Obama: College for Everybody with No SATs?!

Senator Obama now has a solution to education: little or no testing and, of course higher taxes.[1] This is a predictable hope from somebody who practiced ‘community organizing,’ a crude euphemism for rabble-rousing the poor in Chicago using the Communist Saul Alinsky Methods of radicalism. Obama admired Saul Alinsky, a loudly proud Marxist and street hustler. So did Hillary.

The difficulty in the education of minorities is described by the existence of a social phenomenon known as the education gap. [2]  This gap is the difference between average test scores of white and blacks 100- 85 for a 15 point difference. These 15 IQ points have even been acknowledged by the New York Times.[3] This gap was first noticed about 1905 [4] in the early research on cognitive skills and has persisted in almost forms of education in all the school districts and is described in detail by the publication of The Bell Curve.[5] There have been hundreds of millions of IQ tests given since 1910 and these tests appear in different forms such as the military tests and some tests administered by corporations to screen potential employees. This summary of the Bell Curve studies merely stated the obvious existence of such a gap and was based on public test scores and was immediately assaulted by the left as racist.  Perhaps the critics think the book actually changed the test scores. Many seem to think that the publication of his book actually created the gap, or worse. Minorities cannot compete with whites on standardized tests. We can all argue about this gap and the reasons that it exists and grope for ‘root causes’ and other clichés, but the fact remains that minorities cannot as yet compete against whites in academia, the corporate work force, or more particularly Asians, in the academic arena. So, in nearly all of the 14,000 school districts across the land there are no school systems where blacks routinely score higher than whites on standardized tests with roughly 50:50 population ratios. These tests have been stringently rewritten expunge the ‘white bias’ and ‘be fair’ and when re-administered have produced the same results; A15 point deficiency is nearly always observed. If the 15 point gap was a myth then we would expect to see about half the school districts showing blacks populating the upper half of the academic population and we observe essentially none of this,. Money is not the solution as the Washington, DC, school system spends the most money on their students and have probably the worst academic record in America.[6] Money is clearly not the answer.[7] The lefties tacitly admit (without saying it directly) that affirmative action is absolutely necessary for many minorities to compete in our society. They either don’t have the cognitive skills or refuse to use them, or a combination of both. The use of race-norming was used to disguise this gap. [8]

In any given large group, noting that statistics for intelligence do not apply to individuals, we can expect to find a bell curve. There are bell curves for blacks and whites and Asians and Hispanics and Jews and such that all have a similar bell shape except that the mean is different for certain groups. The width of the curve is expressed in standard deviations.[9] So, if we choose to discuss ‘purple people’ to avoid any race arguments we might find that the IQ ranges from 65, below which there is no way to measure the central cognitive tendency ‘g’ to a median of 100 to an upper limit of about 180 or so. Traditionally, those with higher IQs have gone on to college and the SATs correlate well with IQ and successful graduation. Generally, the minimal IQ level for a medical doctor is about 120 and is about the same for lawyers and CEOs as the latter pair seem to attract the most intelligent.  College is appropriate for about 20% of our citizens.

Okay, now we have to realize that in a modern society we must have sanitation engineers, clerks, teachers, physicists and brain surgeons and that these jobs require different cognitive skills. Our society would have to change significantly and approach something resembling Cambodia during the Pol Pot Khmer Rouge days to ‘equalize’ our citizens in jobs and economic terms.[10] Those people with obviously higher IQs or with soft hands were suffocated with plastic so that the resultant society was more homogeneous. The Russians performed a similar social miracle with the liquidation of the stubborn kulaks[11] and that solved some major problems in their utopia. In the Cambodian society, the skill base was strictly limited to agricultural work except for the political dictatorship so that anybody could trade jobs with anybody else and the outcome would not change. The cities were emptied. Those who complained were liquidated thus enhancing the food supply for the dedicated and true believer and facilitated the streamlining of the government. The left likes things simple and tidy.

So, how do we choose our brain surgeons? By lot or political party loyalty norms as the Russians did for 74 years? Can we imagine electrical engineers with an IQ of 85 designing new and better gadgets while another purple person with 100 points higher works as a sanitation engineer? Yes, we certainly can as we inspect the vision of the left.  In our purple society we would still have to match job skills with the cognitive skill base required for that job or accept disaster. Disaster is very acceptable for the left and that is why they would accept a society based on welfare and having most of the citizens work for the government. There is no evidence that the far left can even tolerate a prosperous society.

The Obama Solution to the problem of education lies in the leftist intrinsic hatred for private property and capitalism. He is a product of the gutters of Chicago and rabid Marxism of the mean streets and brings this openly into his campaign. His angry wife parrots this view. The leftist societies like the USSR, Cuba, North Korea and other social latrines are abject failures and everybody knows this. But, for the rabid left, which can be the only way to describe the left-liberals in the US now, this IS a solution. Big government is the only answer to any left liberal question and dumbing down[12] our society by placing the ‘average’ person in control of the economic and governmental levers of society is exactly what they need for a political success. The poor have nothing according to the preaching of the far left so why not vote for Obama and hope for a job as a university professor or brain surgeon or court magistrate?

The proof of the far left and their intent appears quite openly in the failure of the massive social programs such as HUD, War on Poverty, The Great Society and other monstrosities. They have never apologized for these outrages. They only demand higher taxes and opportunities for more of the same. More proof of what the unsupervised leftists in the minority sectors is seen when mostly black liberals get control of cities such as New Orleans, Baltimore, Philadelphia, NYC, East St Louis, Detroit and others. These places are the centers of crime, sloth, sodomy, shootings and abject failure:

Murder in the Cities with left-liberals in control.

So, if Senator Obama wants to convince us of his intentions with this kind of fluff:

"China is graduating eight times as many engineers as we are," he said. Obama, rightly, noted that that's a big problem "in a world where good jobs can be located anywhere there's an Internet connection -- where a child in Denver is competing with a child in Beijing and Bangalore."[13] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

China has 1.4 billion people, some 4.3 times our populating. India is doing better with the highest educated work force on the planet. We actually expect more, but China has a billion poor so who knows?  A child from Denver whose parents have little use for education and are more interested in sports or drugs cannot compete with anybody unless he or she has the drive and cognitive skills to get into college and work hard to learn engineering. Obama will provide a free ride here with no academic responsibilities. This is a circus.

Obama rants on with this phony promise:

“Then, Obama said he'd make community college free, as in beer.”As president, I will ... make community college completely free," he said.

In return, students must agree to teach, volunteer, or join the Peace Corps, Obama said, curiously leaving out the military as means through which kids can "serve their country" to get a free pass into higher education.”[14]

Teach what? How to be a loser and political parasite?

Obama, if his Ivy League education is authentic and he is not just some token who has had very narrow political training, which might be supported by observing that he listened to Jeremiah Wright for 20 years, a lunatic and hopeless racist, merely honks the sorry old kazoo of the socialist left. They want more ‘education.’ This is elitist paternalism.[15] The left still believe that they have something to contribute to society beyond sodomy, chaos, failed government and the mind-expanding effects of drugs.

To think that we cannot test individuals to see where they might be best employed in our society argues against China and India’s impressive academic credentials. They don’t test?

We have to accept the very ugly fact that Obama is just the far left product of gutter Communism and that he knows there is no hope for the inner cities without taxing the rest of society and reducing the suburbs to the same social and economic levels. We can look to Washington, DC and ask: why can’t you make education work there with the excessive money that is wasted there? Why not explain to us about the sloth and crime rates in New Orleans, Detroit and other leftist enclaves? Do they have community colleges in those places? How much education does a drug dealer have to have to make a million dollars in the hood?

Does society really need a college education for their dope dealers, abortionists, muggers, welfare recipients and rabble rousers? Why not convert our prisons into community colleges and see how that works?

Without testing, the left can always claim success and avoid any responsibility for the failure of their politically defined ‘graduates.’ Metrics always sort out the losers and show us what the left is like and what they have to offer.

