Posted by
rycK on Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:27:40 PM
Frank The Crank of the NYT Glubbers and Toots over Obama.
We know that the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]-- always praises and anoints some person, frequently chosen at random or who wandered in from a race riot to elevate to the position of messiah or higher if there is a corresponding leftist term Today we are treated to a little celebration party that toasts the future if socialism and other random desired of the left. Today we get a lesson from Frank the Crank [Rich][2]
In an article entitled [3] One Historic Night, Two Americas we swim in the luxuriance and honey of his prose:
“WHEN Barack Obama achieved his historic victory on Tuesday night, the battle was joined between two Americas. Not John Edwards’s two Americas, divided between rich and poor. Not the Americas split by race, gender, party or ideology. What looms instead is an epic showdown between two wildly different visions of the country, from the ground up.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]
This is a serious cognitive coagulation of opposing elements of circular logic. Here we have some nots that were strewn around like crack vials on the walkways of Central Park that fly in the faces and limited mental spaces of those who believe in the basis tenets of liberalism: take the money and wealth from the rich and keep most of the governing elites while manufacturing hollow speeches about the poor. [a paraphrase of Trotsky.] The first not negates liberal history and the second not negates the ever-present and prescient racism that is celebrated by the leftist, particularly at the New York Times. Perhaps he wants us to consider the opposite of what he preaches here.
This reminds us of the ‘but monkey’ syndrome liberals use frequently, a nifty analysis toolwe learned from Laura Ingraham.[4] The ‘not’ apparently oozes from Times past with a twist of terms.[5]
He gushes on with this:
“On one side stands Mr. Obama’s resolutely cheerful embrace of the future[6]. His vision is inseparable from his identity, both as a rookie with a slim Washington résumé and as a black American whose triumph was regarded as improbable by voters of all races only months ago. On the other is John McCain’s promise of a wise warrior’s vigilant conservation of the past. His vision, too, is inseparable from his identity — as a government lifer who has spent his entire career in service, whether in the Navy or Washington.”
This is like Zoroastrianism where there is an eternal battle between light and darkness.[7] The light is high taxes and the darkness is capitalism. What is not mentioned here in Frank’s soggy salutes to the most far-left candidate since Eugene Debbs[8] is Obama’s racism and intimate associations with psychotic religion mongers and criminals like Rezko not to mention terrorists like Bill Ayers? Where is the discussion of Obama’s antipathy comments and elitist contempt of whites?[9]
“Mr. McCain only reminded voters that he, like Mrs. Clinton, thinks that change is nothing more than a marketing gimmick. He has no idea what it means. “No matter who wins this election, the direction of this country is going to change dramatically,” he said on Tuesday. He then grimly regurgitated Goldwater and Reagan government-bashing talking points from the 1960s and ’70s even as he presumed to accuse Mr. Obama of looking “to the 1960s and ’70s for answers.”
“Change” has not been identified by Obama in terms other than high taxes and punishment of the wealthy and corporations for their alleged greed. Our government is a failure and acts like a pack of baboons trailing behind a slaughter house truck for what falls off in the road. Change here can only meant that MORE money is needed, as usual, by the sordid left and their elites will be more than happy to dissect the gains of the ‘rich’, keep much of this for themselves and then chuck a few crumbs to the mentally disnimble who will vote for them and believe in their screeds because they are really besotted with ignorance, sloth, sodomy and drugs. The left cannot explain or even recommend a different course other than to peruse their old, stale, phony quests for more ‘education’ and social programs that have failed. They will try to clone the Great Society and repeat that disaster as long as the ‘rich’ pay for the exercise. They want to legalize drugs.
Frank offers us nothing but a restroke of past leftist disasters. Perhaps he ignored the Jimmy Carter Era.
Here are the issues that Frank the Crank will not put on the table.
[1] Obama is a racist and so is his wife.
[2] Obama is an elitist who believes that he can direct the flow of wealth and resources better than anybody else.
[3] Obama is intimately connected with flagrant and outrageous racists in his church and will not state publicly that he rejects the overt racism he listened to for 20 years. He lies about his knowledge of Jeremiah Wright’ hateful remarks about whites and must have missed his psychotic rants. Frank Rich will print excerpts of his macaca mumbo but not mention the comments of Obama?[10]
[4] Obama will not reject his friend Ayers of 20years.
[5] Obama will not discuss his Saul Alinsky communist background and gutter-grade activism that he began his career with.
[6] Obama will not discuss how he might pay for expensive and foolish social programs.
[7] Obama insists on using ‘diplomacy,’ decoded as appeasement, of our enemies and how he will not pursue the terrorist that bombed the TwinTowers. Did he recently reverse himself on the Jerusalem issue?? He lied and will not support Israel.
[8] Obama will not discuss what he intends to do about illegal immigration.
[9] Obama will not discuss his cap and trade taxation program that will certainly ruin our economy.
Frank Rich will not broach these snarly issues; the complete explanation of several would sink the Obama Ship. Rich mumbles about ‘change’ in his changeless manner.
The Final Turn of the Crank:
“The selling point of Mr. Obama’s vision of change is not doctrinaire liberalism or Bush-bashing but an inclusiveness that he believes can start to relieve Washington’s gridlock much as it animated his campaign.”
Big time lies here. This is doctrinaire liberalism and Obama’s senate voting record is 100% left liberal. We can translate the word gridlock here as the opposition to confiscatory taxes.
The New York Times is so based in baseless economics and hopeless Marxism that they will suborn lies and the complete swathing of their Marxist candidate in moderate or messianic clothing. No doctrinaire liberalism here!
“This is a fairy tale”—Bill Clinton.
rycK
Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com
[1] In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.
[6] I bet the Kulaks were ‘cheerful’ to meet the Cheka and their firing squads.
[7] “Zoroaster was known as a sage, magician, and miracle-worker in post-Classical Western culture. Though almost nothing was known of his ideas until the late 18th century, by that time his name was already associated with lost ancient wisdom. Zoroaster appears as “Sarastro” in Mozart’s opera Die Zauberflöte, which has been noted for its Masonic elements, where he represents moral order (cf. Asha) in opposition to the “Queen of the Night.” And “Zoroaster’s ethical dualism is - to an extent - incorporated in Mani’s doctrine, which viewed the world as being locked in an epic battle between opposing forces of good and evil” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroaster
[10]The NYT wants us to get off Reverend Wright…[Remember the Macaca Follies?]
http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/05/03/the_nyt_wants_us_to_get_off_reverend_wright…[remember_the_macaca_follies].thtml.