessation of
hostilities to force the Germans to sign the Treaty of Versailles. All jolly
good sport. About 750,000 civilians died in Europe because of starvation
caused by this blockade during the First War. This was all very noble in the words of Woodrow Wilson of April
1917. There is a marvelous account of this mess given in the 1957
book War and Aftermath 1914-1929 by Pierre Renouvin.
Okay, so
some hypocrisy, blunders and false guesses and treachery happened in a place or
two and we all finally came to appreciate ‘peace’ and to erect in Wilson’s words
“…to vindicate the principles of peace and justice in the
life of the world as against selfish and autocratic power.” It is interesting that we
cannot reach that same conclusion about Islamo-Fascism. Hitler’s powers were
puny compared to petrodollar-rich authoritarian states like Iran and Iraq threatening to destroy whole countries and ‘wipe them off the map’ with nuclear weapons. They [US and Israel] are the Great Satan it seems. [Emphasis is mine in
all quotes.]
So, after
decades of groveling before the Labour unions and wining only the last few
battles in several wars our British friends now face political and financial
oblivion as shoveled up from their elected Labour Party man Gordon Brown.
“Gordon Brown faced fresh questions tonight after it emerged that
he discussed with Colonel Gaddafi detailed conditions for the Lockerbie
bomber's return nearly six weeks ago,..”-- Gordon Brown in new storm over freed Lockerbie
bomber • Talks with Gaddafi six weeks ago • US campaign for Scottish boycott By
Gaby Hinsliff, political editor The Observer, Sunday 23 August 2009
P.M. Brown has been the subject of several probing
questions by the Telegraph who question why Scotland and not London are to be blamed for this mess. The case spins on the fact that
one convicted terrorist and noted Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al
Megrahi got a hero’s welcome in Tripoli.
We read in the Telegraph that “Jack
Straw, the justice secretary, was forced to issue a statement conceding that
any decision on the Lockerbie bomber’s future was indeed a matter for Scottish ministers.” Brown happens to be a Scot so the
association was noted. Apparently, Parliament is rendered neutered and helpless
in the face of a band of Scots again. Many think that the Labour Part leader and PM Gordon Brown are sinking the UK in the financial latrines as is most of the Eurozone. Some, like Janet Daley wonder if he is sane. Brown is apparently sinking the UK indebt. He has allies like the Princeling of Wails who preaches the urgency of high carbon caps and associated
taxes to save the planet. Can any of this be related to a selfish and autocratic power element in England?
“The danger is that he [Brown]
will be trapped by his own rhetoric and be forced to embrace a form of state
capitalism (which is the
technical definition of "fascism"). Those who worry about the loss of our traditional
rights and freedoms might want to give that prospect a thought.”-- Janet Daley Telegraph London
Gordon
Brown now appears to look like the cretin in the movie 300 and plays well the key part of Greek traitor Ephialtes. We can only wonder whose side Brown is
on. We can wonder if he is luring the Islamo-Fascists into his party while they
preach hatred in the streets and in full view of the fact that they planted a
few bombs in July 2005. It seems that ”… 40% of Muslims live in
London, where they make up
8.5% of the population.” That is more than 3% of the vote and thus constitutes a splinter
group and in close races becomes a ‘king maker.’ That means the Muslims
might wield mighty powers in Jolly Old England.
Would
Brown sell out his fellows and throw in with Islamo-Fascism given their
solidarity at the polls and the petrodollars that finance their madrasses?
Would Obama sell out his fellows and throw in with illegal aliens given their
solidarity at the polls and the underground tax-free dollars that they get
after stealing social security numbers thus evading taxes?
We know
that the American liberals, Brits, Swedes and others were more than satisfied
to aid the Viet Cong in the 60s and 70s and to spit occasionally on servicemen
to ameliorate their drug-induced displeasure and now favor the Islamo-Fascists
in the Middle
East for
political reasons by making Guantanamo a political trick pony.
Would
either Brown or Obama spend their countries into oblivion and thus create a
Fascist form of state capitalism? Is that one path to power?
Much of
this may be happening now. The Brits may again experience a devastating loss at
a battle similar to the Battle of
Stirling Bridge, although much of their Sterling has already gone astray. They may become beggars again as should
we if Obama is too successful in wrecking our economy. Are these two ‘leaders’ in
any way related to the notion of a selfish and autocratic power system? They seem to share the same
level of respect for what others might view as the enemy and are also vying
with each other for the title of biggest spender in the world. Perhaps the
prize goes to the country that goes broke first. In any event the
Islamo-Fascists seem to be winning this one and the wealth of the capitalist
world is plummeting perhaps by design. If world war III is being fought in the banks, the
tax structure and credit markets then we are losing and Third World is winning. The Fascists had two
jolly good runs at it and now maybe we are in for a third try with some new
players.
rycK
Comments:
ryckki@gmail.com
"Die miserable Versorgung mit Lebensmitteln erreichte
1916/17 im "Kohlrübenwinter” einen dramatischen Höhepunkt. Während des
Ersten Weltkriegs starben in Deutschland rund 750.000 Menschen an
Unterernäherung und an deren Folgenhttp://edsitement.neh.gov/view_lesson_plan.asp?id=473