James Carville Predicts a Race Riot if Obama Loses?

Is this true??

 Some comments from last night:

“CARVILLE: Let me be clear, I said you can call the dogs and light the fire and leave the house. I think it sounds over.

[What do the dogs do?]

Now let me be clear here, if Obama goes in this race with a 5- point lead and losing this election, the consequences are -- bull, man. I mean I don't think that's going to happen, but I think David it's a point to bring up.

[This is bull?]

But you stop and contemplate this country if Obama goes in and he has a consistent five point lead and loses the election, it would be very, very, very dramatic out there.”[1] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

We wonder what the word  ‘dramatic’ means here. It sounds like that the threats of that parasitic Socialist Ségolène Royal who predicted [or faithfully promised] new riots[2] in France.

This sounds like a new form of race-baiting. Jimmy the Snake seems to be saying that if Obama is supposed to win (according to the polls) and then loses that the election was rigged? It is okay for ACORN, Obama’s old gutter-grade racist ballot-box stuffers, who are now being investigated by eh FBI, for voter fraud to practice overt racism and disgrace the voting system, but if the voters do not follow the suspicious polls with their secret choices then the blacks riot? Will Carville join in with the burning and howling? Is that what the dogs are for??

This  is the pinnacle of the glory for the Party of Democrats and Carville’s drug-crazed Marxist homies at the New York Times—aka the Walter Duranty Papers.[3]-- must be celebrating as they were thinking and hoping for this but could scrounge up enough moxie to put it in print. The racist NYT has had to dance around their cryptomisoxenistic [4] beliefs in the past. Maybe Carville has legitimized a new advance in   reverse racism?

Looks like it. Vote against Obama for this reason  as if you didn’t have a dozen reasons.

 rycK

 Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

New York and California Descend into the Financial Maelstrom. Raise Taxes!!

The Obama Jugend Blends with Radical Marxism and Black Activists to form some Combined Socialist Front. Seig Obama!

 The voters need to hear that they can get something from a candidate. This only makes sense. They do not want to hear the opposite. This is an obvious political strategy, but is always difficult to piece together a coalition that works. The country is divided so one theory is try to split the middle into  the usual Dem/Republican sectors, get a buy-in from half the independents and then, as a novelty, get new voters to register and vote even in the same day in Ohio. Ballot stuffing, an old favorite in Chicago politics is a must and illegal aliens must be encouraged to vote. All this has to come together in a grand propagandistic theme: It has.

 It appears that the David Axelrod’s Plan is to abstract the best political attributes of the Nazis, Communists, Socialists, Black Panthers, ACORN ballot stuffers and the Hollywood radicals along with other radical groups and blend them into a winning coalition.  This seems to be working. Axelrod is a slick operator who was able to beat off Hillary Clinton in the primaries by pushing ‘change’ over experience. [1] David is an old hand in the sleazy and racist-oriented Chicago gutter-level politics. Actually, the difference between Hillary and Obama’s outrageous and Marxist-Socialist spending plans was nil and tipped on some obscure and trivial variants in details in their socialized medicine schemes.  It was still free for the low class, and that is a vote grabber.

 Here a sleight of political hand obscures the meaning of ‘change’ which really means high taxation. Promises cannot be fulfilled without new and higher taxes on the working folk in this country. Somebody had to pay for this.  We should wonder who pays for this! We are obliged to pay close attention to the fact that the lower half in this place only pays 4% of the federal taxes so there is no loss to them, they reason, if the top half pays the new tax bills. Most of those who vote against Obama have to pay for his promises.

 Soak the rich! Seig Obama! Power to the People! Crush the Capitalists!

 The hard basis of this theme is the giveaway: the ‘poor’ will get free healthcare, more ‘accordable housing, [read more  zero down phony mortgages that are crushing our economy with bad debt], ‘peace’ in the world, the immediate end of the War on Terrorism in Iraq and on and so forth.  Obama buys into the Carbon Cap taxes, part of the EcoNazi Schemes[2] that are burying Europe in phony debt and strangling their energy supply. This is a key issue with the Greens.

 So, the promises are on the table and we know who must pay so the circus starts of play its songs and the clowns dance in the street with chants of Hope. Or, we hope we get our free money.

 We see some striking similarities between Obama Youth squads and the Nazi Jugend of the 20s and 30s in Germany.[3] Compare this video to the scene in Cabaret [below] when the Hitler Youth go out in the streets and sing about Nazism to examples from Obama:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtGrp5MbzAI

 Here the children are taught songs in praise of Der Fuhrer.[4] Der große schwarze Führer für Hoffnung.[5]   

Here is another one by alpha-omega ‘fraternity’ that shows a Malcolm X style of regimentation. http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/274864.php

 Does this remind us of Nazi Germany or perhaps the beginning of the Bolshevik Revolution? Listen to this song from Cabaret and compare it to the earlier Nazi work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdM8PDu6VMg

 Tomorrow belongs to me!! Heil Obama! Ich werde Stimmzettel für meinen Führer vollstopfen.[6] Macht zu den Leuten[7] 

And from the church we hear:

 “Und sie greifen Sie nicht nur an, wenn Sie versuchen hinzuweisen, was im weißen Amerika, die Vereinigten Staaten von KKK A. "-Dr Jeremiah A Wright, Jr.[8]

 I think we can all acknowledge that David Axelrod has had a brilliant career in identify politics and we can salute his fine work in the customary manner:

 “Wir alle loben Sie Herr Propaganda Minister [Alelrod] für Sie wird uns die Welt geben![9]

 Seig Obama!

 rycK

 Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Sarah Meets the Marxists and their Islamo-Fascist Friends on the Battle Field. The NYT Freaks. Sarah is the Feared October Surprise.

