Posted by
rycK on Sunday, June 15, 2008 2:41:38 PM
Propaganda Gem: Frank the Crank Clarifies Anger for the Women Voters and the Polls Show Obama Wins the Most Women!
We can always appreciate the propagandistic essays of the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]-- as they attempt to ‘form public opinion’ by cherry-picking and redacting history and attempting to persuade voters who are not liberals to vote for their candidate. [Oooops. Did the NYT endorse Hillary?]. Somebody once said that history must be carefully rewritten to justify the candidates for the next election.[2] We women who “love” McCain are the epicenter of this episode of Frank the Crank as he cranks out more little disinformation snippets sausage machine style. He even puts a black heart into his title! How macabre, but appropriate of him.
In the tasteless style of the one of Pinch’s most delectable pustules[3], we read this today:
“TEN years ago John McCain had to apologize for regaling a Republican audience with a crude sexual joke about Hillary and Chelsea Clinton and Janet Reno. Last year he had to explain why he didn’t so much as flinch when a supporter asked him on camera, “How do we beat the b*t*h?” But these days Mr. McCain just loves the women” [4]-- Angry Clinton Women ♥ McCain? By Frank Rich. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
His answer should have Obama and the New York Times—they will handle this nicely. Obama fixed that b*t*h.
Jingo Janet Reno, the Mad Burner, is a joke, but the sexual part of her persona is an essay in beggaring description in human terms. She is famous for gassing children with military CS gas dispersed in Methylene chloride while in a psychotic tirade against some persons who were thought to having illegal sex but she would purr with delight as full term babies have their brains sucked out of their heads as they scream. Clinton was not part of this sexual war on America, strangely, as Janet must not have read the newspapers about his antics with the sink in the Oval Office study. We should not tell off-chemical jokes about Janet or off-sink jokes about M0nica.
We turn the crank some more:
“One of the few visible women in the McCain campaign hierarchy, Carly Fiorina[5], has declared herself “enormously proud” of Mrs. Clinton and is barnstorming to win over Democratic women to her guy’s cause.”
Fiorina’s performance in destroying Hewlett Packard’s bottom line makes here a prime choice to go after Hillary’s supporters. Maybe she can destroy Obama or O’Bozo as I now call him after his phony economics and tax policies. She has more testosterone than John McCain has.
“New polls show Mr. Obama opening up a huge lead among female voters — beating Mr. McCain by 13 percentage points in the Gallup and Rasmussen polls and by 19 points in the latest Wall Street Journal-NBC News survey.
How huge is a 13- to 19-percentage-point lead? John Kerry[6] won women by only 3 points, Al Gore by 11.”
“Only an earthquake — the Iowa results, for instance — could shatter such previously immutable story lines as the Clinton campaign’s invincibility and the innate hostility of white voters to a black candidate.”
Oh, were the polls wrong on I0wa??
Delegates at Stake: 45[7]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gee, some polls had Hillary winning? Only the local newspaper got close. But, Frank wants us to believe the new polls? Really?
Wasn’t all this Iowa stuff before Obama made his bigoted and racist remarks about ‘typical white people’ who ‘cling to their guns and religion’ in standard Harvard paternalistic prose?[8] Too bad we cannot repeat this to see if Iowa voters were offended.
Didn’t this also come before Jeremiah Wright’s national appearance upon the stage for us to ‘clarify’ is position on whites?
“But the notion that all female Clinton supporters became “angry white women” once their candidate lost — to the hysterical extreme where even lifelong Democrats would desert their own party en masse — is itself a sexist stereotype. That’s why some of the same talking heads and Republican operatives who gleefully insulted Mrs. Clinton are now peddling this fable on such flimsy anecdotal evidence.”
Did Frank the Crank read the exit polls in KY, WVA and PA?? And, these were Democrat women! The New York Times would never deal with sexist stereotyping as they do in this piece.
More on polls:
“Since that poll [“NBC Nightly News” and The Wall Street Journal presented their new poll results last week (Obama, 47 percent; McCain, 41 percent) ..ed]gives Mr. Obama not just a 19-point lead among all women but also a 7-point lead among white women, a 6-point deficit in one sliver of the female pie is hardly a heart-stopper. Nor is Mr. Obama’s showing among white men shocking news. No Democratic presidential candidate, including Bill Clinton, has won a majority of that declining demographic since 1964. Mr. Kerry lost white men by 25 points, and Mr. Gore did by 24 points (even as he won the popular vote).”
Well, it looks like the polls have it and we should ignore the next five months. From the Crank’s writings here, there is no way McCain is going get more than 40% or so and will probably only get 20 electoral votes. Maybe he can beat McGovern’s record as a loser? Was John Kerry really white?
The New York Times has looked into the past and the future and has pr0jected that a 100%, racist, elitist, black liberal will sweep the country along with his angry black wife.[9]
I am not even going to bother to vote as Frank has now convinced me. I can save gas by staying at home. But, then, there is David Brooks, the Dr of Doom who wonders about Obama even winning.[10]
And finishing up:
“The ludicrous idea that votes from Clinton supporters would somehow make up for McCain defectors is merely the latest fairy tale brought to you by those same Washington soothsayers who said Fred Thompson was the man to beat and that young people don’t turn up to vote.”
Didn’t many Washington soothsayers say Hillary was the anointed?? Did the New York Times say that? Did they endorse Hillary?
A little NYT history lesion by the New York Times!
“By choosing Mrs. Clinton, we are not denying Mr. Obama’s appeal or his gifts….
The next president needs to start immediately on challenges that will require concrete solutions, resolve, and the ability to make government work. Mrs. Clinton is more qualified, right now, to be president….
When we endorsed Mrs. Clinton in 2006, we were certain she would continue to be a great senator, but since her higher ambitions were evident, we wondered if she could present herself as a leader to the nation.
Her ideas, her comeback in New Hampshire and strong showing in Nevada, her new openness to explaining herself and not just her programs, and her abiding, powerful intellect show she is fully capable of doing just that. She is the best choice for the Democratic Party as it tries to regain the White House.”[11]
Gee, was all that bubbly from the New York Times? Does Frank Rich work there?
Frank forgot to mention that is was Bill Clinton who said Obama’s run was a fairy tale. Is this a fairy tale about fairy tales or fairy tails? There are polls, trolls and fairy tails and songs. Let us cherry pick among the fray and design our own predictions! Such fun.
Isn’t the New York Times wonderful? Raise taxes and bring prosperity!
rycK
Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com
[1] In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.
[4] Angry Clinton Women ♥ McCain? By FRANK RICH Op-Ed Columnist
Published: June 15, 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/15/opinion/15rich.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
[5] As HP's performance slowed, the Board of Directors became increasingly concerned. In early January 2005, the HP Board of Directors presented Fiorina with a four-page list of issues the board had with Fiorina's performance.[22] A week after the meeting, the plan was leaked to the Wall Street Journal.[23] The board proposed a plan to shift her authority to HP division heads, which Fiorina resisted.[24]
On 9 February 2005, Carly Fiorina was dismissed as chairman and chief executive officer of HP. "While I regret the board and I have differences about how to execute HP's strategy, I respect their decision," Fiorina said in a statement. "HP is a great company and I wish all the people of HP much success in the future." She was replaced by Patricia C. Dunn as chairman and CFO Robert Wayman as CEO.[25] Hewlett-Packard's stock jumped 7% on news of her departure.[26]
Under Hewlett-Packard's severance agreement, Carly Fiorina received US $21 million in cash, which was 2.5 times her base annual salary.[27] On March 8, 2006, two large institutional investors filed suit against Hewlett-Packard for violating its own severance cap when it doled out a multimillion-dollar payment to Fiorina as part of her termination agreement.[28] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carly_Fiorina
[8] The Obama Speech outlined the salient fact that intrinsic racism is embedded too deeply into the black society to be set aside or even moderated. The leading racist in North America, after David Duke, of course, is now Geraldine Ferraro. That is a major surprise for several reasons. Radical racism must be accommodated into his presidential run. With the prospect of power we hear of revenge. The whites must be punished. Pundits from the gulches and other places such as the Old Red Lady[8] offer the suggestion that Obama ought to refrain from labels like ‘“[the] typical white person” because typically white people don’t like to be reminded of their prejudices.’[8] Dowd adds in the rest of the political poison with:
“But Republicans are salivating over Reverend Wright’s “God damn America” imprecation and his post-9/11 “America’s chickens coming home to roost” crack, combined with Michelle Obama’s aggrieved line about belatedly feeling really proud of her country.”[8]
The Race Wars are On: Obama Sends His Party into the Dumpster.
Posted by rycK on Wednesday, March 26, 20082:26:33 PM
http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/03/26/the_race_wars_are_on_obama_sends_his_party_into_the_dumpster.thtml