Posted by
rycK on Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:19:17 AM
A Reply to caday5’s
Comment on My Townhall Blog rycK’s Rationalizations of August, 19, 2009
The
Comment:
1 Comment
Wednesday,
August, 19, 2009 7:29
AM caday5 writes:
Your real fear is that
people
who live in an interdependent society have responsibilities for others in the
same society just as others have responsibility for you.
I have never seen such fear mongering in all my life and why?
My reply
I think you, as a liberal, and we can expect
certain narrow reflexive responses from that sector, attempt to define the word
'fear' in some political context such as they have attempted to do with words
like xenophobia or others. The strange
notion that equitable and well-defined 'responsibilities' are intrinsic to
living in some socially or politically variegated society that are strictly
proscribed by leftist dogma is a one-sided argument.
It is always interesting that the left can
preach about ‘equality’ and reciprocal responsibilities to others with certain
differences is tedious in the sense that they advocate exactly the opposite in
revolutions and such in Russia, Cuba and other places. The leftists praise
political power when it is absolute or authoritarian. All we have to do is to
review the outcomes of theses ‘revolutions’ and look for such common factors as
murder, ‘land reform,’ Gulags, show trials, executions and reeducation camps.
Nobody on the left or within their circle of
lackeys in the liberal sector of the Party of Democrats has the least concern
for old white people if they can plunder their wealth and buy votes from others.
Have you been paying attention to President Obama when he tells us of spreading around the wealth? This means
what? How do you redistribute wealth without coercion and confiscation? Do we
have to review, in detail, the thinking and application of the egalitarian
efforts of Pol Pot or Fidel Castro or Kim? Think about Africa and 7,000 years of
tribalism and failure.
Your fear is soundly based on the obvious fact
that if leftist-defined independent people with superior skills or any other
favorable specified attribute or a
cognitive level well beyond the median and extending into the right tail of the
Bell Curve
will create wealth and power for themselves
and fail to ‘share this’ with revolutionaries. It is easy to play the
capitalist game. You and your kind who insist that there is some outward
appearance of ‘equality’ in our world and that we need to listen to primitives
or political revolutionaries to define this term and instruct us in the
redistribution of wealth are merely following the torturous paths of numerous
dictators.
I suppose you can also condone criminal
activity by undocumented workers who cross the Mexican border as persons who now
live in “an interdependent society” and that we are obligated to share our
wealth with them for humanitarian reasons. Never once does the fact that
entering the country, stealing Social Security numbers, lying on job
applications and evading taxes by not filing state and federal tax returns ever
emerge in a discussion from the left that encompasses the word
“responsibilities.” Crime is just fine if it furthers some leftist goal. California will soon show us how wonderfully this works.
The primitive [read liberal] nostrum here is
that, yes, they are illegal and, yes, they do break the laws and render obscene
the leftist notion of the Rule of Law, but as long as they illegally vote for liberals
in our elections then we praise them and their actions.
In a long list of “responsibilities’ in “an interdependent society” we cannot seem to locate any sense that drug addiction, sloth,
sodomy, smuggling, theft, incest, bestiality,
voter fraud and other negative attributes of many on the left violate
these noted mandates as listed in your reply. Certain persons pollute our
society with crime and unspeakable acts of cruelty and we are instructed to
excuse these acts? Yes, if they serve the left.
There is no fear here on my part—just loathing
for criminals and misinformed hokum chuckers who want to spread around more
crime and gain political power. All I find in such screeds is summarized here:
Myth-Making and the
Eternal Quest for Higher Taxes from the New York Times.
http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/18/myth-making_and_the_eternal_quest_for_higher_taxes_from_the_new_york_times.thtml
Winston
Churchill summed up the results of his opposing line of thinking some three
years after the October Revolution and I fully subscribe to his views:
"....But
my hatred of Bolshevism and Bolsheviks is not founded on their silly system of economics, or their absurd doctrine of an impossible equality. It arises from the
bloody and devastating terrorism which they practise
in every land into which they have broken, and my which alone their criminal regime can be maintained...."— Text of Winston Churchill's July 8th, 1920, British House
of Commons, Amritsar Massacre Speech By Winston Churchill given July 8th, 1920 [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
That was nearly 90
years ago and everything he said in 1920 has come to pass when the far left
gets involved.
The left and their associates cannot make it
in our society so they want to change it and confiscate the wealth that they
cannot generate. This is the dog-in-the-manger philosophy so prevalent in
primate worlds haunted by the far left. They have every intention of
instituting confiscatory taxes and inheritances and shifting this wealth to
their political allies. They make strong speeches about equality and racism and
then support people like Robert Mugabe or Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez. Left
means loser. Let them lose without my wealth.
All they have is our wealth and they intend to
get it one way or another.
rycK
Comments
to: ryckki@gmail.com
The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (ISBN: 0029146739)
by
Herrnstein, Richard J. and Murray,
Charles Free Press of Glencoe , Inc, Old
Tappan, New Jersey, U.S.A., 1994.
The Collapse of California and other Third World Marxist Economies. They want our
Taxes.
Herbert at the NYT: We Need More Race-Based
Government and Higher Taxes to Be Fair.