About Me

Name: rycK
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Paulson Speaks and Squeaks and Speaks of Confidence while He Cannot Seem to Tell Us How Much Money has been Spen

Paulson Speaks and Squeaks and Speaks of Confidence while He Cannot Seem to Tell Us How Much Money has been Spent.

 

The New York Times—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]--is a strange platform for a Republican to talk about success and confidence.  Apart from staying toward Dewey in 1948, the Times has a solid history of blindly rubber-stamping any Marxist dictator, any tax increase on anything, Castro’s phony healthcare system and celebrating the death of every American solider since the Korean Conflict. Today, they must have some arcane design in mind as they let somebody who does not know what to do tell us just that.

 

Paulson brings a partial account of what our government is doing in the US and brings us nothing but a revisionist version of a FDR Fireside Chat.

 

I am very proud of the decisive actions by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the F.D.I.C. to stabilize our financial system. … We have preserved the flexibility of President-elect Barack Obama and the new secretary of the Treasury to address the challenges in the economy and capital markets they will face.”[2]--Fighting the Financial Crisis, One Challenge at a Time By Henry M. Paulson Jr. Op-Ed Contributor Published: November 17, 2008 [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]This link references all quotes in this essay unless otherwise stated.

 

This, after he seems to have told us that we wisely spent 250 billion, but the notion that we could cover ‘troubled assets’ is now out of reach.

 

A troubled-asset purchase program, to be effective, would require a huge commitment of money. In mid-September, before economic conditions worsened, $700 billion in troubled asset purchases would have had a significant impact. But half of that sum, in a worse economy, simply isn’t enough firepower.”

 

If we have learned anything throughout this year, we have learned that this financial crisis is unpredictable and difficult to counteract. We decided it was prudent to reserve our TARP money, maintaining not only our flexibility, but also that of the next administration.”

We keep wondering just how much money was spent when we look at this chart:

Given the speed at which the federal government is throwing money at the financial crisis, the average taxpayer, never mind member of Congress, might not be faulted for losing track. CNBC, however, has been paying very close attention and keeping a running tally of actual spending as well as the commitments involved.”[3]-- Financial Crisis Tab Already In The Trillions By CNBC.com |17 Nov 2008 |

FINANCIAL CRISIS BALANCE SHEET

 

Government Entity

Sum in Billions of Dollars

Federal Reserve

 

 

 

(TAF) Term Auction Facility

900

Discount Window Lending

 

Commercial Banks

99.2

Investment Banks

56.7

Loans to buy ABCP

76.5

AIG

112.5

Bear Stearns

29.5

(TSLF) Term Securities Lending Facility

225

Swap Lines

613

(MMIFF) Money Market Investor Funding Facility

540

Commercial Paper Funding Facility

257

(TARP) Treasury Asset Relief Program

700

Other:

 

Automakers

25

(FHA) Federal Housing Administration

300

Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac

350

 

 

Total

4284.5

Note: Figures as of Nov. 13, 2008

How do we reconcile this fraction of the $700 bln prattle with this list? Fannie Mae is a dumpster to hide the phony ‘affordable housing[4]’ giveaways  like the CRA[5]to people who cannot afford houses and the only asset value left is the current market price of the housing. Are we taxpayers expected to cover the losses of bad debt? This is a socialist monster that we must handle by [1] halting the phony notion that we have to give away housing to anybody and [2] that we must give them ‘loans’ or ‘adjust’ their mortgage payment and stick the banks and loan institutions with the losses.

One billion dollars is about 8$ in taxes for workers who pay taxes so 1.0 trillion dollars is $8000 in some kind of tax liability so this works out to the interesting value of $34 trillion dollars. We know that the household asset value in the US is about $58 trillion so we have just put in jeopardy more than half of our citizen’s assets. For the individual worker we are looking at $34,000 per worker except that the lower half pays essentially no taxes so let us double that just to be fair and add in a few bucks for the illegal aliens. This rises to about $80,000 in debt against an average of about $200,000[58 trillion divided by 300 million citizens is $193,000] in total assets for home owners.

To this mess we are supposed to add  in socialized medicine, aid to Africa, and spend a few hundred billion supporting the unions in Detroit who will not budge from their cushy $60-$80 dollar per hour wages and benefits that make the auto business in that area untenable. We have just a few trillion here and there in unfunded mandates in Social Security and entitlements to think about as well.

With a GDP of about 16 trillion we tax ¼ of this to about 4 trillion [3 trillion to the fed] and we now just spent another 4 trillion?! This looks like an effective tax rate of 50% on everything we do and we just elected some liberal who wants to ‘change the world?’

Well, the world has already changed. We have to keep the banks solvent and dump a lot of government rules and regulations like the Clean Air Act and the Carbon Cap taxes because they will consume a few more trillion dollars per year if we do not.

We are going broke and the liberals want to raise taxes?

rycK

 

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

 


[1] In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.

[2] Fighting the Financial Crisis, One Challenge at a Time By Henry M. Paulson Jr. Op-Ed Contributor Published: November 17, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/opinion/18paulson.html?_r=1

[3] Financial Crisis Tab Already In The Trillions By CNBC.com |17 Nov 2008 | http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011

[4] "Zeese-a two intities—Foonnie-a Mee-a und Freddie-a Mec—ire-a not fecing uny kind ooff finoonciel creesis[4]," said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts[4], the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. " Zee-a more-a people-a ixeggerete-a zeese-a problems, zee-a more-a pressoore-a zeere-a is oon zeese-a compoonies, zee-a less we-a will see-a in terms ooff iffffordeble-a hooosing"."[4]

Iffffordeble-a hooosing” is what burdened Fanny Mae with three trillion dollars worth of phony mortgages and we still have failing mortgages that were given to 5 million illegal aliens. We can solve this finoonciel creesis by simply printing more money! http://www.usnews.com/blogs/sam-dealey/2008/9/10/barney-franks-fannie-and-freddie-muddle.html

[5] CRA [the phony Community Communist Reinvestment Act]

The CRA [the phony Community Communist Reinvestment Act][5][5] created mountains of bad debt by forcing banks to give away free houses to the uncreditworthy low class in exchange for their votes under penalty of prosecution by the government. You were supposed to wipe out Redlining[5]  and replace it with Greenlining.[5] Minorities must have loans [free if necessary] so they can participate in the American Dream. This is known as ‘affordable housing’—you cannot afford, but the illegal aliens and criminals and ‘poor’ certainly can.  The cost is essentially zero.  The thrust by the left now is to ‘suspend’ foreclosures that were a result of not paying off their loans and use some bank or government money [what else from a socialist?] to pay for the monthly mortgage payments.  Illegal aliens and dope dealers are most welcome.” The Obama Depression and Surviving the Leftists: Free Homes and Debt Forgiveness for your Votes.

http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/14/the_obama_depression_and_surviving_the_leftists_free_homes_and_debt_forgiveness_for_your_votes.thtml

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive