Colonic Discharge from Colon Powell. Affirmative Action Shows Off its Best Creation.

Politics is a world unto itself where there are few rules but much to celebrate. The major revelry mostly focuses on the misappropriation of other people’s money, the demise or advance of a dictator or the personal and public destruction of a person’s image by detractors with the aid of the press. Frequently, the antics of a traitor or one who churlishly attacks their own patrons is celebrated by the political opposition and our own Colin Powel is an example of this.  Powell pretends to be a Republican. He is a tramp for sale.

We might just assume that many of our political leaders are erudite and can make some independent decisions and invent comments using their own neuronal set and not be steered and biased by the media or the urging of some back seat chum chucker from the PR set. Few can do this, but Powell can seemingly pave his own political road in any direction. Let us look at some of his statements and decide:

Following are three ‘comments’ by our Colonic One that should have been covered months or decades ago by the press or from observers:

[1] “”And I never would have believed that we would have budgets that are running into the multi-trillions of dollars, and we are amassing a huge, huge national debt that, if we don't pay for in our lifetime, our kids and grandkids and great grandchildren will have to pay for it."”[1]--- Is Colin Powell now having doubts about Obama? By John Kinsellagh

Can we believe this? Is Powell so naïve that he misses the radical, far leftist thrust of this Neo-Marxist and his radical hatred of White America?? Powell has no knowledge of Saul Alinsky? Did Powell ride in from some plantation on a horse-drawn wagon full of melons in 18th century Louisiana or has he been watching the political scene? What would you have ‘believed’ about this person you endorsed? He endorsed this phony activist even after listening to all his wild rants about change. We must distinguish beliefs from pedestrian political lever manipulations here. Powell is no fool.

Falling back on his affirmative action benefits on the case of Sotomayor:

[2]“"What we can't continue to have is to have somebody like a Judge Sotomayor ... called a racist, a reverse racist and she ought to withdraw her nomination because we're mad at her," Powell said in an interview broadcast Sunday on "State of the Union" on CNN”[2]-- WASHINGTON (AP)  Colin Powell attacks critics of Sotomayor.

Given her statements, can we wonder what a racist is? Is Jeremiah Wright a racist?

Here is what Powell said about this guy Wright:

“"Rev. Wright is also somebody who has made enormous contributions in his community and has turned a lot of lives around," Powell said, "And so, I have to put that in context with these very offensive comments that he made, which I reject out of hand."[3]—Colin Powell

Doublespeak.  The translation here is that blacks like Colin exercise every opportunity to denigrate whites because of some past history. It matters not that blacks in Africa sold, and still sell, slaves for 7,000 years and made huge profits.  It is institutional racism that keeps blacks voting 97% for only one party. Thus, intolerance is good politics.

The remarkable thing about progressive racism is that blacks like Powell can have it both ways. He can be a victim, lecture whites on racism, use affirmative action for advancement then ‘consider the overt racism of Jeremiah Wright’ and put that in context so that Wright is now not a racist. Isn’t that convenient? That makes for great politics. Racism is anything you can spin for your web if you are only not too white.

[3] “WASHINGTON - Colin Powell stuck up for Sonia from the block on Sunday, labeling as bogus the "reverse racist" charges aimed at Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.”

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/07/06/2009-07-06_sonia_not_a_racist_says_colin.html#ixzz0Kbu8BlLE&C”--Colin Powell says fellow Bronx native Sonia Sotomayor not a racist

“As a key reason , Powell said: "I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration."[4]-- Powell endorses Obama By Mike Allen & Jonathan Martin | 10/20/08 6:31 AM EDT 

Apparently it is okay for Sonia Sotomayor[5] to consider herself of a higher order species where she can make the most of her Hispanic heritage and mix in her gender to make better legal decisions than mere white males. No hint of racism, sexism or other element of bigotry, racism, and bias here? Powell can find none. I have to put all this in my own context.

Powell the military expert:

[4] “Powell is quoted in the report as stating to CNN’s “State of the Union,” “I think we would have been in a much different place if we had surged in the fall of 2003, rather than many years later.” Powell commented in regards to initial successes in 2003 during the administration of former president George W. Bush, “Unfortunately, the war wasn’t over… The war was just beginning. And then it took us, in my judgment, too long to recognize that we needed to put more force in.””[6]-- Colin Powell Remarks on Iraq Surge 2009-07-07 03:45:18 (GMT) (WiredPRNews.com - News, US Presidential News)

The Powell Doctrine proffers a list of questions where all must be answered affirmatively before military action is taken by the United States: [7]

[1] Is a vital national security interest threatened?

[2] Do we have a clear attainable objective?

[3] Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?

[4] Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?

[5] Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?

[6] Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?

[7] Is the action supported by the American people?

[8] Do we have genuine broad international support?

Did Powell forget about his own doctrine? These eight ‘requirements’ have not been fulfilled before the beginning of any known hostilities spanning the current era to way before the ancient Egyptians and is mere prattle.  This list is silly and obviates any military action anywhere. Did Obama think this out before sending in more troops in Afghanistan? Did Powell object to this or caution Obama? Obama must have violated the Powell Doctrine.

Powell endorses Obama:

“"And I come to the conclusion that because of his [Obama] ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities — and you have to take that into account — as well as his substance — he has both style and substance, he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president."

Powell said that he is "troubled" by the direction of the Republican Party, and said he began to doubt McCain when he chose Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.

"Not just small towns have values," he said, responding to one of Palin's signature lines.”-- Powell endorses Obama By Mike Allen & Jonathan Martin 

Apparently he has no problems with Joe Biden, aka Plugs the Buffoon[8] the stooge who can tell fairy tales about taxes and other stories. I am certain that the ‘values’ of the people who live in the South Bronx are superior to Wasilla, Alaska. The South Bronx is actually a dung heap[9] of crime, poverty, drug abuse and worse. Those, we can expect, are the ‘values’ of the far left. The police “precincts [40^th and 41^st] record the highest violent crime rates in the city and are all NYPD "impact zones." Such is a place where American values are learned and displayed we must believe.

Colin Powell is the most undesirable product conceivable as an outcome of Affirmative Action. He has a mediocre set of cognitive skills, comes from some sleazy dump in the Bronx, got into the military via ROTC from a lousy school and then tried to contend with outstanding professional military academy officers to the point where he could not compete and then ran to Washington and bawled for political support to get preposterously promoted.  He is a fraud; he used politics to advance his career. He has never had a proper military command of any size  and has done nothing but push papers in his career and whine about his injury from a pungi stake. He sold himself to the Reagan administration as a loyal member of the military and a successful example of an affirmative action conservative then played the part of the traitor. He is now exposed not only as a racist, but a consummate race-baiter and a devious political opportunist. He can wear the kinky iridescent thongs of either party or dance to an assortment of their little political skits on national TV as he switches back and forth between the parities and their policies alternately praising and then denigrating his benefactors. He weasels his way forward in the political gunk of Washington.

Powell’s military career is so much hokum and fluff and lacks substance. He is a simple political fluffer who can service any john from any party if there is some political or monetary advantage to be gained. He is like an alley cat--always on the prowl. He likes to give speeches and make lots of money off of his rhetorical racism and unpatriotic views.

He now attacks his new master after somebody told him that the consequences of Obama’s style and substance will wreck the economy and bring down the leftists for a generation as Jimmy Carter did. We have already spent too much and the stimulus is not working. The economy is heading for a depression[10] and The Colon must Discharge his duties then beat a hasty advance to the rear to avoid any collateral damage from Obama’s puerile handling of the economy.  But he will find a way to wiggle in with the very next new power group after Obama falls and offer his ‘expertise’ in any and all matters to the next victor regardless of party or creed.

Any professional soldier should be disgusted with this political parasite. His service jacket must have had a giant PI[11] stamped boldly on the front cover to alert good soldiers that they had a gold brick in the company. Any professional politician should beware of his guile and treacherous opportunism. He has more heads than Medusa.

This is the culmination of affirmative action: we offer some help to deserving people who are disadvantaged and manage to  unintentionally include a few  second-rate people into jobs and stations of power that are far beyond their ability to grasp, or worse, even participate. Powell is the affirmative action equivalent of Cornel West in our steamy political barnyard where has to hop from place to place and change his tune to survive his detractors and disguise his failures. [12]

For the first time in my adult life I am ashamed of one of my country’s soldiers. But, my party [Dems] needs and nurtures losers like this if they can bring in votes. And, they will and he will.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The Babbling Brooks of the NYT Manufactures ‘Dignity’ for Obama. A Farce Follows.

Abstract: David Brooks sets out on a sacred mission to bestow or prop up the illusion that Obama has ‘dignity.’ This obvious feint into the sticky political outer limits of realty must be from some editorial assignment, probably as a penance, to bolster the image of this monumental failure and Brooks has risen, so to speak, to the sordid task. A typical propaganda piece follows whereby the new candidate for dignity has his name intercalated among others from history with well-defined authentic dignity.  He is unconvincing and comical in his attempt.  B. Hussein Obama may be more properly associated with ‘judge’ Sotomayor, Pee Wee Herman, The Boston Strangler or Jack-O the Whack-O, a sordid collection of losers with whom we cannot use the word properly. Brooks only undermines his own credibility with a soggy load of crap like this.  This effort is intellectually equivalent to unplopping a camel in the hot sun.

As we peruse the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1][2]--an obdurate  oddity of filtered   information and a rusty turn-of-the-crank Marxian siren,  heading for bankruptcy, we must always be prepared to suffer through missives and other literary mechanisms to get to the bottom line of their current propaganda message. They are all about leftist politics. The NYT can grant the proper social or economic solution to all known problems of society and will condemn all who would disagree with their findings. Today, our Chief Babbler David Brooks [3][4] [5] seems to gather his all for a mighty sortie on the political battle fields and, after digging through history, he can endow the Old Gray Lady with a heart-string plucking testimony to the shimmering dignity of a man who has none. Obama needs a boost or some tightening of his political truss straps and here, Johnny on the Spot is the NYT with a fresh propaganda piece to fabricate the required PR.[6]

Analysis of the method:

This is a name-association propaganda piece whereby virtues of known persons with some desired attribute are tossed around in a gossamer cloud of spice and light with bells ringing and, at a propitious moment, the name of the dolt is shuffled in the deck so as to give the reader the impelled conclusion that this bozo is among those who have this precious attribute. This is pedestrian and generally lower in quality than the average Sonnet of Adoration we read in the NYT for problematic characters of the left. We have read better from the Times.

We can watch David turn the crank for a while until we are bored to tears:

“When George Washington was a young man,.. ”[7]-- In Search of Dignity By David Brooks Op-Ed Columnist July 6, 2009 [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.][All quotes are from this link in this essay today unless otherwise indicated.]

Predictable.  How could he be so sophomoric?? Was this written for him? Is this in the top line of his mandated outline?

““Gordon Wood has written, “Washington became a great man and was acclaimed as a classical hero because of the way he conducted himself during times of temptation. It was his moral character that set him off from other men.””-- David Brooks July 6, 2009

And some more—lest I lose control and tire of this anguish and delete the whole mess:

“Today, Americans still lavishly admire people who are naturally dignified, whether they are in sports (Joe DiMaggio and Tom Landry), entertainment (Lauren Bacall and Tom Hanks) or politics (Ronald Reagan and Martin Luther King Jr.).”-- David Brooks July 6, 2009

Where is Bill Clinton or Nancy Pelosi and why are they left off this list of naturally dignified persons??

