The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray Lady Lashes Out the Other Old Red Lady and Billy too.

We can always   derive some new slants on current political themes and get feedback on errant trail balloons from reading the political essays of the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]. The Old Red Lady, that moniker given the Maureen Dowd, owning more to her electric hairdo than her latent Leninism, is attempting to change ‘change public opinion’ using, what else, the “c” [change] word. If she was a warrior in one of her past incarnations, her trophy belt would sport a bale of scalps from her political enemies. In the print world, few others have a body count more impressive than  hers. Today, the Dowdy Dowd hammers the Clintons and particularly Billy Jeff.

Here we go:

“Unity was spared the banality of unanimity.” [2]-- ‘It’s Over, Lady!’ By Maureen Dowd

Whatever this might mean, and there are legions of interpretations, we are not spared such spurious wordsmithing by this author along with her oblique literary antecedents. This opening line is almost redundant, but, then, this is the New York Times.

“Just as Hillary was testing out the unfamiliar familiarity “Barack and me” Friday and talking about “his grace and his grit,” Carmella began loudly booing and waving her sign.

“We want Hillary!” screamed the 57-year-old retired ad saleswoman and Clinton delegate.”

Well, the quest for unanimity part has been deciphered.  So, what do we say about those who support one who got essentially half the votes in the primary??

““It’s over, lady!” yelled some Obama supporters a few yards away.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Now, what does this mean?

“Standing between the Sharks and the Jets, David Axelrod took pity on an older friend of Carmella’s who was suffering from aridity in the Unity humidity. The chief Obama strategist fetched a glass of water and brought it to the woman, who was wearing five Hillary buttons.

This amenity did not stop the disunity. Carmella and her friends continued to cry, “Nobama!” “We love you, Hillary!” and “We need Hillary!” as Barack Obama sat onstage on a stool behind his former rival, his finger studiously at his lips.”

What this appears to be is division and unrest amongst the Democrats. This is apparently a nasty fracture in the monolithic racist facade erected by The Changeling and his Jeremiah Wright Homies. We need some crack repair or some mouth plugs or to run some mandatory sensitivity courses for disgruntled Democrats who think Obama is really Hussein O’Bozo.

So, what does at the NYT suggest they [or we?] do about that?

There are now described and documented some unseemly antics by some Hillary activist named Carmella who refused to genuflect in the golden glow of Obama and her unsophisticated words are recounted drably in this referenced text, but  the outcome was:

“Afterward, Carmella got her idol to autograph her sign, telling the smiling Hillary, “You’re going to be the next president.”

She told The Times that she and her friends were all voting for John McCain and that Hillary was just doing what she had to do.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

If we recall the exciting 2000 election history of the Ralph Nader Circus, the nadir[3] of EcoNazism[4] of recent history, we can calculate that a mere 2% dissent in the party will give the election to McCain. Thus, the NYT elves must plaster this crack in the dike and keep the simpletons and droolers buried in the leftist sack crafted by Obama and his overt racists.  Didn’t this happen during the George McGovern Era?? Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro[5] are the two highest visibility racists in the Party of Democrats.

““But I have a gut feeling,” she said with macabre faith, “that something’s going to happen so that she becomes the nominee.”

This could mean several things.

“It’s hard to fathom why Obama should be mau-maued[6] into paying off the debt that Hillary and Bill accrued attacking and undermining him, while mismanaging the campaign and their nearly quarter-billion-dollar war chest so horribly that one Hillaryland insider told The New Republic that it bordered on fraud.

But the former president can’t stand being a loser, so he’s taking it out on the winner. When it comes to Bill, there’s a lot of vanity but very little humility in Unity.”

I think he and Hill won 8 straight and now they spent 250 big one and lost?? No IOUs left?

The Old Red Lady has NO solution to this mess other than to tell Billary to shut up and flake off as she has done in the past.[7] Together they have 30 years of political victories and they should just fade away as old soldiers might? Sure.

B. Hussein O’Bozo has torpedoed the party and now the fires of reverse racism start to burn. All the Old Gray Lady can think to do is crank out protoobamic Pinch Pustules [8]on the op-ed pages and hope they can avoid bankruptcy before November. Recall that they endorsed Hillary in the beginning. A new little taste of overt racism suddenly appeared on the political block that forced them to switch to the candidate with the farthest left stance and the one whose toadies raved about racism like rabid dogs. Jeremiah Wright certainly has more sway with the New York Times than Bill Clinton, now sour in the grape and thought. Al Sharpton has now gained respectability.

Let us frolic thru the follies!!

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Krugman of the NYT Condones, Predicts and Celebrates High Gas Prices.

We can always   derive some historical and future political theorems  from  the political essays of the NYT—aka the Walter Duranty Papers[1]-- as they attempt to ‘form public opinion’          or justify the antics of their ideological partners in Congress by suggesting new and sweeping changes that ultimately lead to socialism and the loss of Constitutional Rights.  Today, the notion that oil prices may decline is pooh-poohed.

“Congress has always had a soft spot for “experts” who tell members what they want to hear, whether it’s supply-side economists declaring that tax cuts increase revenue or climate-change skeptics insisting that global warming is a myth.”[2]-- Fuels on the Hill By PAUL KRUGMAN June 27, 2008.  [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Read “stooges” for experts here as in the case of Alar where some dim bulb from Hollywood named Meryl Streep, mounted the stand and  testified using her what—talents?[3] She must be some kind of ‘expert’ on something. But, she was wrong.  Using Krugman as an analogy, she is probably as good or betters a biochemist or pharmacologist as our krugmaniacal writer for the NYT is skilled in elementary economics.

Notice that the only two ‘expert theories’ mentioned in his opening burst are implicitly counterfeit as they favor the unacceptable supply-side economics or dump on climate-change critics who expose the phony science[4] in their plans.[5] This is typical in a propagandistic screed where some hot points are included in the opening verses and used to misdirect the reader. The New York Times is skilled in such propaganda. [6] These theorems are false as supply-side economics works well but to the detriment of the left and the EcoNazis are a phony as a Frank the Crank Rich [7]op-ed piece.

So, the propagandistic props are set up for the freak show:

“Right now, the welcome mat is out for analysts who claim that out-of-control speculators are responsible for $4-a-gallon gas.”

This is as phony as writing long essays that disprove that Barack O’Bozo is not a Muslim. All leftists celebrate the high gas prices and are going to the mat on this one.

“Back in May, Michael Masters, a hedge fund manager, made a big splash when he told a Senate committee that speculation is the main cause of rising prices for oil and other raw materials.”

This is like saying that howling dogs are responsible for the high cost of dog food. Masters is nobody and everybody knows that. His opinions are worthless except for those who foolishly bought shares in his scam. The role of speculators is usually to flatter out highs and lows in markets and the impact of speculation on ‘bubbles’ is unclear[8] They are not to blame, but what is the truth worth in politics and especially the New York Times in an election year?

“And it was John McCain, not Barack Obama, who recently said this: “While a few reckless speculators are counting their paper profits, most Americans are coming up on the short end — using more and more of their hard-earned paychecks to buy gas.”

Why are politicians so eager to pin the blame for oil prices on speculators? Because it lets them believe that we don’t have to adapt to a world of expensive gas”

McCain is a moron who needs a nose ring and mindlessly mouths political points. But, the central point of this screed is that we have to adapt to a world of expensive gas!!

Let us stay focused on the leftist dogma here.

We will not have expensive gas if we drill and expand our oil supply. Krugman has major problems with supply and demand schedules as he prefers a command economy that reeks of the famous Moscow Central Planning Circus [9]that wrecked the USSR and its disnimble satellites. We have perhaps ¼ of all the oil on the planet available to us, but the left needs an economic crisis to blame on capitalism and get control. Their phony tax dodge is Climate Change, a transparent version of EcoNazism.

There was even a call to nationalize the oil companies by leftists such as Maxine Waters.[10]  Cruz Bustamanteof CA also called for the state to seize oil companies. He is a hate-twisted Stalinist-style Hispanic supremacist. [11]They seem to have backed off this nationalization campaign temporarily. It will return. Maxine is not the brightest star in the leftist orbit, but she is as vindictive and hateful  as Cruz and will do her part to grunt and grab some wealth for her party.

“O.K., let’s talk about the reality.”`

O.K., let’s talk about the ‘reality’ of the situation after the stipulations and preconditions have been set up by Krugman.

“In any case, one thing is clear: the hyperventilation over oil-market speculation is distracting us from the real issues.”

A fact. This is precarious as our krugmaniacal propaganda artist gives up a neat leftist political vector to sally forth on something else. But, all is well.

The prediction that conforms to the leftist dreams:

“Regulating futures markets more tightly isn’t a bad idea, but it won’t bring back the days of cheap oil. Nothing will. Oil prices will fluctuate in the coming years — I wouldn’t be surprised if they slip for a while as consumers drive less, switch to more fuel-efficient cars, and so on — but the long-term trend is surely up.”

This is a notion that resembles sulfurous swamp gas or perhaps the glitter of fireflies in the night. Our ‘economist’ here ignores the wild antics to drill and drill by everybody else in the world except us even including Cuba. Eric Sevareid, in his closing piece for CBS News after the Peanut Jimmy Follies , predicted an ‘oil glut.’ That happened and oil went down to $14 a barrel for a long while. Where there is money some bozo will put diamonds or guns or furs on the drum and do some bidness. The supply will increase and world prices will fall unless politicians impose huge taxes on fuels, which they will certainly do. Capitalism is fueled by fuel and energy and that must be severely limited so socialists can wreck the US as they did most of Europe.

And the tautological finale!

“But we won’t have even the beginnings of a rational energy policy if we listen to people who assure us that we can just wish high oil prices away.”

High oil prices no matter what!! That is what the leftists want and they derive high taxes now and those will soar with their phony Cap and Trade Follies.[12]

As the dog returns to its vomit, [13]the leftist returns to the sacred Tax Base for their survival and future.  And, this goes on as long as people are foolish enough to vote for the idiot Marxist stooges known as liberal Democrats.   All the Democrats have is your money and they want a lot more.

The liberals will say and do anything to get more political power and grab more wealth. Anything at all.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The Road to Social Success, Peace and Justice: California has NO Vision!

Government Cannot Solve Society’s Problems.

This is a general refutation to an errant satire-oriented blog post entitled:  The Road to Social Success, Peace and Justice: California has the Vision![1] and refutes the inane and vapid  Marxian logic and phony social theorems and propaganda  trumpeted  therein.  Modern government should rely upon its citizens to provide talent, services and taxes in exchange for its governance. California has not conducted any proper experiments in this social arena lately and San Francisco is now the model for a fraudulent and debauched society. The government is obviously obligated to supply all the needs of its citizenry in one limited form or another, almost always indirectly, and to educate the polis as to the correct or preferred conduct for all.  The government should enable individuals to achieve success with their own resources and form their own identities with their own property and private wealth. Although violent crime, sloth, sodomy and drug addiction are crimes against humanity, they are frequently hailed as progressive in San Francisco and must be punished by strict laws, public executions and incarceration.   Nancy Pelosi[2], the Queen of the Massage Parlors protects any and all of her subjects who participate in degeneracy, theft, illegal immigration and worse.

Any form of indecent conduct must be accepted as a perverted individual choice thus damaging the fundamental rights of every citizen.  Somehow, sodomizing children or forcing them into slavery and prostitution is not considered a crime or even indecent in the City by the Bay. [3] San Francisco ranks among the most evil places in the world for social tribulations and surpasses even the legendary excesses of Sodom and Gomorrah. Government should address this problem—not support and celebrate evil. But, certain unacceptable social actions degrade the quality and inefficiency of any government by creating the need for special and unnecessary services to correct these evils.   This is a perverted source of tax revenue. Sloth, sodomy, drug addiction and political activism in educational institutions along with AIDs infections and their public celebrations are examples of these general social diseases that create excessive government.  San Francisco has made essentially no progress in the social arena since the arrival of the Spanish Conquistadors that might be construed as above the minimal levels of barbarism compared to most other places in the world.  This city is a financial and medical burden to America. The government can not satisfactorily address any pressing problems in our society if the wealth is confiscated by leftist and so-called egalitarian governments as they attempt to do in the City by the Bay. Taxation, always the first action of leftist government, is the road to inefficiency, waste and corruption in our society. Taxation of the confiscatory sort allows the incompetent to make decisions. Education could show us the way to peace and prosperity, but all persons in our society must be educated about spending and taxation and the evils of liberalism and the squandering of the common wealth.  San Francisco has the worst imaginable plans to for their citizens and that malfunction needs to be made public along with a monolithic transformation of the current government.

