Posted by
rycK on Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00:13 PM
Political Lies,
Ghouls, Dictators and the Eternal Quest for your Wealth.
We can
take the simplistic view and point out, as Marx did, that the world is really divided into
two factions: those who can be successful, build wealth and security and enjoy
life and others who cannot. This appears to be trite and a mere scoop of hackneyed reason from a sweeping statement of
history until we look at the stark reality and then look deeper into the pond at
the political types who would make promises to get at your money and assets. This
dichotomy really appears to be the case and this tragedy forms the basis for
leftist politics. They claim [a lie] that they can fix this and bring us
a better society. So far, all they have brought is misery or stagnation.
The world
has never seen a place of any size that has a homogeneous collection of
citizens who have what some economist might describe as a resemblance of
equality. The great empires such as Egypt, the Roman Empire, the feudal systems in Japan or Europe or England or China, or anywhere in Africa for the last 7000 years have
never produced equality or a reasonable distribution of wealth. This quest for
equality has never materialized. We have witnessed a warped version of ‘equality’
in Cambodia and North Korea after the socialists finished
with their social engineering and cut away the unnecessary masses. We can
discount little places such as Switzerland or Sweden as they have special forms of
parasitic income [the dirty gun business or the dirty money business] or places
like Bermuda where tourism is forced upon the
polis and everybody has a job. These are anomalies and cannot be distinguished
from certain isolated parts of bigger countries and regions such as the French
Nobility and their lands, the kings of the Middle East, the City of Rome or some islands in the Caribbean. It is not possible to even start
out with a homogeneous distribution of wealth [other than zero] and maintain
that balance for two or three generations. Sooner or later those who cannot
manage their assets and money will spend it away and return to their earned
lower station in life. An exception
might be San Francisco where a sufficiently drug-addicted community might
experience equality and bliss in some unknown dimension without regard for
money or housing or even food. We need to ask what happened in South America after 500 years of European
enlightenment and wonder why they missed the opportunity for greatness. They
have achieved little more than mediocrity. Three words can describe South America [including Mexico]: Poverty, revolution and sloth.
Religion
first offered a form of equality, for a small price, in the terms of either the
existing life or the afterlife depending on which one you picked. The reward
was contentment and a few cures for diseases and the notion that following the
path of religions morality would produce a better society for all. But, as we
see in India or just outside the Vatican or in the streets of old Saigon, any form of economic equality is
clearly absent. Religion usually attempted to redistribute the essentials of
life in terms of food and shelter by the alms method, which was to be
understood as a solemn duty and the fulfillment of a mandate according to the
tenets of the church. This worked in a few places, but the propensity to
collect sufficient contributions from the supplicants to homogenize the population
with charity in any given area was nil. People
living in view of the Vatican have gone hungry for centuries. In
the 1970s the ugliest slum I had witnessed north of Tijuana was the human wreckage that
surrounded Gracie Mansion in New York. The liberals have no solutions
to social problems. All they have to offer the poor are lies, threats, phony
social programs that work in reverse and acts of brutality.
The First Big Lies and how they
wrecked your lives:
We can
start a study of overt leftist prevarications with a strange character known as
J J. Rousseau
and his tautological lackey Karl Marx, two jokers who were able to warp the
societies of France and Russia with phony notions, mass murder
and absurd promises. Rousseau proffered a host of implausible nostrums that
were supposed to improve society. Rousseau taught that man was out of place in
the society as it then existed and that we should preferably share many attributes found in the animal
kingdom in nature and, thusly, crafted a
social contract
for us to follow that would solve this problem. The savage was nobler than the
nobles it seems. This mental patient formulated his theory as Theory of Natural Man
and mumbled about social justice, and equality and economics and thus was made to
look like a gibbering fool. He made discourtesy a social attribute. France promptly tested his phony notions,
a pack of preposterous lies, with the glorious French Revolution that resulted
in the systematic murder of thousands. Baskets of heads were paraded thought
the streets and this became the grand culmination
of this lunacy. Liberalism was born and died here. All books became the
‘property of the state’ and many still lie moldering away in bins in France [in Bibliothèque Nationale de
France (BnF) ]unread. The Napoleonic dictator ship followed.
Not to be
bested in terms of terror and propaganda, Karl Marx conjured his phony notion that if the proletariat
could take over the means of production from the bourgeois then the profits of
capitalism might be returned to the people and eventually government would no
longer be necessary. This would be the Golden Age. The fault here is that
political types were put into power after the entire means of production was
confiscated in a brutal revolution and some 65 million people put to death and
then they couldn’t manage the economy they had usurped. This wreckage slowly degraded
for 74 years until it finally crashed in infamy and shame in 1989 with a strong
push from Ronald Reagan. Lenin and several of his subsequent disgusting
parasites mangled the economy and mismanaged the natural resources and were
able to produce 100 million dead during their reigns. That Marxism could produce any form of a
decent society is a brutal lie. Yet, there are many on the left today who enjoy
prosperity in the US while they avidly celebrate the
governments of Cuba, North Korea and Nicaragua.
Liberals freeze and stare off into space when prompted to explain why
the last 100 or so Marxist dictatorship in Africa failed to deliver on their
promises to make a decent society for their tribal members. They also have some deep reverence and
misplaced respect for Islamo-Fascism and, as such, defend overt terrorism. Many
liberals and their ignorant victims lament the demise of the USSR and would want the old régime to
return to power. This is happening.
The
obvious brutality and public murder of millions in order to produce a society
that would be egalitarian or at least produce some form of social justice
prompted some to think of other lies that might drain the wealth of the
bourgeois away even in small packets and use that to create social programs
that would redistribute the wealth with fewer murders. Communism morphed into radical socialism
where command economies might be created that would employ Marx’s theories such
as high progressive taxes and confiscatory inheritance taxes and could ‘spread
around the wealth’ as we heard recently in our Presidential election. After two world wars, 80 million dead and a
Great Depression in Europe, the European
Union was formed and it is now collapsing from poor administration
and the predictable defect of the manifold inefficiency of big government. The phony notion [another lie]that
some cluster of politicians can micromanage the economy of millions and adjust
the economic supply and demand schedules of food, housing, transportation,
defense and other societal metrics is so preposterous as to be dismissed immediately
if we judge the result based on the outcome. When the means of production are
controlled by politicians the number of ways to fail multiplies almost in
proportion to the numerical square of the number of bureaucrats on the planning
boards. Thus, the nostrum that big government can solve problems and spread
around the wealth in a sane and equitable manner is a sick joke and a
preposterous lie. Take a close look at Europe as a test case. The proof lies
there anywhere you look.
The Notion of Education:
The quest
for ‘equality’
and ‘social
justice’ might be attained in other ways we are told and that ‘education’
of the masses is the way to do this. If we teach our offspring to be classless
and steep them in fairness and humanity then social justice will spring forth
like flowers in the meadows. The disease
that prevented this splendor was capitalism. Any intrinsic truths in the
educational theory entrenched in this message failed to materialize in the
society as a whole because of two factors: propaganda
and the maldistribution of cognitive attributes
or IQs.
Given the
chance to edify their citizens and others, the early educators were tutors in
Egypt, Greece, Rome and other empires and they first concentrated on teaching
administrative theory, then diplomacy and then into war colleges and then into business. The Romans were highly
educated with many high schools in The City/State of Rome where Greeks were revered as
those who could teach Romans the essentials of philosophy, engineering,
probably war and society. Their republic
lasted either 800 or 1000 years depending on when you might think it
ended. Nothing has matched this, ever. After
the Roman Empire crashed, the classical education efforts remained concentrated in Europe and was based on the ‘authority of the
ancients’ and thus Latin was the language of the educated up to about the end
of the 18 century. But, there was no
equality for the masses in the strict terms of equal incomes, equivalent
housing and assets and the essential fact that those who had great wealth
actually provided for the poor was ignored and refuted. That form of education
only benefited the adept and was wasted on the ignoranti.
To fix
this problem, propaganda must replace education. The trickle down theory of distribution of
wealth was unacceptable according to the new educated view. Now leaders of corporations became greedy
tyrants and exploited their employees instead of being benefactors and
employing millions from their risk-taking and ingenuity. Only a few of these
entrepreneurs would rise to power and they were not the ones who by an accident
of birth became royal rulers, but they were the ones who were adept in
business. In England those who were originally
privileged to become educated by their royal parents or peers of the realm were
supplanted by those with higher intelligence, more assertive personalities and
advancing business skills. Education had now, in the views of the left,
produced the same monsters as the royal bed chambers and must be severely
modified to teach the masses how to recognize the proper leaders that would
create a more liberal society. Education, then, must be modified and
transformed into a major propaganda mechanism [a
lie machine] that would create a mold where the elite could push out conditioned
citizens who would conform to the liberal model. The citizens must be ‘educated’ to the phony notion that
socialism or one of its variants is the best form of government for all. This,
of course, is a lie and a difficult one to implement without some heavy propaganda and some other drastic measures. The left
used both. Educators must now be social tyrants
and act as stooges of some leftist social agenda to hold jobs in the
leftist-dominated educational system. Testing must be minimized and students passed
along to higher grade levels without regard for academic credentials or any
recognizable form of performance. Politics has now replaced facts.
The Failure of Education and Proliferation
of Propaganda:
Somehow,
the citizens of so-called democracies must be educated and properly propagandized into mere obedient and static pieces of
some grand collage that can be constructed in accordance with modern concepts
of liberalism. But, the difficulty here is that the skeptical must be lead to
believe that they are giving up both power and wealth for some cause. Fear,
compassion and hate are the strongest emotions so a good propagandist must use a complex elixir of all three to
strip the affluent citizens of some or all of their wealth. The leftists have
not ignored this precept.
World
Wars 1, 2 were suitable propagandistic instruments to convince the good
citizens to give up their time, lives and much wealth in order to fix some
threatening situation. The assassination
of the Archduke Ferdinand precipitated the first big war that was going to
proceed anyway but that was as good an excuse as any available at the time.
Here, the fear that the enemy might march in and take over your house was real
so Europe went bankrupt in the hasty
prevention of this threat and received something worse for the effort. The fact that militaristic politicians
conjured up this behemoth was beside the point. Without warring politicos there would never
have been war. We are reminded by George F. Will
that diplomacy might have solved the dispute by talking it over as reasonable
persons and making some compromises.
That [diplomacy] was only one of the big lies. By definition, diplomacy has never solved any major war or aggression
in the history of the world. American taxpayers, after sacrificing 160,000
soldiers, paid Europe to restructure and they managed to get along until the Great
Depression. We were promised that this was the ‘war to end all wars’ or at
least until the next big one, which was set up by the Treaty of Versailles and
would start within a generation.
During
the Great Depression, which may not have been so great because we have not seen
the end of the new one we are entering, was an occasion to institute novel
social programs with grand promises that failed to solve the problems of
deflation and unemployment. Promises to
decrease the unemployment with infrastructure and building programs failed. Another
war was necessary to mobilize the citizens and pull us out of the depression.
The
American citizens originally balked at the notion of another World War as the
first one was a bummer. The lie here
was that fascism would engulf us and we would be slaves of Hitler or worse.
He couldn’t even handle Russia. He was lucky to survive his own army. The
Neutrality Act passed by Congress to keep us out of that wasteful mêlée was
ignored by FDR and he goaded Japan on numerous issues such as oil
and helium and scrap metal and credit and presto—the war was on. We took sides against Germany and Italy by helping a belligerent [England] during the ‘neutrality’ and they
knew it and responded. This one war cost us a year’s GDP and 400,000 dead. The outcome was
that anti-capitalistic ideological enemies were now the masters of half of Europe and they now possessed nuclear
weapons so we had a cold war for half a century or so. The fear here was that
the USSR would nuke us so we dug holes in
the ground and put in missiles and built subs that could hide on the bottom of
the ocean in wait of a signal to destroy the enemy in 15 min. The big lie here was that the Communists
were our allies. After the war, some of our more ignorant politicos like Truman
found out the truth. Today, we are still counseled that anticommunism is evil and that the Soviets were really not out to get
us.
Did the Poles ever hear this? What about
Georgia? We must tolerate communists, in
our society it was proffered, because attacking or exposing them is
unacceptable and sanctions the inane process of Red Baiting or McCarthyism. We should respect these parasites and murderers.
This form of propaganda gives more latitude to the leftist attacks on capitalism.
With capitalism out of the way the leftists in America could party with international
communists over the wreckage and fumes. We would then experience justice and
freedom.