An ignorant population is the only one that the leftists can govern so they pursue the dumbing down of American so their political constituents can compete. Money and power are what they want and the tax base can be milked until the system collapses then they will blame capitalism. Dekulakization[16]is their goal. They cannot tolerate those who oppose socialism or have the cognitive skills to finess the crass tenets of the forms of socialism that has ruined Europe and most of Asia. The let has learned nothing from the 100,000,000 dead bodies they left scattered around in Europe in Marxist purges.

If they cannot round up the non-Marxist anti-believers they can certainly tax them away from their power base, quench their individualism  and teach the proper use of socialism to their cadres in free community colleges. The government will pay them impressive salaries with the best benfits in the world.  Such is happening to California now, a hopeless case heading for certain bankruptcy and probable civil war.

Obama is a slick  politial constuct carved out of primitive leftist political theory and can best work the dispicable  levers of racism and marxian ecnomnics for the Democrats. It a testamant to the Democratic Party that Saul Alinsky, whose mental and personal hygienes could not approach the common goat, is the enchanting idol for our two presidential candidates. That is very telling.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The EcoNazis and Reality: Klaus Offers to Debate Al Gore.

The flight from reason of liberals is based on the frantic quest for political power [read tax mongering here] and has elevated al Gore and his EcoNazis[1] to grand heights.  There is so little time left to save the planet!  Al Gore has pledged he will eliminate the internal combustion engine and other anti-capitalist maneuvers to save the planet, or, in the immortal words of Ted Turner to ‘save us from cannibalism,” or words to that effect. No matter that their computer models and other feather and drum ensembles give the wr0ng predictions. This is all politics and devoid of any science.

All this hysteria is enabled by mental freak show hucksters like Rachel Carson and screeds like her maudlin screed Silent Spring.[2]She was sick in body and mind and lashed out in fury at something that did no harm. DDT is not harmful to birds or anything else except mosquitoes.[3]  This bit of pseudo science actually surpassed the political follies of Lysenkoism[4] [5], the wild magnetic healing machines of Mesmer[6] and reminds us of the wizard Merlin. [7] All this is phony and all attempts to ‘predict’ the future of natural resources, temperature and such have resulted in abject failure. The phony book: The Limits to Growth[8]used acomputer model that hilariously predicted we would run out of oil, copper and lead by 1992 and deplete our natural gas reservoirs by 1993. These fools actually produced a revision of their ‘model’ in the 90s which was ignored.

 But, when there is a mass movement, the loonies pile on the mattresses as Eric Hoffer [9] warned us.

Read this summary of this True Believer and see if the description fits the contemporary left-liberals and their racist allies:

“Hoffer argues that mass movements such as Fascism and Communism spread by promising a glorious future. To be successful, these mass movements need the adherents to be willing to sacrifice themselves and others for the future goals. To do so, mass movements need to devalue both the past and the present. Mass movements appeal to frustrated people who are dissatisfied with their current state, but are capable of a strong belief in the future.  As well, mass movements appeal to people who want to escape a flawed self by creating an imaginary self and joining a collective whole. Some categories of people who may be attracted to mass movements include poor people, misfits, and people who feel thwarted in their endeavors.”

This describes losers, the soul of the Party of Democrats as we now know it.

The loonies and others described by Hoffer include a significant number of ‘scientists, who, in nonscientific mandates, tell us that the ‘science is over’ and what they offer is fact. Science does not operate in this manner.   Science is always open to discussion of data and theories are always subject to verification and question. Not so with the EcoNazis, who pronounce that their stuff is the Final Solution to ecology and there is no need to question their words. The arrogance of this stance soars beyond ignorance and sleaze, but it works for the politicians. In the political arena, the ‘facts’ can always be forced to confess to any allegation. Scientific charlatans can bring about this stunning political feat by forming a simple ‘consensus.’ We can just hold a meeting, smoke some dope in university settings, and decide what the current laws of physics ought to be if most of the attendees are merely ‘concerned’ and federal funds are on the drum.[10] The fact that the weather veered off in its own direction made the ‘scientists’ and their models look like fools. [11]

It seems that 21,000 scientists, I among them [12], have refuted this garbage but Al Gore and his political minstrel show players honk their kazoos and calls for more taxes and bans on energy. They have nothing except our tax monies.

The Czech President Klaus now is ready to debate al Gore on climate change:  

“Washington - Czech President Vaclav Klaus said Tuesday he is ready to debate Al Gore about global warming, as he presented the English version of his latest book that argues environmentalism poses a threat to basic human freedoms. "I many times tried to talk to have a public exchange of views with him, and he's not too much willing to make such a conversation," Klaus said. "So I'm ready to do it."[13] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

The phony scientists cannot stand to have their final conclusions questioned or their computer models tested as they know that the scientific basis is equivalent to shoe scrapings. Thus, they must keep silent and appeal to the political groups who need the money and could care less about the weather or the science.

C. Edmund Wright comments on this:

“When you understand this concept and examine the theory (also known as fact) that extreme environmentalism is a totalitarian ideology, it makes sense on many levels. Not the least of which are the resulting effects of totalitarianism or enviromentalism [sic] on free markets and more pointedly... the vast "coincidence" of the leftist and green movements' leaders. Apparently, inside The Beltway pundits have never bothered to even examine it. And they admit it.”[14]

This is the tip-off: the EcoNazis formed ranks about the time the USSR went bust and placed their efforts in other areas. They relied on the Clean Air Act and Endangered Species Acts to work their radical Marxist political levers.

From the 20s Von Mises warned us of Communism[15] Later Hayek, about 1943, ampllified his remarks and cofirmed his theories.

 “Hayek argued that countries such as the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had already gone down the "road to serfdom", and that various democratic nations are being led down the same road. In The Road to Serfdom he wrote: "The principle that the end justifies the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the denial of all morals. In collectivist ethics it becomes necessarily the supreme rule." [16]

Now, Communism andEnvironmentalismare indistinguishable.

Al Gore’s Marxist credentials are well established as he inherited this disease from his father, a stooge of the Russians as a lackey for Armand Hammer whose father founded the Communist Party USA with Stalin’s blessings.[17] So, why should we continue to believe in this worthless quest for our tax money? Is this not mere Marxism in a green skirt?

The answer is frustration, hate, sorrow and drug addiction on the part of nearly half of our society. Hoffer described these people perfectly. Part of our society has degenerated into a quivering mass of maudlin, whining criminals and sodomites who have no future without feeding on the tax base. We have 2 million criminals in prison at this time and probably 5-10 million felons running free in the streets. The left welcomes Hispanic criminals into their midst in many cities and protects them from authorities and justice. The rabid left use racism, crime, support illegal immigration, promote drug use and celebrate addiction and grunt and grab for public money in every corner of our society. They are frustrated and lost.  They infest our schools and colleges and ‘teach’ anti-Americanism as they promote Marxism and its later forms. They have no shame, but do have the wild support of the United Nations and   any third world country that begs for alms.  They ally with Islamo-Fascism who chant ‘Death to America’ along with the terrorists. Depression and revolution are their only roads to victory.

Al Gore will not debate the issue as the phony EcoNazism is political and has no basis in fact.

Our society is sick and Obama and his racists will exploit that sickness.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

The NYT Talks about Telling the Truth with Half Truths. Walter Duranty Would Be so Proud.

In a decent propaganda piece the writer needs to give mostly the facts as Hanoi Hanna [1]did in her Vietnamese radio broadcasts to the US military forces or as sanctioned by Omar Shariff, in the movie Tamarind Seed:[2] “Tell the truth most of the time so that an occasional lie will be believed when necessary.” [or words to that effect]. Here, one of the lesser, but still dedicated liberals tries his hand at explaining the ‘truth’ about the ‘truth’ about the oil crisis and that here is only one alternative.