 We are always privileged to study and digest the frantic political foam that is proffered as thinking at the New York Times—aka the Walter Duranty Papers. [1] When new events threaten their precious leftist candidates, new political actions are required so that the public can be reeducated and vote accordingly for whatever political leftovers the leftists are currently stuck with. We are frequently ‘educated’ on the new plan by Frank [the Crank] Rich[2] [3][4] [5] one of the New York Times’ most thoroughly celebrated and left-thinking stooges. Frank Rich is well known for his supernatural ability to crank out sophomoric dogmatic far-left literary brats with sausage-machine tedium even when they apply to nothing in particular. He is known as the most accomplished Smear Hatchet Contrivance and operative at the Times, as we witnessed in his phony Macaca Follies where he exhibited his skills in his sleazy personal attacks against Sen. George Allen. Somebody has now alerted The Crank that some new sleaze scenario has to be stewed up and cobbled into a sticky mass and shoveled onto the print media to attack Sarah.  She is a serious threat. This current op-ed piece is an interesting case study as this propaganda piece uses numerous circus tricks.  We need to study nifty gadgets like this so we can avoid their effects.

 The sudden appearance of Sarah in the lists astride a Great White horse with shining amour has shaken the munchkins at the New York Times.  They are afraid. She attacks Obama!! This is so serious that Frank [the Crank] Rich must rise to the occasion and join in the battle.  This op-ed is his answer to this problem. In his latest screed, premised upon the hope that he can persuade us that Obama is not really some gutter-grade racist stooge from the far left fringe loony bin who is soaked in Communism and sat in the pews there mesmerized by his crack-job racist pastor Jeremiah Wright and his familiars, he attacks Sarah and anybody else.  That negative of image of Obama must be changed. So, Frank puts this up for consideration:

 “SARAH PALIN’S post-Couric/Fey comeback at last week’s vice presidential debate was a turning point in the campaign. But if she “won,” as her indulgent partisans and press claque would have it, the loser was not Joe Biden. It was her running mate”[6]-- Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain By Frank Rich Op-Ed Columnist Published: October 4, 200 [All quotes references this link in this blog unless otherwise noted. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

 The first consideration in any propagandistic piece is to attempt to convince the reader that the obvious results of some political action are really backward or actually worked in reverse. Using some circular logic and some disreputable essays in triple reverse irony theorems, he pastes up a response.  Whatever is truth must be converted to lies or set aside as nefarious schemes by the right-wing designed to conceal the true facts. The second consideration is to smear (or maybe in this case reverse blackwash) the opposition’s candidate and show that the action he [or SHE] advocated was a grave error.

 The next consideration is to introduce an off-topic issue that was already beat to death and give it a new heart and lungs. Recall that Slick Willie never released his medical records, probably a necessary act to suppress awareness about his drug addictions and bouts with various sexual diseases.  John McCain has offered more than 100 pages of his medical history. Could John Kerry or Al Gore do that? McCain has been pronounced cancer-free by experts. This fact must be revised.

 The theory: John must be ill:

 “The second bit of predebate news, percolating under the radar, involved the still-unanswered questions about McCain’s health.”

 Here, we must be persuaded to wonder if Old John can last until he swears in.

 Now, the fear mongering is uplifted in glittering lights for all to see with dripping blood and gore:

 “She [Sarah] wants to be president, she thinks she can be president, she thinks she will be president. And perhaps soon. She often sounds like someone who sees herself as half-a-heartbeat away from the presidency. Or who is seen that way by her own camp, the hard-right G.O.P. base that never liked McCain anyway and views him as, at best, a White House place holder.”

 Here we are encouraged to believe the feverish and outrageous nostrum that McC is now living  out his last few days before his new residence on some marble slab is a reality and there is some nefarious deal stewing away in the cauldron whereby he can hand off the baton to Sarah as his carcass rots away. There is a nasty right-wing plot here! A switcheroo is in the works. Frank honks on this fluff with all his talents.

 The Last Turn of the Crank:

 “You have to wonder how long it will be before they plead with him to think of his health, get out of the way and pull the ultimate stunt of flipping the ticket. Palin, we can be certain, wouldn’t even blink.”

 This sounds a snippet from some Allen Ginsberg sonnet[7] scribbled on an old mattress after one of his famous LSD flashbacks in some dingy San Francisco bathhouse. To resort to this kind of hysteria signals much about the level of fear from the left. Many on the liberal side still think we might not vote for some Commie racist tax-whore who hates America, loathes guns and the white middle class and their childish religion and will confiscate their weapons and tax them to the limits of their income so they can enjoy the prosperity of terminal socialism. That is the image that the New York Times wants to squash—true, false or partially true. They will apologize for any of his faults and rewrite history if necessary to shape his image of change.

 Frank was given the solemn task of reversing this situation and by  Sarah.

