We are taught about the inherent injustice and moral depravity of racism. We are taught that such practices are not to be tolerated anywhere on this planet if justice and freedom are to be preserved for all. We are taught that racism and slavery must be eliminated or strongly suppressed wherever encountered.

This all sounds good and can be accepted at face value until we examine the antics of the far left.

The problems now begin: The liberals, who have made the greatest political gains with the issues of racism, seem to be unable to see how they, themselves, put into practice and embrace this disgusting and immoral course of action.

What is racism and how do we recognize it?? The answer is quite complicated and politically stacked to grant some phony escape-free platform to attack others while, hypocritically, practicing overt racism with the full support of the media.  It seems that blacks cannot be racists because they have not power. This is a stunning achievement and a piece of wonderment. Jesse Jackson, Cynthia McKinney and Al Sharpton have no power? One would imagine that any forms of discrimination and advantage that are clearly based on race or other ethnic attributes would be defined as racism and condemned.  Not for the liberals.

Not even close to being so.

Here are some examples of racism and how they are played on the liberal stage:

Senator Chuck Schumer of New York comments on a judicial appointment for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of Judge Southwick. Here are his exact words:

Schumer: “When it comes to the area of race and racism, we have to bend over backwards,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N. Y. , a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“I certainly don’t think he’s a racist,” Schumer added. “His words have to be seen in context. Like it or not when he’s nominated to the Fifth Circuit he’s carrying 200 and some odd years…on his back. That is the issue here.”

I don’t think Al Gore is a Communist although his father took money from Armand Hammer, whose father founded the Communist Party USA and Al himself grubbed for money from the Red Chinese in some Buddhist Temple and lied about it.  I don’t think Hillary is, necessarily, a Communist although her champion in college was Saul Alinsky, an avowed Communist.  The Clintons took in a lot of Communist monies as well. I do think Schumer is a racist or race-baiter.

I never say that “when around left-liberal Democrats that I sometimes detect a burly scent of Communism”, at least not all the time.

Here, Schumer’s motives have been correctly elucidated by an alert blogger[1]  named Allahpundit who demonstrates that the Senator from New York is actually  “...accusing him [the judge]  of the appearance of racism” and alerts the universe that he carries  “200 and some odd years” of such behavior.

The left only carry some 150 years of Communism around in their pockets for instant reference so there is a major difference.  The left liberal Democrats have shown us many examples of the appearance of being Communist stooges, as in the Viet Nam war and as exemplified by Democrat  Jim Wright, former Speaker of the House when he cooed and fawned over Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro.

We might be able to give the good senator a break here in terms of his waxy syntax if it were not for the fact that he cannot condemn, or even mention,  overt racism in his own party like Senator Byrd of WVA or Al Sharpton of NYC.

From Byrd: Year 2004:  “I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time…”[2]

And:

Byrd, when he was 28 years old, wrote to segregationist Senator Theodore Bilbo, of Mississippi, vowing never to serve in such a military:

“Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds[3]”

Senator Schumer, like other racist enablers, needs to ignore and wax silent on such comments because Senator Byrd is a desperately needed for his left liberal vote in the Senate.  He can be a racist [or not] if he votes for expensive social programs and tax increases  as a liberal Democrat.

There are more examples

Al Sharpton speaks:

White folks were in caves while we were building empires.... We taught philosophy, astrology, and mathematics before Socrates and those Greek homos.[4]

 

And: "What’s wrong with denouncing white interlopers?"[5]

We can then wonder what is wrong with denouncing black racists. But, that will not work with the current set of Democrats in office.

A former instructor at N.C. State University, Kamau Kambon said blacks must "..exterminate white people off the face of the planet."[6]

Imagine the explosion if some college instructor turned the colors around on this statement. The eruptions would exceed, we expect, the attack on Rush Limbaugh for talking about ‘phony’ soldiers.   Liberal racists are not phony.

Where are the good Senator Schumer and his comments about these examples?? Schumer can hint and grope low for some obscure history of the Americas for examples that might support his oblique attack on Republicans in the veiled guise of morality but cannot seem to identify stark, blatant examples of racism by blacks against whites or by his fellow liberal Democrats on the floors of Congress . This is known as political reciprocity.  And, it is politically successful, as we obviously see.  It gets votes and must be politically correct.

In passing, we can wonder what this means:

“Chris Rock when he says, “I love black people, but I hate niggers,” even if they themselves are not allowed to make such an honest declaration.[7]”

One wonders what color these niggers might be if not black??

For the left, the sleaze of racism drags on and this will continue until demagogues like Schumer and Byrd lose votes when they exploit bigotry and demagoguery for political gain. That will take some time.

The Dr. Martin Luther King notion of a colorblind society is made impossible by the rabid left.

rycK

The Political Hoax and Other Follies Such as Global Warming

We need to examine, critically, the notion of hoaxes and their utility  in politics and science and structure some political response as to how they originated, but more importantly, how they influence certain political outcomes by the work of those perpetrators who construct such monstrosities. As always, politics is  based on persuasion—not fact as we shall see below:

From the past we can identify such famous hoaxes as The Ems Dispatch[1], The Protocols of the Elders of Zion[2], Margaret Mead’s crude racist political stunt Coming of Age in Samoa [3], the startling record finish of the Boston Marathon runner Rosie Ruiz Vivas[4], The Priory of Sion[5] , Global Warming and the recent article published in frontpagemag.com:  Who Hates Americans? We Do.

Manyof these hoaxes produced political or personal sensations, financial rewards,  started wars, legitimized Anti-Semitism or other pressures against certain groups, projected political views into certain cultures, produced a champion athlete who used  bus to aid her running skills, gave accounts of a secret society and  have convinced millions of the demise of the Earth.

 The recent flyer seen circulated in several universities entitled Who Hates Americans? We Do. [6] fits into the political hoax category. The question we always ponder on the hoax mechanism is this: who benefits from this falsification of circumstances or facts?? A review of previous hoaxes shows that millions of people were to believe, and still do,  the phony newspaper reports of Walter Duranty [7], the political propagandist and stooge for the Soviets and  a celebrated Pulitzer Prize winner for the New York Times. The fact that he published lies has little to do with his success in influencing the far left wing in America in their fervid support of Marxism. Similarly, the disgusting prejudice, bigotry and intolerance of certain social and religious values detested by Margaret Mead as she provided ‘proof’ that:

"She emphatically criticized the neurosis-inducing nuclear family, including the stress of Christian monogamy, and used her Samoan material to demonstrate an alternative to premarital chastity..."[8]

and her phony, political conclusions are still celebrated as a foundation in cultural studies. Mead is highly regarded as some wondrous pillar of authority in academic circles by those who seek to attack basic American culture. She will be surpassed in beauty and acclaim only by the discoverer of the gay gene, when that happens, and it will. This is both a political necessity and a political certainty.

Following all this we must include the Global Warming Hoax as a construct strictly conforming to the classic definition of the hoax and skirting the usual scientific precepts employed to examine such wild claims. Al Gore has assembled a group of people [read stooges in some cases] who attest to some impending climatic holocaust and has ignored, even suppressed any contradiction of his claims. People who even attempt to question his ‘findings’ and obvious propaganda are subjected to the most acute ridicule by the media, such as the New York Times. Those who would impede capitalism, which includes the PRC, India and most of the third world, are wildly enthusiastic about restraining growth in the US, hence the political basis for this hoax. Here the usual scientific rational criteria that are most necessary to support, compare and define scientific conclusions are summarily dismissed in an emotional political comportment characteristic of the hoax phenomenon. Al Gore and his politicos employ blatant pseudoscience, which is defined as  “…any body of knowledge, methodology, belief, or practice that claims to be scientific or is made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the basic requirements of the scientific method.[9]” We must note, with some concern, that so-called ‘scientists’ and ‘authorities’ support the Global Warming Hoax with ‘data’ that cannot stand the examination and tolerate free discussions  of  the scientific data and basis [10]:

[1] Use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims

 

[2] Assertion of scientific claims that are vague rather than precise, and that lack specific measurements.

 

[3] Failure to make use of operational definitions. (i.e. a scientific description of the operational means in which a range of numeric measurements can be obtained).[24]

 

[4] Failure to make reasonable use of the principle of parsimony.

 

[5] Use of obscurantist language, and misuse of apparently technical jargon in an effort to give claims the superficial trappings of science.

 

[6] Lack of boundary conditions: Most well-supported scientific theories possess boundary conditions (well articulated limitations) under which the predicted phenomena do and do not apply.

 

[7] Lack of effective controls in experimental design.

Here, items [1], [2], [6] and [7]  are seen to properly characterize the Global Warming Hoax as pseudoscience. We can correctly ask:

Where is the source for the ideal mean temperature of the Earth and how is it measured? What is the standard error in such measurements?

 

How do you measure the mean temp? Select certain cities and average the readings?

 

Why do satellites no show a significant increase in temperature in the upper atmosphere?

 

What are the effects of sun spot activity on the heat radiated upon the Earth?

 

How do you identify and confirm cyclic phenomena in weather patters and relate them to temperature trends?

Their data set is essentially all political and insufficient to demonstrate their claims. They substitute emotion in place of scant and insufficient experimental results and demand chauvinistic belief in their wild claims and ardently suppress criticism of their implausible conclusions. Do they really use tree rings to ‘correct’ temperature readings from the last century? This is classic hoax mechanism disguised as science that employs pseudoscience in its most elegant form.  We can expect such from politicians.

Never the less, millions believe this phony political circus.

When the FrontPagemag article[11] was featured on a Townhall blog [12] by this blogger the result was a firm disbelief in the political attributes of this hoax and resulted in dismissal of the authenticity by some and a refutation by others[13]. My guess was that this flyer was proffered by the far left. The response to the wording of the flyer by Lord Upright, however,  is classic leftist rhetoric and amplifies the nature and basis of this piece and tends to support my tentative view. His mechanical response highlights the standard leftist views on the pejorative words and themes in the flyer and gives us some proof that it is a political tool and probably leftist in origin. The fact that it may be, or is, a hoax is subordinate to the political objectives here, and parallels the phony support for Global Warming and its attendant Nobel War Prize. It is not known who wrote or circulated this paper, but it had the hallmarks of a political hoax and the comments and fluff and foam associated with placing this on the Internet had predictable results. It worked. The liberals were properly outraged as expected.

The Who Hates Americans? We Do piece is classic example of propaganda and the political players have responded to it as predicted. Puppets and sausage machines work in this fashion. It was designed to be divisive, offer a signal clarion call to those from the far left or far right for a vigorous and noisy response and many performed in the expected political  left-liberal  or far-right fashion. The public is apparently too ignorant of politics to venture beyond their fears and prejudices to critically examine the FrontPage article, the War on Terrorism , Global Warming, that Hillary Clinton is “The Smartest Women in the World,[14]”  the success of capitalism or much else.

What else is new in politics?? Nothing: Same old same old.  Walter Duranty, Uncle Joe Stalin, FDR and Margaret Meade would have been proud. Al Gore is ecstatic.

Propaganda works: Read the New York Times for proof.

rycK

Hillary and her Manifold Crimes: Subsidizes the Far Left Blogs and Listens in on Conversations.

Lies, sleaze and criminal actions continue to be the defining attributes of the Clintons and this is the latest pair of  instances in  a long history of criminal activity. Such is the sleazy legacy of those who would pollute the once-noble Party of Democrats.  We can reflect on Whitewater, Castle Grande, her Saul Alinsky Marxist Follies and her ignorance of the philandering of her worthless husband who spent several weeks in Moscow in 1969 while our troops were dying in Viet Nam and wonder with shock and awe.

So, on goes the sleaze:

Here, we find that Hillary admits to some them what  seems to mean she started and funded a blog:

We  learn, from the maw of the Monster “… she helped "start" and "support" Media Matters.”  Supposedly a  non profit 501(c)(3)  corporation. ^[1] Isn’t that swell? And so fair and balanced we expect.  She shrieks and  confesses:”  I Started Media Matters [5] .” ^[2]

At a convention of left-wing bloggers last summer, Hillary Clinton announced, “We are . . . putting together a network in the blogosphere.” [3]

Her remarks became public only three weeks ago, on Oct. 2, when an anonymous person posted a shaky, hand-held videotape of her speech on YouTube. In it, Hillary bragged that she had helped create “institutions” which had produced a left-wing “network in the blogosphere” capable of “matching” the alleged “advantage of the other side.” [4]

Isn’t  this illegal? But, does it matter for a Clinton? No.

Not only does this crooked lawyer [ no trials  or law review articles]  illegally subsidize political antics prohibited by  law and an affront to IRS rules, she now barrows a bit from her criticism of  the conservatives, such as the current War on Terrorism, by listening in on people’s phone conversations. This is the antic of a psychopath.

Then, we have this from Jeff Gerth’s  new book ^[5]:

In the book “Her Way,” former New York Times investigative reporter and Times investigative reporter Don Van Natta Jr. wrote that during Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign,

 “Hillary’s defense activities ranged from the inspirational to the microscopic to the down and dirty. [6]

 

“She received memos about the status of various press inquiries, she vetted senior campaign aides; and she listened to a secretly recorded audiotape of a phone conversation of Clinton critics plotting their next attack.” [7]

 

"In a lot of the new progressive infrastructure, institutions that I helped to start and support like Media Matters and Center for American Progress, we’re beginning to match what I had said for years was the advantage of the other side.” [8]

 
This is completely sick but praiseworthy and consummate  in liberal terms. And this person wants to be in our government?? Where do these people slither forth from??

What is the statute of limitations on this kind of crime??

Will she get off this on like she did with the subpoenaed Rose Law firm billing records she apparently hid in the White House.

Hillary and Bill have a lot of criminals on the payroll and may survive this new  pair of outrages. The liberal Democrats will vote her way and any liberal who makes it into the White House will certainly pardon her and her criminal groupies.  They can suck money in the best traditions of Grunt and Grab from Communists and Islamo-Fascisti and professional criminals and escape punishment.

I think we are a bit too tolerant in our society when it comes to criminal activity. The liberals apparently think the worst they can get in punishment is the Sandy Berger Sentence,  or nothing. BTW, where is his mandated lie detector test and results??

Sleaze and Corruption in the Clinton Camp as always.

rycK

__

A ‘Hoax,’ Leftist Slogans, Nov 31 and Other Follies.

It seems we have some kind of ‘proof’ that the flyer [1]was a hoax. Of course, there is no indication from frontpagemag.com as to this effect. If it was a hoax then it was politically effective.

We can always check a few items against the standard leftist slogans and wonder:

From the flyer:

Your typical American is:

                                    Ø A racist. A sexist. A homophobe.

                                    Ø An Islamo-phobe.

                                    Ø Is willing to invade other countries for oil and pleasure.

                                    Ø Is easily manipulated by Rush Limbaugh and Jews

All this is a perfect fit and conforms to  the far left’s agenda and propaganda base. We can all recall the Jesse MacBeth rants and lies that were so popular with moveon.org and other propaganda rags like the New York Times. Some of us remember Jane Fonda and others from the 60s who made similar comments.

 Politics is not generally based on absolute truth and, as such, tends toward persuasion in its methods and intent. Here, the comments on the flyer are exactly what we would expect from the leftists, word or word, so it matters not where it came from if the screed merely parrots the party line.

I find no reason to think that it is not either authentic or, if it is a ploy, then it becomes a gold standard model of the usual and hackneyed leftist rants. A brick is a brick when it comes to building a road.

Either way, it highlights the bigotry and sleaze and racism employed by the left in all cases. Michael Moore or  Sean Penn, if sober,  would have been proud to pen this.

Where is the evidence it is a hoax besides some calendar error?? A lot of liberals are too stoned to know what day it is. We need more than this.

jmnsho, ryck

Liberals Sponsor a Hate America Day where they can praise Islamo-Fascists and Marxists

Here is a self-descriptive flyer reprinted on the David Horowitz site[1]. This kind of anti-American hate is supported by the Democrats as we note Dennis and Kucinich  and Ron Paul, persons who wanted to be president or whatever.  

This is the kind of tactics that left-liberals need to inspire the criminals, terrorists, muggers, dope peddlers and other contributors to left-liberalism. As usual, the Communists are present as is Sean Penn.

____________________________________________________________

Who Hates Americans? We Do.

                                    Your typical American is:

                                    Ø A racist. A sexist. A homophobe.

                                    Ø An Islamo-phobe.

                                    Ø Is willing to invade other countries for oil and pleasure.

                                    Ø Is easily manipulated by Rush Limbaugh and Jews.

                                    Ø Is the cause of global warming.

Join Us For American Fascism Awareness Day

Place: Washington (Slaveholder) Monument

Date: November 31, 2007

Time: 12PM-2:00 PM

Speakers:

                                        Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, congressmen
                                        Adam Kokesh, Iraq War veteran
                                        Cindy Sheehan, Harry Karry, peace activists
                                        Michael Moore, Sean Penn, film-makers

Sponsors:

Peace and Social Justice Crusade, Iraq Veterans Against the War, Code Pink, Muslim Students Association, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Students for Justice in Palestine, Revolutionary Communist Party, International A.N.S.W.E.R., Moveon.org, DailyKos.com, Indy-Media.org, HuffingtonPost.com, Ivorypower.com

____________________________________________________________

Such hatred and bias!

But, we expect this kind of conduct from the far left.

rycK

THE GENERAL DENUNCIATION OF THE BOOK OF RESOLUTIONS OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

Nov. 3, 1996

Abstract: The Book of Resolutions is hereby denounced by the authors of this document, who are members of the St. Paul’s United Methodist Church in Wilmington, Delaware. This document outlines the many reasons for this stance.

Background: We held several classes to study the contents of the Book of Resolutions (B/R) during adult Sunday School at St. Paul’s United Church. Many of us were alarmed and disturbed by what we learned about the social positions of our church. Most of the people in the class had never seen the book and were unaware how the resolutions were generated, modified, or qualified for inclusion in B/R. The material in this book was the subject of hours of discussion and prayer among us. As a result of these deliberations, the objections and basis for the summary denunciation of B/R are outlined below:

Scriptural Basis. The book is highly secular in nature. Most of the points offered in the various resolutions are not supported by scriptural references. Where references to the Bible do occur, they are frequently subordinate to and given equal weight and treatment with such secular  references as U. S. Supreme Court decisions (1) or leftist political Basis. 

Political Basis. The book is mostly political in nature. The language, dogma  (2,3).and tone of the book have been skillfully structured by dedicated experts  in the use of political correctness. References to scripture are secondary, sometimes irrelevant, often conspicuous by their obvious  absence, and most often subservient to the political arguments in support  of resolutions. Examples are: Sexuality (3) affirmative Action (4), Diversity of Language (5) and Racism (6). Themes like the general  eradication of genocide are touted throughout the book with serious  omissions of clear examples. Pronouncements on this theme continue while  references to obvious pogroms like the genocide of Cambodians by the Khmer  Rouge are omitted, perhaps through some reciprocal agreement or political  courtesy. In place of such serious omissions are various minutia such as  the trivial ardent desires to restrain the U. S. Navy from target practice  on two small islands (7) in Puerto Rico, whose citizens are victims of  American colonialism.

A careful reading of this material reveals that the B/R is essentially 100% left-liberal and ultra-radical in its outlook, tone, theme, theology, and policy. There is no variation from this narrow view. The fraction of the political spectrum populated by the radical left is far less than a majority of the adult U. S. population, but this small group apparently has total control over the text and contents of B/R. The resultant text has narrow and shallow spiritual values, abounds in loose secular ethics, and insists on substituting rigid political dogma for other more obvious scriptural lessons, morals, and Christian practice.

The appearance of numerous non-Christian notions, platitudes and polemics implicit in this book may be explained by the petition procedure detailed on p. 19. According to the process, petitions submitted, from any source, must pass through the Church and Society Legislative Committee, which accepts, rejects or amends the petitions. There are no published guidelines for reviewing petitions. There is apparently no appeal process. The format for this form of secretive process was known as a Star Chamber in earlier centuries. It should be obvious that the members of the Church and Society Legislative Committee can easily filter out, suppress or redact, any petitions that are considered politically incorrect. This practice is authoritarian. Dictators use this method. It is quite clear, after reading the text, that this political screening process is in effect and working smoothly. Without dictatorial political filtering, the content of this book would otherwise reflect the natural social, economic, intellectual, and cultural diversities of the membership of the Methodist Church. The text of the book would read much differently in many sections if the Church membership, as a whole, were allowed to submit their concerns and comments. Church membership: The B/R tends to polarize members of the United Methodist Church. Many of us are alarmed at the use of old socialist, radical activist and Marxist economics theories and polemics now being reshuffled, thinly-disguised, and proffered as responsible social theory and conduct, wholly approved by God.

Conclusion. We find the resolutions and positions of this book to be largely without social, theological or economic merit. Much of the text of the B/R resembles the crude sophistry of propagandists. This book panders to the radicals of the left-liberal wing of the political arena and uses platitudes and petty sophisms to legitimize current activist themes. The effect of this tautological political exercise is to polarize the members of the United Methodist Church, many of whom give substantial gifts in time and money and are unaware of the political underpinnings of the General Conference leadership. Perhaps the basis for determining gifts to the church should be reviewed, at least by the authors of this document in light of the comments in this book. We find B/R frequently barren in elementary Christian ethics and teachings. References to God and scripture are selectively used where possible and even distorted, if necessary, to support political viewpoints. Obvious Biblical references and teachings are omitted when discussing a given topic, even if they might be pertinent, because they would naturally conflict or undermine rigid leftist dogma. The B/R rates a low score on all Christian, or even secular, theological approval scales and merits a general denunciation by any objective Christian standards.

Demands:

[1]  We demand that this Book of Resolutions be open to allow changes  in social position statements through petitions from responsible Methodist Church members.

[2]   We demand that other points of view be considered. We demand that these petitions be included for open vote at General Conference without prior political filtration by secret committee.

[3]   We demand that the texts of such resolutions be left pristine  and devoid of editing by zealous individuals, free from propagandizing and  distortions from radical revisionism theories, free from being abstracted,

Footnotes

(1)       Capital Punishment.  B/R, p. 465-466. The case is here argued that the use of capital punishment (CP) found in Matt. 5:38 was repudiated by Christ. This essay is based on the theory that the motive for advocating CP is only revenge. Israel always had CP and A. Eichmann was hanged in this century. CP need not be based on revenge; it can be based on justice alone. This is an example of a distortion of scripture.  See Exod. 21:15, Lev. 24:14, Num. 15:32-36, Lev. 20:10, Heb. 11:37, I Pet. 2:14, and many others.

(2)       Grand Jury Abuse. B/R, p. 503

Here the teachings in Matt 7:1 (Judge not....) are distorted to make this passage appear to apply to the judicial grand jury system as tool for the suppression of anti-war activists, minorities, and political dissidents. This is an example of the sophomoric nature of many positions in this book.

(3)       Responsible Parenthood, Sexual Violence and Pornography. B/R, pp. 125-128.

This broad section covers: abortion, parenthood, sexuality, population expansion, health care, genetics, venereal disease, extended family, and cultural diversities of groups. There are no references to scripture cited except for the obscure Nelson reference in The Christian Century cited below. The general tone of the language of this section is devoid of any meaningful reference to scripture. When scripture is cited it is frequently vague and loosely connected to the point being made. Example: p.128 where Genesis 1:27;31 is connected to an obscure reference:  J. B. Nelson who states “...sexual sins lie not in being too sexual, but  in not being sexual enough in the way God has intended us to be.” We missed the connection of this thought to any known Christian principles. Appropriate Biblical references for this section are: I Cor. 6:9-20; II Cor. 12:14; Eph. 6:4; Col. 3:21; Jer. 2:20, Jer. 3:6; Ezek. 16:3-22; Exod.  20:12; Lev. 19:3; Deut. 5:16

(4)       Affirmative Action. B/R, p. 159-160

talks about biblical teachings but makes no citations from scripture while  discussing a secular book ( G. Myrdak, An American Dilemma, 1944). The absurd notion is put forth in this section that “...affirmative action is...essentially moral and spiritual in nature.” Affirmative Action efforts do have many legitimate concerns  but some of this is activity is based on political activism, revenge, reverse discrimination, and greed.

(5)       Affirming a Diversity of Language.  B/R, p 162-164.

Here opponents of a multi-lingual nation, which would present monumental problems in communication, education and other civil areas, are curtly labeled as racists. These opponents are accused of “..[being] involved in various legislative and lobbying activities.” These obvious democratic rights and privileges of the opponents to legal due process are “...another manifestation of the systemic racism which has infested this country for generations.” Radical comments and the churlish tone of this sort of attack are not scriptural in nature, but belong to a select group of self-anointed political activists.

(6)       Racism.   B/R, p 258-259 A list of organizations, including the KKK,

Nazi Party, Posse Comitatus, etc. are condemned, and justly so. No corresponding left-wing political or military organizations are mentioned such as: The JDL, Shining Path, the Black Panthers, L. Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, etc., although some of these organizations practice racism and anti-Semitism according to the guidelines of the B/R. Omitting several obvious racist organizations in this manner, while condemning racism in general, is clear evidence of political bias.

(7)       B/R, p. 633. The islands are Culebra and Vieques. This concern pales

In contrast to one million deaths in Phnom Penh in Kampuchea (formerly  Cambodia).

rycK

A Legacy of Gore Sleaze and the Democratic Allies of Communism.

The Gore’s gory association with Communists goes back a half century, and more, and is a tale of sleaze, corruption and treason which begins with Al Gore’s father, a former deceased Senator from Tennessee. All that follows below is well documented as the footnotes and links will show. The links add additional information to support these conclusions:

FBI files, open to the public now,  mentioned that in 1948 Gore Senior had expressed interest in joining the National Lawyers Guild a slimy leftist group that  Sidney Hook[1] “described the individuals who founded the NLG as being as “not being capable of taking any stand that conflicts with the CPUSA” a Communist-front organization, but it doesn't say he joined.[2] There were scads of phony organizations like this, and many are still around. Gore was on the lunatic fringe of the Crypto-Marxist wing of the Party of Democrats and his son follows in his tacky trail. The Gores have always sought out and supported enemies of our system and supported our enemies.

The Elder Gore was motivated, or more likely indoctrinated,  by far leftist notions and also apparently galvanized by the ‘impertinent’ FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's 1953 testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security.  Hoover testified that Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White[3] was a Soviet agent although Truman ignored this. The VENONA Project[4] and recent KGB files show that White was indeed a Communist and traitor and working against the United States, all good sensible  reasons for a probable Neo-Communist Stooge like Gore to risk all. Truman was not able to see very many Communists in his own organization and his image suffers for this as he is regarded as being a puppet or a simple stooge whose sole purpose was to keep the moderate and conservative Democrats in the Marxist fold. The Dixiecrats fixed that. Harry could not trust Hoover.

Gore Sr. had close ties to Armand Hammer, head of Occidental Petroleum, a criminal and whose father[5] Dr. Julius Hammer [“Dr. Julius Hammer was given 3½ to 12 years at Sing Sing, for manslaughter.”], an abortionist, helped to co-found the Communist Party USA or CPUSA. This makes a lot of sense.

 Hammer helped enrich Senator Gore as he was given prize breeding stock and was gifted with a sleazy business deal in a zinc mine that has paid huge royalties to Al Gore Jr., the second worthless Senator Gore.  The Dirty Money Trail goes back to Lenin or farther. The elder Gore lost his reelection in a bitter battle for the Senate, probably because of his support for the Communists in Viet Nam, and Armand Hammer put him on his payroll in a fluff position as a sop and reward for supporting Marxism. We can find nothing about this in Gore's FBI file even though it is a very important issue in fighting Communism. It appears that Director Hoover was intimidated by leftist Democrats in Washington but allowed James Jesus Angleton[6] "the Kingfisher", to pursue Hammer[7]. Angleton was hounded, as expected, by the leftist media for the signal affront of hunting Communists. We know Hoover was an enemy of RFK, among others. Those who attack Communism are constant targets of the far left, as we saw in the cases of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. RR fixed the Soviets for all time and he is hated for this.

We keep witnessing Asian Communists and others offer bribes to The Lesser Gore and the Clintons and we seem paralyzed into inaction. Al’s recent receipt of the Nobel War Prize from the far left in Sweden and Norway, clients and sycophants of the Marxist Vision, is just another sop for Marxism and Islamo-Fascism [now allies of the Communists].

It is disgusting that we cannot expose these criminals and stop the flow of dirty bribe monies to the Democrats and their servile lackeys.

Hillary and her Alinsky Marxists seem to have too much power. People like Jingo Janet Reno will do anything to support and protect criminals like the Gores and Clintons.

Wake up and vote these despots out of office.

rycK

The Clinton Crooked Money Machine

We grow weary of crime, especially that kind of crime that propels parasites into our government where they can subvert and tax our system.

There is a long list[1] of slimy criminals that are beholden and thankful of the Clinton’s power base. Billy pardoned [2] numerous dirt bags such as Henry G.   Cisneros, Roger   Clinton, Jay Houston Harmon, Marc Rich and many others for such crimes as: conspiracy to steal government property, conspiracy to import marijuana, conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, importation of marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, conspiracy to import cocaine, wire fraud, money laundering, distribution of methamphetamine, Income tax evasion, false declarations before grand jury [remember both Hillary and Bill did this one], Medicaid fraud, Armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a felony, among many others.

The salient question here is why would he pardon such scum?? We can understand the Marc Rich case because his wife gave bags of money to the Party of Democrats and his worthless, drug-besotted, booze-soaked brother. The rest of these felons and criminals apparently bribed the Clintons or some of their friends for the pardons. We can wonder if the old adage that ‘Our politicians are the best that money can buy’ is true.

 The latest outrage is the slippery con artist Norman Hsu [3] who has connections to Clinton Friends and other criminals.

Former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack got some help with his $450,000 debt as Vilsack endorsed Clinton and was rewarded [paid] for the Clinton’s agreement to help him shed some his debts. Many of Clinton’s political partners gave this bum Vilsack checks including our arch political criminal Hsu.

Via the Clintons, this same weasel Hsu steered $6,000 to Governor John Lynch of New Hampshire. We can expect a loud endorsement for Hillary from this triangulation of money and sleaze.  The same crook threw $17,000 to Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, a key state.

And there is much more:

New Hampshire Senate President Sylvia Larsen's Democratic Caucus committee received $5,000 from Hsu.

 Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan collected more than $20,000 from Hsu and his associates.

 Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas got $11,000.

Senator Dianne Feinstein of California caught $17,000.

Senator Tom Harkin [who lied about his View Nam service] of Iowa raked in $50,000 from Hsu.

I wonder why the Justice Department cannot find a network of conspiracy here. What more do they need?? The Clintons have been in the sleazy money-grubbing business for decades. Hillary used her position in the Arkansas government to steer business to the Rose Law Firm associated with numerous criminals such as Red Bone who apparently fixed her up with some phony sweetheart deal that magically transformed a $1000 investment in cattle futures into a fat $100,000 nest egg, an enormous profit. She and Bill can perjurer themselves and escape the jail cell.

Can the liberal wing of the Party of Democrats be more corrupt?? The Clintons wallow in sleaze, crime, bigotry, racism and use criminals to control the flow of dirty money for bribes to places where they can get votes.

Would Hillary pardon Norman Hsu like Billy did for Marc Rich??

This phony Party of Democrats is a cesspool of corruption.

rycK

The Swedes Choose Another Marxist Criminal for their War Prize.

The criminal Al Gore ^[1],[2], the one who pandered and groped for dirty political money from the Chinese Communists and was let go by Janet Reno,  has just been awarded the Nobel War Prize for Political Sleaze. He joins a long list of Marxists and other criminals and their political stooges. 

An erstwhile favorite money grubber for the Clintons, who have their own Dirty Money History^[3], algore has now polluted the scientific world with gross speculations and defiance of reason and history. Since the Global Warming Farce can be used to attack western capitalism, the Swedes and their Marxist allies can celebrate. China is acclaimed exempt by al gore  from any emission cutbacks [or anything else] according to al gore. The US should make the cuts and let India and his financial benefactors in the Peoples Republic off.  How progressive of al.

That, alone, is worth a Nobel War Prize.

Al gore has earned his bribe and satisfied the current Marxist thrusts to control growth in capitalism, a factor that has trashed Marx and his ignorant followers who now wallow in poverty when they ignore commerce. The left have been crushed by capitalism and growth and their phony economics has ruined their societies along with the secret police murders, genocide and other preferred leftist methods.

The leftists in the Nobel Prize Committee have make the correct political choice, as usual.  Here are some of their proud awards for   praiseworthy Marxists and their accommodating stooges [4]:

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, Marxist Stooge ,

 

Rigoberta Mench  Marxist Stooge  and Liar,

 

Nelson Mandela, Marxist Stooge , Criminal and  convicted Bomb Maker

 

Kofi Annan Marxist Stooge , Liar and Criminal,

 

Jimmy Carter, Marxist stooge who supported Marxists

 

Al Gore, Marxist stooge and bribist. who supports Marxists where possible.

All  so  very predictable[5]

rycK

The NYT Supports the Demise of Our National Security

The New York Times, supporting any and all enemies of America, predictably plop some more Pinch Pustules [1] upon the yellow pages of their offensive ragzine^[2].

 
Somehow, the court could not muster the four votes needed to grant review in the case of an innocent German citizen of Lebanese descent who was kidnapped, detained and tortured in a secret overseas prison as part of the Bush administration’s morally, physically and legally abusive anti-terrorism program. The victim, Khaled el-Masri, was denied justice by lower federal courts, which dismissed his civil suit in a reflexive bow to a flimsy government claim that allowing the case to go forward would put national security secrets at risk.

 There are other views on this simplistic ploy: ^[3]

Seventy-five thousand doesn't seem like a lot of money, but the US couldn't allow Masri to set a precedent. The intel efforts would come to a standstill if every jihadi could file lawsuits against us for every slight, real or perceived. It would tie the intel bureaucracy in knots, keep analysts and covert operators pinned down for depositions, and shift focus from defending the country to defending the blizzard of court motions. That precedent could turn the judicial system into one of the most productive fronts of the war for our enemies,..

 This is the central issue: If there was some mistake on the part of our anti Terrorist units, the notion that every dirt bag, real or imagined, can open secret and super secret US files to grope and grunt around for some tidbits to throw to the NYT and other Marxist, anti American and  Pro-Islamo-Fascisti is disgusting and absurd.

The New York Times here, again, finds sleaze and propaganda and wraps them up in sorrows, whines and veiled threats to attack, as usual, our way of life and support our enemies.

The New York Times has no use for our military or our intelligence agencies as in evidence that they leak every secret they can get their slimy hands on. We need to reinstate the Alien and Sedition Act and provide some justice for those who commit treason upon us.

