The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray Lady Lashes Out the Other Old Red Lady and Billy too.

We can always   derive some new slants on current political themes and get feedback on errant trail balloons from reading the political essays of the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]. The Old Red Lady, that moniker given the Maureen Dowd, owning more to her electric hairdo than her latent Leninism, is attempting to change ‘change public opinion’ using, what else, the “c” [change] word. If she was a warrior in one of her past incarnations, her trophy belt would sport a bale of scalps from her political enemies. In the print world, few others have a body count more impressive than  hers. Today, the Dowdy Dowd hammers the Clintons and particularly Billy Jeff.

Here we go:

“Unity was spared the banality of unanimity.” [2]-- ‘It’s Over, Lady!’ By Maureen Dowd

Whatever this might mean, and there are legions of interpretations, we are not spared such spurious wordsmithing by this author along with her oblique literary antecedents. This opening line is almost redundant, but, then, this is the New York Times.

“Just as Hillary was testing out the unfamiliar familiarity “Barack and me” Friday and talking about “his grace and his grit,” Carmella began loudly booing and waving her sign.

“We want Hillary!” screamed the 57-year-old retired ad saleswoman and Clinton delegate.”

Well, the quest for unanimity part has been deciphered.  So, what do we say about those who support one who got essentially half the votes in the primary??

““It’s over, lady!” yelled some Obama supporters a few yards away.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Now, what does this mean?

“Standing between the Sharks and the Jets, David Axelrod took pity on an older friend of Carmella’s who was suffering from aridity in the Unity humidity. The chief Obama strategist fetched a glass of water and brought it to the woman, who was wearing five Hillary buttons.

This amenity did not stop the disunity. Carmella and her friends continued to cry, “Nobama!” “We love you, Hillary!” and “We need Hillary!” as Barack Obama sat onstage on a stool behind his former rival, his finger studiously at his lips.”

What this appears to be is division and unrest amongst the Democrats. This is apparently a nasty fracture in the monolithic racist facade erected by The Changeling and his Jeremiah Wright Homies. We need some crack repair or some mouth plugs or to run some mandatory sensitivity courses for disgruntled Democrats who think Obama is really Hussein O’Bozo.

So, what does at the NYT suggest they [or we?] do about that?

There are now described and documented some unseemly antics by some Hillary activist named Carmella who refused to genuflect in the golden glow of Obama and her unsophisticated words are recounted drably in this referenced text, but  the outcome was:

“Afterward, Carmella got her idol to autograph her sign, telling the smiling Hillary, “You’re going to be the next president.”

She told The Times that she and her friends were all voting for John McCain and that Hillary was just doing what she had to do.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

If we recall the exciting 2000 election history of the Ralph Nader Circus, the nadir[3] of EcoNazism[4] of recent history, we can calculate that a mere 2% dissent in the party will give the election to McCain. Thus, the NYT elves must plaster this crack in the dike and keep the simpletons and droolers buried in the leftist sack crafted by Obama and his overt racists.  Didn’t this happen during the George McGovern Era?? Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro[5] are the two highest visibility racists in the Party of Democrats.

““But I have a gut feeling,” she said with macabre faith, “that something’s going to happen so that she becomes the nominee.”

This could mean several things.

“It’s hard to fathom why Obama should be mau-maued[6] into paying off the debt that Hillary and Bill accrued attacking and undermining him, while mismanaging the campaign and their nearly quarter-billion-dollar war chest so horribly that one Hillaryland insider told The New Republic that it bordered on fraud.

But the former president can’t stand being a loser, so he’s taking it out on the winner. When it comes to Bill, there’s a lot of vanity but very little humility in Unity.”

I think he and Hill won 8 straight and now they spent 250 big one and lost?? No IOUs left?

The Old Red Lady has NO solution to this mess other than to tell Billary to shut up and flake off as she has done in the past.[7] Together they have 30 years of political victories and they should just fade away as old soldiers might? Sure.

B. Hussein O’Bozo has torpedoed the party and now the fires of reverse racism start to burn. All the Old Gray Lady can think to do is crank out protoobamic Pinch Pustules [8]on the op-ed pages and hope they can avoid bankruptcy before November. Recall that they endorsed Hillary in the beginning. A new little taste of overt racism suddenly appeared on the political block that forced them to switch to the candidate with the farthest left stance and the one whose toadies raved about racism like rabid dogs. Jeremiah Wright certainly has more sway with the New York Times than Bill Clinton, now sour in the grape and thought. Al Sharpton has now gained respectability.

Let us frolic thru the follies!!

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com