 Now, this is Frank at his best: we have an example of some sleazy character assignation mitigated by emotional innuendo, rumor, complemented by the ‘advice and opinions’ of ‘experts.’ He puts much stock in one Katie Couric, who seems to need someone to tell her in confidence how to wash her hair.  Katie has apparently recovered from her brief encounter with the truth concerning the enormous illegal alien problem where she strayed from the narrow leftist ditch.[8] She has been reeducated and given another chance to redeem her image as a leftist tool.  She learned much from that mistake. Her ratings are horrible, but she serves a useful political purpose: sleaze chucker. She did her best to unhorse Sarah in her ‘interview.’ Frank also retains in this piece what appear to be a near-religious faith in Barney Frank and other losers. Would we expect the NYT to attack Chris Dodd, Backside Barney, Chuckles Schumer or little Henry Waxman with his Hitlerite mustache? No. Not even Maxine Waters or ‘Cold Cash” Jefferson would be reproached for anything they might have done.  They are allies of the left. Racists and criminals like Dodd and Franklin Raines are more than welcome. In the feverish political world of the far left they actually keep the communal sheets moist.

 Using the reverse analysis technique implicit in the propaganda from this NYT screed, we can see that the Times wants us to believe this steamed tripe with these caveats and considerations:

 [1] FEAR: Sarah is now a major political threat to the rabid left and that they could not foresee what damage she could and will do to the cause. She is the October Surprise they have feared all along.

 [2] HOPE: That McCain has collapsed in confusion, is addled by fear and self-loathing and is expecting episodes of bad health and might as well just ‘give up’ and do the honorable thing by quitting the race.

 [3]THE SCENARIO: That the crotchety old senator has admittedly made the ultimate bad decision in his political life by selecting Sarah and that he now must resign in disgrace or find some oblique way to offer the election to Obama before he dies from old age and advanced senility.

 Maybe, The Crank thinks that McCain might stumble his way to the podium and tell the world that he is all wrong for the job at the White House and that Obama needs to protect us from Sarah and her right-wing hoards and save the country from the greedy creeps on Wall Street. That is a pipe dream, but one of the sort that would satisfy the left.

 Good work Frank!  This is one of your finest pieces and we can all learn much about propaganda, lies, sleaze and character assignation from this work. We expect more in the future.

 Sounds like Frank is worried.  We should be glad at that.

 rycK

 Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Obama Will NOT Abandon his Good Terrorist Friends Like He did His Racist Pastor.

Politics is not based on truth but rather on the nebulous nostrum of persuasion. The political progression is defined as simply the process of decision making[1] in groups, but those decisions cannot be enforced without power. The power derives, in some way, from the voters in this country so the good politico has to offer as much to any and all and not offend his core vote. Thus, the vote count may be influenced by seeking help from allies, appearing to independents that control 1/3 of the voter power and considering cutting loses by severing connections with groups that may lose votes for the candidate for any of several reasons.

The ‘solution’ to attaining a wide and comfortable majority of votes in the political arena is to simply set up a platform that a wide majority of the voters will celebrate and support. This simpleton’s notion is unworkable in the world of politics. The inverse of this thinking forces the conclusion that the wise politico must avoid association with groups that will drive the votes in the opposite direction. Here Obama has had to make some difficult choices.  He made some and must make some more.

Senator Obama was forced to dump his slimy, racist ‘pastor’ Jeremiah Wright because he was connected to Wright’s wild anti-white racism for a depth of 20 years. This, after promising never to abandon him. But with stuff like this:

“In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01,” Wright wrote in a church-affiliated magazine. “White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” [2]--Jeremiah Wright. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

And:

“And they will not only attack you if you try to point out what's going on in white America, the U.S. of KKK A."[3]-- Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.

Obama’s speech writers tried to patch this one up with this nonsense:

“The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

I can no more disown him [Jeremiah Wright, ed] than I can disown the black community.” [4]--Obama in his Philadelphia Speech.

Later, his maniacal racist pastor was dumped. The replacement Otis Moss[5]  was not much better. Obama had to leave the ‘church’ or whatever you might call this get-together.  Maybe the Times thinks they can convince us that notable leftist blacks like Maxine Waters, John Conyers, Jr.,  “Cold Cash” William Jennings Jefferson[6] of LA, Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee, Barbara Lee, Minister Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright, Otis Moss, Angela Davis, Al Sharpton and the great philosopher and poet Mumia Abu-Jamal[7] are not racists and shills for Marxism or revolution. That will not be easy.

Now, this Jeremiah Wright episode was a safe discard in many respects because he still has 95% of the black vote and the liberals could care less if racism is employed in this election if Obama can win. The overt use of racism while attacking so-called racists is known as Cryptomisoxeny [8] and works well in politics. People like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton we kept well away from the convention and not allowed to make speeches is customary.

Obama’s elitism and bigotry is another problem:

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."[9]-- Barack Obama

The New York Times to the Rescue:

Obama’s history and close associations with unrepentant terrorists is a matter that he hoped would burn out except that the  New York Times—aka the Walter Duranty Papers relit the fires in some misguided attempt to ‘defuse’ the issue.[10]

“Their relationship has become a touchstone for opponents of Mr. Obama, the Democratic senator, in his bid for the presidency. Video clips on YouTube, including a new advertisement that was broadcast on Friday, juxtapose Mr. Obama’s face with the young Mr. Ayers or grainy shots of the bombings.

In a televised interview last spring, Senator John McCain, Mr. Obama’s Republican rival, asked, “How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings that could have or did kill innocent people?”-- By Scott Shane in the NYT  Published: October 3, 2008

Great question! How do you do this?

The Times then blunders with this bit of political redaction of history:

“In the stark presentation of a 30-second advertisement or a television clip, Mr. Obama’s connections with a man who once bombed buildings and who is unapologetic about it may seem puzzling. But in Chicago, Mr. Ayers has largely been rehabilitated.”

Rehabilitated? By whom?

