About Me

Name: rycK
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

98 Reasons Why Nancy Pelosi Should Not Blame Republicans for Failure to Socialize Bad Debt

98 Reasons Why Nancy Pelosi Should Not Blame Republicans for Failure to Socialize Bad Debt

Nancy Pelosi has a caustic and reptilian personal manner and ought to have sought a career in shrinking heads or perhaps  checking for disease in one of  her Asian Massage Parlors. Yesterday, the steaming sputum drenched the floor of Congress as she let loose with a speech[1] that would make Mussolini blush. She threatened the Republicans with the cause of here failure and then 95 of her own Democrats voted against her. That accounts for 95 of the good reasons.

Could we hear from Nancy as to why 95 of her own voted against her? Is it true that more Dems voted against the bill than Republicans?

The other three are the criminal bribe-takers Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and Socialism.

Chris Dodd and Backside Barney prevented reform of Fannie Mae so they could take bribes and make neighborhood heroes out of Jim Johnson and Franklin Raines, two plundering socialist parasites who sucked big salaries and bonuses out of the system while they piled up several trillion dollars worth of bad mortgages. The scheme here is simple: You just give away houses to illegal aliens, people no credit, drug addicts, criminals, felons and others in trade for their votes and left the government with the bad debt. Now, they want the taxpayers to cover this scheme and what will they continue to do:

 

MAKE MORE BAD LOANS AND SUBZIDIZE THE LOSSES WITH MORE TAXES??

 

YES, THAT IS THEIR PLAN.

All this is made possible by the phony and socialist CRA Act.  John McCain warns us of the Fannie Mae three-card Monte Scam:[2]

For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs--and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. ..  GSEs need to be reformed without delay.

… the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.”—see full paragraphs below.

Now, who blocked this legislation? Well here is the list of the bribees who did:

 


Top Recipients of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
Name                                  Office                  State    Party   Grand Total
Dodd, Christopher          S                             CT         D     $165,400
Obama, Barack                 S                             IL          D     $126,349
Kerry, John                       S                             MA        D     $111,000

The CRA [Community Reinvestment Act]is the barnyard engine that runs the phony Marxist Mortgage Scheme.[3] It says that you MUST give mortgages to minorities and others, period. There is no responsibility here for them to make payments on the loans if they fail. Now, Nancy Pelosi and the bribees from the Senate want the US taxpayer  to cove the bad debt and allow the courts to fix up the loans by reducing the principal, interest rates and such and let the tax payer pay t he difference.

Here is the criminal bribee Chris Dodd’s assessment of Fannie Mae:

To suggest somehow that [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] are in trouble is simply not accurate,” Dodd replied.

The facts are that Fannie and Freddie are in sound situations,” Dodd said. “They have more that adequate capital, in fact more than the law requires.”

When pressed about the recent IndyMac Bank federal takeover, Dodd said that could have been avoided if there had been proper regulations in place to monitor the sub-prime mortgage market.

IndyMac closed on Friday after federal regulators realized that the bank was no longer capable of guaranteeing deposits. The bank was also a large issuer of sub-prime mortgages.”[4]—Chris Dodd

How does that speech work for you?

How about a lisping message from one of the Queens of the House about how secure Fannie Mae is:

"These two entities—Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."[5]—Backside Barney Frank

The price is right Barney—free housing!

Well, that adds up to 95 or more.

These leftist parasites defended the disaster before it happened and now blame Bush for the disaster even though Bush and his people warned us of this in 2003.[6]

This is all Marxist politics at its best. Whatever happens the wealth of the honest people in this country must be handed over to losers, drug addicts , illegal aliens and others who vote to keep Pelosi, Dodd and Frank in office.

Tell your elected officials how happy you are with this arrangement.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com



[2] http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=109-s20060525-16&bill=s109-190

For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs--and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO's report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO's report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.

I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act

Community Reinvestment Act (or CRA, Pub.L. 95-128, title VIII, 91 Stat. 1147, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.)

Community Reinvestment Act (or CRA, Pub.L. 95-128, title VIII, 91 Stat. 1147, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.) is a United States federal law that requires banks and thrifts to offer credit throughout their entire market area and prohibits them from targeting only wealthier neighborhoods with their services, a practice known as "redlining."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive