About Me

Name: rycK
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Race Wars are On: Obama Sends His Party into the Dumpster.

 

The Race Wars are On: Obama Sends His Party into the Dumpster.

 

We learn from political theory that special interests and splinter groups, be they separate parties or otherwise, always want a scrap of the aggregate power of a given party. The Party of Democrats, not so democratic in recent years[1], is an aggravated ensemble of warring factions who have more in common with their constituents in terms of hating their enemies than being united by brotherhood. They do have a common psychotic lust for taxes, however. Most political parties have a hierarchal structure where one group selects the candidates and offers minor offices and stations to the other groups as a reward for piling on. In the case of the Party of Democrats, the left-liberal wing of the party has, with few exceptions, has led the party to a curious win or loss, mostly losses since 1950. The new party [McGovern Rules] selection process of candidates, therefore, tends to be guided, at least in principle, by the quest for those defined as most suitable and compatible with leftist dogma and we saw that with persons like Dukakis, Kerry, Gore and now with Hillary Clinton. It would be difficult to find many to the left of this sordid bunch of societal tumors. Bill Clinton was an anomaly as Ross Perot acted as a wedge to split the opposition party and allow two wins for Clinton who took less than half the voters in each contest. We saw Ralph Nader [2] split the Party of Democrats in 2000 probably giving the White House to the second generation of Bushes. This is a chaos system. There are few rules.

Apart from some deviations from the grand plan, the splinter parties usually don’t have enough votes to do much more than become king-makers only  if they threaten to switch their votes among the warring parties. We see this in France, Italy and Israel yearly. They rarely claim the top spot if they are a small percentage of their parent party, but they can defect and destroy a coalition. In the case of the African-American wing of our party, the heiress-apparent seems to have been pushed away by a popular surge for Senator Barack Obama and now the contest is essentially deadlocked where neither candidate can win a clear majority of delegates until the 800 or so ‘superdelegates’ gather to work the political levers.  It was not supposed to work this way. When the race is close[3], either within the party of in open contests, those smaller or splinter groups may compete for favors and power and change the politic fabric of the party beyond recognition. To add to the confusion, there is the Hispanic component who, as yet, cannot vote legally except in California and a few other states that refuse to inspect voter credentials. This is as yet a wild card with the turnout being the most important factor. The superdelegates are not so super and cannot abrogate the winnings of Obama at this juncture. Their phony charge to select the best candidate is shown up as a farce right now.

Thus, the party drifts into a deadlock with the leader issuing from a minor wing of the party in the person of Barack Obama with major racist and socialist trappings. The difficulty here is that blacks were offered social programs and other perks for their votes instead of placing black leaders in high offices. The media went along with this idea. Now, the splinter party vies successfully for the top spot and brings along its own particular and characteristic political elements into policy fights. Here, the major concerns of the black community become a prominent factor in the noisy political circus as they steer toward the convention and final selection process. Unfortunately, the most prominent political vector of the African-Americans is revenge-race-based odium encumbered with the usual and often manufactured wild oration of hate from the religious pulpits and the urgent call for retaliation against the vast majority of whites. Compounding all this is the usual leftist indictment of corporations and greed and all this propaganda. Apart from the direct racist elements, this is standard leftist fluff—a proven loser in national political races. The media has done its part in essentially granting Obama half the delegates and holding the reporting the howls of racism to a minimum. Once half way, there is no way to allow Obama a loss from a ‘reasonable’ conclusion by the superdelegates. That would sart a race war and massive defections from the party. Hillary has now condemned Obama’s precious Reverend Jeremiah Wright. This is an act of desperation. The party faithful have dumped her lying carcass into the dumpster.

The Obama Speech outlined the salient fact that intrinsic racism is embedded too deeply into the black society to be set aside or even moderated.  The leading racist in North America, after David Duke, of course, is now Geraldine Ferraro. That is a major surprise for several reasons. Radical racism must be accommodated into his presidential run. With the prospect of power we hear of revenge.  The whites must be punished. Pundits from the gulches and other places such as the Old Red Lady[4] offer the suggestion that Obama ought to refrain from labels like ‘“[the] typical white person” because typically white people don’t like to be reminded of their prejudices.’[5] Dowd adds in the rest of the political poison with:

But Republicans are salivating over Reverend Wright’s “God damn America” imprecation and his post-9/11 “America’s chickens coming home to roost” crack, combined with Michelle Obama’s aggrieved line about belatedly feeling really proud of her country.”[6]

Stereotypically speaking, the Obama stereotyping of whites appears to destroy the concept of unity and ‘change’ and nullifies the concept of a cloture to the racial hatred of the past. Nothing in this stance transcends race in a political sense. Obama endorses and enables overt racism and smiles as his wife Michelle plays the angry black lady. As the power base shifts, however, Jimmy Carter has abandoned Hillary along with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and lesser beings. There was probably no base support there anyway. Al Gore brings to mind the nasty history of his failed run and recites the sour memories of Monica Lewinsky and appears to offer this as the reason that he lost. Losers always need several excuses for their failures. All this is expected as the power pendulums sway back and forth and the acolytes scurry back and forth to curry favor. When the race is close, those with special interests will revert back to their strongholds and support their political bases. Senator Obama reacts in an identical fashion: he cannot abandon racism, the nuclear glue that holds blacks to the party.

Obama tries to cut the political fabric into two broad parts by offering excuses for the comments and views of his repulsive pastor and similar followers who praise Louis Farrakhan [7] and Quannel X and with stupid, racist, comments against Jews like: “"They helped him [Hitler] get the Third Reich on the road."[8]

Now, all this is standard politics as Obama cannot reject or notify his strongest supporters that they are simple, ignorant racists beating the drums of hate for political power. The Senator must accept their views at face value and attempt some form of intercalation into the structure of his political machine. This works for the Democrats. This does not work for the Republicans and a lot of independents, a party of nonparty voters whose singular attribute is a disgust of the two traditional parties. We shall see how this works for the voters.

We know that at the best of times the leftists who steer the clumsy Party of Democrats cannot command much more than 41% of the vote and must appeal to the independents for the missing 10. We also realize that the black vote is a critical 2-3% of the 41 and if absent signals another loss of the White House.

Purely by accident, we have a so-called moderate running for the right wing who is not so right or even right-thinking in conservative terms, but can harvest moderates, the silly putty of the political world. Thus, there is a push-pull battle for moderates and Obama must be careful not to push the malleable  and mentally disnimble into the hands of the Republicans.

Thus, it appears that the Democrats have hired another Vinegar John Kerry [9] [10] or algore to lead them into the septic ditch were it not for the perceived high registration levels of the young. If the twenty-somethings vote for Obama then he will preside over a mangled political machine that will be the object of a racial backlash from many quarters. He could McGovern the party for a decade or two. This remains to be demonstrated.  From my previous blog:

There are several theories on political theory, but none actually suggest or mandate inflaming part of your potential constituency. Machiavelli taught that you should do nothing novel or new and just keep to known political mechanisms used by others. The mistakes by other political masters are also very valuable to analyze. “[11]

There is nothing new here! I have mentioned that I think Senator Obama is honest [12]and I still do. I truly believe that he truly believes this redacted historical view of white racism and oppression. He thinks that high taxes and micromanaging the corporations will bring some leftist-defined ‘economic justice.’ Any downturns in the economy would be solved by new and higher tax rates.

All this goes to emphasize the fact that politics is mostly identity based and that politicos are mere reflections of the loudest and angriest factions of their constituencies compounded by serendipity. We must hearken back to Eric Hoffer in his book The True Believer[13] when he said that leaders don’t create mass movements they sort of fall in front of the rabble and get pushed into the lead by default. Obama is not an original leader nor has he presented anything that we could describe as ‘new. ‘ His ‘hope’ message is not new, but is merely a reiteration of old political wounds mostly self-inflicted by the phony social programs and mangled education antics of the left. What is ‘new’ is that he is black, or gray [14] [Dowd] and brings a new twist to current political disaster.

So, we have a half-black far left 100% liberal running, again, for President. He has probably just sold out much of this white support for Jeremiah Wright’s favors. Disasters are made of this. I believe that he can lose the White House in the best tradition of George McGovern. That, I truly believe.

rycK

Comments: ryckki@gmail.com



[1] We need to watch the superdelegates for this.

[2] EcoNazi furher.

[4] Maureen Dowd of the New York Times .

[10] Liar, Communist stooge and parasite.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (3) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive