About Me

Name: rycK
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A Leftist Plan Exists to Rob and Euthanize Old White Folk in America?

A Leftist Plan Exists to Rob and Euthanize Old White Folk in America?

 

Politics, more precisely the analysis of such, requires some detective work based on trends, something not much more than a casual examination of history and a study of the past performances of murders--particularly serial murders[1]--and those who precipitated violent political revolutions. Politics is concerned mainly with the acquisition of power and the use of that power to enforce the decisions made by the political leaders. There are literally thousands of political leaders, criminals and others who have successfully usurped the wealth of others using a variety of political and criminal methods and an analysis of some of these is presented below. Our current government in the United States may be thinking about a way to confiscate sorely needed wealth to keep the economy from collapsing.[2]  They could do this ‘legally’ by taxation and preventing effective healthcare for older Americans.

 

The Ugly Past of the Far Left

 

[1] The French Revolution[3] was such a plan as the title of this blog suggests. Here, the lawyers and intellectuals and peasants brewed up a grim solution to the ever-popular notion of redistribution of wealth. Louis XVI and his peers were rounded up like cattle and their heads severed to baskets in a shower of blood as the crowds chanted about new notions of liberté, égalité and fraternité.[4] Louis had fought many wars, food was scarce and also much of this revolution was precipitated by a financial crisis, high debt, and inflation in food prices--all similar to the one we are experiencing now except inflation. The spending and debt levels are so high that hyperinflation is a surety. [5]

 

Similarities to our current economic and social situation: War in Iraq, high unemployment and rising bank failures and soaring debt.

 

[2] The Russian Revolution[6] was based, in part, on the French Revolution. Nicholas II was leading a country with food shortages, strikes and weakened himself by acceding to the insistence that he share power with the low class by forming the State Duma of the Russian Empire, originally intended as a consultative body with limited power. This gesture signaled a flaw in his power and the revolution began in earnest. Millions eventually died in gulags and from crude executions conducted harmoniously by the secret services [NKVD, GRU, KGB] and the army and the Stalinists soon forgot to redistribute the wealth as promised. Reminding Stalin of this, Trotsky eventually received an alpine ax[7] thrust through his head while in exile in Mexico. Only 4% of the population was eligible for party membership and only they benefited from the ‘revolution.’ Instead of land reform the peasants were forced into collectivized farms of the lowest efficiency in the civilized world. Much of the thinking was chartered by the Manifesto of the Communist Party of 1848 written by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. It is interesting that many more revolutions [Maoism[8] Castroism[9] Pol Pot[10] Allende[11] Hugo Chávez [12]] were inspired by the teachings in this tome. Since the Manifesto is so highly regarded by the far left and the middle-grade left stooges[13] who subscribe to such government, we might look into those pages and see if anything points us to what the left are trying to do to us today.

 

I will set in bold red those elements in the Manifesto that the liberals are working hard to put into law in the US:

 

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to

public purposes.

 

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

 

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

 

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

 

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a

national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

 

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in he hands of

the state.

 

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state;

the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the

soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

 

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies,

especially for agriculture.

 

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual

abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable

distribution of the populace over the country.

 

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of

children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with

industrial production, etc.

 

 

Much of this fits now very well into what liberals or their puppet masters are talking about or told them to say.  Our government has nationalized some auto companies, insurance companies and a dozen huge banks. They want to control healthcare. Only a few words from the Manifesto need to have their precise definitions loosened and we can see much of this happening again today in our country or about to happen. I have written about this for some time.[14] We are broke and they desperately need our savings and assets to liquidate and fuel their socialist intentions.

 

Next, we can ask if they really want a huge inheritance tax.[15] There is an enormous sum of money in the accounts of the senior citizens in the USA.

 

The Distribution of Wealth, by Age Group (dollar figures in thousands)

Age Group

Top 1%

Top 5%

Top 10%

Top 25%

Median

80 or older

$2,957.8

$ 693.0

$440.0

$252.2

$118.0

70-79

$4,338.1

$1,074.5

$703.4

$316.5

$140.9

60-69

$6,263.4

$1,850.2

$902.8

$356.7

$155.8

50-59

$5,791.7

$1,410.6

$708.8

$326.7

$120.9

40-49

$3,402.7

$ 829.0

$531.6

$226.8

$ 86.2

30-39

$1,210.1

$ 451.1

$267.5

$127.4

$ 34.7

20-29

$ 383.3

$ 148.2

$78.3

$ 25.4

$ 5.2

Source: The VIP Forum, Corporate Executive Board, 1998 data

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/scottburns/columns/2002/stories/041302dnbusburns.807a4.html

 

And this is only 1998 data. A quote from the reference from Dallas: “The Most wealth research is based on the Survey of Consumer Finances, which is done by the Federal Reserve every three years.[16]  You can get to the top by “If you get an education, marry, buy a home, maintain steady employment and spend less than you earn, you've got a very good shot at being in the top 25 percent for wealth. As I pointed out in a recent column, you could get to the top 50 percent simply by owning a house. Add regular participation in a company 401(k) plan, and there's a good chance you'll get to the top 25 percent.”

 

Note that getting married, keeping good employment and savings are the kind of attributes missing from the ‘poor’ that beg for more money from the left. Drugs, sloth, sodomy, criminal activity and other leftist adventures tend to ruin the chances of accumulating wealth and that angers the left. They can do their drugs and get their spending money from you if they vote properly.

 

There are numerous estate taxes, gift taxes, death duties and other taxes that tend to confiscate much, 0r all, of a person’s financial holdings upon death. This is different from a wealth tax as some in Sacramento are working on which would tax accumulated wealth [a 1-time 55%tax] and more “penalize people who leave the state by seizing 55% of assets exceeding $20 million.”[17][18] Ted Kennedy[19], in brief moment of valiant sobriety, says this: “The estate tax is the most progressive of all federal taxes. “[20] And, it doesn’t affect any of their low class constituents! Soak the rich! We who make more than $50,000 per year and saved our money in 401(k)s and other investments ARE the rich. We are the targets. This whiskey-soaked blowhard also brought us the failed Immigration and Nationality Act Of 1965. [21] Lately, he went down to Mexico to sing Mariachi songs and encourage more illegal immigration.[22] They need the votes.

 

So, let us see if there is a winning scenario here: We look at leftist ideology and their practices in revolutions and murder, then inspect their plans for taxation and blend in some Marxist stipulations like 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax and 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance and do some wondering.  Note t hat the word ‘progressive’ is used by Kennedy and other far left Marxists? The Progressive Caucus[23] is now a safe haven for the far left and Communists may do what they wish while hiding under the cover of McCarthyism. It is full of left-wing advocate organizations[24] [25] [26]

 

If we merely combine government control over healthcare with confiscatory taxes we can wonder if our government might not just withhold medical care from the old white folk, as it is too expensive, and then haul in their wealth with the inheritance tax after we expire.

 

Sounds too extreme?? Think about the prize if they can pull this one off. Doesn’t this euthanizing plan outlined above start to euphonize[27] harmonically with the leftist desires? The left have done worse things in history such as the liberal-celebrated works of Robert Mugabe[28] and will do even worse in the future. The left-liberals have a long, tortuous history of revolution, murder and appropriating the wealth of their enemies. They need your money and they need it quick.

 

rycK

 

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

                                 

 

 

                                   

                          

 

 

 

 



[1] The Human Predator: A Historical Chronicle of Serial Murder and Forensic Investigation" by Dr. Katherine Ramsland (Berkeley Publishing Group, 2005), on the history of serial killers since Ancient Rome. The work by Ramsland combines the history of forensic science and investigation, the history of serial killers and the history of forensic psychology and provides, for the first time, a chronological analysis of serial killing. http://www.desales.edu/default.aspx?pageid=2400

 

[2] Our Economy is Collapsing. The Liberals will Now Institute Some Kind of Neo- Fascism or Socialism or Some New Blend to Maintain Power.

http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2009/08/06/our_economy_is_collapsing_the_liberals_will_now_institute_some_kind_of_neo-_fascism_or_socialism_or_some_new_blend_to_maintain_power.thtml

 

[4]Liberté, égalité, fraternité, French for "Liberty, equality, fraternity (brotherhood)",”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberté,_égalité,_fraternité

[7] Or, so the legend goes.

[8] Maoism departs from conventional European-inspired Marxism in that its focus is on the agrarian countryside, rather than the industrial urban forces. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maoism

[10] During his time in power, Pol Pot imposed a version of agrarian collectivization, forcing city dwellers to relocate to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labor projects, toward a goal of "restarting civilization" in "Year Zero". The combined effects of slave labor, malnutrition, poor medical care, and executions resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1.7 to 2.5 million people, approximately 21% of the Cambodian population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot

[11] Allende  On 22 August 1973 the Christian Democrats and the National Party members of the Chamber of Deputies voted 81 to 47 the resolution titled Declaration of the Breakdown of Chile’s Democracy that asked the military to put an immediate end to breach[es of] the Constitution . . . with the goal of redirecting government activity toward the path of Law and ensuring the Constitutional order of our Nation, and the essential underpinnings of democratic co-existence among Chileans.

 

The resolution declared that the Allende Government sought . . . to conquer absolute power with the obvious purpose of subjecting all citizens to the strictest political and economic control by the State . . . [with] the goal of establishing a totalitarian system, claiming it had made violations of the Constitution . . . a permanent system of conduct. Essentially, most of the accusations were about the Socialist Government disregarding the separation of powers, and arrogating legislative and judicial prerogatives to the executive branch of government. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Allende#Supreme_Court.27s_resolution

 

[13] Known as ‘useful idiots’ in the Marxian jargon.

[18] 1344. (08-0012, Amdt. #1NS)

Wealth Tax. Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

Summary Date: 08/04/08 Circulation Deadline: 01/02/09 Signatures Required: 694,354

Proponent: Paul McCauley

 

Imposes one-time tax of at least 55% on property exceeding $20 million of a California resident or held in California by nonresident. Imposes one-time tax (between 36.5% - 54.3%) on income exceeding $10 million when resident dies or leaves California. Imposes additional 17.5% tax on total incomes of taxpayers with income exceeding $150,000 if single, $250,000 if married; 35% if incomes exceed $350,000 if single, $500,000 if married. Creates tax credits. Requires State to acquire shares of specified corporations to influence environmental practices. May exempt new revenues from education funding requirements. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: One-time increase in state revenues potentially in the low hundreds of billions of dollars from imposition of a wealth tax, and ongoing increase in state revenues potentially in the billions of dollars from imposition of the tax on certain people dying or leaving the state. This revenue would be allocated to accomplish various goals related to environmental protection. Potential annual net increase in personal income tax revenues in the tens of billions of dollars annually. The first $7.5 billion annually would be allocated to the state General Fund with additional revenue allocated for environmental protection. Unknown state and local revenue reductions – potentially in the tens of billions of dollars annually – due to changes in taxpayer behavior. (Initiative 08-0012.) (Full Text)

[22] The Undocumented Workers cross over the Frontier while a Host of Parasites and our own Whiskey-Soaked Mariachi Sings Songs and Panders for their Votes.

Posted by rycK on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:55:01 PM

http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/03/12/the_undocumented_workers_cross_over_the_frontier_while_a_host_of_parasites_and_our_own_whiskey-soaked_mariachi_sings_songs_and_panders_for_their__votes.thtml

 

[24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus#Ideology .

“An array of national progressive organizations will work to support the efforts of the caucus, including the Institute for Policy Studies, The Nation Magazine, Moveon.org, National Priorities Project, Jobs with Justice Campaign, Peace Action, Americans for Democratic Action, and Progressive Democrats of America. Also co-sponsoring the kickoff event were the NAACP, ACLU, Progressive Majority, League of United Latin American Citizens, Rainbow/Push Coalition, National Council of La Raza, Hip Hop Caucus, Human Rights Campaign, Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, and the National Hip Hop Political Convention. The CPC has long maintained cordial ties with the Democratic Socialists of America, which hosted its website during the 1990s.”

[25] Congress' Red Army caucus. Here was their charter in 1998: Our purpose is to present thoughtful, practical solutions to the economic and social problems facing America," says its statement of purpose. "Our people-based agenda extends from job creation to job training, to economic conversion, to single payer health-care reform, to adequate funding for the AIDS crisis, to environmental reform and to women's rights. "Now that the Cold War is over, this nation's budget and overall priorities must reflect that reality. We support further cuts in outdated and unnecessary military spending, a more progressive tax system in which wealthy taxpayers and corporations contribute their fair share, and a substantial increase in social programs designed to meet the needs of low-and-middle-income American families. We believe that these goals fit within an overall commitment to deficit reduction." http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14542

[26] http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=2978.

[27] tr.v. eu·pho·nized, eu·pho·niz·ing, eu·pho·niz·es To make pleasing in sound

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/euphonize

[28] A number of people have accused Mugabe of having a racist attitude towards white people. John Sentamu, a Uganda-born Archbishop of York in the United Kingdom, calls Mugabe "the worst kind of racist dictator," for having "targeted the whites for their apparent riches".[52]Almost thirty years after ending white-minority rule in Zimbabwe, Mugabe accuses the United Kingdom and the United States of promoting white imperialism and regularly accuses opposition figures to his government of being allies of white imperialism.[53][54] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_mugabe

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive