Posted by
rycK on Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:42:38 PM
Clinton: Rule or Ruin, the Colonel Klebb Solution to the Party of Democrats.
Politics may be compared to many things such as war, sleaze or disease, but never directly as self-directed ruination as we see in the Clinton determination to continue with a losing battle with Barack Obama. Most politicians can be persuaded to yield a lost contest ‘for the benefit of the party’ if the numbers show that the propensity for a win is either hopeless or damaging to the party in at least one of several ways. Not so with Hillary Clinton, the Colonel Klebb of the so-called Party of Democrats, a surly and obstinate surrogate of the tattered remnants of Marxism.
Trained in gutter politics by the social Marxist parasite Saul Alinsky and taught how to scatter the entrails of friends or enemies indifferently when the political circumstances require this action, Hillary the Queen of Clintoonery stands firm against the wishes of her (loosely defined) party ‘leaders.’
In her latest act of defiance, we read:
“There are millions of reasons to continue this race: people in Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina, and all of the contests yet to come," Clinton told reporters Friday. "This is a very close race and clearly I believe strongly that everyone should have their voices heard and their votes counted.” [1]
The ‘closeness’ term implicit in this comment logically demands an algebraic inspection of the variables to analyze the potential outcomes for a closed system. There are only so many votes left and 35% of them are superdelegates whose votes depend on party leadership guidance and other nefarious factors. Many have openly opted for the Other Senator and have called for Hillary to cease the war. Clinton apparently believes that she can somehow make a case that she is more electible than the good Senator Obama, now recognized as an apologist for the overt racism of Barrack’s worthless, bigoted, psychotic, rabble-rousing racist, hate-twisted pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
She defines the ongoing contest in terms of a favorable outcome:
“"I believe a spirited contest is good for the Democratic Party and will strengthen the eventual nominee," she said.” We will have a united party behind whomever[sic] that nominee is. ... I look forward to campaigning over the next several months."[2]
Since the curious and ineffective system of delegates and superdelegates is not strictly rule based, treachery and intimidation are the most obvious mechanisms to turn the delegate votes away from their intended ‘duty’ to the party in terms of selecting the ‘best’ candidate. The Democrats have created this slugfest and can deal with the self-inflicted outcomes of such a joke.
The Clintons can only offer prizes and bribes in terms of what they can do if, and only if, they win. What they can offer outside of this definition is nebulous at best at this time apart from cabinet offices and such. Congress already uses tax monies in the form of port and earmarks to buy their votes for reelection under our phony system. In this regard, Senator Obama could offer the same perks and rewards to those who flock to his fold.
The Clintons will lose this contest as they just about as many enemies inside the Party of Democrats as they do in the opposition party. In an effort of desperation they may select to use the race card in reverse [3] and tell the world that a slick black enabler of the kind of racism that Jeremiah Wright preaches [4] will lose the white backlash votes as Bill tried to do in South Carolina.
All this will proceed in spite of the substantive facts that they are trying to elect a 100% far left liberal with an enormous tax-whoring agenda who is black and wants to maintain the institutionalized racism[5] inherent in government programs such as busing, affirmative action and such. These elements, alone, would call for voting against him, but Hillary must get up enough courage to state this scenario in explicit terms.
That will persuade the superdelegates to ‘make the right left decision.’
rycK
Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com
[2] Clinton: In the Race for the Long Run Ibid.