The Needs of the Citizen Comes First.

Every citizen has certain strengths and weaknesses as defined by accepted norms of conduct, inherited skills, home training and are analyzed in detail by well-defined by standardized test scores patterned from the scientifically verified Bell Curve[4].  This process has been verified and has been used with success since 1906. There is an obvious distribution of cognitive skills among all individuals in all societies that serves to convincingly refute the notion of ‘equality’ as the leftists define the term. It turns out that certain leftist views of social conduct, particularly the choices to appease the Marxists and socialists and cause the labors of citizens to be misdirected, are socially and intellectually bankrupt and this fact need to be emphasized in government and education.  The political term ‘equality’ is used to enlist the votes and support of the lower classes and criminal elements thus confounding the simple notion that we are all equal. We are not equal.  The tautological and perpetual quest for ‘equality’ actually generates and validates the gross equalities they hypocritically harp about. These inequalities produce self-designed opportunistic cracks in the social fabric and thus create false strata in our society that are conveniently utilized by the overt racists and far leftist radicals who desire power.

Equality and Inequalities caused by Bad Government.

The far left invents and celebrates inequalities using poverty, racism, sodomy and capitalism.  They exploit these differences and promote the struggles in this farce as they inflict this wreckage upon society. They deal successfully in political agitation and unrest. The Marxists have murdered 100,000,000 people since 1917 and this salient fact ought to provide us with a comprehensive narrative of their notions of government.  Cuba and North Korea receive only praise from the left. They are out to corrupt our society. Those who trumpet a perverted view of love and society and those who think that the personal choice of using drugs,  boundless sex with anonymous partners in bath houses  and the criminal theft of misappropriated property or abortion are regarded as  crimes and their views  appear to be in the vast  majority of our society in places like San Francisco.  They believe that government can actually solve many social programs. They will vote to change our entire society if they can for their own aggrandizement as Stalin did.  The liberal courts in California will transform the laws if the voters stray too far towards the narrow leftist path. The left would ruin our world as they have effectively done in Europe and Asia and Africa.  The left-liberals and their Marxian cousins cannot survive in a successful economic environment as they cannot generate wealth on their own. They must act as functional parasites to exist and gain power.

While the most important duty of government is education—second only to  law enforcement as one would expect --the resources devoted to the desperate criminal actions of a few provide unnecessary and wasteful  jobs for many citizens who must be enlisted to serve to clean up this mess.  Crime, sloth, sodomy, venereal disease, AIDS, the homeless and illegal aliens produce thousands of useless jobs for the city.  San Francisco has attained an incredibly negative score on the health and social services issues with an unimpressive  and an  outlandish list of phony ‘social services’ is listed  in the footnotes. [5] We need more efficient jobs and fewer limitations on our individual life styles. The leftists want to control essentially everything especially speech and would hungrily burn this essay if they c0uld.  They cannot stand open criticism and dangle on revenge as part of there psychological constitution. Government is limited in the services it can supply without consuming too much of the domestic product—thus government should be as small as possible.  We can have a great society with full employment and benefits for all if we force the far left to yield most of their ill-gotten controls on our society and force them to work for a living.  They can probably perform acceptable menial tasks in many areas but never in education, administration or in the courts. They are the epitome of failure. They are societal parasites.

The essential services required to support individuals who wish to run their own lives without government interference are only provided by small revenues and fees and by lightly taxing those who have worked hard for their families and society. We do not want this money to be instantaneously wasted by liberals or diverted to degenerate activities.  Workers, tourists and businesses should pay appropriate taxes so that the city can provide agencies and services for the criminals and the poor. They could pay much less and have even better government without the drug-induced leftist government. The minimum wage in San Francisco is an excessive $9.36/hour, [6] which is so high as to burden the tax base revenues and forces the government to improperly function. This is not, however, even a reasonable wage as it is arbitrarily and politically determined by political fiat and guessing and does not include any due consideration of business costs, fees, taxes and profits so it might be much lower, probably $6 or $7 an hour.  The proper rate, of course, is always determined by supply and demand. The tax rate on payroll expense is 1.5%.[7] The city sales tax is 8.50%.[8] A high minimum wage and subsequent high progressive taxes now degrade the city services and they must beg money from federal funds to escape the inevitable turmoil of bankruptcy. Typically, the leftists run up high debt and then pander for a bailout as New York City did.  We expect California to financially collapse and then have the federal government pay for their perversions.

Taxes

Higher taxes are always destructive as they give power and unwarranted resources to the incompetents in the left.  A detail account of leftist financial policy is essentially one long brown streak. We need very low marginal tax rates to recover the money and land that the leftists have stolen from the decent working people. The individual is more than competent to direct his or her own funds and the notion that government programs can solve social programs is a farce notably grounded in the ugly history of failures of such notions.   Social Security is a disgrace and is hailed the summit of a leftist social program.  We must always be reminded of Moscow Central Planning in the USSR for examples of how to ruin a society.  Many on the left think Karl Marx had the proper method for addressing wealth and its distribution.

For the rich, we need a 20% tax rate, or so, and 5% cap for all profits over 1 million dollars per year.  It is only the financially successful person than can direct resources to growth, new business opportunities and to engender prosperity.  The notion that the socially unfit, perverts, criminals or the cognitively disnimble can effectively address finances, business and taxation is a sad joke. Giving profits to the frequently drug-besotted and intellectually degrading left always wastes precious resources. We can cut costs and lower tax revenues by eliminating most social programs.  The object of a social program is to create dependency—not to solve social problems. Many people have to be shown, forcefully if necessary, that they can work, even in the menial arena and avoid taking drugs.  But, as long as drug addicts can vote, a mistake, they can vote for sloth and drug rehab programs. Degenerates should not be given the vote.

Profits by individuals in the current San Francisco paradigm are achieved only after excessive coddling of the poor, enduring the burdens of socialist and Marxian governments and toleration of sadistic criminals that is the central resource of liberalism.  Leftist governments induce inequalities in our lives with the obvious purpose of partition and chaos and these notions need to be controlled by the voters.  It is a good ideal to vote against any leftist in any form of government.  Egalitarianism should be considered a crime against humanity.

 Personal Freedoms, Drugs and their Use.

Citizens must be able to choose their lifestyles and recreational modes of life. But, the celebrated illicit drugs and their proffered mind-expanding effects are destructive and a wasteful individual choice that ruins lives and the government should strongly supervise those druggies in all personal and public matters. San Francisco has a Drug Court (SFDC)[9] and the court prevents any substantial progress of the treatment of those persons who elect to abuse themselves with recreational substances. This is a crime of bad government. Many who are arrested for choosing this disgusting and perverted lifestyle that satisfies only them are let loose uncured and unattended and that is inhumane.  San Francisco has a Drug Court has a phony record as stated:

“Since 1996, over 900 participants have graduated from the San Francisco Drug Court.  Among them, ninety-three percent of the graduates had a stable source of income upon program completion, 91% had obtained stable housing, and several participants enrolled in school or vocational training while participating in the program. Twenty-percent of the graduates had reestablished contact with their minor children upon graduation.”

This is a phenomenal disgrace and this synthetic legal circus requires hundreds of redundant jobs to supply incompetents for kangaroo courts and unnecessary city employees. The actual rate of recidivism is about 98% so this does not include repeats.  Drug addiction is the surrogate for religion in San Francisco.  They want to feel good as a first response to any issue. The government wants to legalize or decriminalize drugs to keep their supporters happy and focused on their addictions. Drugs and stronger than people, rehabil9ition is not a reality, so the high drug addiction rates support leftist governments. Most of our administrative jobs should be oriented so as to help our citizens avoid such disgusting and destructive personal choices and lifestyles. We need fewer such inefficient and perverted social services that trumpet perversions and drug addictions and those agencies and the attendant task forces should consume fewer resources. Using illicit drugs is a basic affront to humanity and the medical treatment of the predictable and unfortunate side effects is an excessive burden of government. Drug addicts should be given menial jobs and forced to pay for the costs of their social perversions. We have to admit after decades of research and futile attempts that drug addicts have no hope of a cure and need to be closely supervised and prevented from infecting the rest of society with their repulsive afflictions.  Drugs are stronger than people.

