Posted by
rycK on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:20:12 AM
The Answer to the Question: What is Clinton's argument now?
The question persists and the answer is obvious.[1] Hillary and Bill cannot attack Obama on issues such as their common adoration for Saul Alinsky, a goat-essence Communist from the projects of Chicago as all players have common ties to Alinsky or more directly with Bill’s visit to Moscow in 1969 in a probably mole training exercise. The anti-commie speech cannot be issued in this contest.
Their differences in taxation and detestation for capitalism are also too common.
The only significant difference between the Clintons and Obamas is the way that they exploit racism and the War on Terrorism. Hillary can work the levers better than Barack. Obama has lost the war issue for those who believe we should hunt down our enemies. Hamas and Hezbollah both support Obama.
To win, Hillary has to call in IOUs from 300,000,000 worth of campaign fund-raisings in the past and show the party leaders that Obama has offended the simple, typical white voters in key states. Her best argument is Pennsylvania. If this state is lost to McCain, the race is all over and the anti-white racism issue will not have been useful to either candidate.
Far leftist candidates who lose like, McGovern, Mondale, Humphrey, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry fade away like a bee who wasted its only stinger.
Hillary has to keep mum about Marxism and show that Obama is a radical racist surrounded by a host of howling black racists who cannot win the white vote. That works for her.
rycK
Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com