Colonel Klebb and Her Eternal War to Destroy the Party of Democrats.

The ‘races’ between Colonel Klebb [1] and the artificial construct known as Obama the Elitist and Proponent of Black LiberationTheology in Indiana and North Carolina turned out to offer nothing in terms of a solution to the Democratic Wars. Both candidates attempted to reposition the truth, adjust and fluff up their images and redact a few elements of history as they essentially split the voters. Nothing has changed. The voters seem to be confused over the offal offerings that both contestants offer. In balance and depth, they both offer only the old, stale, tax-grubbing froth and hokum that has made the Party of Democrats look like understudies for the Circus Dancers of the Soviets, Marxists in Africa and South America and now bespangled teasers and belly-dancers for the Islamo-Fascisti. Theatre is what they offer, at great expense. Socialism is their goal.

If the tax monies and gullibility of the citizens will hold out, they can solve every imaginable social and financial problem, and more, and bring back lost jobs and prosperity and probably eliminate unemployment along with free medical care and instant abortions for all ‘persons’ including felons and illegal aliens.  They can tax gasoline until the price drops to a level so the citizens cannot complain. They can restore jobs to the auto industry, make friends with the Iranians, welcome Hispanic criminals into our society, and solve the oil crisis by strangling the supply and other great accomplishments.  They can fix the non-existent global warming with new and astronomical taxes and save us from boiling ourselves in our oceans and curtail cannibalism. [2]

The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray Lady comments on this with the usual bent and song for Obambi: [3] Butterflies Aren’t Free :

“Just as Obama spent his youth trying not to be threatening, so as not to unnerve whites, Hillary spent her life learning to be threatening so she could beat back challenges to her and her husband — from Republicans and from “bimbo eruptions” and now from a charmed younger rival.”[4]

Here, with some judicious propagandistic theorems, the Dowdy Dowd again draws distinctions for us as if we have not heard enough of the plastic distinctions between this pair before. The great secret of these races is that there is no secret: they are both slavering tax whores[5] who have slightly different costumes and spangles and offensive familiars who haunt their campaigns. Both have their pet Racist Dragons who storm around the country and race-bait either the homies or the unwashed cretins who drive pick up trucks to the NASCAR races and swill beer. Everybody else has made up their limited minds on this socially offensive project we must endure every four years.

And more nothingness:

“As Obama learned to accommodate, the accommodating Hillary learned to triangulate and lacerate. As he learned that following the rules could get you far with adoring mentors, she learned from Bill and Dick Morris and Mark Penn that following the rules was for saps.

 Hillary is less Blanche than Scarlett. “Heaven help the Yankees if they capture you,” Rhett told the willful belle at the start of her rugged odyssey.” [6][Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

After we untangle The Old Red Lady’s theatrics and theatrical metaphors, as we are wont to do for understanding, we find only stale scripts and unwashed costumes.   Butterflies are not free and there is nothing new in liberalism.

Obama has not learned to accommodate anything. That is a phony spin job .He is a simple ideological construct buoyed up by his narrow leftist ideological training and spirited by his ‘religious’ beliefs in his ‘church.’ A true leftist would flatly reject the kokum and fluff of religion as other, more successful Marxists have done in past ages, and only ‘accommodated’ such flaming religious nuts as compliant supplicants who could provided some more voters. Obama treats the noisy racist hate mongers in his Trinity congregation the same way Nancy Pelosi[7]--aka Spartacus—tolerates and accommodates  the sleazy skin shops and bath houses of San Francisco. Nancy is sans Nancy if she rejects or ignores the carnal needs of these social perverts, but ‘prays daily’ even for Bush. This is all part of the theatre: Nancy can cook up atheism, abortion, sodomy and Catholicism all in the same cauldron and give the onlookers an icy cadaverous glare in defiance of their looks and comments. She can be anything a pervert wants her to be.

Hillary is exactly the same. The frantic efforts to proffer some kind of distinction between Clinton and Obama are nonsense. There is not a whit of difference and their speeches and promises for the upcoming splendor of tax whoring are obvious and instructive. These social parasites have only one message for the folks:

We want to spend you money for you because you are too stupid or bigoted to do this wisely.  We know what is best for you.

“Wandering around Indiana, appearing in neighborhoods and at diners without any advance notice, talking to handfuls of people, Obama strived to seem less lofty and more mortal. Hounded by Hillary, Bill and Rev. Wright, he just looked sort of numb. When Obama went to an 11:30 p.m. shift change at an auto components plant here, a Newsday reporter on the scene noted that many of the white men “were less likely to smile or look him in the eye or seem impressed with him.”[8]

This is a lament. Obambi has lost his baby fuzz and now must do combat with the older animals and get down into the gutter-sleaze elements of leftist politics. To think that he thought his phony ‘change’ mantras and songs would be sufficient to mesmerize the voters is so silly that we have lost faith in this neophyte’s ability to compete. Hillary’s many battles with everybody including her worthless husband have set her up to deal with wimps like Obambi. She is making progress while Obama is stunned and uncertain. Where is Reverend Wright now with his counsel? How about a prayer meeting with the good pastor to see how they can deal with a Marxist Radical who   will serve up his entrails to the vultures if she can?

This contest has shown the public exactly who and what this pair of leftist extremists really is. The Chardonnay and poached salmon set have had their chance to put up a  shining messiah with sequins and bells  and now their dreams and hopes have been trashed by a two  pair of  closet racists[9] in the form of both Clintons an both Obamas. Here, the ugly  racist comments of Bill Clinton in South Carolina, the  hateful and revengeful remarks by The Angry Black Woman, the combative screeds of Colonel Klebb  and the Stuffed Ivy League Suit all blend into an image of just what the Party of Democrats have to offer. They are morally and intellectually bankrupt.