Not to bore the readers with a rummaging exercise through the tombs of lost enterprise, we can just abridge Brooks’ conclusion at this point with this summation:

“Americans still admire dignity. But the word has become unmoored from any larger set of rules or ethical system.

But it’s not right to end on a note of cultural pessimism because there is the fact of President Obama. Whatever policy differences people may have with him, we can all agree that he exemplifies reticence, dispassion and the other traits associated with dignity. The cultural effects of his presidency are not yet clear, but they may surpass his policy impact. He may revitalize the concept of dignity for a new generation and embody a new set of rules for self-mastery.“-- David Brooks July 6, 2009

Finally, we get to the end of this rubbish and can focus on the point: Obama has failed to deliver on any promises he has made to date like holding unemployment down  to 8% or less, lowering  or managing taxes for those who make $250,000 or less, ‘stimulating’ the economy, which is crashing and much  more. He spends like a Madoff or a Michael Jackson. He has done noting but honk and blow to the winds and now looks like a jerk.  He is an ideological racist who hates White Americans and blames the Anglos for the problems in this world and publicly blames us for all evils.  His most favorable comments seem to go toward our enemies like the maggot Hugo Chavez or the Russians or some Middle East Satraps who hate us and live greedily off oil revenues while financing terrorism with some of the loot. He will not condemn the maggots of the third world. He apologizes for us.

The Babbling Brooks frantically inserts, from the shadows, some manufactured observations about Obama that are non existent because he must redefine ‘dignity’ to make it fit the current political crisis. To think that a radical Neo-Marxist can embrace even some warped and mystical elements of ‘dignity’ when he sat for 20 years and howled and shouted at Whitey in the pews of Jeremiah Wright’s House of Hate. Racists now have some form of dignity?

From a previously edited blog:[8]

Senator Barack Obama told us about the ‘typical white person’ and denigrates whites[9] for ‘clinging to their guns and religion’ and escapes any accusations of overt racism by the left. Obama is an ideological racist, a bigot, an arrogant elitist and a racism enabler and all this welcomed by the rabid left as they grunt and grab at the tax base. He can listen to the rabid, racist howls of Jeremiah Wright and see nothing out of the ordinary.  He can explain all this. He cannot disown his pastor or church for what they  said. Then, he did.[10]

And:

"And it's not surprising then they [read Whites...ed] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."[11]—Barack Obama off camera in what he thought was a safe environment to express his views.[12] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Where are the clichés about how a man chooses his friends?

He has always surrounded himself with undesirables like Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright and now has his PR man Axelrod and Dead Fish Immanuel[13] [a hopeful ballerina with a stubby bird finger he lose while slicing meat at Arbys[14]] close at hand in the White House.[15] What a parade of dignitaries!

More celebrities with whom we can counter this screed and defeat t he NYT attempts to put Obama in with dignified persons [from a previous blog]:

‘He seems to have nothing to say about Cold Cash Jefferson[16], Good Time Charlie Rangel the Crook  from Harlem[17] or the ramblings of the mental midget Maxine Waters, a psychotic racist and cognitive peanut, who wanted to nationalize [socialize in her words] the oil companies:[18] “And guess what this member* would be all about? This member would be all about socializing — er, uh. [Pauses for several moments] …. would be about … [pause] … basically [… taking over, and the government running all of your companies.” [19] Waters also fantasized about the CIA peddling drugs.[20] He did score with Henrietta Hughes, a welfare queen over a new house, but “she is not milking the system.”[21] Tribuo mihi quispiam nusquam.[22]More top talent.’[23]

By using the Brooks Propaganda Device of the Day, we can confidently metamorphose the definition of dignity to any extent to suit Obama’s warped character. Obama has the same kind of ‘dignity’ that we might give to Sotomayor[24], Pee Wee Herman, The Boston Strangler or Jack-O the Whack-O.

These people are all disgusting losers and incompetents.

All Brooks has accomplished with this screed is to unmoor his reputation.

rycK [a 5^th generation Californian in exile]

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com