Posted by
rycK on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:06:24 AM
The Hand-Wringing Droolers at the New York Times Lament about ‘Lack of Issues.’
In a rare [but strangely]correct political analysis, the collection of Pinch Pustules at the New York Times, the dandy handy candy ragzine of the Walter Duranty Adoration Society, the current slate of political issues is poorly chosen.
The Times begins with a soggy lament about ‘planning’ born of tears and unhealed wounds and broken dreams in a woeful glubberance entitled Guns and Bitter[sic]:
“Whose brilliant idea was it to leave six weeks open before the Pennsylvania primary?” [1]
The Republicans?? Whose brilliant idea was it to have put this starter in their editorial? Duh? Whose brilliant idea was it to let 796 party hacks have 20% of the party vote for the convention?? After subtracting these ghouls from the contest, one of the candidates would get a majority even if it was only one vote. Such a superdelegate ‘system’ was designed to prevent exactly what happened here and the phony paternalist mechanism has created this fiend for the left. Jokes like this show up the leftists who control the Party of Democrats like a pack of front parlor fluffers in a drunken frenzy for customers.
“But the campaign, as seen on TV — the one that counts — has been consumed with the senators trading insults over Mr. Obama’s boneheaded remarks about working-class voters. They are not doing themselves or the country any good. A few more days of these Punch and Judy shows and even we will be tempted to tune out.”[2] [Emphasis is mine in quotes.]
Obama’s bigoted remarks are exactly what Howard Dean, Ted Kennedy and other elites think about Middle America. They use overt racism for political gains. [3] These cretins are too stupid and unfamiliar with basic hygiene and sobriety to vote appropriately and cannot understand the splendor they would live in if their taxes were doubled, their guns confiscated and parental restraints on their offspring’s sexual adventures were abrogated by the state. Obama parrots Lenin in this matter. So does Colonel Klebb[4]
Since the two leftist candidates agree on most other far-left topics such as gun control, high taxes, amnesty for illegal aliens what else should they do? This is a contest between two liberals. Perhaps they should auction off the most expensive tax hike plan or talk about emptying the jails of political prisoners. They might call for all illegal aliens and felons to vote.
“After days of digging at Mr. Obama for saying that working-class voters turn xenophobic or “cling to guns and religion” because they’re bitter over lost jobs, Mrs. Clinton couldn’t resist a new nasty attack ad. What she has yet to figure out is that she ends up hurting herself — feeding her negative image — by attacking too long and with too much relish.”[5]
Religion is the enemy of the socialist and Marxist states as it tends to take away things that ‘feel good,’ the sordid basis of liberalism. The New York Times and other elements of the moral relativism combine have tried to protect perversions, crime, drug addiction, sloth and sodomy and those cretins who “cling to guns and religion” are their political enemies. They are also unimpressed when political hacks at the Times and other rags attempt to instruct Americans on the virtues of Islamo-Fascism. The NYT seems to have forgotten that guns and religion took down the British parasites and corralled the savages and that 8000 farmers with squirrel guns defeated General Bourgoyne in Saratoga[6] in New York. All despots should fear guns and religion.
“The reason this campaign started out as the Democrats’ big chance to take back Washington is that Americans face huge challenges on which the Republicans have an abysmal record: Iraq and Afghanistan, the trashing of America’s global image, inequitable taxes, a flagging economy, epidemic home foreclosures, lost jobs, soaring health care costs and struggling schools.”[7]
Yadda yadda yadda--the usual tax-whoring screed from the left.
Recall that Hillary voted to authorize the Iraqi war. The War on Terror is going well. America’s image in the world is fine except for the drooling Marxist and Islamo-Fascisti who are fanatical social parasites. Who cares what Hugo Chavez or North Korea’s Kim, darlings of the New York Times, thinks?
A focused debate on the agenda issues enumerated by the Times would lead to either a head banging spectacle or a contest to see who could make more promises about fixing ‘problems’ with the American people’s tax money. The Devil is in the Details in this case, something to be avoided as cautioned by Saul Alinsky,[8] Hillary’s patron saint and would open up the attack by the opposition. After tax whoring[9] [10] and Hezboadulation (or Hizboadulation) [11] and other forms of praise for any thing un-American, what do the far left have left? [pun intended].
We invite these two bigoted elitists to open up and tell us how they would change our society by bringing in some of the cherished ideas of Saul Alinsky, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Jimmy Carter, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Lenin, Uncle JoeStalin, Squeaky From, the Code Pink Perverts and other social misfits.
We want to hear the elitist views from both of these candidates. Tell us the truth some more. There are plenty of issues.
rycK
Comments: ryckki@gmail.com
[1] Guns and Bitter Editorial Published: April 16, 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/opinion/16wed1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
[2] Guns and Bitter Ibid.
[5] Guns and Bitter Ibid.
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Burgoyne
[7] Guns and Bitter Ibid.