The disgusting militant Communist William Ayers is again a problem for Obama. Sarah now cites the NYT in their comments about this bomber and social parasite. We can see that this was a blunder as now Obama must do some damage control.

Obama has to balance support in terms of certain salient questions:

[1] What would President Obama do for his brothers under the spiritual concept of the Black Liberation Theology that he espouses? Would he pardon and free Mumia the cop killer?[11]

[2] Can Obama’s spending work in the new economic atmosphere we are now sunk in?

[3] How about Reparations?

[4] How about letting illegal aliens vote? Obama favored drier’s licenses for them.

[5] Does he really ‘have no problem with $4 gas?” How about $6  gas and the Carbon Cap Follies[12]?

These are ugly questions that he must not attempt to answer. But, these topics are open for consideration now that we have 30 days left. These questions will be posed by Sarah if necessary.

His VP matey and fellow liberal Joe Biden [‘Plugs’] is not exactly an asset for Obama as he is seen as the Loopy Gaff Master of Delaware. [13] In a previous rant[14] over Bush’s comments he wails:

“An exasperated Biden skewered Bush over that in a conference call with reporters, calling the comments “pure politics,” “blatant,” “beneath the presidency,” “truly disgraceful,” “outrageous,” “disturbing,” “ridiculous hypocrisy” and “long-distance Swiftboating.” He even said Bush “oughta get a life.” [15]  [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

That is the way a good liberal relates to news.

Now Sarah steps in with:

““Turns out one of his earliest supporters is a man, who according to the New York Times, was a domestic terrorist,” Palin told about 10,000 supporters at a rally at the Home Depot Center. She was referring to William Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s, which sought to bomb the Pentagon and US Capitol.”[16]

“Our opponent is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who target their own country."

This is a fact. Obama is a known Marxist[17] [18], racist, [19]ACORN rabble rouser and a good friend of violent terrorists.  How can he answer this?

But Obama has ‘experience.’ He offers ‘change.’

Senator Obama’s ‘experience’ is limited to running for office and his work in ‘organizing’ in the slums of Chicago for the criminal organization ACORN where his views were shaped by Saul Alinsky, and  William Ayers[20], who is famous for saying  "I don't regret setting bombs...I feel we didn't do enough."[21] Throw in Jeremiah Wright and we can wonder just who trained this guy and where his loyalties lie.   His boyhood  mentor was by Frank Marshall Davis[22], a known and avowed and unrepentant Communist.

Ayers does seem to be everywhere these days. His stench has affected the voters.

We will more about Obama and his Marxist and criminal friends in the very near future. Sarah will bring them up.

Stay tuned.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The Old Brown Lady of the New York Times [Old Gray Lady] Works the Smear Machine and Reinvents the Constitution.

We are always privileged to read the New York Times, the Main Propaganda Machine of the far left, the drug and rabid abortion crowds and their Islamo-Fascist allies. I normally look to the bright and sassy prose of The Old Red Lady, Maureen Dowd for insights into matters of right-wing corruption and greed. The dowdy Dowd has earned her Red Label from her hair color[1] and not from her politics as one might first presume from reading my blogs. My emphasis on the font color and boldness for the New York Times’ moniker as the Walter Duranty Papers [2]is based on the Communist and Bolshevik politics of Duranty and his Soviet handlers so her hair is also red, but only by coincidence.

 Gail Collins is another matter. Lacking sufficient cognitive skills, a praiseworthy countenance or even approaching the electric prose style of the other old lady at the Times, I have chosen to give her a slightly different color, also based on her [rather plain] hairdo and not, necessarily, in honor of her politics. Thusly, she is anointed The Old Brown Lady[3] of the Old Gray Lady. [Do they still use bowls for haircuts like that?] Today, she works the fluff and fill-in sections of the Slime Machine as today’s nifty smear artist. Along the way she seems to be rewriting the constitution as well. Gail is given the menial fluff-fill pieces because these trinkets are about the only job she can do but is a loyal wordsmith with solid training in liberalism. She plods along in her narrow assignments and, as such, is a great asset to the paper.

 The Motto of the New York Times is: Slime over Substance.

 In this episode, the Slimers attempt to bend and twist a simple comment given by their dire enemy Sarah in the VP debate. [She is so famous we can safely omit her last name] She is bright and honest and quite beautiful, those attributes being gross insults to most reputed females in the Party of Democrats, which probably includes Barney Frank.  This Times staff apparently selects ‘females’ by some esoteric  metric of repulsiveness so as not to offend N.O.W. or the diseased  bag ladies of the streets in NYC. Sarah entered  the lists in full combat regalia against the saggy old bald plagiarist and liar Joe Biden, known as The Hot Dog[4] in Delaware, or more  recently, as  ‘Plugs’[5]. “He sports an interesting forest of randomly spaced wispy pellage on his dome. The message offered here is not very clear.  She destroyed this freak show poser in the debate—and the NYT is enraged. Revenge is necessary.

The ‘moderator,’ an old hand in leftist politics and hoping to make bags of money off her new Obama book posed certain questions that prompted this curious attack on Richard Cheney, who is not actually running for any office.

“IFILL: Governor, you mentioned a moment ago the constitution might give the vice president more power than it has in the past. Do you believe as Vice President Cheney does, that the Executive Branch does not hold complete sway over the office of the vice presidency, that it it is also a member of the Legislative Branch?

PALIN: Well, our founding fathers were very wise there in allowing through the Constitution much flexibility there in the office of the vice president. And we will do what is best for the American people in tapping into that position and ushering in an agenda that is supportive and cooperative with the president's agenda in that position. Yeah, so I do agree with him that we have a lot of flexibility in there, and we'll do what we have to do to administer very appropriately the plans that are needed for this nation. And it is my executive experience that is partly to be attributed to my pick as V.P. with McCain, not only as a governor, but earlier on as a mayor, as an oil and gas regulator, as a business owner. It is those years of experience on an executive level that will be put to good use in the White House also.[6]

Freak Time!

 Quoth the Slimist:

 “She appeared to agree with Dick Cheney’s manic theory that the vice president is a member of both the executive and legislative branches, although it’s hard to tell since she began her answer this way: “Well, our founding fathers were very wise there in allowing through the Constitution much flexibility there in the office of the vice president. And we will do what is best for the American people in tapping into that position and ushering in an agenda that is supportive and cooperative with the president’s agenda in that position.”[7]-- Talking in Points by Gail Collins Op-Ed Columnist Published: October 3, 2008

 This uses the Slime by Association smear mechanism, a favorite carnival trick by this paper. We could do the same by associating Obama with Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers or Tony Rezko as a comparable comment in this vein, but the salient point in this episode is that Cheney did not modify or usurp the Constitution. What the NYSlimes are angry and frustrated about is that he cast the deciding vote several times as President of the Senate.

 I wonder if we can take this opportunity to read the Constitution in its original form before the Walter Duranty Papers manages to revise it and get it passed by Congress.

 “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.

 The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore,

in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of

President of the United States. “--Article I Section 3 of THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

 Do the Marxian supplicants of the Times realize that the words pro tempore are Latin and mean “for the time being"? [8] Cheney could have opened and closed the Senate and acted as the highest officer of this body.

 It is astonishing that the Slimes work the bug holes in every soggy mattress in the flop house to raise such worthless ‘points’ as this. But, they do have fears.

 Plugs gives us a lesson on the Constitution:

“BIDEN: Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history. The idea he doesn't realize that Article I of the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch. He works in the Executive Branch. He should understand that. Everyone should understand that.

And the primary role of the vice president of the United States of America is to support the president of the United States of America, give that president his or her best judgment when sought, and as vice president, to preside over the Senate, only in a time when in fact there's a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit.

The only authority the vice president has from the legislative standpoint is the vote, only when there is a tie vote. He has no authority relative to the Congress. The idea he's part of the Legislative Branch is a bizarre notion invented by Cheney to aggrandize the power of a unitary executive and look where it has gotten us. It has been very dangerous.”[9]—Joe  Hot Dog Biden’s Rant.

Recall that Joe cheated in his law school days at Syracuse.  He lifted the work of others and plagiarized to get his ‘law degree.’ We should not look to the Hot Dog to deduce the Constitution for us. After we wipe Joe’s sputum off his podium, we must state that Cheney only acted as a tie-breaker, a legal function that infuriated the soggy Marxian stooges from the left. This was no bizarre notion—this was only sour grapes by Democrats.

Clearly, the VP is the highest officer of the Senate and could act as one any old day.  He [or she!!] probably could set the agenda and open and close sessions and perform other duties as a president could do.  He [Cheney] prefers not to do so as he has to associate with slimy idiots like Harry Reid, Chuckles Schumer, Chris Dodd [a crook] and other disgusting personalities.  The VP actually has broad constitutional powers and perhaps the Walter Duranty bunch fears that Sarah might be a force in the next Senate even if there were no instances of an even vote. This might be a valid fear.

 This is a wonderful example of political cipher text that attempts to preempt any future powers of the right by a retrograde rewriting of the Constitution on the stage with tinsel, tambourines and lights.  

 Then, a cheap smear:

 “This is all a terrible shame. For us, mainly. But also for Palin, whose intelligence and toughness may wind up buried under the legend of her verb-deprived ramblings.”

 This from some hack desk editor who is a cliché monger?

 This is the kind of sleaze t hat makes the New York Times the best mechanism to wrap old stinky fish. The intellectual content of this rag compares only to tautological rants of leftist icons like Allen Ginsberg, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and Squeaky From.

The Old Brown Lady did here job with her pointless talking and worked up this little piece as a good little worker and now should get her usual prize for this propagandistic smear effort. She did well. Menial political mimicry absent any original thinking is a leftist virtue. Turn the crank.

rycK

 Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Puffington Huffs and Snuffs over Palin: Snake-Eyed Ugly Women Fly to the Obama Rescue

 One of the more animated utensils of the far leftist political wherewithal is Arianna Huffington or The HuffyPuffer[1][2] as I like to call her.  She routinely turns the crank on her old rusty hurdy-gurdy and toots the matching old stale songs for the idiot, Marxist left with pieces  illustrated by  this reference:[3] She must have spent a week or so on her cliché-ridden screed about the final conclusions on the Palin Debate last night.  The journalistic cluster that drives the inspiration for her current written work: Huffy plays the hurdy-gurdy Grinder with other contributors being cryptically represented by: the Monkey, the wooden nickel[sucker chum]  and the Tin Cup. They huddled together to dredge up some new nasty grams or whatever they can salvage from the yellowing old stack of left-liberal platitudes.  Intellectually, this is the equivalent of squeezing the script out of your socks.  Politically, this is bon bons and crack. In a fit of rage, The Puffer  mounted her broom and enlisted her simpering  familiars in a frantic  redaction of  history to defend[and reverse] what we all saw lat night : Sarah wiped the floor with ‘Plugs’[4] as Mark Levine [5]calls this old wart Biden  who votes for any socialist spending program that  slithers by. She was gracious enough to spare The Hot Dog [6]from reliving his gaffs, plagiarism, braggadocio and wild redactions of history. She showed much tender grace in dealing with the cognitively deficient elites who stumble around Washington in a marijuana-induced stupor and make absurd speeches to spend our tax money.  We all have to tolerate and toss a few crumbs to the losers in our society.

