Posted by
rycK on Sunday, August 16, 2009 2:57:35 PM
A Leftist Plan
Exists to Rob and Euthanize Old White Folk in America?
Politics,
more precisely the analysis of such, requires some detective work based on
trends, something not much more than a casual examination of history and a
study of the past performances of murders--particularly serial murders--and
those who precipitated violent political revolutions. Politics is concerned
mainly with the acquisition of power and the use of that power to enforce the
decisions made by the political leaders. There are literally thousands of
political leaders, criminals and others who have successfully usurped the
wealth of others using a variety of political and criminal methods and an
analysis of some of these is presented below. Our current government in the United States may be thinking about a way to
confiscate sorely needed wealth to keep the economy from collapsing. They could do this ‘legally’ by taxation and
preventing effective healthcare for older Americans.
The Ugly Past of the Far Left
[1] The
French Revolution
was such a plan as the title of this blog suggests. Here, the lawyers and
intellectuals and peasants brewed up a grim solution to the ever-popular notion
of redistribution of wealth. Louis XVI and his peers were rounded up like
cattle and their heads severed to baskets in a shower of blood as the crowds
chanted about new notions of liberté,
égalité and fraternité.
Louis had fought many wars, food was scarce and also much of this revolution
was precipitated by a financial crisis, high debt, and inflation in food
prices--all similar to the one we are experiencing now except inflation. The
spending and debt levels are so high that hyperinflation is a surety.
Similarities to our current
economic and social situation: War in Iraq, high unemployment and rising
bank failures and soaring debt.
[2] The
Russian Revolution
was based, in part, on the French Revolution. Nicholas II was leading a country
with food shortages, strikes and weakened himself by acceding to the insistence
that he share power with the low class by forming the State Duma of the Russian
Empire, originally intended as a consultative body with limited power. This
gesture signaled a flaw in his power and the revolution began in earnest.
Millions eventually died in gulags and from crude executions conducted
harmoniously by the secret services [NKVD, GRU, KGB] and the army and the
Stalinists soon forgot to redistribute the wealth as promised. Reminding Stalin
of this, Trotsky eventually received an alpine ax
thrust through his head while in exile in Mexico. Only 4% of the population was
eligible for party membership and only they benefited from the ‘revolution.’
Instead of land reform the peasants were forced into collectivized farms of the
lowest efficiency in the civilized world. Much of the thinking was chartered by
the Manifesto of the Communist Party of 1848 written by Karl Marx and Frederick
Engels. It is interesting that many more revolutions [Maoism
Castroism
Pol Pot
Allende
Hugo Chávez] were
inspired by the teachings in this tome. Since the Manifesto is so highly
regarded by the far left and the middle-grade left stooges
who subscribe to such government, we might look into those pages and see if
anything points us to what the left are trying to do to us today.
I will
set in bold red
those elements in the Manifesto that the liberals are working hard to put into
law in the US:
1.
Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to
public
purposes.
2. A heavy progressive
or graduated
income tax.
3. Abolition of all
rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation
of the property
of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of
credit in the banks of the state, by means of a
national
bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of
the means of communication and transport in he hands of
the
state.
7. Extension of
factories and instruments of production owned by the state;
the
bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the
soil
generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of
all to work. Establishment of industrial
armies,
especially
for agriculture.
9.
Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual
abolition of all the
distinction between town and country by a more equable
distribution of the
populace over the country.
10. Free education for
all children in public schools. Abolition of
children's
factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with
industrial
production, etc.
Much of
this fits now very well into what liberals or their puppet masters are talking
about or told them to say. Our
government has nationalized some auto companies, insurance companies and a
dozen huge banks. They want to control healthcare. Only a few words from the
Manifesto need to have their precise definitions loosened and we can see much
of this happening again today in our country or about to happen. I have written
about this for some time.
We are broke and they desperately need our savings and assets to liquidate and
fuel their socialist intentions.
Next, we
can ask if they really want a huge inheritance tax.
