Posted by
rycK on Friday, August 21, 2009 12:26:44 PM
The Propaganda of
Spreading Mistrust in Obama by Propaganda Experts at the New York Times
Abstract: Krugman peruses the
current support for certain elements in the proffered socialized medicine scam
and identifies some unseemly conduct on the part of his master Obama. He dares
to state that the President has ‘undermined’ confidence on the part of progressives over the options of a public option with nonprofit co-ops reveals his hatred for
the private sector. This angry screed is aimed directly at Obama and is
intended to force him to stop mumbling and get back to the single-payer system
that will ruin our country. The details of costs and eligibilities and taxes
are omitted for clarity as is Krugman’s convention. The change to grab 18% of
the GDP fades like a wilting daisy.
The New York Times,
aka the Walter
Duranty Papers[1]
is a sophisticated propaganda machine , sophisticated in the limited sense that
their core craft is disinformation, which they peddle excellently, and has a single focus: to form public
opinion to support any far left-liberal legislation or policies that may arise
from time to time. Ancillary, but essential for providing
background and references for their political screeds, is the necessity to
redact and reconstruct history to show that such programs in the past have been
successful and beneficial to our citizens. An injection of racism always seems
to help.
Part of
their authorized existence as lackeys is to view any criticism directed toward
their masters or their political or economic themes as an act of cosmic heresy
and to refute this problem with ‘the facts’ so far as they can massage them to
fit the current problem. In today’s
propaganda piece, their Chief Chum Chucker Paul Krugman wanders about in his little room
filled with stacks of soiled clichés and randomly assembles them into a fitting
NYT opinion piece. But, enigmatically
he offers criticism of Obama!? This is just an exercise as David Brooks is
off today.
The ‘public option’ and folly:
“According to news reports, the Obama
administration — which seemed, over the weekend, to be backing away from the
“public option” for health insurance — is shocked and surprised at the furious
reaction from progressives.”--
Obama’s Trust Problem By Paul Krugman Op-Ed Columnist Published: August
20, 2009
[Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
Since
labels are applied in order to split away groups for isolation, domination and
abuse and perhaps reeducation, if warranted, so we must look at his collective
and derogatory term: “progressives.”
[1] This
is Stalin’s
big word.
Krugman
correctly signals “all progressive mankind” and demands their attention with this
opening.
[2] The
murder and the gulags are always ‘excused’ by progressives for the sake of “good intentions” according to a former insider
David Horowitz.
[3] The
word ‘progressive’
is a collective term that includes a host of anti-capitalist and anti white
terms.
It is a synonym for a bevy of stooges.
So, the
good Dr.
Paul Krugman [or Mr. Nobel Laureatte] dootifully follows
his narrow training and waxes
politically correct in the first phase of this screed. Great start.
“One purpose of the public option is to save money. Experience with Medicare suggests that a government-run
plan would have lower costs than private insurers; in addition, it would
introduce more competition and keep premiums down.” -- Obama’s Trust Problem By Paul Krugman [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
A frequently axed question: What government program can you
[directed at Krugman]
site that has ‘saved us money’ or produced ‘lower costs’ in your research? Can
we wonder about the efficacy of: The Great Society, HUD, War on Poverty, Social
Security, Medicare, WW1, WW2, federal welfare and Amtrak to suggest a few? This
must be set in the future past perfect subjunctive tense to make any sense
here. This is massive government boondoggle and our government is preoccupied
with taxes and failure and not ‘saving money.’ Saving money means fewer jobs
for the mentally disnimble and horse-stall muckers and is antithetical to the
goals of the progressives.
Let us also be clear here: There are no
details of how this plan works no hint of any way to pay for
it and according to the CBO
it will NOT save money. It is fitting and proper to lie by omission here in order
to sell this trash to the simple and then set up the taxes and rules later.
That is how Stalin
worked. That is how Obama wants to work too.
“The CBO
report "strips away the political posturing and gets down to the basic
fact that it will require alternatives that are
generally unacceptable to the people who have been putting forward health-care
plans."-- Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) quoted in Obama's Health Plan
Needs Spending Controls, CBO Says By By Lori Montgomery, Shailagh Murray and
Ceci Connolly [Emphasis is mine in
all quotes.]
This is
just a cheap grab at our tax base by people like Stalin and his lackeys.
“And let’s be clear: the supposed alternative, nonprofit co-ops,
is a sham. That’s not just my opinion; it’s what the market says: stocks of
health insurance companies soared on news that the Gang of Six senators trying to
negotiate a bipartisan approach to health reform were dropping the public plan. Clearly,
investors believe that co-ops would offer little real competition to private
insurers.” -- Obama’s Trust Problem By Paul Krugman [Emphasis is mine in
all quotes.]
The feces
now fly. We might inquire if Social Security or Medicare fits into any
‘market.’ Here is the Demonization and Hitlerization of opponents that we hear
about so often in editorials from this ragzine. But, where is the racism? That
is omitted in this piece? We shall see. Let’s do some progressive hating and
attack those who would reject the splendor of
socialism! Get ‘em.
An option for a public option!
“That said, it’s possible to have universal
coverage without a public option — several European nations do it — and
some who want a public option might be willing to forgo it if they had confidence in the overall health care strategy.
Unfortunately, the president’s behavior in office has undermined that confidence.”
-- Obama’s Trust Problem By Paul Krugman [Emphasis is mine in
all quotes.]
Yes!!
Socialized medicine where the government controls all HC costs! Yes. Like Cuba!
This is a serious case like the Trotsky Problem where some person questions the
Fürher. I suppose, from this reading,
that Obama’s approval rating is plummeting among the ‘progressives’
as well as normal human beings. Krugman dares to do this? The problems must be
more severe than we thought.
Groping for a concurring opinion:
“So there’s a growing sense among
progressives that they have, as my colleague Frank Rich [e.g., Frank the Crank
Rich
ed] suggests, been punked. And that’s why
the mixed signals on the public option created such an uproar.” -- Obama’s
Trust Problem By Paul Krugman [Emphasis is mine in
all quotes.]
Frank has never been depunked.
“Indeed, no sooner were there reports that
the administration might accept co-ops as an alternative to the public option
than G.O.P. leaders announced that co-ops, too, were unacceptable.
So progressives are now in revolt. Mr. Obama took their trust
for granted, and in the process lost it. And now he needs to win it
back.” -- Obama’s
Trust Problem By Paul Krugman
The Dems
‘won’ so get on with it! Listen to Nancy
Pelosi! Take the Nuclear Option and cram this crap down the taxpayer’s throats [or
other convenient orifice] and bring us the splendor of socialism!
So much
prattle about ‘trust’
leads me to distrust
any trusty comment here by our krugmaniacal leader. This all staged
propaganda. He supplies no useful information on costs or structure or
eligibility or anything else but just wants the damn thing punched through the scabs.
Vote them
out!
rycK
Comments
to: ryckki@gmail.com
“Ever
since abandoning the utopian illusions of the progressive
cause, I have been struck by how little the world outside the left seems to
actually understand it. How little those who have not been inside the
progressive mind are able to grasp the cynicism behind its idealistic mask or
the malice that drives its hypocritical passion for “social justice.”
“No matter how great the crimes progressives
commit, no matter how terrible the futures they labor to create, no matter how
devastating the human catastrophes they leave behind, the world outside the
faith seems ready to forgive their “mistakes” and to grant them the grace of
“good intentions.”-- Progressive
Narcissism By David Horowitz (Excerpted
from How to Beat the Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas) http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/Progressive%20Narcissism.htm