 The Puffer is always instantly annoyed by the right, but was outraged by Sarah even before debate started so we can only wonder who wrote the final copy and filtered out the sputum, bad grammar and crude invectives that normally besot her written works. Whoever redacts her screeds missed a few disgusting innuendos, but the applause drowned that out. Sarah is, obviously, a threat to the Afro-Leninism [7]of Obama and his SDS allies in crime.  His contempt[8] for the white middle class was not even mentioned. She is nice.

 “I watched the vice presidential debate in a ballroom at the Four Seasons hotel in Aviara, just north of San Diego, along with a couple of hundred women attending Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit -- a receptive audience, you would think, for a debate featuring a woman who might become the most powerful in the land. ”[9]— VP Debate: McCain's Big Gamble Comes Up Snake Eyes by Arianna Huffington [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.  This link references all quotes in this essay unless otherwise noted. ]

 A testosterone-free zone we expect. We can wonder if Angela Davis, Squeaky From or some Code Pink operatives were there to hop and clap. Where was Hillary?

 “The loudest ovation of the night -- at least in that ballroom (granted, not the most representative-of-America crowd) -- came when Biden said that Dick Cheney was the most dangerous VP in history.”

Did Puffy and her Puffettes realize that Richard Cheney is not running in this election? Here, the stale attempts to divert attention from the salient fact that Obama is in bed with slimy, Marxist radical parasites like Bill Ayers and cannot seem to condemn Iran’ Revolutionary Guards for what they are: terrorists. [10] And, Jeremiah Wright, the New Leader of the Black Liberation Movement was not mentioned. It is soothing to wallow in hate for leftists but Puffianna knew that even Marxists need limits on the scope of their propaganda and screeds. Islamo-Fascism has allies in this cluster. What happened to the $4 gas?

More:

“The only subject on which Palin displayed superior knowledge was when she corrected Biden on the proper delivery of "Drill, baby, drill!" Christie Hefner thought Palin's sex-tinged twist on the chant should be appropriated for a commercial. Perhaps for Viagra”

Isn’t Christie Hefner the Queen of Hustler or Screw or other example of male immorality? [Yes she is the chairperson and CEO of Playboy Enterprises.] We can always get an objective political analysis on sexual innuendos from some crotch magazine peddler. Christie can play the wooden nickel in this circus nicely as the price is right: 5 cents a pop.

“Here's how Esther Dyson put it: "It's pretty clear that Biden spent decades getting ready for this debate, learning from experience; Palin spent a couple of weeks, learning from handlers and speech coaches."

Esther Dyson is the Internet’s court jester, we understand, from the info in Huffie’s Puffy Post[11] It helps to have some choreographed follies for the audience where some clown shakes some rattles, cranks a pair of  phosphorescent pasties with digitally-controlled clockwise synchronization and waves the donkey’s jaw bone at the opposition to the tunes.  She can play the Monkey in this theatre.

We need to read more:

“"The home-spun homilies have to go," Martha Stewart told me. "And, oh my god, words do have ending consonants."

Martha must have spent several months analyzing the low-class homilies in jail for lying to the FBI in a frantic effort to cover up a stock insider trading scam. Jail birds frequently emerge from the can with new attitudes.   I wonder how many floors she scrubbed in the prison kitchen. Martha, for her fine work with her magazine can play the part of the Tin Cup here.  Listen for the tinny sound as the sucker’s dime rings her bell. She is a yodeling member of the Jail Bird Chorus in this intermezzo.

It is too bad that Cynthia McKinney is running against Obama. She would normally be an asset in this situation. Where was Barney Frank? Is he really a male?

So, we can thank Arianna for her entertaining post. She is a semi-conscious dupe for Marxism since her husband abandoned her for a better looking guy and can probably appreciate part of this comedy, but her wandering logic on this topic is fun to read. Roll the dice again Huffy and see if you can roll a 7 once in a while. It will take more phony votes and some other creative pains to elect this parasite. The Snake has eyes like yours PuffTime. Get a hood from the hood.

 Get Huffied and Puffed!

 rycK [a 5^th generation Californian in Exile and  safely removed from this mental infection. ]

 Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The NYT Hopes for Hope to Stick Taxpayers with Bad Debt for Political Reasons.

The Senate Bailout Swamp and Other Follies: The Taxpayers will Give you  Free Mortgages and Get Stuck for Carbon Taxes in Return.

The 400+ page screed that our idi0t Senators will ‘vote’ on is out it contains a cornucopia of goodies that reminds of some drunken biker’s acid trip.[1] This behemoth contains a swamp of sugar-coated goodies and a snarled and unworkable bureaucratic committee headed by the Secretary of the Treasure and modifies numerous other laws and regulations.

The general thrust is that the Secretary will have unlimited powers to buy and sell all sorts of financial assets and liabilities at his discretion with some vague regard to the rights of the taxpayers. There will be some oversight committee and a bunch of reports that appear to be arbitrary. They can stick the taxpayer with 350 bln dollars and give all sorts of tax bennies to special interests. The ability to foreclose on mortgages held by  deadbeats is apparently abrogated.

Here are a few juicy tidbits from this wreckage that include washing machine restrictions and tax relief for wooden arrows made by Indians.

