The NYT Calls for More Illegal Votes to Stuff Ballots for the Leftist Democrats.

The New York Times, the paper that celebrated the 1960 Daley Machine that allowed the dead to graciously vote for JFK, has now decided that showing your ID during the voting process is some nasty plot to keep eligible voters away from squashes their chance to vote. In a tear-saturated lament, the Walter Duranty Papers[1], that rag that celebrated Stalin’s voting system—not to mention the sensational and efficient Moscow Central Planning—gives a woeful essay on this matter. In a typical leftist propaganda piece[2] that grinds away with the stale myth-busting illusions used by swamis, hucksters and psychic channelers of the black arts, we read in this propaganda article about The Myth of Voter Fraud:[3] 

“Missouri and at least 19 other states are considering passing laws that would force people to prove their citizenship before they can vote. These bills are not a sincere effort to prevent noncitizens from voting; that is a made-up problem. The real aim is to reduce turnout by eligible voters. Republicans seem to think that laws of this kind will help them win elections, but burdensome rules like these — and others cropping up around the country — pose a serious threat to democracy and should be stopped.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Such crap. Where is the missing essay on how California and some other states allow people to vote without ID or to submit absentee ballots under the ‘honor method?’ where is their account of the rampant ACORN frauds? Oh! Well, they are our ‘friends’ so we cannot mention them. They are manufacturing votes so that is good even if illegal.

This phony fluff must be contrasted with this testimony from an article entitled The Stunning Reality of Voter Fraud [4]by Wright Talley:

““I have been in conversations with people who have told me that, at various times, they’ve voted more than once on Election Day.…It happens.” Asked by the clerks how he could guarantee that same-day voter registration laws would not cause more voter fraud, Ivey-Soto replied, “I can’t ... but I can’t guarantee there isn’t fraud going on now.…I know people who have gone on Election Day and voted multiple times because they knew people who weren’t going to vote. I’ve never participated in that, but I know people who have.”” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Here is a clip on the voter corruption in the fraudulent Loretta Sanchez election:[5]

“An INS investigation in 1996 into alleged Motor Voter fraud in California's Forty-sixth Congressional District revealed that "4,023 illegal voters possibly cast ballots in the disputed election between Republican Robert Dornan and Democrat Loretta Sanchez." (p. 24)”

Now, what should we make of the New York Time’s endorsement of ID-free voting, leading in many cases to votes which are illegal and fraudulent? Don’t we expect this?

The New York Times will celebrate any tax hike[6], cheer on the butchery of 1900 fetuses per day  in a wild celebration that approaches a pagan Rite of Passage, an extermination of ‘non-persons’ that are extracted crying and thrown in the garbage disposal. Instead, they will wildly cheer Marxist despots like Fidel Castro and tell us how wonderful their $230 per year their healthcare system [7]is. They can dump on our soldiers and support Islamo-Fascism and compare our War on Terrorism to just another Nazi exercise.

So, why is this fraud endorsement any different from their previous actions?

It is not. The New York Times and their stooges will shore up any instance or clarion call for more sloth, sodomy, degeneracy[8], criminals in office[9], drug addiction[10] or Marxist dictators and explain away their intrinsic racism[11] such as the racist rants of Jeremiah Wright[12] [13]and his successor and defend the adoration of Louis Farrakhan and tell us that Senator Obama[14] is really not like all that. He is not a racist. They have no problem with celebrating the overt sodomizing of children in San Francisco in their bath houses and salons or endorsing terrorists that bomb school buses full of children in Israel, but they cannot stand capitalism and its ugly profits. They will defend their open border policy and welcome any illegal alien or terrorist who might possible give them a favorable vote.  This is all a matter of record on their part. Read their archives.

The Times now celebrates the high oil prices and tell us to ‘take public transportation’[15] and calls for higher and higher taxes.[16] We an all ‘conserve.’

The myth here is that the New York Times reports the ‘truth’ as we can easily prove that they are little other but simple supplicants and stooges  for the far left and will print any lie or construct any distortion of any issue to get power back to those who adore Fidel Castro, Vinegar John Kerry[17], Karl Marx, Squeaky From or Louis Farrakhan. They could stalwartly defend Clintoonery [18]until a black racist suddenly  became a viable candidate. [19] [20]

The New York Times is still in the primitive stage of politics where lies and sleaze are the common currency. They cannot rise above their third world mentalities. The myth here is that these leftists could recognize any form of American life. These people are primitive animals and act like cockroaches when power hangs in the balance. Expect more of this as the election contest heats up. The leftists are frantic and may have chosen another yo-yo like Dukakis to lead them into the political latrines again.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com