Dowd ends with this lament:

“Obama is like her idealistic, somewhat naïve self before the world launched 1,000 attacks against her, turning her into the hard-bitten, driven politician who has launched 1,000 attacks against Obama.

 As she makes a last frenzied and likely futile attempt to crush the butterfly, it’s as though she’s crushing the remnants of her own girlish innocence.”

This is so sorrowful; we are reminded of several Greek Tragedies.[10]

Butterflies are not free and the potential crushing of this bug will be the culmination of Hillary’s political accomplishments. But, the cost of this insect hunt will be high.

This is so sad. The elites of the Party of Democrats have given their very all to position all the proper feathers and sparkles on their two puppets and then their strings tangled during their performances. It would be such a simple ending if even one of them would disembark from this sinking ship, but not Hillary. Her Rule or Ruin philosophy cannot permit her from filling her war belt with scalps.[11]

The only true solution to this dilemma would be for John McCain to suddenly switch parties and promise to put Hillary on the Supreme Court, a promise he could keep, and have Obama be his running mate and then take the reins of his presidency after the last few of his remaining neurons sag and fall away.  That would give us at least 12 years of political psychosis as if 12 years of Bushisms were not enough. Pelosi cares not which one autographs the tax bills. Dean cares not. Hate Bush.

And, we get to choose among 3 Senators! Elitist Democrats will pick one of these for us and our votes are worthless, as usual. [12]

We deserve this wreckage. Isn’t there a way to blame President Bush for this mess? Rhett Butler would just walk away in disgust.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

From the Babbling Brooks: Confusion, Hokum and Fluff: Vote for Obama

Denial is a mental affliction that precedes a certain disaster and the New York Times, who carelessly endorsed Hilary Clinton-- aka Colonel Klebb—now wallows in misery. The therapy is to put up a rasher of minutia to banter around like a ping pong game with no prize money [or balls] to the winner. It is all just for fun—or better—to sooth the mind before the fall.

When it comes to mumbling, the Babbling Brooks is usually selected to mouth the words without any obvious connection to any set of connected neurons.  This is wonderful.

In an essay that avoids all known serious defects that have been highlighted in their candidates, we read stuff such as this:

“Life is short, but campaigns are long. And during the course of them, each candidate will have impressive and pathetic moments. But underlying the highs and lows, there are the fundamentals.”[1]

This is a typical propaganda method. Here, we will be offered an essay on the fundamentals, but this is hokum as nothing like that appears in this lament. Read on.

“Hillary Clinton went on “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” incarnating her role as the first Democratic Rambo.”[2]

Brooks might have then recalled the Clintoonery solutions to aggressive countries and cite the USS Cole, North Korea, Somalia and bombings in Africa, which might have indicated a military response: appeasement and blame for America in all cases.  Missing.  Bambi on drugs—not Rambo.

“She peddled her sham gas-tax holiday and repeated her attempt to blame Indiana’s job losses on outsourcing and Nafta[ sic, should be NAFTA]. Stephanopoulos asked her to name a single economist who thinks a tax-holiday plan would work, and the daughter of Wellesley and Yale took the chance to shove the geeks into their lockers: “I’m not going to put my lot in with economists.”[3]

Perhaps she has had some troubles with ‘economics’ from the NYT with their famous non-economist Paul Krugman, the krugmaniacal Tax Hike Zombie [4]of the Old Gray Lady. This is the usual question asked by the left: How can you ever advocate a tax cut!! You fiend!!

“But, as Sunday’s contrast made clear, Obama still seems like a human being. He still seems to return each night to some zone of normalcy where personal reflection lives. He wasn’t fully candid when answering questions about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but there are some inner guardrails that prevent the spin from drifting too far from the truth. Thoughtful and conversational, he doesn’t seem to possess the trait that Clinton has: automatically assuming that critics are always wrong.”[5]

Apparently, we must limit this fluff to economics as there are plenty of critics who view Obama and his psychotic racist pastor Jeremiah Wright as hopeless racists and   point out that Obama has been his stooge for 20 years. The ‘expert’ will ask Obama to explain this and Obama will not.

“Obama still possesses his talent for homeostasis, the ability to return to emotional balance and calm, even amid hysteria. His astounding composure has come across as weakness in the midst of combat with Clinton, but it’s also at the core of his promise to change politics. He vows to calm hatred and heal division.”[6]

 Here, we read the slick outline of the political construction known as Obama. No mention of his 100% leftist views, his utter lack of any meaningful legislation, his racist endorsement of Black Liberation Theology or his close association with Weatherman Terrorists. No, Brooks must babble about personalities and ‘little things’ and ignore the fact that Obama is an elitist and a tax whore.

“Obama’s campaign grows out of the longstanding reform tradition. His implicit argument is that politics doesn’t have to be this way. Dishonesty and brutality aren’t inevitable; they’re what gets in the way. Obama’s friend and supporter Cass Sunstein described the Obama ideal in The NewRepublic: “Obama believes that real change usually requires consensus, learning and accommodation.”[7]

That’s regarded as naïve drivel in parts of CampClinton.

Campaign issues come and go, but this is a thread running through the race. One believes in the raw assertion of power, the other the power of communication.”

The NewRepublic is a Marxist rag as The Nation .

There are so many mixed and convoluted metaphors here that are confidently commingled into some kind   60s era biker’s acid flashback episode it is difficult to find a place to begin to address this fluff. Apparently the message from the Times is:  that you can be a hollow liar and elitist as long as your are willing to ‘open a dialogue’ with the voters.   [A Clinton prop early on in this contest!] You can accept a little disapproval from those upon you heap contempt in buckets and verse, but you can comprehend why they need to be reformed, why we should hike their taxes for their own good and treat them like trained like monkeys in a cage.  They are too stupid to realize the gifts you offer. You can secretly embrace and cherish the overt racism of Louis Farrakhan and his lackeys, based on accepted  leftist ideology, and listen to hate speeches of your supporters while preaching the practice of some form of passive tolerance. Apparently we have to tolerate dishonesty and brutality, somewhere,and wonder if this means intrinsic attributes of Senator Obama, his angry black wife or his howling pack of ideological racists who hate American and threaten riots in the streets.

The belittling comment about “…change usually requires consensus, learning and accommodation” apparently invites us to trust this stuffed suit and believe in what he thinks he wants. We can pay for his mistakes and dishonesty along the way.  He thinks he might be the person he has waited for[8], a messianic being who will bless us all.

Reparations, punitive taxes and overt racism are attributes that really are the core of the Democratic reform tradition.  These parasites cannot exist without functional racism. That much is true. The ugly facts are that the leftist welfare society and praise of abortion and drugs, sloth and sodomy have created a need from some caricature to assume this urgently needed role. Obama is that vision.

We all know that Hillary is a monster[9], a criminal and a pit bull in the political arena. She will be ultimately muzzled by the whining, gutless DNC operatives that formed a Star Chamber [superdelegates] to ‘select the best candidate.’ They are slaves to ideology, a stance that will lose the race for the White House again.

As such, they recruit swamis and menials like Brooks to muddle the issues and prepare the ignorant unwashed masses for an ideological racist who will work the political levers and a dedicated and self-believing cryptomisoxenist[10] to perform as the Perfect Liberal Fürher. We don’t need truth or reality here or even an accurate historical account of who this ‘leader’ is, or was, or will be—we need to bow and grovel as unwashed supplicants to Leftist Orthodoxy.

The left knows what is best for us and the New York Times, as usual, and is properly telling us how to think and how to vote.  So, let us practice how to be in awe of those who spit upon us and call us stupid, rednecks and racist and to rely on the New York Time’s announcement of the Coming of the Messianic Fürher. With our tax monies he will recreate the Great Society. As typical whites we can all be retrained and share the leftist vision.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Obama: Pitiful Liar and Caretaker of Black Liberation Theology Racism

Just read this pitiful fluff[1] from Tim Russert and Barack  Obama as they both try to cover over black racism, a political factor that might just put Obama’s campaign in the latrines along with Hillary. Maybe the Party of Democrat have two losers to offer to the superdelegates. Where is our red-meat eating al gore when we need him or  Donna Brazile[2]?

“Moderator Tim Russert asked Obama why he waited until last week to denounce Wright’s controversial comments instead of earlier in the campaign. Obama said he felt that Wright’s earlier comments about U.S. foreign policy, origins of AIDS and other issues “didn’t define him.”

“They were a bunch of sermons that had been spliced and that’s not who I thought he was,” Obama said. “I did what I thought was right, which was denounce the words, not denounce the man.”

“But when Wright spoke at the National Press Club on Monday, “not only did he amplify some of those comments and defended them vigorously, but he added to them,” Obama said.

“I think what really changed was he was going to double down on the statements he made before,” the senator said. “He put gasoline on the fire.”

Pitiful

20 years swaying back and forth and listening to this racist parasite and Obama didn’t know what he was like? That is like saying Hillary did not know what Slick Willie was like.

The Democrats deserve these two parasites.

rycK

Who Will Tell the People? Who Should NOT Tell the People: the NYT

Much of contemporary politics appears to be structured like the game of pick up sticks. Here you toss a pack of sticks onto the rug and then try to pick them off without disturbing any other sticks.  The editors at the New York Times, Walter Duranty’s Memorial Rag [1], routinely throw sticks to the wind and then explain why they were disturbed during the game and where the penalties lie.

In today’s article entitled: Who Will Tell the People?[2]  By Thomas L. Friedman, we learn about this:

“Traveling the country these past five months while writing a book, I’ve had my own opportunity to take the pulse, far from the campaign crowds. My own totally unscientific polling has left me feeling that if there is one overwhelming hunger in our country today it’s this: People want to do nation-building. They really do. But they want to do nation-building in America.”[3]

This is about the most sophomoric statement I have ever read. The author breathlessly undermines his own credibility with his confessions about his own unscientific polling methods and then draws grand and sweeping conclusions from his own self-inflicted notions and random prattle. This is almost and example of double circular logic.

“They are not only tired of nation-building in Iraq and in Afghanistan, with so little to show for it.”[4]

Don’t leave out our 75 year failure to build anything but latrines sand flophouses in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Oakland, St Louis, Detroit and Chicago. We are tired of the crime, sloth and the flesh merchants in those places that were carefully constructed by leftists and criminals. You can test your own pulse in any of these rat holes, particularly at night. But, they do  vote straight Democrat so that much is a success.  I suggest you visit East Brooklyn at night and do some more research.

“We are not as powerful as we used to be because over the past three decades, the Asian values of our parents’ generation — work hard, study, save, invest, live within your means — have given way to subprime values: “You can have the American dream — a house — with no money down and no payments for two years.”[5]

The values he speaks of: work hard, study, save, invest, live within your meansare American values and he openly distorts our heritage as any propagandist ought to do by reversing the situations.  Maybe he can square the 54% drop out rate in high school for blacks with his value theorems and explain the fact that 7% of blacks are prisons at this moment as example of working hard and studying. Oh! These are political prisoners like Mumia? Sure.

Much of this results from a known liberal disease, expectedly, directly toward failure: Grunting and grabbing votes from the ‘poor.’   The Democrats wanted the credit ratings of dead beats and criminals legally expunged in a process called Greenlining, a political exercise.[6] This was to ‘combat’ a business practice known as Redlining used by many banks to identify areas where the knowledge of good credit was largely unknown and the attributes of financial responsibility were bleak at best and the propensity to lose the whole loan was more than probable.  So, the ‘be fair’ the rules were bent and the ‘poor’ were given a chance to try to own private property and maintain it under their own auspices. This is an indirect tax that subsidizes votes for Democrats and their criminal allies. Banks and loan institutions were forced to pay this tax and give out freebees to the low class.

This notion of private property [7]is not exactly permitted under the leftist stale and erratic Fabian notions of government. There has to be an underlying precept here that will work against private ownership and encourage government control of housing. Better to slant the system so that the ‘poor’ and criminal elements WILL default then the case for more regulation government-subsidized housing[8] can be more forcefully and tearfully made.

“A few weeks ago, my wife and I flew from New York’s KennedyAirport to Singapore. In J.F.K.’s waiting lounge we could barely find a place to sit. Eighteen hours later, we landed at Singapore’s ultramodern airport, with free Internet portals and children’s play zones throughout. We felt, as we have before, like we had just flown from the Flintstones to the Jetsons. If all Americans could compare Berlin’s luxurious central train station today with the grimy, decrepit Penn Station in New York City, they would swear we were the ones who lost World War II.”[9]

Why not tour the bus station in Philly or maybe Boston or drive into beautiful East St. Louis  and test the dirt and slime on the floors and toilet seats?[10] It was US money that raised the essence of Berlin to the place where they could stop using rubble to wipe with after World War II. I was in Penn Station on the NJ Transit line one week ago Sunday and would like to compare it with a similar station in Mexico City or Havana or Angola. I wonder how it would compare then. The examples and places discussed above by our instant propagandist are the products of liberal Democrats squandering taxes to keep voters satisfied. How many massage parlors and bath houses are in San Francisco? Is there a charge for antibiotics for treatment for STDs in the Cit by the Bay?

The point, finally:

“Much nonsense has been written about how Hillary Clinton is “toughening up” Barack Obama so he’ll be tough enough to withstand Republican attacks. Sorry, we don’t need a president who is tough enough to withstand the lies of his opponents. We need a president who is tough enough to tell the truth to the American people. Any one of the candidates can answer the Red Phone at 3 a.m. in the White House bedroom. I’m voting for the one who can talk straight to the American people on national TV — at 8 p.m. — from the White House East Room.”[11]

So far, we have a racist, cryptomisoxenist elitist who hates middle-class whites and an old wrinkled radical Saul Alinsky Marxist[12] with no credibility for anything she says. Where does the ‘straight talk come from from  that pair? We really did  heard straight talk from Jeremiah Wright. [13]That, at least, was an honest opinion of American. Tough questions are not being answered by this pair. [14]

What are you going to tell them? Raise taxes and put more incompetent bureaucrats into the system?

“It is especially not trivial now, because millions of Americans are dying to be enlisted — enlisted to fix education, enlisted to research renewable energy, enlisted to repair our infrastructure, enlisted to help others. Look at the kids lining up to join Teach for America. They want our country to matter again. They want it to be about building wealth and dignity — big profits and big purposes. When we just do one, we are less than the sum of our parts. When we do both, said Shriver, “no one can touch us.”[15]

Oh!! Let us have a Great Society and wage a War on Poverty and have some more ‘education’ where children are taught the wonders of sodomy, free sex and the mind-expanding wonders of drugs. The author didn’t mention how many vending machines he found in Singapore that sold drugs with credit cards. What happens to drug dealers in China? Oh, they are shot? What happens to illegal immigrants in Mexico and Singapore? They are deported? How cruel.

Gee, according to Ronald Reagan we doubled education spending from 1960 t0 1980 and the test scores went down and then we doubled or tripled such spending from 1980 to 2005 and the test scores went down again. Can anybody ‘tell the people” who is in charge of public education in the US?

The NYT needs to tell the ‘people’ that they encourage illegal aliens and criminals to live in our cities where they will be shielded from criminal enforcement and that their votes are important to maintaining Democrats in their cushy jobs. When is the NYT going to tell Californians that their state is going broke[16] from paying excessive salaries to leftists, EcoNazis  and do-gooders? How about New Jersey and Michigan? What responsibilities can the liberal Democrats that structured and infest these places have in terms of crime and debt?

Who will tell THAT to the people? Not the New York Times or one of its stooges.

The ugly fact is that the leftist parasites hate American and detest our wealth and affluence and praise our enemies and would gleefully take our property property, inheritances and wealth and create   a society like Oakland or New Orleans. The leftists are little more than Marxist wannabees with low test scores.

This is an example of a pedestrian-level sausage machine screed generated in panic as now both far-leftist political candidates are seen to be both phony and undesirable to the votes. The NYT attempts here to sell us failure in the guise of what we want. Such crap.

Tell THAT to the people and try again in 2012.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Howard Dean and his Leftist Racists Revisited. Cryptomisoxeny is confirmed.

In a previous blog, I quoted some items from Howard Dean, Little Dick Gephardt, Vinegar John Kerry, Al Sharpton and those who stooge for the Clintons. These are all examples of liberal racial bias and race baiting.

Dean grovels now that Hillary made points with her quite excellent appearance on Fox and  this morning  Dean squeals forth with:

“Your audience is important to us," Dean, who hadn't appeared with Wallace for almost 19 months, said when asked about the sudden spate of Democrats on Fox. "A lot of your audience are working-class Democrats, the kind of people who will vote either way, and we'd like them to vote Democrat."[1]

Although Hillary [aka Colonel Klebb [2]] now pledges:

“If Senator Obama is the nominee, you better believe I’ll work my heart out for him,” Clinton said.”[3]

We can now wonder if the reverse might be true outside of fairytale land.

This reminds us of the real Howard Dean when he said:

“"I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks," the former Vermont governor said in a telephone interview quoted in Saturday's Des Moines Register. "We can't beat George Bush unless we appeal to a broad cross-section of Democrats."[4]

That must mean rednecks.

Or Dick Gephardt’s comment:

“"I don't want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks," Gephardt said in a statement. "I will win the Democratic nomination because I will be the candidate for guys with American flags in their pickup trucks."[5]

Kerry pipes in:

“"I would rather be the candidate of the NAACP than the NRA," Kerry said in a statement.””

Then Al Sharpton:

“Candidate and civil rights activist Al Sharpton — who has accused Dean of having an "anti-black agenda" — said he was "surprised and disturbed" by the Confederate flag remark. "If I said I wanted to be the candidate for people that ride around with helmets and swastikas, I would be asked to leave," Sharpton said.”[6]

So, how does the New York Times navigate this swamp? In an article by Herbert entitled: Some Perspective on ‘Bitter’ [7] we read:

“There is no mystery here. Except for people who have been hiding in caves or living in denial, it’s pretty widely understood that a substantial number of those voters — in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and elsewhere — will not vote for a black candidate for president.”[8]

Clinton’s reputed view as envisioned by the NYT by Bob Herbert:

“This toxic issue is at the core of the Clinton camp’s relentless effort to persuade superdelegates that Senator Obama “can’t win” the White House. It’s the only weapon left in the Clintons’ depleted armory.”[9] [10]

All this goes to show the world that those white Americans who drive pickups, bowl, go hunting and such are the ideological enemies of the liberal left, who have a strangle hold over the Party of Democrats.

The left-liberals have preached zero tolerance of the middle class for decades and now the truth slobbered from Obama’s lips in San Francisco when he confided in some elites over white wine and truffles. The current pandering to those who votes they desperately convincingly show us how shallow and sleazy people like the Clintons, Dean and Obamas really are. They would crawl through any latrine for power.

Howard is a treacherous and mentally ill bigot and racist and leads the list of cryptomisoxenists [11]

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The Old Red Lady of the Old Gray Lady Advises Obama   to ‘Rewind’ His Life

Maureen Dowd[1], never a Hillary convert it seems, we might conclude  after a scrutiny of her NYT articles, has published a few caricatures about Hillary.[2]

In a reflexive analysis of beer boosting entitled This Bud’s for You we read the following:

“Checking out what the vets were drinking, he announced, “I’m going to have a Bud.” Then, showing he’s a smart guy who can learn and assimilate, he took big swigs from his beer can, a marked improvement on the delicate sip he took at a brewery in Bethlehem, Pa.”[3]

 Perhaps he is just slumming, popular among elites in the 40s and 50s.

“The lioness of Chappaqua is hot on the trail of the Chicago gazelle, eager to gnaw him to pieces, like a harrowing scene out of a George Stubbs painting.”[4]

Or the aftermath of a Jackson Pollack work.

“Cherry-bombing the word “pansy” into the discourse, Gov. Mike Easley of North Carolina said Hillary made “Rocky Balboa look like a pansy.”[5]

Okay, enuf, give us some real comments Old Red Lady!!

Here it is:

“I do think that one of the ironies of the last two or three weeks was this idea that somehow Michelle and I are elitist, pointy-headed intellectual types,” he said, adding sincerely, “I filled up my own gas tanks.”

It’s hard not to be who you are, but it’s doubly hard to be who you’ve strived not to be. Obama not only has to figure out how to unwind with a Bud. He has to rewind his life.”[6]

Translated, this must mean some kind of redaction of his previous beliefs and actions so as to mollify this racist and bigotry he haughtily announced, albeit in private, in San Francisco. The New York Times might just try to print a retraction of his anti white screed and spin off some of his elitism and contempt for the gun-toting slobs who might not vote for him.

The Cloak of Innocence has rotted away exposing a pedestrian-level leftist policy wonk from the Ivy League with big ears. Maybe Maureen can help the New York Times can transmutate his words and explain away 20-year long association with the idiot racist Jeremiah Wright and his sophomoric rants

Let us watch, with interest, how The Old Red Lady changes his image as a pointy-headed intellectual type and his wife as the ordinary angry black woman.

Well, Hillary is the only other option!!

Maybe The Old Red Lady will join forces with Rush: Go Forth with Operation Chaos!

RycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The Two Faces of The New York Times: Overt Racism Explained in Racist Terms.

Recently, Bob Herbert of the NYT, presumable one of the staff who might know Frank Rich, had called for an end to the endless looping of the Jeremiah Wright Saga [1]and encouraged us to concentrate on other matters. Today, Frank Rich, the one who pushed the Macaca Follies to the patience limits of the Times’s readers, has tried to hoist up a counter demon in the name of Rev. John Hagee.[2] Since Obama is a racist we now must make John McCain one too for balance in the fevered reasoning of the Old Gray Lady.

We must be reminded of The God Janus here, as the writers of the usual propaganda screeds from the Walter Duranty Papers[3] seem to be looking in difference directions as did the Greek God on matters of endings and beginnings. [4]

Frank Rich, no friend of objectivity or truth, remaining loyal to leftist dogma and in his tautological pursuit of the fruits of leftist propaganda has tried to force some kind of reciprocal obligation upon Senator John McCain to denounce this pastor. Oh, why can’t we ferret out all the racists!

“BORED by those endless replays of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright? If so, go directly to YouTube, search for “John Hagee Roman Church Hitler,” and be recharged by a fresh jolt of clerical jive. “[5]

It is interesting how influential YouTube has become. We wonder if the NYT even needs reporters when they can sort through the Internet for any nasty video and then wordsmith the propaganda piece backward from the screen. That saves in gasoline and taxi fares in NYC.