The NYT staff, still warm and sticky  in the brilliance of Walter Duranty, the liar and Soviet Stooge who got a Pulitzer Prize for their sorry paper, will find every excuse to undermine the security of the US and celebrate the destruction of our society hoping for some Maoist revisionist society.

rycK

Al Gore, Political Sleaze, Meddling Swedes and the Nobel War Prize.

We will soon encounter a malaria-like periodic contagion of world society known as the Nobel Peace Prize. The Peace-Loving Swedes annually select somebody to ‘win’ the prize as they continue to secretly fund wars around the globe and sell munitions as they have done for 150 years. Here is their new assault rifle. [1] Their phony ‘neutrality’ stance is just an excuse to advance their lucrative weapons sales. 100,000,000 people have died in Europe and their attendant wars during the past 15 decades and many, if not practically all, died from Swedish weapons from Bofors. Notice that they escape the horrors of war on their own soil by sleazy politics and make thus garner huge profits off of the misery of the combatants. Their neutrality stance allows them to make secret arms deals as they smoke the peace pipe with the belligerents.

The founder of Bofors, one Alfred Nobel^[2], was a successful chemist who produced numerous versions of high-intensity explosives for war and made his country rich. It appears that a French newspaper  erred in posting his obituary a bit sooner than necessary  ("The merchant of death is dead”) and prompted Alfred to suffer some psychotic episodes resulting in a hastily-written one page will and to  frantically write a play, which was quickly suppressed to cover his legacy and image. His will was not clear on how certain prize decisions were to be made, but the Marxist-oriented governments of Sweden and Norway quickly grasped the money as a source of political power. The Nobel War Prize has been used ever since for far leftist political propaganda, sleaze and money grubbing. During the numerous wars since the 1860s, Bofors and other companies have made untold millions off being ‘neutral’ and selling weapons and ammo to all participants in any and all wars. This was Leon Trotsky’s fear [3]: that those who advocated Marxism would succumb to capitalism and establish an elitist political leadership and drift away from world communism. The Swedes have justified his fears.

Heading the sleazy leftist antics of Sweden was the Marxist Olof Palme^[4]. He was anti US activist and frequently called US soldiers in Viet Nam the favorite leftist slur:  Nazis. I had the opportunity to read his political offal in the Asian edition of Time about 1967 off the coast of Haiphong in Viet Nam where as I read his political rants and threats I watched Swedish, German, English and French ships loaded down with cargo steam into Haiphong Harbor and come out empty. One wonders if the Swedish and Norwegian ships were loaded with medical supplies, food or war munitions. The Swedes also had cozy relations with the Nazis and sold them munitions. Neutrality at work!

The Nobel War Prize was awarded, actually voted,  to several disgusting social parasites and war mongers^[5] that fostered and aided the Marxist, far-leftist anti US notions and political ideas of the far left. Here are some disgusting war mongers [and their opponents in a few cases] who seem to have been searching for peace and found war:

1990 Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev. Idiot Communist.  

 

1992 Rigoberta Menchú Guatemala "…in recognition of her work for social justice and ethno-cultural reconciliation based on respect for the rights of indigenous peoples" Her phony book was written by some Marxist revisionist who was a bed partner of Che Guevara. [6]

 

1993 Nelson Mandela, a self-confessed and convicted road bomber.

 

1994 Yasser Arafat. Murdering terrorist and arms smuggler.

 

2001 Kofi Annan United Nations “…for their work for a better organized and more peaceful world" Thief and bungler of Iraq’s oil monies.” Talked about the ‘illegal’ US war in Iraq although his phony UN authorized it.

 

2002 Jimmy Carter  United States "..for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development"… and eternal love of any and all Marxists who kissed Leonid Brezhnev. Jimmy never met a Marxist he didn’t instinctively love.

It is now time for the Peace-Loving Swedes to, again, meddle in international politics and probably nominate Al Gore, who’s ties with Asian Marxists and dirty money grubbing is legendary. He is also the chief Carnival Barker for the phony Global Warming Follies. He needs a political boost from the left and Bofor’s war proceeds are quite suitable for al gore’s peace-in-our-time mentality and comic antics.

We can listen to their propaganda and wonder: [7]

A prerequisite for winning the Nobel peace prize is making a difference and Al Gore has made a difference,” said Boerge Brende, a former Norwegian environment minister who nominated Gore and Watt-Cloutier.

 

“I think they are likely winners this year,” said Stein Toennesson, director of Oslo’s International Peace Research Institute. The winner will receive $1.5m (£750,000) in prize money.

 

“Some commentators in America, including the British writer Christopher Hitchens, believe he could use a Nobel win to challenge Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination.” 

Hillary, we might  recall, has seemingly supported the War on Terrorism and needs to be challenged for her obstinate stance against ‘peace’ although many think she is just lying again as she frequently does.

And the Swedes get so upset when we ‘meddle’ in the squalid process of third world politics and interfere with their gun running and missile sales. Palme was assassinated[8], some believe, because details for his lucrative weapons deal with Iran for a huge missile sale was leaked and then he tried to cover his worthless behind by canceling the order, which had been paid for. He received a .357 bullet in the back for this and his Defense Minister seemed to wander in front of a fast-moving train soon after. The Swedes tried to blame the murder on some deranged idiot who lived nearby. No sane person would murder a Marxist Stooge like Palme who peddled guns for ‘peace.’ There are numerous theories about who might have killed Olof. Even Indians are suspected. The investigation of the Palme Assignation is an ongoing joke. The interference of this leftist parasite on US military actions in Viet Nam is not so amusing.

So, now we wait as another leftist with strong ties to Marxists probably gets a gratuitous give of money and fame from some other Marxists. Is this unexpected? And, there will be speeches and laudatory praise and flowers and the liberals will hop and clap and snort  for al gore and  generate more grubbing for money for his phony EcoNazism. The US is supposed to make cuts in industry, autos and lifestyles while his Chinese Communists and Indians get a pass and can pollute as they please thus solving a liberal political problem for Democrats by suppressing economic growth, the key factor in defeating communism and socialism in the world.  