The construction, entitled Truth or Consequences[3] by Tom Friedman begins with this:

“Imagine for a minute, just a minute, that someone running for president was able to actually tell the truth, the real truth, to the American people about what would be the best — I mean really the best — energy policy for the long-term economic health and security of our country. I realize this is a fantasy, but play along with me for a minute. What would this mythical, totally imaginary, truth-telling candidate say?” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.][Also, this link references all quotes in this blog unless specifically designed otherwise.]

In terms of a propagandistic construction this is not bad as the door here is opened for speculation about what politicians might say under a heavy dose of truth serum. Of course,   this is not reasonable as our planetary culture seems to utilize some macabre reverse Darwinian Selection process that selects the worst possible liars and sleaze bags as our ‘leaders,’ but we can play along here for educational purposes. We already know what the NYT intends to tell us, because that is part of the party line: we don’t like private property or capitalism. The key to this screed is based on ‘telling the whole truth’ and this will be suppressed today, as usual,  at the Walter Duranty Papers.[4]  They deal only in half truth mixed with leftist ideology and cryptomisoxeny. [5]

More oozes forth:

“For starters, he or she would explain that there is no short-term fix for gasoline prices.”

 Now, that is the truth, but we need a little truthful fluffiness to give the reader the false notion that the rest of this essay is also grounded in truth. Note the little gender slip here. Hillary is out as far as the Times is concerned. [6]

“Cynical ideas, like the McCain-Clinton summertime gas-tax holiday, would only make the problem worse,…”

The cynicism here refers to a tax cut, something so abhorrent to the left that it cannot even be discussed with any coherence. His brother in economics on the NYT staff [some krugmaniacal essayist] actually uses terms like Tax Zombies [7]to criticize and demonize those who would take money away from the ‘people.’ Actually in Europe, now having riots and blockages and more,  the 19% VAT tax might be lifted with some effect.[8] But, as they could not handle the cars being burned or being overrun by Islamo-Fascists either so we shall see. Losing 100,000,000 good citizens since 1870 in nasty wars has affected their gene pool we might surmise as we view the incoherent sputum of European Leadership such as the Prince of Wales. [9]This effect will be discussed later in my refutation of this NYT fluff.

“This candidate would note that $4-a-gallon gasoline is really starting to impact driving behavior and buying behavior in way that $3-a-gallon gas did not.”

 True. This is an astonishing remark as it implies that there is some kind of supply and demand function that might influence buyers and sellers. Maybe NYT economists and their lackeys did take Econ 101.

“But the message going forward to every car buyer and carmaker would be this: The price of gasoline is never going back down.”

 Oooops. The supply/demand function now has a bottom on it. If the supply increase, the price will never go down = NYT Econ Lesson #8831.

And, here we hear the Final Solution:

“We need to make a structural shift in our energy economy. Ultimately, we need to move our entire fleet to plug-in electric cars. The only way to get from here to there is to start now with a price signal that will force the change.”

Some think we need a structural change in our political system. Sometimes there is truth and then there are consequences.

Translated, this means fixing supply and letting the price go wild. The economies of Asia, the US and the socialist Europeans will take a serious downturn, but what the heck. We need to ‘do the right thing’ as Spike Lee said. [10]And, what will generate the electricity? Nuclear power as in France and Japan? Coal? On an efficiency basis, only solar powered cars would let us escape fossil fuels or nuclear energy.  They don’t work. Batteries are too heavy.

“Barack Obama had the courage to tell voters that the McCain-Clinton summer gas-giveaway plan was a fraud. Wouldn’t it be amazing if he took the next step and put the right [(sic), he means left] plan before the American people? Wouldn’t that just be amazing?”

Yes, but telling the good citizens that he will hold down supply and let the price of gas rise to 8-10$ per gallon is not the kind of thing that gets you elected. The citizens will tolerate this for a while until they realize that the liberal Democrats are directly responsible for these prices as they prevent us from exploring, drilling and producing gas from the trillions of barrels of energy we own. The utopian leftists, dreaming of high-rise projects where the good citizens use public transportation and adore their leaders is a dream that will be smashed with capitalism, as usual. Remember the USSR? 74 years of this drool and it went down.

When the voters get angry enough, there will be more drilling and pumping and the construction of numerous nuclear plants. The penalty for this is little as the Global Warming Crisis is a leftist EcoNazi [11]pipedream and only a slick trick to hike taxes and everybody will know that when the weather and hurricane activities continue to run counter to the predictions of their phony compute ‘models.’ [12]

Notice the cynicism in his description of a temporary tax cut? He foams at the mouth at such a prospect.

Here is the truth about capitalism from a distinguished Democrat member of Congress:

“And guess what this member* would be all about? This member would be all about socializing — er, uh. [Pauses for several moments] …. would be about … [pause] … bsically [sic]… taking over, and the government running all of your companies.” [13] [14]--Maxine Waters.

“Policy, for the most part, has been made by white people in America, not by people of color. And they have tended to take care of those things that they think are important. Whether it's their agricultural subsidies, or other kinds of expenditures that are certainly not expenditures for poor people or for people of color. And so we have to band together and keep fighting back.”[15]-- Maxine Waters.

These rants are shared by almost all the Obama core supporters and the New York Times as well. What NYT article takes on Maxine for her ignorance and racist remarks? She is as important to the Times as Walter Duranty was in his day. This is known as belligerent ignorance.

Several things can be of help here:

[1] Obama tells the liberal truth as the liberals want it to be said, and loses the election and the voters learn that the liberals and their racist progenitors do not like private property and especially hate  SUVs and private  homes in the suburbs.

[2] The idiot Europeans have a nice heavy depression and a juicy civil war with their new Islamo-Fascist masters, lower the demand for oil and the US price goes down while the supply goes up.  Maybe Paris will finally burn down.

[3] The Chinese and Indian economies go into the dumpster as the US demand for their plastic crap is lowered by the high gas prices here at home.

[4] We could blend our current fuel consumption and energy needs with other alternative energy schemes in some kind of decade-long program where oil is slowly phased out and new fuels are phased in. Tax incentives and research and such can be used to find new efficient ways for energy and avoid a depression or severe economic decline in the US and the world.

This blending theme, or any variant thereof, is not mentioned here in this propaganda piece by the Times, but only half truths are offered from the NYT, as this plan is too reasonable and takes power away from the liberals. The best of political times was in 1933-1935 where workers were ‘thankful’ for their worthless jobs raking leaves in the  national forests and viewed Roosevelt as some form of paternal god. “These are hard times.” Well, the left can bring back those times.  After they cause the oil crisis they can solve it with more socialism.

 So, another sophomoric rant passes over the muddy waters and we are again educated as to the actual intent of this form of propaganda. The ‘truth’ in this article was properly distorted in classic Walter Duranty fashion and we salute the Times for being consistent. They are not as good as their Soviet mentors in this art, but some of their works are praiseworthy.

Another thing that might help the fuel prices might be if we legalized sodomy, narcotics, prostitution and celebrated any form of sloth and forced the good citizens at the LeftCoast to recycle food. [16] We could suggest they eliminate all wage taxes for government workers, double taxes for corporations and their employees. As an added social feature they might suddenly double the welfare payments in California, Washington and Oregon thus attracting the sick, lame and lazy from other Parts of America. That might lighten the gas usage for Real Americans.  Utopias do not need fossil fuels—they exist on love, drugs and song.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Bill Clinton: Obama Will Lose in November.

“(CNN) — Former President Bill Clinton said that Democrats were more likely to lose in November if his wife Hillary Clinton is not the party’s presidential nominee, and suggested some people were trying to “cover this up” and “push and pressure and bully” superdelegates to make up their minds prematurely”.[1] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

We heard this before.

““And they're trying to get her to cry uncle before the Democratic Party has to decide what to do in Florida and Michigan” – which the party would need to do “unless we want to lose the election. "

Yes, that is a problem.

“"If you notice, there hasn't been a lot of publicity on these polls I just told you about,” he said. “It is the first time you've heard it? Why do you think that is? Why do you think? Don't you think if the polls were the reverse and he was winning the Electoral College against Senator McCain and Hillary was losing it, it would be blasted on every television station?”

For sure, for sure.

He added, “You would know it wouldn't you? It wouldn't be a little secret. And there is another Electoral College poll that I saw yesterday had her over 300 electoral votes…. She will win the general election if you nominate her. They're just trying to make sure you don't."

Bill, you lost control of the media, most importantly the New York Times—aka Walter Duranty Memorial Paper.[2] They hate Hillary now even thought they endorsed her. Ho ho ho.

This all sounds reasonable until you realize that the Obama Thingis a cheap political trick designed and sculpted in racism[3] and the leftist Party of Democrats must risk all to secure the black vote.[4] So, Jeremiah Wright and his phony, mud-raking racists have to be tolerated to prevent a revolt of blacks who have been taught how to suffer and vote for Dems.  They bolt and nobody wins. They take their simple instructions and some walking around money and maybe Obama wins. Hillary loses on all variations.

If Hillary is nominated, the blacks revolt, she loses and we get the loser McCain.

That is how it stacks up if we cannot Dump McCain soon. They lived by racism and they will fall by racism. Justice of a sort.

Happy Trails Billy.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

World Wide Protests against Oil Prices. We Should Join Them!

The French and Brits, and others, are now staging blockages and slowdown over the price of oil:

Ref Article: Sarkozy calls for tax cut as fuel protests spread in Europe [1]

 Well, even the socialists are feeling the tax pinch. We can thank the Marxist EcoNazis for high costs and no help from nuclear power.

“"I want to ask the question to our European partners: if oil continues to increase, should we not suspend the VAT taxation on the price of oil?" Sarkozy said in a radio interview.

The effect of skyrocketing fuel prices on fishermen has steadily gained attention throughout the continent, and European ministers on Tuesday called for direct EU economic aid to the industry.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

“French consumers pay about 19.6 percent VAT on the price of fuel.”

That is a great idea for liberals to push for! Why not raise taxes on gas now?

“Meanwhile, French Prime Minister Francois Fillon said the country must boost its nuclear power to address the problem, adding that "we are dealing with a long-term increase of the price of oil."

Where is our nuclear power?: Oh! Stalled for 30 years by liberals?

“British truck owners say they face unfair competition from continental haulers who they say can buy cheaper fuel.”

 Maybe we can get truck service from illegal aliens! Can they buy oil from Mexico at low cost??

Thank the liberals for this and remember them in November.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The NYT Fixes the Potholes in the Roads for Biden and Trashes Hillary.

It is election time and always the perfect time to start sculpting images for the voters to view and faint over before the ballots are print ed. Such occasions prompt the The New York Times—more accurately portrayed as the Walter Duranty Memorial Paper[1]--has a self-anointed mandate to council the people on how to vote. They serve no other  purpose unless you think they pick decent books to encourage people to read., this instance of propaganda, some facts have to be polished a bid and a lot of other, more nasty, antecedents to one of the players must be left abandoned on the floors of history hopefully to be left to lie in piece.

“On Friday morning, Joe Biden gave us an example of a leading national politician exhibiting decency and class. Later in the day, Hillary Clinton gave us an example of something else.”[2] [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Here, Herbert offers us the Zoroastrian approach to propaganda where they set up the characters of Light and Dark for us to watch the battles. This is a little clownish, but the NYT revenues are falling and then need to do something.  I omitted his oblique remarks about Hillary is so much fluff. The more important factoid here is the obvious polishing of Joe Biden for Sec of State, an office he would disgrace like Dean Acheson did [3]. Here we merely substitute Communists for Islamo-Fascists and the stage is set.

Golden Joe Speaks for US:

“Senator Biden, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, was on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program. He spoke insightfully about the complexity of dealing with Iran, moving the discussion beyond the tedious and simplistic argument over whether to meet with certain foreign leaders.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

“I refuse to sit back like we did in 2000 and 2004. This administration is the worst administration in American foreign policy in modern history — maybe ever. The idea that they are competent to continue to conduct our foreign policy, to make us more secure and make Israel secure, is preposterous. ... Every single thing they’ve touched has been a near-disaster.”

Full of rancor and hate, Joe needs something to control his rage. [4]

But, here is a sample of the Real Curmudgeon of Claymont:

He rants:

“"This is raw, raw politics, demeaning to the presidency of the United States of America," Biden said in an exclusive interview on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos." ”[5]

He is really out of control and embarrasses the constituents of his own state. [6]This guy is not a person who can handle diplomacy or his own fevered outbursts.[7] Joe Biden cannot even tell his constituents whether stealing social security numbers and not paying taxes is a crime. He needs the votes of criminals so very much.[8] But his earlier work as a rabid hawk in Bosnia needs some clarification. He was attempting to ‘stop genocide’ by taking sides against the Serbs is illustrative of his ‘foreign policy’ and diplomacy.[9] His plagiarism must be recalled as well.[10] He cheated his way through LawSchool at Syracuse.

He is a war monger for starting the war in the Balkans with rants like this:

“Opponents of a new Kosovo must be stopped,”[11]

This is Joe Biden diplomacy with shouts and emotion.

This sounds like a crusade leader or some carnival tinsel barker in the middle of some  sales pitch for cupie dolls and cotton candy. Why not say” Opponents of the new wave of Hispanic Illegal Aliens must be stopped.” Joe favors the votes he may get from illegal aliens.  Joe supports the Islamo-Fascists in Kosovo the way he supports the Islamo-Fascists in Iran and Syria.

The wreckage in Kosovo after Biden’s works:

“The truth of the matter is that Kosovo has a dismal record regarding basic security, the rule of law and respect for property and human rights for non-Albanians. Democracy should not be universal and not ethnic, nor based on religion. Should the threat of violence be rewarded by a quick move to independence or is Kosovo just a propaganda tool for the Muslim world as Senator Biden seems to suggest?[12]

Kosovo’s provisional joke of a ‘constitution,’ an expected outcome when the United Nations and their lackeys when are given such power, allows the Islamic majority “unicameral Kosovo Assembly of the Provisional Government (120 seats; 100 seats directly elected, 10 seats for Serbs, 10 seats for other minorities; to serve three-year terms)”[13]

Joe Biden snarled up much of this mess in the Balkans with his oppressive and bigoted remarks about Serbs so that seems to give him license to use the same language against George Bush, the President of the United States and this kind of rhetoric is just fine with liberal Democrats. People like Biden allowed a reverse genocide to occur [14] He would never talk about Castro or Kim or Robert Mugabe in the manner he used for President Bush.  He has respect for them.

Joe Biden’s liberal rants against the Serbs are of the same quality and thrust and political direction as against Israel by supporting the Palestinians and, of course, standing firmly  against US Citizens in California and other states  where illegal aliens are welcomed and encouraged to vote. Joe supports the terrorists[15] Joe would prevent Israel from a preemptive strike against Iran and their nuclear project so he could ‘talk’ with them. This is appeasement with a political reward. He can get more support and votes from Arabs than Jews it seems. He will swing and grope for the graft and support as Clinton does.

Joe attempts an apology for his psychotic outburst:

“"I shouldn't have used that word [bullsh*t, ed]. I came off the elevator and was confronted with what had happened, and I responded. ... I should have just said 'malarkey,' but the essence of what I was saying is absolutely accurate. This is outrageous." [16]

Herert rambles on with the NYT article:

“Senator Biden became emotionalas he began his response to the question. “This is tough for me,” he said, “because John’s been my friend for 35 years, and I’m disappointed. Because, as you all know, there is a difference between an ad hominem argument and a logical response.”

How can we tell which form you use Joe? I wonder if you know the difference.

Herbert summs up:

 “Mr. Biden understands that the tone of a campaign is important, that it can make a difference. It’s a lesson Mrs. Clinton seems not to have learned.”

Herbert cannot find any problems with Joe Biden’s tones? Does Bob think Joe is playing a flute or bongo drum?

There are a lot of words Joe Biden ought to chosen. The word 'malarkey,' however, is very accurate when describing his rants.

Joe Biden is Malarkey and Malarkey is Joe.  Talking to Joe about ‘tone’ is like talking to the Snake in the Garden of Eden about fruit.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

 Dick Morris Ask Questions About Questions Hillary Should Answer.

The most astute political analyst since Karl Rove bungled the 2004 election predictions in Congress we have these unanswered questions about Bill and Hillary.

1. What did Bill Clinton do for the $15 million he was paid by the Emir of Dubai?

2. What did he do for the Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra, who he brought with him to Kazakhstan and introduced to its president after Giustra gave his foundation, which he controls, $100 million?

3. What did he do for InfoUSA, the direct mail list company that sold lists of vulnerable elderly people to criminally convicted telemarketers so they could scam them? [ed. This guy Gupta is probably a crook[1]]

4. Did Bill Clinton know that Hillary’s brothers were being paid to secure some of the pardons he granted on their recommendations?

Obama doesn’t need this kind of trouble. Bringing Hillary and her criminal baggage on the ticket brings Bill’s image and deeds with her, these days a loose cannon at best, a self-destructive narcissist at worst and a confirmed racist.[2] Somehow, that doesn’t fit into a reasonable political scheme.

On [1] we know money flows like a gusher from this place[3]. What we don’t know is for what. Can we presume that, as always, the Arabs back terrorism world wide and this cozy little arrangement is not about either politics or Islamo-Fascism? Iraq and Afghanistan are the only Arab democracies—the others have dictators such as Syria, Libya and Egypt. Should we wonder why Hillary is $31, 000,000 dollars in the political hole and she continues on with her very slight chance of winning and cares not how much she spends? Is there a sugar daddy or two waiting in the wings with IOUs and gifts? If she wins, or even if she loses, will her ‘friends’ in high Arab places help her pay off the debts? We know algore and the Clintons have been paid of by Communists before, and organized crime, but this is a new adventure. The Arabs have oil money!! So does the little monkey Oooogo Chavez [caca de chongo]

On [2, 3] this guy as the head of Lions Gate Entertainment and backed Michael Moore’s documentary Fahrenheit 9/11.[4] He is a trustee of the Clinton Foundation, a secretive organization that deals in politics and who knows what else?[5] The Clintoonery Experts contribute to their own charity.

 On [4], it is improbable that he didn’t know. Between the pair of Clintons there are three worthless criminalistic siblings who are known criminals and one is a doper. Those pardons are just a part of doing business with the Clintons. These parasites rank up in the leftist clouds with Jimmy Carter’s brother who urinated on the wall of the airport in Libya. Interesting DNA linkages here.

There is a lot of money flowing in this election [probably more than 400 million as of June] and we can wonder just what money can buy from those favored by the Islamo-Fascists. Bilkary and Obama may have to bid against each other for support.

Parasites at the parapets.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The New York Times Turns on the Worm: Hillary:get OUT [but save your votes for Obama]!

The New York Times, the Walter Duranty Memorial Paper[1], has again chosen to unch0ose their Anointed One.  In a sophomoric screed entitled [2] “Divided They Stand “ by their famous non-economist we read of treachery:

“…the final days of the struggle for the Democratic nomination have been marked by yet another fake Clinton scandal — the latest in a long line that goes all the way back to Whitewater.” [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

We are always stand refreshed and enlightened by the beauty and awe of the propagandistic sleight of hand granted b y the busy little Fellow Travelers at the Times, the Old Gray Lady, for lessons in rudimentary politics and its spin tactics. The first utterance in this rant instructs the mentally disnimble to learn, or to reinforce that indoctrinative point, that Clinton scandals are somehow faked. This is a political apology that is used to defend persons with slimy histories that the new attacks are b0gus. We can wonder how Bill faked his DNA specimen on Lewinski’s blue dress. Bill faked his perjury?

“This one, in case you missed it, involved an interview Hillary Clinton gave the editorial board of South Dakota’s Argus Leader, in which she tried to make a case for her continuing campaign by pointing out that nomination fights have often gone on into the summer. As one of her illustrations, she mentioned that Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June.”

Some of this is actual history, which must not be cited unless the appropriate caveats are introduced and there is the scattering of rose petals and song. This is fluff and the zingers come later in this piece.

“It wasn’t the best example to use, but it’s absurd to suggest, as some Obama supporters immediately did, that Mrs. Clinton was making some kind of dark hint about Barack Obama’s future.”

Probably true. But, the spin doctors picked up on this quickly and they can turn any statement into some form of nasty plot to gain power for their masters. We would be foolish indeed to attempt to show that when political figures suddenly exit stage left, for any reason, that the power vacuum is not instantly grabbed by some body else thus muddling the fact that this is one of the many ways in which power is transferred. Who benefited by the JFK assignation? LBJ? Fidel Castro? Cui bono? [Wasn’t she one of Che’s girlfriends?]

“Why does all this matter? Not for the nomination: Mr. Obama will be the Democratic nominee. But he has a problem: many grass-roots Clinton supporters feel that she has received unfair, even grotesque treatment. And the lingering bitterness from the primary campaign could cost Mr. Obama the White House.”

This prompts us to rewatch Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and study that fascinating scene where the bad guy wonders about ‘rules’ in a knife fight.[3] We can also wonder who wrote the rules for politics.  The NYT thinks they do. Notice that Hillary is not quitting. Why should she?

Now, the conclusion is slipped in as an obvious outcome of the facts!

“To the extent that the general election is about the issues, Mr. Obama should have no trouble winning over former Clinton supporters, especially the white working-class voters he lost in the primaries.”

Here the krugmaniacal one has just performed a leap of illogic and ignored the race and tax issues that both Clintons and Obama’s supporters have been depending on. We can thank the NYT for a slick piece of misdirection.  Obama will win with no troubles except for the massive troubles he and his racist allies created for himself.  Krugman wants us to forgive and forget such as this:

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not."[4] –Barack Obama

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."[5]-- Barack Obama

This is a parental belittling of the ignorant and unenlightened voters who can, after being shown that they are stupid, unwashed bigots, be instructed to thrown down their guns, renounce God and vote for Obama any way. To do otherwise would be an act of racism as defined by the New York Times. Well, that problem is solved. These dumb bigots need some supervision by blacks like Maxine Waters.[6] She will fix their cowboy capitalism, confiscate their guns and solve many of their other problems. She knows how to handle whites.

And, now another misdirection by omission!! Such a great piece of propaganda!!

“Indeed, John McCain has shed whatever maverick tendencies he may once have had, and become almost a caricature conservative — an advocate of lower taxes for the rich and corporations, a privatize and shredder of the safety net.”

Such poetic language!  Of course, he fails, purposely, to mention that McCain was a drooling stooge for Ted Kennedy’s Amnesty Bill, voted against Reagan Tax Cuts, worked this McCain -Feingold bill[7] so that the left would be able to spend more money in political campaigns and abrogate the First Amendment   and has other disturbing qualities that render him something of a loose cannon the wormy decks of the sinking Republican barge. The NYT wouldn’t want any Democrats or independents, following Lou Dobbs[8], to vote for McCain on the immigration issue.

“The point is that Mr. Obama may need those disgruntled Clinton supporters, lest he manage to lose in what ought to be a banner Democratic year.”

Only those with at least one half inch of encrusted drool on their shoes would miss this salient point.  The word may here is ominous.

The Solution!! There are no cases in point where the Times leaves a problem without a favorable scenario for the far left.

“Mrs. Clinton needs to do her part: she needs to be careful not to act as a spoiler during what’s left of the primary, she needs to bow out gracefully if, as seems almost certain,…”

 Translated: Hit the road b*tch.[9] The NYT already forgot they endorsed you.

The bottom line for the Times:

“Here’s the point: the nightmare Mr. Obama and his supporters should fear is that in an election year in which everything favors the Democrats, he will nonetheless manage to lose. He needs to do everything he can to make sure that doesn’t happen.”

And, that is the point of this propaganda piece. We have to wait all the way to the end of this latrine to get to the good stuff.

The NYT always picks the most expensive and extensive and far left way and the one that maximizes taxes.  But, reality for the times is Obama is a racist and awash in black racism and hate and futile attempts to direct some of this onto Hillary are futile.   They have a lot of damage control to do so watch them heighten their attacks on McCain, also endorsed by the Times.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The Rise of a Black Dictatorship in the US??

The prospect of a black President has encouraged the socialists and black racists to now taunt their new potential targets. The notion that capitalist corporations might be ‘socialized er, duh, ahm?? duh nationalized’ and  now the conception of a group of politicos running Big Oil is now within reach. The little man, Harry Truman in 1952 attempted to nationalize the steel companies. [1] [2] His own court, with hand-packed stooges from FDR and his  own little person, couldn’t even buy this one and pushed little man back for a huge political defeat. The Constitution is quite clear on this point. As such, we ought to dump the phony Postal Service and Amtrak as well.

 But, the thirst for power funded by someone else’s money is always the first dream of a leftist or Communist or other form of parasitic Fellow Traveler. In a hearing before Congress, the CA Rep Maxine Waters blurted out this preemptive screed:

“And guess what this member* would be all about? This member would be all about socializing — er, uh. [Pauses for several moments] …. would be about … [pause] … bsically … taking over, and the government running all of your companies.” [3]

Now, that is a cheery thought. We have heard brass threats from this disgusting racist before.

“I have a right to my anger, and I don't want anybody telling me I shouldn't be, that it's not nice to be, and that something's wrong with me because I get angry.”[4]

“Policy, for the most part, has been made by white people in America, not by people of color. And they have tended to take care of those things that they think are important. Whether it's their agricultural subsidies, or other kinds of expenditures that are certainly not expenditures for poor people or for people of color. And so we have to band together and keep fighting back.”[5]

Blame the whites.

“I don't see white police officers slamming the heads of little white boys into police cars,”[6]

“This cowboy capitalism must stop.”[7]

 “I don't believe in giving private properties to someone else for private use to make money off of it.”[8]

One wonders if she would permit private property if she was part of a junta?[9]

She also thinks the CIA sold dope in black neighborhoods. [10] It seem she joins Jeremiah Wright, Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee and Will Smith in this myth. [11]

She abets theft in this quote: “One lady said her children didn’t have any shoes. She just saw those shoes there, a chance for all of her children to have new shoes. go–amn [sic] it! It was such a tear-jerker. I might have gone in and taken them for her myself.”[12]

She can buy a lot of shoes from the proceeds from running US oil companies.

Here we see the emerging pattern: a black person gets a chance to run for the ultimate office in the US and we now see that his base is racism, the standard political mechanism in the Part of Democrats. Obama has buzzards like Waters, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and now Otis Moss hanging around his neck. They will drag him down, but we wonder if that matters to Barack. His allegiance to Black Liberation Theology [Black Racism] must be worth the risk. His Angry Black Wife is no asset either. When we look into Obama’s bigotry and contempt for the wife middle class then we can see that Obama is a racial political construction and Maxine Waters is one of his pit bulls.[13] The exit polls in West Virginia and Kentucky show us a lot about how whites react to people like Obama and Maxine Waters.

Liberalism triumphs again and the Quest for a Black Dictatorship in the US in apparently on. Hate-twisted racists howl for money and power. Check out the African experience with black Marxist dictat0rs for a comparison.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The New York Times Makes Politics out of ‘Diplomacy’, Again.

Typical blow from the New York Times:

“When he lashes out, as he did in Israel, Mr. Bush makes it harder for reasonable people to pursue diplomacy. And it is hypocritical. His cease-fire in Gaza(still on the terrorism list) and has had limited, largely unsuccessful, contacts with Iran over its support for insurgents in Iraq. Israel is indirectly negotiating a cease-fire in Gaza with Hamas with the help of Egypt.” "[1]   [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

What will the Times say if the cease-fire in Gaza doesn’t work? OH! More diplomacy!!

He didn’t lash out; he called stupid people stupid for their manifold stupidities.

If we review the history of diplomacy, we wonder how the New York Times, the Walter Duranty Memorial Paper , can forget about Jimmy Carter and his ‘diplomacy’ with North Korea and their unswerving allegiance to the United Nations, who has condemned Israel several dozen times in recent history with no rebuke from the New York Times. Do we have to wonder about Madelyn Albright who was duped by Dearest Kim?

The United Nations is dead set against the Sate of Israel and their phony ‘resolutions’ show that.

“United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 (S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 22, 1967 in the aftermath of the Six Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter.[1] The resolution was drafted by British ambassador Lord Caradon and was one of five drafts under consideration.” [2]

This is after Israel was invaded and they crushed their enemies.  Did the NYT complain about Russia taking control of the Baltic States, Hungary or others on their frontier? No.

“It calls for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles:" "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict" (see semantic dispute) and: "Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries.” [3]

There are ongoing disputes what this verbiage means.

 The phony notion of ‘land for peace’ is a joke and the Arabs cannot be trusted from any   so-called sovereign country anywhere in the Middle East. The Islamo-Fascists of the Hezbollah and Hamas are not going to agree to anything but the ultimate destruction of Israel as the current head of Iran promises.

Calls for Bush to ‘negotiate’ with the tyrants and murderers in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria have only two objectives:

[1] Give Obama some leverage to show that he can do something in the M.E., like letting the fascists sack Israel.

[2] Attack Bush even though we all know that the United Nations and the ‘diplomacy’ they mumble about have always failed. Clinton showed us all the

For the New York Times, ‘talking’ is an end into itself and if Israel bombs Iran before November then the Times will, doubtless, blame that on Bush also.

These are all diplomatic failures. North Korea treated the Clintons as the sorry, naïve dupes they really are and have lied about their nuclear programs and missiles on every account since their unearned gifts of US tax monies. Carter failed miserable with Iran and Clinton failed miserably with Arafat.  The New York Times seems to fail to show a diplomatic victory when it comes to the Middle East, Africa, Cuba, Iran, North Korea or with tyrants in general.

 Despite the known failure, the NYT will try to make some political points out of a hopeless situation. Their mouths are all they have.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Obama as the Spider: Says to The Jews: Come to Me [after you vote] and Enjoy My Web.

 Pandering to voters by offering them endless promises of goodies and such from the tax base is an old system that the Romans perfected, who learned that from the Greeks. The Jewish vote has always been sought in many states and is customary to don a yarmulke and make a speech offering to protect Israel. This time it may be different.

Barack Obama has now put on a pin with the American Flag at the urging of some to show his ‘patriotism’ and might just put his hand over his heart in a pledge of allegiance if forced to do so by political necessity. These are all retroactive ex post facto political fixes to his image, sculpted by the far left. His education and work experiences have been with the far left and he privately loathes the low class. Now, as to the Jewish vote, his followers have been the primary antagonists of Jewry in the US apart from the dozen or so Neo-Nazis who still flounder in the backwaters of history.  Black Americans do not like Jews.   Jeremiah Wright and Al Sharpton make this very clear.

Obama meets openly with Jews but privately with a Muslim activist known as  Imam Hassan Qazwini, who is head of the Islamic Center of America and also the Shiite Dearborn mosque[1] said in an email that he met with Obama at MacombCommunity College. [2] Eide Alawan, confirmed that the meeting and the pair discussed the Presidential election, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the Iraq war.

I wonder what they discussed: Was Israel mentioned. Would Obama say?

Well, his own pastor says this:

“Wright rationalized his current persona non grata status by stating that otherwise "a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell"   [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

Why would Wright alienate supporters for his congregation member? Much of the reason comes from the street wars and murder like the Crown Heights Unrest. This was a form of civil war or pogrom with three days of rioting. [3] Remember Al Sharpton? He said this:[4]

 “Al Sharpton made statements regarding "diamond dealers"^[18] and commented "it's an accident to allow an apartheid ambulance service in the middle of CrownHeights."^[19] In addition, a banner displayed at the funeral read "Hitler did not do the job".”[5]

 Followers of Sharpion chanted “No Justice, No Peace!”, "Death to the Jews!", and "Whose streets? Our streets!"[6]

Does this remind you of Iran with their Death to America?

“The Gaffes of Al Sharpton His most embarrassing quotes, in context. By William Saletan and Avi Zenilman Posted Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2003, at 10:49 AM ET.” [7]

“The issue is not anti-Semitism; the issue is apartheid. ... All we want to say is what Jesus said: If you offend one of these little ones, you got to pay for it. No compromise, no meetings, no kaffe klatsch, no skinnin' and grinnin'. Pay for your deeds."

“…On June 11, 1992, after the Anti-Defamation League accused Sharpton of helping to incite anti-Semitism in the Crown Heights conflict, Sharpton scoffed, "You don't even have a direct quote from me that anyone can call anti-Semitic." Sharpton has also reminded people that he never participated in the looting and riots that followed Cato's death. In a June 29, 2003, Washington Post article, however, Sharpton took a more apologetic stance: When questioned about his past abrasive comments (which included calling blacks who disagreed with him "yellow niggers"), he said, "I've grown … I'm not as brash. There are ways I look at life now that I would not have when I was a younger man from the ghetto."[8]

Obama criticized the wall that protects Israel from the rabid terrorists in Gaza and other terrorist areas:

 “..the creation of a wall dividing the two nations is yet another example of the neglect of this Administration in brokering peace.”[9]—Barack Obama

 Okay, what would Obama do? Tear down the wall? That sounds like he is confusing the Communist Berlin issue with terrorism. The walls did different things and Obama ought to know that. This is what ensues from reaching into the rhetorical grab bag of history for examples to hurl at your political opponents.

Obama is trying to unsnarl his relations with a strong faction of the Democratic Party by redacting some of his statements and faking support for Israel when the left-liberals of the US clearly support Hamas and Hezbollah and condemn Israel for defending herself against rocket attacks. That is the rigid position 0f the fare left, from whom Obama was created at least in image.

I call this Hezboadulation[10] and Hamasimianism.[11] Obama would cut off Israel from support in a heartbeat and let the terrorists occupy much more of Israel. Obama would also attempt to stop the destruction of the Iranian and other nuclear bomb facilities as they have already done in Syria.

Obama will be a hero in the eyes of the Islamo-Fascisti if Israel collapses and everybody should recognize this fact.

Obama is lying to the Jews on this issue and he is their ideological enemy not his friend. "Hitler did not do the job” but the American left liberals with the help of their Islamo-Fascist allies might finish the job.

This is a candidate for President? How about Al Sharpton for Secretary of State or Attorney General? How about Jeremiah Wright for the Supreme Court? Works for the far left.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Aut0matic Gas Taxes Fuel Salaries of City Employees and Welfare.

In some cities, those controlled by parasitic leftist Democrats, the gas tax rise with the price. The welcome cash is necessary to help pay for the exorbitant salaries and benefits and grand retirements of patronage jobs granted by Democrats in control.

In Chicago, the tax is now 20% of the price! [1]

“Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin complained to oil company bosses at a hearing on Capitol Hill about Chicago having the highest gasoline prices in the United States. Largely ignored was the role taxes are playing -- an astounding 10 levels of taxation. “[2]

Durbin[3] has no shame and needs dirty tax monies from anywhere to keep his socialist machine intact. He cannot tolerate a tax cut so he blames oil companies for high prices even though they cannot control the price. They make 8 cents per gallon and Chicago crooks, disguised as politicians, make.

In Illinois, “The watchdog Civic Federation says that on a $4 gallon of gas, the total tax is 79.2 cents. That compares to 77 cents in Los Angeles and 65 cents in New York City.”[4]

Los Angeles is now a social septic tank and NYC has always been out of control.

The local political parasites need the money:

“And that, of course, is exactly the point for the politicians. Gov. Blagojevich, for example, is counting on the high price of gasoline to bring at least an extra $220 million in the State Treasury in the fiscal year that begins this July. Most of that will be used to balance the way-out-of-balance budget.”[5]

These people are building political empires and bankrupting the states and the citizens are paying for this with high taxes, the very highest in gas taxes.

If the Democrats had allowed the oil companies to increase supply then gas would be around $1.50 at the pump, but, sadly, the tax revenues would be very low. So, to keep their rat nests warm and cozy they dream up new ways to soak workers and other tax payers for money.

Look at the crime rates in these places:

This is deliberate theft. We can thank liberal Democrats for the high taxes, high crime, ugly streets, dirt, filth and hopelessness.

Your tax money at work.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

Diplomacy and Failure: Obama’s Naiveté and Reflections from the Kennedy Era, the Berlin Wall and nuclear missiles in Cuba.

In a rare example of objectivity the New York Times has reviewed the history of diplomatic relations and ‘talks’ with adversaries and gives examples of JFK and how he was made to ‘look the shoe’ by Nikita Khrushchev in 1961.

 In a critical historical review that probably should not have been published by the Walter Duranty Papers entitled Kennedy Talked, Khrushchev Triumphed [1] the woeful outcome of a neophyte sparring with a seasoned adversary bent on destroying our society with nuclear bombs if necessary is laid bare. There are lesions to learn from this disgraceful episode in our history that matches the disgraceful SALT talks some time later. This article was written by Nathan Thrall of Published by the GLORIACenter, the InterdisciplinaryCenter in Herzliya, Israel. Thrall was also critical or Reagan’s diplomacy with Iran and other aspects of the foolish attempt to reason with terrorists and religious fanatics. Jesse James Wilkins is doctoral candidate in political science at Columbia. [2] What they present here is a sober and frightening assessment of diplomacy with tyrants and fanatics when neophytes get the power to do so.

“Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”[3]—JFK 1961 Inaugural Address. [Emphasis is mine in all quotes.]

This is fluff. But, many are inspired and transfixed by such empty rhetoric and can convince others that talking can solve the world’s problems.

“Senator Obama defended his position by again enlisting Kennedy’s legacy: “If George Bush and John McCain have a problem with direct diplomacy led by the president of the United States, then they can explain why they have a problem with John F. Kennedy, because that’s what he did with Khrushchev.”[4]—Barack Obama.

This is a statement born of ignorance and probable adoration for the far left.

“Kennedy’s assessment of his own performance was no less severe. Only a few minutes after parting with Khrushchev, Kennedy, a World War II veteran, told James Reston of The New York Times that the summit meeting had been the “roughest thing in my life.” Kennedy went on: “He just beat the hell out of me. I’ve got a terrible problem if he thinks I’m inexperienced and have no guts. Until we remove those ideas we won’t get anywhere with him.”[5]—JFK

Then came the Berlin wall. This was a political triumph for the USSR as JFK’s inexperience and weakness in ‘diplomacy’ was adroitly exploited by the Communists.

 And worse:

“A little more than two months later, Khrushchev gave the go-ahead to begin erecting what would become the Berlin Wall. Kennedy had resigned himself to it, telling his aides in private that “a wall is a hell of a lot better than a war.” The following spring, Khrushchev made plans to “throw a hedgehog at Uncle Sam’s pants”: nuclear missiles in Cuba. And while there were many factors that led to the missile crisis, it is no exaggeration to say that the impression Khrushchev formed at Vienna — of Kennedy as ineffective — was among them.”

JFK was long on rhetoric and short of political acuity.  He was more interested in fun and sex with starlets than national security. [6]He was a fanciful political construction, a creation of his father’s criminal earnings and appreciation for dictators particularly from the left but  his admiration for Hitler finally  backfired on him. Shallow as he was, he immediately switched to supporting Communists. Jack was an artificial creation and the triumph of the public realti ns and  image-crafting industry.  Obama relies on this plastic platform as he has no experience or kudos to show the voters. Kennedy’s abject failures can be attributed to the false notions that diplomacy has prevented wars, persuaded tyrants to step down from their offices or retreated from the battle fields. Jimmy Carter was even more naive in his dealings with Iran.  Ted Kennedy missed most of this as he was more e concerned with the contents of brown bottles and sailing. In these respects, JFK and Obama are essentially clones.

 Senator Obama’s ‘experience’ is limited to running for office and his work in ‘organizing’ in the slums of Chicago where his views were shaped by Saul Alinsky, William Ayers[7], who is famous for saying "I don't regret setting bombs...I feel we didn't do enough."[8] Throw in Jeremiah Wright and we can wonder just who trained this guy and where his loyalties lie.   He parrots the stuffy and arrogant lines from the Ivy League set almost exclusively. His Senate voting record is 100% liberal. He certainly has the support of the New Black Panthers, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iranian tyrants so we wonder what he might do if he is empowered to ‘negotiate’ with Islamo-Fascists. Wright, his mentor, thinks we are state sponsors of terrorism.[9] Senator Obama is hesitant to reject these views unless he is pressed and only forced to do so in public. Wright  still holds to the Black Liberation Theology and stands on his racist views that:

"And it's not surprising then they [whites] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."[10]—Barack Obama off camera in what he thought was a safe environment to express his views.

Ronald Reagan took a strong stance against the Russians and forced their collapse.[11] This outcome was not viewed well by the far left, where Obama was trained and now resides. In his recent book Left Illusions: An Intellectual Odyssey by David Horowitz, the author flatly states that the New Left, of which he was a founder, wanted the US to lose in Viet Nam and it is difficult to find a single left-liberal politician to state without reservations that they would favor a win in the War on Terrorism. Quite, the opposite, as the liberals have criticized and overemphasized the ‘lousy economy’ we   supposedly have as soon as Bush was inaugurated in his first term. The twin political objectives of defeating the Republicans by wrecking the economy and shielding the terrorists from interrogation and electronic monitoring are obvious and are a staple of the leftist political strategy since 2000. It is quiet apparent that they are willing to sandbag our military forces and then blame Bush for battle casualties. They can think of nothing other than high and punitive taxes to further their ends. [12] [13]

The insistence that we not expand our oil production in the US thus raising the price of       gasoline at the pump will wreck our economy and return us to a Jimmy Carter Era and will only enhance their power.[14]

Given all this, there is no reason to believe that Obama and his allies have any regard for our economy or flag or our fight against terrorism. They seem to favor some anti-capitalist stance and are quite willing to tax our corporations and successful business leaders out of political spite and revenge.

Obama and his supporters are Closet Traitors and will seek the aid of the Islamo-Fascists to defeat capitalism in our society. The liberal media will assist them in this adventure unless we realize just who we are dealing with. We don’t need another Berlin Wall in terms of fuel prices and we certainly don’t need some 20,000,000 illegal aliens and criminals voting for the far left in the future.  We also do not want our society to resemble or even reflect the social cancers of San Francisco or Managua or Havana.

Obama is either ignorant, a stooge for the far left or a combination of the two. He certainly is a racist and uses the race issue as a wedge. His parroting of JFK’s speeches was an act of   ignorance and shows his lack of understanding both history and his faulty analytical techniques.

“Paraphrasing what H. L Mencken said about Adolph Hitler in his glory days: Obama is just a newer jackass with an old broom.”[15]

The editors at the New York Times must lost their minds for publishing this.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com

Stupid Questions and Comments by   Senator Leahy from  Vermont

Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said there's an unexplained "disconnect" between prices — at nearly $130 a barrel — and legitimate supply and demand.[1]

There is no disconnect Senator, your liberal Democrats have prohibited drilling, exploration, refining and other aspects of   oil and now the supply is limited so the price is rising. 

Who have you been talking to for your economics details?            Jerry Garcia?

 “Leahy is a fan of the Grateful Dead. He has not only attended concerts, but has taped them, and has a collection of the band's tapes in his Senate Offices. Jerry Garcia visited him at his Senate offices, and Leahy gave a tie designed by Garcia to Senator”[2]

We still remember y0ur disgusting leak of secret material from your staff [3] You resigned  from the committee in disgrace. That is why you are known as Leaky Leahy, because you are a security risk.

Learn a little economics and then note that the oil companies do not set the market price and they make only 8 cents per gallon and your federal government makes about 16 cents and some states about   30-40 cents per gallon.

 Did you support ethanol from corn?

“Reductions in demand for gasoline or oil could occur as Americans switch to alternative energy sources such as wind power, hydroelectric, geothermal, or engage in more conservation activities, or use renewable fuels (such as 85 percent ethanol, fuel cells, or hydrogen).  Sen. Leahy has strongly supported research and development funding for these and other technologies.  These are solutions that can break our long-term dependence on foreign oil, as well as creating new industries that would strengthen.[4]

Ethanol from corn is not a long term solution: Even the New York Times knows that:

The Leftists Bawl for Grain-Based Fuels and the Prices Rise and they Bawl About the Prices.

http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/04/07/the_leftists_bawl_for_grain-based_fuels_and_the_prices_rise_and_they_bawl_about_the_prices.thtml

In an article entitled Grains Gone Wild[5], the Times’ noisiest non-economist waxes economic for our amusement.

“Over the past few years the prices of wheat, corn, rice and other basic foodstuffs have doubled or tripled, with much of the increase taking place just in the last few months. High food prices dismay even relatively well-off Americans — but they’re truly devastating in poor countries, where food often accounts for more than half a family’s spending.” [All quotes here have my emphasis and refer to the article Grains Gone Wild unless otherwise indicated.]—Paul Krugman New York Times.

You seem to advocated higher and punitive taxes on oil companies:

“But these approaches will not be sufficient in the short run to have a significant downward effect on the current high prices at the pump.  In light of the record-breaking profits being made by oil companies, another option Sen. Leahy and his colleagues have been examining is the possibility of a windfall profits tax on oil company proceeds, which could be rebated to American Consumers or invested in these new alternative technologies.[6]

Could you explain how higher taxes on oil companies coiuld lower gas prices at the pump? Did you realize that if we drill and produce more oil the price would go down? Or is that not an option for you given the politics??

Liberal Democrats have forced this supply shortage. We have lots of oil and we can blend in our oil usage with new   forms of biofuels, but you prevent that. Did you advocate corn being converted to fuel?

 What are you liberals doing?? It looks like you are trying to wreck our economy.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com

The Answer to the Question: What is Clinton's argument now?

 The question persists and the answer is obvious.[1] Hillary and Bill cannot attack Obama on issues such as their common adoration for Saul Alinsky, a goat-essence Communist from the projects of Chicago as all players have common ties to Alinsky or more directly with Bill’s visit to Moscow in 1969 in a probably mole training exercise. The anti-commie speech cannot be issued in this contest.

 Their differences in taxation and detestation for capitalism are also too common.

The only significant difference between the Clintons and Obamas is the way that they exploit racism and the War on Terrorism. Hillary can work the levers better than Barack. Obama has lost the war issue for those who believe we should   hunt down our enemies.  Hamas and Hezbollah both support Obama.

To win, Hillary has to call in IOUs from 300,000,000 worth of campaign fund-raisings in the past and show the party leaders that Obama has offended the simple, typical white voters in key states. Her best argument is Pennsylvania. If this state is lost to McCain, the race is all over and the anti-white racism issue will not have been useful to either candidate.

Far leftist candidates who lose like, McGovern, Mondale, Humphrey, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry fade away like a bee who wasted its only stinger.

Hillary has to keep mum about Marxism and show that Obama is a radical racist surrounded by a host of howling black racists who cannot win the white vote. That works for her.

rycK

Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com