Posted by
rycK on Saturday, May 03, 2008 11:51:23 AM
The NYT wants us to get off Reverend Wright…[Remember the Macaca Follies?]
The New York Times, chum-chuckers for any far leftist process including praise for our enemies, has, in today’s column by Bob Herbert made a maudlin plea to focus on something else other than the good Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the famous leader of the Black Liberation Theology movement. The press coverage is now thought to be Overkill and should be given Short Shrift. [1]
“The Rev. Jeremiah Wright is no doubt (and regrettably) a big issue in the presidential campaign. But what we’ve seen over the past week is major media overkill — Jeremiah Wright all day and all night. It’s like watching the clips of a car wreck again and again.” [2]
Really? How could we compare this issue to the macaca follies the Times celebrated during the presidential race of Senator Allen? It seems Frank Rich of pratfall fame and other propagandists worked this issue into the ground. [3]
Why was this comment, using an unknown word, so important? Why, it allowed the New York Times, the Scion of Walter Druanty’s[4] image, to strongly influence the race with the result that some Democrat won in Virginia.
Could we wonder if the NYT’s incessant political screeches over macaca could be compared, in overkill terms, of course, to a disgusting racist popinjay who hates America and also, apparently, Senator Obama?
We understand that truth and such are not essential elements in propaganda screeds[5], but this frantic leap from objectivity needs to be highlighted.
Wright, driving two Mercedes cars, living in a million dollar home with a $10,000,000 line of credit and making obscene speeches about hating America is now exposed as a disgusting, gutter-grade racist and this linkage upsets liberals. We all have to understand that the leftists ‘own’ the race issue and have used it to success to keep their constituents directed to the correct ballots ever since Bobby Kennedy. Racism is one of the main underpinnings of the Party of Democrats, second only to tax whoring, celebrating drug addiction and the continual praise of abortion.
Herbert tries to deflect this juggernaut even when the Times was fishing for ‘issues.’[6] Well, they have one now.
When we assemble the bits and pieces of Senator Obama, adding in the remarks of his angry black wife, we can see a picture of an ideological racist[7] in full force. This definition is adequate, but not sufficient to describe the race effect so the new word cryptomisoxeny[8] was recommended to clear up the facts that those persons of color may be true racists in the classic sense normally attributed to, politically, and limited to whites. The Senator believes that white, middle-class rural and suburban people are ignorant, unsophisticated, flee to their belief systems in terror, are rude, unwashed and clean their guns nightly.
Senator Obama tried to suppress the complexities of race in his race [9] with his Philadelphia Speech, but the race card was played by Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro[10] early on in the contest and the emergence of Reverend Wright as supreme leader of the black racists bothers the New York Times. Wright is now the nosiest and most visible racist in America and hangs like a buzzard around Obama’s political neck where he is dragging him down in the polls.
The Times, of course, would try to spin off this disaster and switch to other issues like they did with the Macaca Follies. Sure. We understand.
Herbert pleads:
“The challenge for the working press right now is to see if we can force ourselves past the overwhelming temptations of Wright and race and focus in a sustained way on some other important matters, like the cratering economy, metastasizing energy costs, the dismal state of public education, the nation’s crumbling infrastructure or the damage being done to the American soul by the endless war in Iraq.”[11]
Sure.
The leftists who have polluted the Party of Democrats with racist sludge and slime for decades now are wet and sticky with blowback from their racist labors. They planted this monster as were the teeth of the dragon in the sands and now warriors armed with the modern weapons of racism grow out of the earth and attack those who sowed the seeds.
The Times help create this new monster and now it is hungry and comes to feed on its creator.
Justice is served.
rycK
Comments: ryckki@gmail.com
[2]Overkill and Short Shrift Ibid.
[4] From his devotion to Communism, Stalin and propaganda. In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor
[7] Ideological Racism Ideological racism refers to the belief that some races are biologically, intellectually, or culturally inferior to others. From time to time, these ideologies are elevated to the status of scientific theory (Farley, 2000:14-15). http://www.delmar.edu/socsci/rlong/race/far-01.htm.
[11] Overkill and Short Shrift Ibid.