The Hard Stuff:

SEC. 103. CONSIDERATIONS

(1) protecting the interests of taxpayers by

maximizing overall returns and minimizing the impact

on the national debt;

(2) providing stability and preventing disruption

to financial markets in order to limit the impact

on the economy and protect American jobs, savings,

and retirement security;

(3) the need to help families keep their homes

and to stabilize communities;

This reads as the foreclosure of any mortgage is probably prohibited or will not be used as an option.

SEC. 109. FORECLOSURE MITIGATION EFFORTS.

(a) RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING

STANDARDS.—To the extent that the Secretary acquires

mortgages, mortgage backed securities, and other assets

secured by residential real estate, including multifamily

housing, the Secretary shall implement a plan that seeks

to maximize assistance for homeowners and use the authority

of the Secretary to encourage the servicers of the

underlying mortgages, considering net present value to the

taxpayer, to take advantage of the HOPE for Homeowners

Program under section 257 of the National Housing

Act or other available programs to minimize foreclosures.

In addition, the Secretary may use loan guarantees

and credit enhancements to facilitate loan modifications

to prevent avoidable foreclosures.

This is a government license for people in default on their mortgages to not pay anything and maintain their residence at taxpayer expense.

c) CONSENT TO REASONABLE LOAN MODIFICATION

REQUESTS.—Upon any request arising under existing investment

contracts, the Secretary shall consent, where appropriate,

and considering net present value to the taxpayer,

to reasonable requests for loss mitigation measures,

including term extensions, rate reductions, principal write

downs, increases in the proportion of loans within a trust

or other structure allowed to be modified, or removal of

other limitation on modifications.

(2) MODIFICATIONS.—In the case of a residential

mortgage loan, modifications made under paragraph

(1) may include (A) reduction in interest rates;

(B) reduction of loan principal; and

(C) other similar modifications.

 We can only wonder what ‘similar’ means.

This apparently circumvents the bankruptcy courts and allows some bureaucrat to restructure mortgage contracts.

SEC. 115. GRADUATED AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE.

(a) AUTHORITY.—The authority of the Secretary to

purchase troubled assets under this Act shall be limited

as follows:

(1) Effective upon the date of enactment of this

Act, such authority shall be limited to

$250,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time.

(2) If at any time, the President submits to the

Congress a written certification that the Secretary

needs to exercise the authority under this paragraph,

effective upon such submission, such authority shall

be limited to $350,000,000,000 outstanding at any

one time.

So, this is a 350 bln dollar bailout.

SEC. 122. INCREASE IN STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United

States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation

contained in such subsection and inserting

‘‘$11,315,000,000,000’’.

There is an unintelligible b) GOLDEN PARACHUTE RULE buried in legalese.

There is more fluff and EcoNazi burdens in this mess:

There is huge pile  of hooey about energy credits. This crap extends for 250 pages:

SEC. 117. CARBON AUDIT OF THE TAX CODE.

(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

enter into an agreement with the National Academy of

Sciences to undertake a comprehensive review of the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 to identify the types of and

specific tax provisions that have the largest effects on carbon

and other greenhouse gas emissions and to estimate

the magnitude of those effects.

(c) CARBON CAPTURE REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN

FUELS.—

 Who knows what this means. The EcoNazis get a bunch of stuff here.

(a) PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLE

CREDIT.

SEC. 211. TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT TO BICYCLE

COMMUTERS.

(4) TOP-LOADING CLOTHES WASHER.—

(5) GALLONS PER CYCLE; WATER CONSUMPTION

FACTOR.—

Sec. 322. Tax incentives for investment in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 314. INDIAN EMPLOYMENT CREDIT

SEC. 315. ACCELERATED DEPRECIATION FOR BUSINESS

PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

SEC. 503. EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX FOR CERTAIN

WOODEN ARROWS DESIGNED FOR USE BY CHILDREN.

This is a circus.

Vote out all of these parasites out of office.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The Babbling Brooks of the NYT Babbles about Nihilism with Innovative Socialist and Nihilist Overtones.  Raise Taxes!

 As we read the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]-- we must be alert for new visions and slants on the political activities of our times. We must also be in a position to identify and highlight the brassy stoogery and pedestrian-level platitudes of the left as they festoon the written works of this paper.  Problems, nearly all, must be solved by government as we are always instructed that this is proper and fair and ‘democratic. ‘Always replete with noisy praise and grand salutations for some misguided person’s replastered precept of socialism or Marxism  that must be summarily incorporated into our society with great alacrity and song, we must follow the clarion calls, sound off to the alerts,  hear the trumpets ring and scrounge  for suitable social solutions for problems.  Taxes are the only way. Higher taxes can only heighten our glory as a nation in the views of the left. We are now instructed in the nostrum of some New Nihilism as nothing else has worked for the left so let us try that one.[2]

  Such comments and conclusions are supplied daily like chum to the fish by the New York Times.[3] There is always some pressing grave threat to society than can be handily solved with a good stiff tax increase. We are recurrently offered detailed analyses of: how we were steered into this swamp by capitalism, how the tax increase opportunity that will hoist us from the communal latrines, and, how we learn, anew, about the basics and root causes of our societal problems. Liberalism always provides a solution.  Capitalism and private property are always the culprits. Such is the mission and mantra of the Times and, today, our Babbling Brooks[4] comments on the urgent need to soak the taxpayers for faulty loans to mollify and stimulate the voting habits of deadbeats and losers and illegal aliens and the urgent reasons why we need to vote for Obama who will give us more of this. Let us all rush to Ohio and get wasted on drugs and sex and then vote in one day and crawl back to our home states. That works for the New York Times.

 Today Brooks gives us a history lesson:

 “In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt inherited an economic crisis. He understood that his first job was to restore confidence, to give people a sense that somebody was in charge, that something was going to be done.”[5]-- Revolt of the Nihilists By David Brooks Op-Ed [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]This link references all quotes in this essay unless otherwise stated.

 In 1929 FDR gave a speech on the stock market crash on TV and wowed the audience. This is also political history as we understand it from the Obama camp.[6] This, from Joe Biden swells us with confidence in his ability to redact history and relate the outcome to the current political scene.  We need to hear more from Joe Biden.[7] We need some of his authority.

 More:

 “This generation of political leaders is confronting a similar situation, and, so far, they have failed utterly and catastrophically to project any sense of authority, to give the world any reason to believe that this country is being governed. Instead, by rejecting the rescue package on Monday, they have made the psychological climate much worse.”

 The notion that there is no authority here is proof of the New Nihilism of the Left. Our phony government hangs on us for alms like some delirious chancre mechanic in a San Francisco alleyway. It is convenient to turn any nostrum to advantage in politics. We heard from Clinton that taxes would be ‘investments” too. This is actually an investment in failure and socialism if we look at other sectors of history and, in particular, at Fannie Mae like Jim Anderson[8] and his fellow money-grubbing parasites like Franklin Raines[9] with the ringing praise of Al Gore and his EcoNazis[10]. There was the place where any hint or attempt to “to project any sense of authority” went into the latrines. This was a crude grab of cash from the banks to pay off the low class for their votes with free housing. Socialism works in this limited sense.

 Rants frustra

 “Was the media darling Barney Frank too busy to notice the 95 Democrats who opposed his bill? Pelosi’s fiery speech at the crucial moment didn’t actually kill this bill, but did she have to act like a Democratic fund-raiser at the most important moment of her career?”

 Yes. The whole purpose of this mess is to blame Republicans for phony political economics where it says that you must give mortgages to deadbeats and illegal aliens and that the taxpayer must subsidize this political gift. We need to hear more from Barney Frank[11], Good Time Charlie Rangel[12], Dingy Hairy Reid[13] and Chris Dodd.[14] They are pillars of Reason and Integrity.

 “And let us recognize above all the 228 who voted no — the authors of this revolt of the nihilists. They showed the world how much they detest their own leaders and the collected expertise of the Treasury and Fed.”

 How many of these were in the Black Caucus Babbs? 21 members vote NO?[15] How does our Babbler explain the split? He works half a loaf and ignores the fact that dedicated Marxists and Supplicants for Reparations voted against this gem?

 Now we find the fulcrum of this crummy logic. If we do not fall face down in shame and ignominy and rush to soak the taxpayers for some phantasm then we must be ignoring reality. That makes sense for a frustrated liberal who thinks he might have once been a ‘conservative.’ Lets us all panic and throw our economy in the socialist toilet like the idiot Europeans have done. We can all wallow in failure and Sharia Law. Why not let the illegal aliens make the decision. They have been successful in the past in getting around government and taxes. Sounds like they can be trusted more than liberals or other mindless stooges who read the New York Times.

 “If this economy slides, they will go down in history as the Smoot-Hawleys of the 21st century.”

 Here begins the fatalistic version of the nihilism that our Babbler babbles about as he plays the ‘objective’ observer in this theatre. There is only one reason for an impending failure and we hear this all the time from the Phony Times and their socialist droolers.

 The solution, of course, and the only reason this guy has a job at the near-bankrupt New York Times is this in his own words: Big Government.

 “What we need in this situation is authority. Not heavy-handed government regulation, but the steady and powerful hand of some public institutions that can guard against the corrupting influences of sloppy money and then prevent destructive contagions when the credit dries up.”

 How about a War on Poverty? Or, how about a Social Security. We have a lot of faith in that one. That really worked out swell and we note that when Bush wanted to fix this time bomb—much bigger than Fannie or Frumpie Mollie, they said we ‘have plenty of time.” How about we set up some kind of New Fannie Mae to back up our mortgages and give us confidence in the housing markets? Why not double taxes on corporations and give us all a lift toward economic prosperity.

 The only credit that is drying up is the places where deadbeats get it for voting Democrats.  People have stopped lending to drug addicts and illegal aliens and deadbeats. Does Brooks know the stock market went up nearly 500 points yesterday. Maybe that was a sigh of relief as business missed, narrowly, another massive tax burden. Why is Asia up this morning?[16]

 “The Congressional plan was nobody’s darling, but it was an effort to assert some authority. “

 A mugger who has just bashed out the brains of some old lady for her welfare check fits this description as well. The idiot Europeans[17] know all about the ‘authority’ of their governments as the taxes soar, the price of gas rises and the Islamo-Fascists burn cars in the streets. We can all wonder if the crooks have a better plan for the economy than the New York Times and the leftist stooges who parade around talking about responsibility like Nancy Pelosi[18] and Barney Frank. Barney Frank is he darling of many. Al Capone and Big Bill Thompson ran Chicago better than the current parasites.[19]

 Obama is the most far-left politician every to run for office in this country.  A vote for this idiot is a vote for economic failure and that is exactly what the Times wants. They cannot compete with capitalism and private initiative and property must be controlled with sever taxes and ‘authority.’ We heard this crap from the Times since 1918.

 rycK

 Comments: ryckki@gmail.com