Unexpected Prosperity Undermines
Government.
By
accident, and entirely unpredicted, the economy surged after WW2 and prosperity
if not peace stubbornly persisted. This was not some detailed plan by
government. Indeed, the government had
predicted more depression, but they could not stop individualism and capitalism.
The tax cuts of JFK, Ronald Reagan and George Bush produced prosperity and
marginalized socialism. This process must be halted the leftists argued if
egalitarian notions were to be implemented. Capitalism is inherently evil
the lie goes and the government knows how to create a balanced society. They
can accomplish this by redistributive tax policies.
Big Lies About Big Government And
Their Big Promises.
Several big
lies from the New Deal era were worked simultaneously. The big one was that
social security would provide some retirement benefits and would benefit all.
The lie here was the taxes on this program were excessive and unnecessary so politicians
spent the excess and let the system debt grow like a cancer upon our society. We
now face some 30 trillion dollars in costs by 2050 with no obvious way to pay
for this. The IOUs at the Treasury are worthless as the taxpayer is stuck with
this. Other social programs such as new forms of ‘education’ were instituted
with massive costs. We wonder why the SATs are down and the high school
graduation rates in half the population is barely 50%.The strange notion that
many who could not seem to pass courses and were marginalized in their education
by insufficient unit spending was crushed when Washington, D. C. trudged on for
decades with the highest spending per pupil in the Western Hemisphere and
produced horrible results. Indeed, the debate over cognitive skills as
described in the Bell Curve was hot and nasty and the scientific
findings of the very basis of cognitive skills were dismissed by the left.
They could not handle even a discussion of the educational ‘gap.’ The truism
that many minorities and everybody else on the left tail of the bell curve could
not compete with equality on standardized tests was known from 1906, but became
a major political issue in 1965 after LBJ asked Professor Jensen at Berkeley
why his Great Society educational spending failed to produce results. The big lie
was the tests were racially biased as any differences in cognitive skills
among races would be the equivalent overt racism [a lie] hence not true.
People are ‘equal.’ Affirmative Action
was then instituted to make up the difference between certain minorities and
others who participated in the society. The big lie here was that if
quotas and race norming test scores were instituted the results could show that
everybody could have an equal outcome in economic terms. A bigger lie was
that the IQ tests proved nothing and the emotional intelligence
was the true measure of the citizen and more important than a mere cognitive
metric. The standardized tests were
‘unfair’ and just another lie. It
is interesting that when the tests were redesigned according to norms suggested
by experts in minority matters that the tests show that the IQs did not change
significantly. Lies of this magnitude allowed political parties to attract
minorities with the promises that they would ‘fix’ the problem. That was a
lie. What else should an IQ test do except sort out the test takers by IQ?
The Big Lie That Tax Cuts Do Not
Produce Prosperity.
Keynesians
and other ‘economists’ insist in some big lie that lost taxes are ‘costs’ to
an economy and that tax cuts result in bad economies. The New York Times
publishes the foaming screeds of this failed economic theory twice a week for
our amusement. This
lie has been disproved many times, but the left cling to this notion
because if they were to agree then the funding for the politicians would
decrease and they would lose power and see capitalism become even stronger.
Capitalism is the enemy here and taxes curtail capitalism. Only half of this is
true. Excessive taxation destroys capitalism and results in distressed economies
like we see in Germany, England and France. They are now beggared by socialist
levels of taxation, have lost hope and crawl to the US for money to bail them out. We cannot afford to bail them out three times
in a single century.
The Big Lie That ‘Affordable
Housing’ Is Good For Our Society.
If any lie
can top this one then we must look to the future and see how the Carbon Cap
taxation and Climate Change taxes work out. We see now that the CRA [the Community Communist
Reinvestment Act] created mountains of bad debt by forcing banks to give away free houses to the uncreditworthy
low class in exchange for their votes under penalty of prosecution by the
government. The scam here was that banks were forced to loan money to people
with poor credit, scant educational skills, drug addicts and even illegal
aliens and could peddle this worthless paper into the dumpsters known as Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. What happened here
is that the process demanded ‘affordable housing’ for millions and wealth was
then lost from the failure to make mortgage payments. These two phony big-lie
federal quasi-government corporations racked up 3-5 trillion dollars in debt
[we don’t know how much yet] and started off a steep recession that will
probably turn into a depression.
Somehow, this mortgage process mentality infected Europe and elsewhere and
they have the same problem with the deflation of housing prices. Europe is busted now and Japan is following. But, this may be nothing if we look for even a
bigger lie.
The Big
Lie That Global Warming Will Destroy Our Planet.
The biggest
lies are the most preposterous but like the [false] Hitlerian case
cited as:”… if stressed long enough then
the populace will eventually be convinced of the lie’s efficacy or “…in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small
lie,...”
Hitler was talking about somebody else
and not offering this as his own propaganda mechanism. Nevertheless, the notion of the big lie
seems to work well for the left and they use it as far as they can. The lie
here, thus, is that we cannot confine big lies exclusively to the narrow zones
of National Socialism as this variant
is only one small historical sector of the broad expanse of socialism and Communism, its charter benefactor. We cannot allow the environmentalists
[read EcoNazis here] the opportunity to escape the provable accusation
that they are wantonly using this fascist propaganda theme to support their
big lie. The quest for wealth and control of assets and means of production
has never matched this attempt at control of our society.
Two big lies are intertwined here: The
first is that Carbon dioxide is a pollutant and the second is that the global temperature is rising due
to the use of fossil fuels. CO2 is not a pollutant. This is a lie. The temperature of the earth is not rising—this
is a lie. The temperature has been
falling the last three years.
The big prize for the socialists is that the
entire planet can now be taxed because the toxic gas produced from respiration
of animals like us pervades the entire sphere and everybody must reduce
emissions. This big lie transcends the socialist notion of confiscatory
taxes on individuals or corporations as now everybody
can pay for the abusive use of certain forms of energy from any source. A
bigger lie would come from a few years of destroying our industrial base and
living like beggars when the EcoNazis can announce that all these measures prevented the oceans from
rising and boiling and saved us. Here we
have the potential case where a big lie that predicted a nasty outcome was the
correct path of prevention because the dire outc0me did not happen to
materialize. This self-aggrandizing ‘truth’
resembles the act of hanging of garlic around the house and this prophylaxis has
prevented the home owners from being bitten by vampires. Perhaps we should just
howl at the moon every evening during the CBS News broadcasts and measure the
height of the oceans and if the waters do not rise then we can just keep
howling on key and in time. This would be proof that such nonsense fixed any
problem. This is a lower cost version and just as effective.
The Big Lie about Tax Cuts in
2009.
The
politicians that seem to float to the top of the heap are mostly disgusting
parasites. They are crooked and tell lies to get power. We were promised
‘tax cuts’ for those making less than $250,000 by president-elect Barack Obama
and this was seconded with by his VP running mate Joe Biden. [12] This is probably a lie. We will find out soon enough.
We were
assured by Barney Frank about the security of Fannie Mae and that story was
this: on July 14, 2008:
“I think this is a case where Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound. They're not in
danger of going under. They're not the best investment these days from a
long term standpoint going back. I think they are in good shape going forward.
They're in the housing market. I do think their prospects going forward are
very solid.”
This was probably
a lie, but Barney Frank is not the kind of person we can be persuaded that
knows what he believes in, if anything. He seems to speak in some political
dialect so we don’t know what he knew. I doubt if he does. Now, we face new ‘leadership’ in the form of a
person who is 100% left liberal and has no accomplishments other than blindly
voting for far leftist causes. So far, Obama is nobody with nothing to say
outside some liberal script.
“Obama is nothing but a sophomoric
political construct that is nothing more than a scripted oratorical puppet that
performs on a glittering stage and gives sterling speeches that fall backward
upon old, stale socialist precepts. He would be pedestrian-level, but has a new
and talented style of tinsel-town stage delivery and a few hundred million
dollars in funding from the Middle East and Europe. The money makes the man here.”
–from my previous blog by rycK
The Real Ugly Question: Do the
Lefties Care if We Enter a Depression?