While considered legal, chic and socially desirable by some progressive cities and counties and certain elements of the federal government, the drug sharing, fellowship, camaraderie and the concomitant personal choice to enjoy dangerous recreational substances actually degrades our society.  The pursuit of whatever ‘feels good’ is a social defect and psychological aberration, a serious mental affliction and can be considered as the general notion of a parasite. The ‘addict,’ a medical  definition  of a practice  that  destroys  individual freedom, needs special education, counseling, and the cooperation  of law enforcement, medical services and many other special services at low cost.  All these services are now, unfortunately, paid for by the government and thusly create worthless jobs for liberals. They degrade and waste the resources of the cities to ‘correct’ what some citizens voluntarily do to themselves. Societies need to be socially content and recreational drugs bring sorrow and despair and amplify hopelessness. Those persons who thrive in criminality such as drug traffickers need to be hunted down and incarcerated or deported. Liberalism is a societal disease.

We need to eliminate all illegal drugs and provide counseling for their use among those who suffer from the ills of liberalism and racism and the abuse they hurl at the white majority as they practice capitalism.  Drug addicts need to be isolated from society and reallocated in distant lands if necessary.  Drug cartels need to be obliterated by force. We need mandatory sensitivity courses for those who cannot appreciate capitalism and business and moral social conduct.

Immigration

There are thousands of human boundaries and fences in this world. The world is not supposed to be a system of societies with open doors and welcome wagons designed to coddle, praise and extract political support from the criminals who sneak into our society to plunder and burden our system.  All persons must be allowed to own private property in concert and harmony with the plants and animals on this globe and no leftist or environmental group should prevent the successful from enjoying a decent life in the US or elsewhere.  We have made the world rich with capitalism. We can make it richer. To protect the working class and the successful and support their human rights, no San Francisco city tax revenues or any other kind of money should be spent in assisting authorities in enforcing unfair or excessive tax laws.[10] Those laws are forms of institutional racism, paternal essays in crude bigotry, leftist greed and a crime against a good society. The influx of illegal aliens means that new jobs must be created to keep and protect our citizens from the evils of those   who come from other countries and who would normally be considered to be felons and perhaps deported.  San Francisco has found the way to become a haven for illegal aliens, some even fictional [like Joaquin Murietta for whom some street was named[11]], thugs like Cesar Chavez [I was a witness to his works in Tulare County[12]] and adherents of a degenerated society through unacceptable government and by ignoring the law.  All this crime brings power to the far leftists who are perpetually elected by degenerates, the homeless, illegal aliens and worse.

We have enormous wealth and we must use it to create a new society for those young people and redress the criminal sins of the socialist past. Crimes committed by undocumented workers and other persons are really unnecessary crimes, and they do waste a large number of government jobs and corrupt the tax base by high city taxes.  Those who embezzle the money and property using phony tax methods and fees from the upper class are committing crimes against society; they are simply stealing their self-determined share of prosperity that was created by the successful. They are parasites. Persons have no right to steal resources provided by business and a decent government. This criminal system is as obtuse as the racist notion of reparations and its remedy is way overdue.

Prostitution

Love is not usually a crime but those people who choose to enjoy sex at any age or with any person, child or their pets are perverted criminals. Tax hikes are crimes. The city of San Francisco has a phony social plan to “Stop the Enforcement of the Prostitution Laws and Bring Protection to Sex Workers”[13] The city has a Task Force on Prostitution that considers such practices by citizens and others as a basic human right and the apprehension, persecution and incarceration of those persons who are merely plying their craft as costly, unjust and ineffective. [14] The sex workers suffer ‘humiliation’ from being apprehended by the police and also their clients, which