The EcoNazis are Frantic for your Money!

We live in a world where parlor tricks and stories of goblins and werewolves make us shake in fear as the sun descends and darkness surrounds us  and we mutter and wonder about our safety. We take advice from our ‘leaders’ on how to avoid attacks  from monsters in the dead of night so we hang garlands of garlic around the house or plant pungi stakes as barrier to fortify ourselves. We buy amulets and recite runes for protection.

We also live in a world where human parasites feed off the intrinsic fears and prejudices of the citizenry and challenge us to yield to them with wild stories of our impending doom that favors their own personal aggrandizement. We elect many of these slimy creatures to public offices as ‘public servants’  and give them special powers to tax us into poverty or get us into famine, foment  race riots and start wars. On the top of the list of things for any politician to do, as we have seen vividly in Chicago this week, is to find new ways to raise taxes, scrounge a little bribe money  and increase  government spending on pet projects that are advocated by their  ‘supporters.’ Thus, we see a simple pattern of bribery, sleaze and corruption in many government programs like Fanny Mae, HUD and welfare. The process of extracting wealth from the citizens using whichever nostrum is actually recurrently abetted and trumpeted by ideological allies in the media. Disgusting people like Dan Rather, a person who had the trust of many, was found to be a sleaze bag as he attempted to influence an election with phony documents. His performance was disgraceful, but his leftist allies still think he was innocent and should have retained his seat of power on CBS. Many think the Rosenbergs were innocent too. Many still believe that the Clintons are honest and have never lied, had no involvement in the Whitewater mess, were not involved in taking bribes from Chinese Communists or were not involved in phony cattle futures investments. It took some solid forensic DNA evidence for Bill Clinton to admit that his explanations about Monica Lewinski were lies. His supporters knew he was lying and that made no difference because he favored certain left-liberal legislation and tax policies that would make them rich or powerful. Lying for money is an old art and makes people rich if skillfully done. People are easily deceived. Politicians can be liars, sleaze bags, parasites or criminals but as long as they push a little booty to their cronies they are welcome to continue with their crimes.

The world runs almost solely on power derived from money now. Gone are the feudal systems that regulated the class levels and lands so that rents could be collected. Independence and freedom from serfdom were earned by ingenuity, boldness and daring and written in blood as we cast off our ‘masters’ who would direct our lives for “our benefit.” The wealth of the world has flowed into odd corners from global commerce and is scattered so that the existence of a new class of global criminals is mandated if they want to get at some of it. World-wide taxes, the final solution, must be collected now as many localized people refuse to believe in phony scams designed to steal our money and resources.  Some phony organization like the United Nations must take the lead in global taxation. Legislation like the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Air Act were ostensibly constructed with good intentions to save parts of nature and clean up waste lands. These acts have generated millions of nasty legal cases, rules and regulations with high costs to consumers so that ideological parasites can continue to couple with crooked or ideological judges so as to force their enemies out of business or put them in jail. These groups are joined by the zero-growth crowd and other anti-capitalist undesirables. Such corruption is disguised as environmentalism or other such monikers and the process employs various ‘authorities’ in the guise of scientists who have ‘computer models’ that can predict whatever the ideological operatives want to see. Laws and taxes are then constructed and used to extract wealth and enhance the power of the parasites.

 Premise: The truth matters not; what matters is fear itself and this fear generates power in the hands of those who conjure up the politically convenient nightmares and demons. They  will try to alleviate or sooth fears by gross taxation of the masses so that certain heroic rescue  ‘projects’ can be contrived and paid for  that will ‘solve’ the problem that created the fear.

This is a circular essay, of course, as only the singular attribute of  fear is necessary to start up and continue to propel this engine.  Truth has nothing to do with the process. Any phony bogeyman story can pull in the suckers. Global warming has stunned the timid and the mentally disnimble and caused them to panic.

As such, the biggest tax-whoring scheme ever devised on the planet is the current EcoNazi-Inspired Global Warming Scam. The fact that there is no evidence for such a process has not prevented politicians like Al Gore from hyping the impending disaster and getting wide political support for his antics. People bawl in the streets at the thought of the destruction of the earth and many will listen to any perverted scheme that will moderate their fears. That is where the slick politician derives his or her strongest power base. Politicians get on the bandwagon and promote legislation to hire ‘scientists’ to look for, predict and sanction more legislation supported by their ‘studies’ and the process continues to spiral out of control. It matters not that the ‘scientists’ are phony—it matters only that they ‘study’ the matter and mumble about the need for more data. Truth has little effect in many scientific circles now as data may be selectively scrutinized in a manner that supports the original political conclusion that funded the study.

Phony science can produce excellent political results as we saw in the 1920s in the USSR with Lysenko.[1] The press spreads nonsense like this AP comment about what ‘scientists’ believe:

“In the early 1990s, many scientists figured that the world was about a century away from a truly dangerous amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, said Mike MacCracken, who was a top climate scientist in the Clinton administration. But as they studied the greenhouse effect further, scientists realized that harmful changes kick in at far lower levels of carbon dioxide than they thought. Now some scientists, but not all, say the safe carbon dioxide level for Earth is about 10 percent below what it is now.”[2]-- Obama left with little time to curb global warming [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Here are some of the ‘but not all”

“Over 650 scientists have put their names to a US Senate Minority report that challenges the contention of the UN's International Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific "consensus" on the causes of global warming.”[3]-- Over 650 Scientists Challenge Global Warming "Consensus" Twelve times more than those that put their names to the IPCC report Steve Watson Infowars.net Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

This is the Lysenko Syndrome in action. The statement above announces that some so-called scientist guessed the outcome of some effect and realized that his guess was significantly off the mark and that a reassessment might mean more publicity and more research money. They looked backward from some political objective and ‘figgered’ out how to gain political support! Lysenko promised he could grow winter wheat by employing the phony “heritability of acquired characteristics” scam he invented so he became a major political power based on this single stupid lie. Those true scientists who objected to Lysenko were deposed or jailed or murdered. What he was doing was attempting to maneuver around nature and trick wheat plants into growing and maturing during their off seasons. He may have temporarily believed in this folly but that did not matter. The lie, itself, was sufficient to propel him into a position of power even though he couldn’t demonstrate his idea in the wheat fields. Many authentic scientists who differed with Lysenko were executed [see ref below] just for challenging him on a scientific basis. Notice that nobody called Lysenko on his claims for decades. They had a political vector to use and they used it. The truth of the matter was never important as truth is not necessary for successful politics.

It is interesting that Al Gore now plays the part of Lysenko while Steven Milloy [4]and others like Professor David Russell Legates the Delaware State Climatologist and an associate professor at the University of Delaware[5] are standing firm on the basic tenets of science as they refute this farce. Professor Legates have even been challenged by Delaware Governor Ruth Ann Minner, who struggled to secure a G.E.D. after years of trying. This is proof that low brow persons with minimal cognitive skills can attain or sustain political power by merely mouthing phony political slogans and propaganda. Minner couldn’t distinguish a plastic carrot from a carbohydrate.

I, as a scientist of 35 years and the author of 25 research papers have a general distrust of politicians as their craft is not based on truth but on persuasion. The laws of physics may not be altered by a good political argument. The disgraced Russian politician and pseudo scientist Lysenko and US liberals like algore have much in common as we look at the current global warming circus.[6] When I see some movement where huge tax revenues are to be directed into specific areas where politicians or their supplicants may financially benefit I become suspicious. I have commented before on Global Warming. [7] It is a joke and a lie. To point out a glaring instance of phony science: we were exposed and nauseated by some ‘computer models’ that seemed to predict 14 major hurricanes after Katrina for the very next year [there were zero] and ‘about the same’ for 2007 [the year after that] and we also saw zero!  How is 0 for 28 in scientific terms? What is the arithmetic mean and meaningful statistical attributes of this? This form of groping for disasters is good enough for Lysenkoism and algore, but they are so far removed from real science that the scientific communist must rebel. Where is the top-shelf science in weather prediction when we get 0 for 14 twice in a row?  Are they guessing? Yes, and their computer m0dels are so much crap.

We saw the beginning of this brand of phony science with the 1972 with the publication of the book The Limits to Growth [8], a book that asserted  hilarious predictions and made the authors look like fools as they used their ‘computer model’ to alert us that we would run out of out of oil by 1992,  diminish our supplies of  copper and  lead about the same time and then run  out of natural gas by 1993.  Cobalt played some special role in the world economy according to them.  I confronted these people in a innovation conference and reminded the audience of their previous work. They were not ashamed at the failure of their pseudoscience to predict the future—they were gong to try again! They even put out a second book on the subject [one that I refused to read]. Is there no shame here? Can the political left think they can just make wild predictions disguised as ‘science’ and that we must follow their follies into bankruptcy or the graveyard? Why can they not explain where their predictions went wrong?  The answer is political. They do not have to show anything—all they have to do is continue to work the fear levers and grub for money.

We must remember the mentally ill and maudlin Rachel Carson’s book/screed Silent Spring[9] and the phony ‘science’ behind the DDT ban that was not based on good science.[10] This was a major political victory for the far left who later vacated the Marxian groups and joined environmental government pressure groups world wide when the USSR crashed in 1989. That is when the Sierra Club and other organizations suffered an influx of far left political operatives who have only an attack on capitalism as their main ideological thrust. I have discussed some of this phony buffoonery before.[11] This is not science; this is gutter-level politics of the far left. Their psychotic hatred of capitalism is driving this phony Global Warming Circus as a means of producing the biggest tax haul in the history of the Universe.

It appears that Al Gore [algore] has the genetic and political credentials to carry off a phony Marxian Rip-off like Lysenko did. Al’s disgusting father was also a senator from Tennessee. [12] Albert Gore Sr was a Marxist stooge and horse stall mucker for Armand Hammer [get the pun?[13]] and Armand’s father was an incompetent abortionist named Julius Hammer who bungled a few cases resulting in several deaths [a woman and her fetus in one proven case] and he wound up in Sing Sing for 2 ½ years. This parasite met Lenin and later founded the Communist Party USA.   Armand was a mule for Stalin in 1921 and carried $34,000 to the US commies from Russia.[14]See the footnotes for more.  Hammer employed Al Gore Sr. as some kind of stooge or familiar after he lost his senate seat.  With such a background, it is not surprising that little Al Gore turned out to be such a friend of Marxism. He later participated in some bribery schemes where Red Chinese money found it way into the DNC and White House.[15][16] How nice. Al Gore and EcoNazism have a long history:[17] Al Gore was a liar ["I ... walked through the elephant grass, and I was fired upon" in Vietnam.] [18] [19], Buddhist Temple money grubber and liar, Communist Stooge[20], a Lysenko styled pseudo scientist/politico[21] [22], like his worthless father, and pandered for money from Asian Communists and then lied about it. This is all fact. The NYT becomes the stooge enabler resource  here when they attempt to redact history and state the Clintons were not involved in Whitewater, Castle Grande, crooked cattle futures investments, the Waco Massacre and other outrages. They are so innocent. Only Susan McDougal saved Billary from the slammer.

There is no way any of this fluff can help our economy as it enters a dangerous deflationary period.  A world tax on energy will only shift wealth the leftist governments. They plan to give much of this tax to Africa and other hopeless places that have a solid history of failure for about 7,000 years. We can tolerate the USSR going down. We have leftist parasites like Backside Barney  Frank who waddles around in an fog of iridescent spittle dropplets and mutters about ‘affordable housing’ as he wastes trillions of our tax dollars on deadbeats who just happen to vote for Democrats.  H0w about that for progressive politics?

We must resist any an all attempts by our worthless government o increase taxes on energy. Don’t buy phony windmill energy; don’t even think about buying an electric car and think twice before you but a car from Detroit as they will be subsidized by Washington in some welfare mode.

Hopefully, California and NY will go broke first and then we can take a close look at their energy polities and exorbitant salaries for union teachers and state employees. This has to stop. Our economic future depends on it.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com