This is
hard to tell at this point. The history of the various quests for power in
numerous countries by those in power in leftist circles is strewn with dead
bodies, wasted economies and even piles of human skulls. A crushing depression
would allow our elected ‘leaders’ to institute drastic measures like setting up
confiscatory taxes, the attachment of our 401(k)s and mandated closure of banks so
that we cannot get to our bank accounts. There are many political opportunities
here for Democrats to proclaim that capitalism has failed and needs to be
suppressed. They would then use our ill-gotten wealth to institute socialism.
You might watch the movie Doctor
Zhivago again
and pay special attention to the scenes where Gromeko's
house is confiscated by a citizen’s committee
and his literary works condemned by the state. That movie tells us much about
the left and their mentality. The outcome of Doctor Zhivago is one leftist-endorsed way to get an
enlightened ending to capitalist society that matches the typical leftist’s
notions of fairness and equity. War and/or depression are the only changes that
will allow for a concrete change in our society according to the left. They
have nothing else but other people’s wealth.—revised comment from a previous blog by
rycK
The answer to the last question will probably
be revealed if and when Obama and his friends go after the tax base, place a
high tax on gasoline and restructure the economy based on the EcoNazi tenets of clean and green.
The residual wealth in the US is in our bank accounts, 401(k)s and homes. They could roll our IRAs into the phony Social
Security system and close the banks for a time and reopen them with government
downsized account balances.
We shall see how much they hate capitalism
very soon. They may try to confiscate guns soon.
rycK
Comments:
ryckki@gmail.com
“Bear
Stearns made the first public securitization of Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) loans started in
1997.[6] Editorialists in some American
newspapers[7][8] and US Congressman Ron Paul[9] say the CRA loans were lent to
otherwise un-credit-worthy consumers in the name of ending discrimination,
although an analysis of actual lending patterns does not generally support this
conclusion.[10][11][12]
On June 22, 2007,
Bear Stearns pledged a collateralized loan of up to $3.2 billion to "bail
out" one of its funds, the Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Fund,
while negotiating with other banks to loan money against collateral to another
fund, the Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Enhanced Leveraged Fund.[13] The funds were invested in thinly
traded collateralized
debt obligations (CDOs)
found to be worth less than their mark-to-market value. Merrill Lynch seized $850 million worth of the
underlying collateral but only was able to auction $100 million of them. The
incident sparked concern of contagion as Bear Stearns might be forced to
liquidate its CDOs, prompting a mark-down of similar assets in other
portfolios.[14][15] Richard
A. Marin, a senior executive at Bear Stearns Asset Management
responsible for the two hedge funds, was replaced on June 29 by Jeffrey
B. Lane, a former Vice Chairman of rival investment bank, Lehman Brothers.[16]
During the
week of July 16, 2007,
Bear Stearns disclosed that the two subprime hedge funds had lost nearly all of
their value amid a rapid decline in the market for subprime mortgages.
[It is often erroneously claimed or implied Hitler had
advocated the use of the Big Lie as a viable propaganda technique. Chapter
10 of Mein Kampf:
“... in the big lie there is always a certain force of
credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily
corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or
voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more
readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves
often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to
large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate
colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the
impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove
this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and
waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been
nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all
who conspire together in the art of lying.
—Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf,
vol. I, ch. X http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie#Use_of_the_expression_by_Hitler
“"Read my lips," Biden said, using Bush's famous
phrase while referring to a Barack Obama administration. "Nobody, nobody
making less than $250,000 is going to see a penny of their taxes go up."—Biden in an incoherent rant at some county fairgrounds near the campus
of Ohio University in Athens on Oct 15, 2008.
"Zeese-a two intities—Foonnie-a Mee-a und Freddie-a Mec—ire-a not
fecing uny kind ooff finoonciel creesis," said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the
Financial Services Committee. " Zee-a more-a people-a ixeggerete-a zeese-a problems, zee-a more-a
pressoore-a zeere-a is oon zeese-a compoonies, zee-a less we-a will see-a in
terms ooff iffffordeble-a hooosing"."
“Iffffordeble-a
hooosing” is what burdened Fanny Mae with three trillion dollars worth of phony mortgages and we still
have failing mortgages that were given to 5 million illegal aliens. We can
solve this finoonciel creesis by
simply printing more money! The
Looming Depression and Surviving the Politicians who Lust
for your Wealth.
http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/17/the_looming_depression_and_surviving_the_politicians_who_lust_for_your_wealth.thtml