“Since then, Mr. McCain has been shocked to learn that his clerical ally has made many other outrageous statements. Mr. Hagee, it’s true, did not blame the American government for concocting AIDS. But he did say that God created Hurricane Katrina to punish New Orleans for its sins, particularly a scheduled “homosexual parade there on the Monday that Katrina came.”[6]

Many think the hurricane was a welcome relief to the crime, street murders, sloth, and sodomy and drug addiction in the city of New Orleans, a testament to the leadership skills of the liberal Democrats.  The effects of this non-Republican weather can be praised for reducing suffering  above similar places like Detroit, Baltimore City, Philadelphia, East St. Louis and their greatest achievement: Oakland, California. Read my earlier blog entitled Murder in the Cities: The Triumph of Liberalism[7] for some interesting numbers. Throw in Dallas and Washtown and few others and you get 3,569 murders in 2007. At this rate, we might wonder why the Party of Democrats bawl about our 4,000 dead soldiers who willingly and valiantly gave their lives in the War on Terrorism and note that after 7 years the urban US street killings must have gone 7X this number to just short of 25,000. Recall that crime creates all sorts of jobs for both criminals and social workers and police. Is true that the liberals subsidize murder and drugs for fun and profit? The liberal Democrats win this contest!

No worries about this by the Times? Oh yes, higher taxes and ‘education’ will fix the crime rates. Sure.

Rich proceeds:

“Mr. McCain says he does not endorse any of Mr. Hagee’s calumnies, any more than Barack Obama endorses Mr. Wright’s. But those who try to give Mr. McCain a pass for his embrace of a problematic preacher have a thin case. It boils down to this: Mr. McCain was not a parishioner for 20 years at Mr. Hagee’s church.” [8][Emphasis is mine in all quotes in this blog.]”[9]

Here, the standard propagandistic effort to discredit the most important piece of comparative evidence is given the treatment:

“That defense implies, incorrectly, that Mr. McCain was a passive recipient of this bigot’s endorsement. In fact, by his own account, Mr. McCain sought out Mr. Hagee, who is perhaps best known for trying to drum up a pre-emptive “holy war” with Iran. (This preacher’s rantings may tell us more about Mr. McCain’s policy views than Mr. Wright’s tell us about Mr. Obama’s.) Even after Mr. Hagee’s Catholic bashing bubbled up in the mainstream media, Mr. McCain still did not reject and denounce him, as Mr. Obama did an unsolicited endorser, Louis Farrakhan, at the urging of Tim Russert and Hillary Clinton. Mr. McCain instead told George Stephanopoulos two Sundays ago that while he condemns any “anti-anything” remarks by Mr. Hagee, he is still “glad to have his endorsement.”[10]

This throws a lot of toads and other reptilian parts into the cauldron. Can we wonder if John Kerry was a recipient of political support from the North Vietnamese Communists in Paris, or that perhaps Obama derives some support from Hugo Chaves, the shrunken remains of Fidel Castro or the Code Pink Pinkies in a similar manner? What about Hillary and her adoration of Saul Alinsky?

Frank Rich opens up too many related political stories to be able to demonstrate a major distinction between McCain and Obama. First, and foremost, Barack Obama is an elitist bigot who true feelings about middle-class whites was broadcasted  in San Francisco from a position where he thought he could speak openly about his elitism. I wonder if Hillary is glad to receive votes form the racist La Raza Hispanics or Senator Obama from the Islamo-Fascisti residing in Detroit.

Frank bends his rusty crank on onedownmanship[11] on this issue.

Frank Rich and the New York Times have depended upon utilizing ideological racism for decades and now they, embarrassingly, have this offal  thrown back in their two-faced faces. They disease here at the Old Gray Lady is cryptomisoxeny, the hidden, repressed loathing for another group. [12] It is a mental affliction where the operators of this malady believe they are not racists or bigots when the openly use the same words, tactics and endorse racists and bigots in their own publications.

Frank now gropes the outer reaches of political history to come up with this feasible statement of fairness:

“There is not just a double standard for black and white politicians at play in too much of the news media and political establishment, but there is also a glaring double standard for our political parties. The Clintons and Mr. Obama are always held accountable for their racial stands, as they should be, but the elephant in the room of our politics is rarely acknowledged: In the 21st century, the so-called party of Lincoln does not have a single African-American among its collective 247 senators and representatives in Washington. Yes, there are appointees like Clarence Thomas and Condi Rice, but, as we learned during the Mark Foley scandal, even gay men may hold more G.O.P. positions of power than blacks.”[13]

Oh really?  So Obama and Colonel Klebb [14] [15] [16]and her occasional consort are accused of overt racism by the New York Times.   Then, why does the New York Times, the High  Oracle of Racism violently oppose blacks who are successful Republicans and label them as inauthentic? What about Thomas Sowell, Larry Elders and other ‘Uncle Toms’ who point out the racist elements of the Democrats.  Didn’t the Times dump on Mark Foley because he was gay? The Times is now anti-gay?

The argument falls flat here. McCain cannot be compared to Obama and his angry black wife any more than Jeremiah Wright can be compared to John Hagee. These are four different cases, but the Times needs to equate some nonequatables because Jeremiah Wright, who hates Americans, IS the issue now and Obama sat in the pews listening to his racist rants for 20 years.

Explain that away Frank!!

Extending Rich’s arguments, we wonder if Adolph Hitler’s works might be excused, in part, because of his socialism. Der Furher’s close association with Josef Stalin ought to be reexamined in political theory. Uncle Joe could ‘work’ with the Nazis.

Well, Frank, let us all give the old college try! Digging for dirt is an art form of sorts and we may eventually be able to connect Obama with Marxism in our findings. That would square the Circle for many and show that Senator Obama is but a common Ivy League political construct with some class and a slick set of suits.

Keep on digging, there must be a CommunistDonkey in that pile of manure somewhere.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The NYT wants us to get off Reverend Wright…[Remember the Macaca Follies?]

 The New York Times, chum-chuckers for any far leftist process including praise for our enemies, has, in today’s column by Bob Herbert made a maudlin plea to focus on something else other than the good Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the famous leader of the Black Liberation Theology movement. The press coverage is now thought to be Overkill and should be given Short Shrift. [1]

“The Rev. Jeremiah Wright is no doubt (and regrettably) a big issue in the presidential campaign. But what we’ve seen over the past week is major media overkill — Jeremiah Wright all day and all night. It’s like watching the clips of a car wreck again and again.” [2]

 Really? How could we compare this issue to the macaca follies the Times celebrated during the presidential race of Senator Allen? It seems Frank Rich of pratfall fame and other propagandists worked this issue into the ground. [3]

Why was this comment, using an unknown word, so important? Why, it allowed the New York Times, the Scion of Walter Druanty’s[4] image, to strongly influence the race with the result that some Democrat won in Virginia.

Could we wonder if the NYT’s incessant political screeches over macaca could be compared, in overkill terms, of course, to a disgusting racist popinjay who hates America and also, apparently, Senator Obama?

 We understand that truth and such are not essential elements in propaganda screeds[5], but this frantic leap from objectivity needs to be highlighted.

 Wright, driving two Mercedes cars, living in a million dollar home with a $10,000,000 line of credit and making obscene speeches about hating America is now exposed as a disgusting, gutter-grade racist and this linkage upsets liberals. We all have to understand that the leftists ‘own’ the race issue and have used it to success to keep their constituents directed to the correct ballots ever since Bobby Kennedy. Racism is one of the main underpinnings of the Party of Democrats, second only to tax whoring, celebrating drug addiction and the continual praise of abortion.

Herbert tries to deflect this juggernaut even when the Times was fishing for ‘issues.’[6] Well, they have one now.

When we assemble the bits and pieces of Senator Obama, adding in the remarks of his angry black wife, we can see a picture of an ideological racist[7] in full force. This definition is adequate, but not sufficient to describe the race effect so the new word cryptomisoxeny[8] was recommended to clear up the facts that those persons of color may be true racists in the classic sense normally attributed to, politically, and limited to whites. The Senator believes that white, middle-class rural and suburban people are ignorant, unsophisticated, flee to their belief systems in terror, are rude, unwashed and clean their guns nightly.

Senator Obama tried to suppress the complexities of race in his race [9] with his Philadelphia Speech, but the race card was played by Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro[10] early on in the contest and the emergence of Reverend Wright as supreme leader of the black racists bothers the New York Times. Wright is now the nosiest and most visible racist in America and hangs like a buzzard around Obama’s political neck where he is dragging him down in the polls.

The Times, of course, would try to spin off this disaster and switch to other issues like they did with the Macaca Follies. Sure. We understand.

Herbert pleads:

“The challenge for the working press right now is to see if we can force ourselves past the overwhelming temptations of Wright and race and focus in a sustained way on some other important matters, like the cratering economy, metastasizing energy costs, the dismal state of public education, the nation’s crumbling infrastructure or the damage being done to the American soul by the endless war in Iraq.”[11]

Sure.

The leftists who have polluted the Party of Democrats with racist sludge and  slime for decades now are wet and sticky with blowback from their racist labors. They planted this monster as were the teeth of the dragon in the sands and now warriors armed with the modern weapons of racism grow out of the earth and attack those who sowed the seeds.

The Times help create this new monster and now it is hungry and comes to feed on its creator.

Justice is served.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Yet Another Democratic Rat Rats Out Colonel Klebb in Massachusetts 

From a previous blog, we leaned that yet another leftist Dem sandbagged Hillary and her consort. [1]

It looks like it be ring around old Rosy week just before a couple of critical primaries for the Queen Bee. It appears that one of Ted Kennedy’s lackeys wandered off in the fog.

“Today, Former Democratic National Committee Chair and Massachusetts supderdelegate Paul G. Kirk, Jr. endorsed Barack Obama.”[2]

And:

““It is with a great sense of pride and confidence in his leadership that I am delighted to publicly endorse Senator Barack Obama and pledge my support to him as former National Democratic Chairman and as a superdelegate. Senator Obama is the one candidate who has and will continue to expand the electorate beyond the traditional Democratic party base and bring young and new and Independent voters to the Democratic banner in November, an essential ingredient to a Democratic victory.”

Rush was right about wrinkles and politics.

Wappo, Zappo whim and wham!

Ooops. Where is the loyalty to HillBilly?

And, just when Obambi was shown to be an ordinary ideological racist. [3]

The Democrats deserve this mess. Raise taxes and praise the Islamo-Fascisti for a better society. Power to the People.

Let us all watch the cookie crumble.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Krugman Denies the Denials Of The Party Of Denial: Raise Taxes No Mater What.

In an incoherent essay by our krugmaniacal non-economist from the lofty throne at the New York Times [1], we get, following the trend of this paper,  an incoherent essay on Democrats buying into unknown positions taken by Republicans dating back to Ronald Reagan. Paul Krugman [2]is lost in his own fog in this screed as he stumbles around the theory of eternal mandates of tax hikes—the solution—that all left-liberals know is the path toward economic glory in the Soviet and Cuban modes.  We can enjoy the fruits of Marxism if we only learn and recite the litany.

“During Barack Obama’s Sunday appearance on Fox News, the interviewer asked him for an example of “a hot-button issue where you would be willing to buck the Democratic Party line” and say that Republicans have the better idea. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes from the NYT.]

Mr. Obama’s answer was puzzling because he gave credit where it isn’t due — and thereby undermined what could be a very effective Democratic line of argument.”