There is an enormous sum of money in the accounts of the senior citizens in the
USA.
|
The Distribution of
Wealth, by Age Group (dollar figures in thousands)
|
|
Age
Group
|
Top
1%
|
Top
5%
|
Top
10%
|
Top
25%
|
Median
|
|
80 or
older
|
$2,957.8
|
$ 693.0
|
$440.0
|
$252.2
|
$118.0
|
|
70-79
|
$4,338.1
|
$1,074.5
|
$703.4
|
$316.5
|
$140.9
|
|
60-69
|
$6,263.4
|
$1,850.2
|
$902.8
|
$356.7
|
$155.8
|
|
50-59
|
$5,791.7
|
$1,410.6
|
$708.8
|
$326.7
|
$120.9
|
|
40-49
|
$3,402.7
|
$ 829.0
|
$531.6
|
$226.8
|
$ 86.2
|
|
30-39
|
$1,210.1
|
$ 451.1
|
$267.5
|
$127.4
|
$ 34.7
|
|
20-29
|
$ 383.3
|
$ 148.2
|
$78.3
|
$ 25.4
|
$ 5.2
|
|
Source: The VIP Forum, Corporate Executive
Board, 1998 data
|
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/scottburns/columns/2002/stories/041302dnbusburns.807a4.html
And this
is only 1998
data. A quote from the reference from Dallas: “The Most wealth research is based on the Survey of Consumer Finances,
which is done by the Federal Reserve every three years.”[16] You can get to the top by “If you get an
education, marry, buy a home, maintain steady employment and spend less than
you earn, you've got a very good shot at being in the top 25 percent for
wealth. As I pointed out in a recent column, you could get to the top 50
percent simply by owning a house. Add regular participation in a company 401(k)
plan, and there's a good chance you'll get to the top 25 percent.”
Note that
getting married, keeping good employment and savings are the kind of attributes
missing from the ‘poor’ that beg for more money from the left. Drugs, sloth,
sodomy, criminal activity and other leftist adventures tend to ruin the chances
of accumulating wealth and that angers the left. They can do their drugs and
get their spending money from you if they vote properly.
There are
numerous estate taxes, gift taxes, death duties and other taxes that tend to
confiscate much, 0r all, of a person’s financial holdings upon death. This is
different from a wealth tax as some in Sacramento are working on which would tax
accumulated wealth [a 1-time 55%tax] and more “penalize people who leave the state by seizing
55% of assets exceeding $20 million.” Ted Kennedy, in brief moment of valiant
sobriety, says this: “The estate tax is the most progressive of all federal taxes. “ And, it doesn’t affect any of their
low class constituents! Soak the rich! We who make more than $50,000 per year
and saved our money in 401(k)s and other investments ARE the rich. We are the targets. This whiskey-soaked blowhard also
brought us the failed Immigration and Nationality Act Of 1965. Lately, he went down to Mexico to sing Mariachi songs and encourage more illegal immigration. They need the votes.
So, let us see if there is a winning scenario
here: We look at leftist ideology and their practices in revolutions and
murder, then inspect their plans for taxation and blend in some Marxist stipulations
like 2. A heavy
progressive or graduated income tax and 3.
Abolition of all rights of inheritance and
do some wondering. Note t hat the
word ‘progressive’ is used by Kennedy and other far left Marxists? The Progressive
Caucus
is now a safe haven for the far left and Communists may do what they
wish while hiding under the cover of McCarthyism. It is full of left-wing
advocate organizations
If we
merely combine government control over healthcare with confiscatory taxes we
can wonder if our government might not just withhold medical care from the old
white folk, as it is too expensive,
and then haul in their wealth with the inheritance tax after we expire.
Sounds
too extreme?? Think about the prize if they can pull this one off. Doesn’t this
euthanizing
plan outlined above
start to euphonize
harmonically with the leftist desires? The left have done worse things in
history such as the liberal-celebrated works of Robert Mugabe
and will do even worse in the future. The left-liberals have a long, tortuous
history of revolution, murder and appropriating the wealth of their enemies. They
need your money and they need it quick.
rycK
Comments:
ryckki@gmail.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus#Ideology .
“An array
of national progressive organizations will work to support the efforts of the
caucus, including the Institute for Policy Studies, The Nation Magazine,
Moveon.org, National Priorities Project, Jobs with Justice Campaign, Peace
Action, Americans for Democratic Action, and Progressive Democrats of America.
Also co-sponsoring the kickoff event were the NAACP, ACLU, Progressive
Majority, League of United Latin American Citizens, Rainbow/Push Coalition,
National Council of La Raza, Hip Hop Caucus, Human Rights Campaign, Association
of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, and the National Hip Hop Political
Convention. The CPC has long maintained cordial ties with the Democratic Socialists
of America, which hosted its website during the 1990s.”
tr.v. eu·pho·nized, eu·pho·niz·ing, eu·pho·niz·es To make
pleasing in sound