So, Obambi is either a heretic or liar? No, the question was out of order. The Republics have done nothing good in the past that could be praised or adopted into an Obama Administration.

“In particular, Mr. Obama attributed to Republicans the idea that regulation can be flexible rather than a matter of “top-down command and control,” and in particular for the idea of controlling pollution with a system of tradable emission permits rather than rigid regulations.”

The notion that a leftist leader would not employ a categorical “top-down command and control” concept for  any facet of our society, including the number of sheets of toilet paper, the amount of fat in a hamburger or  how many illegal aliens can work in a San Francisco massage, parlor breaks with the Democratic tradition of a command economy.  After all, they did such great jobs with The Great Society, War on Poverty, HUD, HHS, and AIDS and have really shown their economic credentials in the glorious Marxist experiments like California [3], New Jersey[4] and New York [5], all soon to default. The NYT recently had its credit rating placed down there somewhere the pigeon droppings as well. The celebrated reopening of the Bay Area bath houses really fixed the AIDS problem with applause.

Krugman gurgles and gropes far and wide in a futile attempt to contain his fury when he prints this:

“And that, surely, is the line the Democrats should be pushing in this election: Republicans have become the party of denial. If a problem can’t be solved with deregulation and tax cuts, they pretend it doesn’t exist.

Climate change is the obvious contemporary parallel with acid rain. But if the Democrats really want to pin the denialist[sic] label on John McCain, health care is the place to focus.”

The opposite notion of massive and intense regulation and tax hikes follows the mindless thesis of Krugman and the New York Times, both tributes to Walter Duranty and Lysenko.[6] It doesn’t matter what the program is if it will provide some basis for new tax hikes. [7] Thus, the quack science of Global Warming, EcoNazi Propaganda at its best, [8] has been transmutated to an essay on ‘climate change’ since the models were proven wrong in 2007 and the predictions went astray. The models are frequently phony. As we saw in the hilarious predicts given the leftist book The Limits to Growth[9] or the maudlin rants of mentally ill Rachel Carson.[10] No matter! Let us just say that ” up”  is either up or “down” and both are equally  bad when we read the thermometer.  Change now means new taxes in the Obama theory. The endless quest for new reasons to be a Tax Hike Zombie [11]is part of the mantra of the NYT and its attendant lackeys if the paper can avoid bankruptcy.

Then he turns the rusty crank on healthcare. We saw what that looked like when the NYT darling Fidel Castro worked up his phony system.[12] Can’t we do better than Fidel and offer our healthcare limited to less than  $230 per year as in Cuba?  We pay an average of $430 per month now. What a savings! Let California go show us the way! I would vote for such a limit to contain costs and force Congress to participate in this. They could have magic elixirs, drums, feathers and homeopathic jars of scented fluids to spread around at low cost and fix this nagging problem at low cost. Splendor with the grass.

Krugman and his trusty stack of soiled and dog-eared clichés from the Lenin Era can always manage to produce the same answer to any and all economic questions:

Raise Taxes  Raise Taxes  Raise Taxes

 We cannot find a case where our vaulted non economist has ever advocated a tax cut or a reduction in any government program except the military.

Tax and Spend Tax and Spend   Tax and Spend

And, some can say that this guy is ‘logical’ or ‘ponders weighty matters for a solution’ or presents several sides to any economic question?

Certainly not. This form of tautological soothsaying is best presented in the form a looping tape with bells and sad songs from the Drug Era of the 60s.     Cal Berkeley has certainly left its indelible mark on this guy.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Another Democratic Rat Rats Out Colonel Klebb in Indiana

In the best traditions of sleaze and backstabbing, the once-loyal Clintoonery[1] Clintinobots now scurry for favor and fluff by endorsing Obama just before the Indiana primary. We can all wonder what his prize for such treachery might be in the Obama Administration. This after Colonel Klebb[2] showed some leadership and style against the Evil O’Reilly in the Forbidden Fox Zone.

In a maudlin intermezzo with tears and soggy underwear, typical of the drooling sycophants that haunt the brackish backwaters and sanjacks[3] of politics, a former DNC chair under Slick Willie jumped on the Obama bandwagon. Joe Andrew, who was DNC chairman [1999-2001] sleazed out with an essay on politics as his excuse:

“"While I was hopeful that a long, contested primary season would invigorate our party, the polls show that the tone and temperature of the race is now hurting us," Andrew wrote. "John McCain, without doing much of anything, is now competitive against both of our remaining candidates. We are doing his work for him and distracting Americans from the issues that really affect all of our lives."”[4] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Invigorate? This, of course, is the ‘democracy’ that far leftists dream of where the unwashed and inbred can cast their votes to the winds and then reflexively allow the party elites to decide the outcome. This is the democracy of the USSR and North Korea, who actually has three parties.

“"He has shown such mettle under fire," Andrew said in the interview. "The Jeremiah Wright controversy just reconfirmed for me, just as the gas tax controversy confirmed for me, that he is the right candidate for our party."

Obambi was trying to get the support of the mentally disnimble[5], ‘typical whites” and other ignorant bystanders while attempting to keep his rabid racists and Islamo-Fascist supporters in the fold. The good Reverend Wright sandbagged Obama and threatened to give Hillary a boost in the Sacred Count Of The 800.  Book sales hang in the balance.

The Clinton Machine continues to rust away and now a black ideological racist approaches  the penultimate pinnacle in the Party of Democrats. We may expect the count may soon  even up and then each new ‘decision’ to endorse one or the other of these two tax whores will bring new oratory, flowers and song. Hillary has now failed in both the War Test and the Tax Whoring Test where Obama and his angry black woman stood firm. Keep gas prices high and let the terrorists win so we can blame Bush.

The Democrats deserve this mess. Raise taxes and praise the Islamo-Fascisti for a better society. Power to the People.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com