Political Sleaze in Action.

rycK

Hillary Clinton Adds  Another Criminal  Scumbag  to Her Staff And Continues On With The Long List Of Criminals that infest the Clinton Dynasty.  To wit:

Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Berger, who was fired from John Kerrys presidential campaign when the scandal broke in 2004, has assumed a similar role in Clintons campaign, even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008. This is raising eyebrows even among Clintons admirers. It shows poor judgment and a lack of regard for Bergers serious misdeeds, said law professor Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University, who nonetheless called Clinton by far the most impressive candidate in the Democratic field.[1]

The slimy criminal and drunkard [DUI on Rt 64 out side Alexandria] now rejoins the liberal camp and can more better advise Hillary Clinton as a convicted criminal.  If you are a criminal, a drug addict, a pervert or worse you may have a job in the Clinton Administration. Sandy has one!!

For a brief review of the List of Criminal Dirt Bags that are political friends of Bill and Hillary Clinton, and convicted felons,  just check out  this lengthy list. The list needs to be updated.[2]

ARKANSAS:

     1) Roger Clinton: Bill Clinton brother; drug trafficking

     conviction (Wall Street Journal "The Foster Test" January 14,

     1994)

     2) Dan Lasater: governor Bill Clinton contributor a nd state

     contractor: drug trafficking conviction (Wall Street Journal "The

     Foster Test" January 14, 1994)

     3) Dan Harmon: Arkansas Seventh Judicial District prosecuting

     attorney and Bill Clinton friend and political ally: five federal

     racketeering, extortion, and drug distribution convictions (Wall

     Street Journal "Arkansas Justice" June 13, 1997)

     4) Bill McCuen: Bill Clinton political ally: former Arkansas

     Secretary of State; bribery, tax evasion, kickbacks convictions

     (Wall Street Journal: Whitewater: "The Prosecution Rests" May 7,

     1996)

     WHITEWATER:

     5) Webster Hubbell: Bill Clinton friend and political ally;

     Hillary Clinton Rose Law Firm partner: embezzlement; fraud; two

     felony convictions (Wall Street Journal "Whither Whitewater?"

     October 18, 1995)

     6) Jim Guy Tucker: fraud; three felony convictions (Wall Street

     Journal "Second-Term Stall" February 11, 1997; Associated Press

     "Tucker Pleads Guilty to Cable Fraud" February 20, 1998)

     7) William J. Marks Sr.: Jim Guy Tucker business partner; one

     conspiracy conviction (Associated Press "Whitewater Defendant

     Pleads Guilty" August 28, 1997)

     8) Jim McDougal: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend, banker, and

     political ally: eighteen felony convictions (Wall Street Journal

     "Immunize Hale" May 29, 1996)

     9) Susan McDougal: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend; former wife of

     Jim McDougal: four felony convictions (Wall Street Journal

     "Immunize Hale" May 29, 1996)

     10) David Hale: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend, banker, and

     political ally: two felony convictions of conspiracy and mail

     fraud (Wall Street Journal "The Arkansas Machine Strikes Back"

     March 19, 1996)

     11) Chris Wade: Whitewater real estate broker; two felony

     convictions (Wall Street Journal "Hard Evidence From a Federal

     Investigator" August 10, 1995)

     12) Stephen Smith: former Governor Clinton aide; one conviction

     (Wall Street Journal "Hard Evidence From a Federal Investigator"

     August 10, 1995)

     13) Larry Kuca: Madison real estate agent; fraudulent loans (Wall

     Steet Journal "Hard Evidence From a Federal Investigator" August

     10, 1995)

     14) Robert Palmer: Madison appraiser; one conspiracy felony

     conviction (Wall Street Journal "Hale Predicts Hillary conviction"

     October 21, 1996)

     15) Neal Ainley: Perry County Bank president; embezzled bank funds

     for Clinton campaign; two misdemeanor convictions (Wall Street

     Journal "Arkansas Bank Shot" May 4, 1995)

     16) John Latham: Madison Bank CEO; bank fraud conviction (Wall

     Street Journal "Smoke Without Fire" January 12, 1996)

     17) John Haley: attorney for Jim Guy Tucker; misdemeanor guilty

     plea; tax fraud (Associated Press "Tucker Pleads Guilty to Cable

     Fraud" February 20, 1998)

     18) Eugene Fitzhugh: Whitewater defendant, pleaded guilty to one

     misdemeanor count of trying to bribe David Hale; is appealing a

     ten month prison sentence (The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette,

     "Whitewater Defendants" February 22, 1998)

     19) Charles Matthews: Whitewater defendant, pleaded guilty to two

     misdemeanor counts of bribery, served fourteen months of a sixteen

     month prison sentence (The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "Whitewater

     Defendants" February 22, 1998)

     ESPY:

     20) Tyson Foods: guilty plea; $6 million federal court fines and

     investigative costs (Washington Post "Tyson Foods Admits Illegal

     Gifts to Espy" December 30, 1997)

     21) Sun-Diamond Growers: $1.5 million fine for illegal campaign

     contributions to Espy's brother (Associated Press "A Look at Mike

     Espy Investigation" August 27, 1997)

     22) Richard Douglas: former Sun-Diamond Growers official; several

 bribery convictions and guilty pleas (Washington Post "Tyson Foods Admits Illegal Gifts to Espy" December 30, 1997; Associated Press:

     "Lobbyist Pleads guilty in Espy Case" March 17, 1998)

     23) James H. Lake: Sun-Diamond Growers lobbyist; three convictions

     regarding illegal campaign contributions to Espy's brother

     (Associated Press "A Look at Mike Espy Investigation" August 27,

     1997)

     24) Ron Blackley: Espy's chief of staff: financial fraud

     conviction; twenty-seven month prison sentence (Washington Post

     "Tyson Foods Admits Illegal Gifts to Espy" December 30, 1997;

     Associated Press: "Judge Sentences Espy Aide to Jail" March 18,

     1998)

     25) Smith Barney: improper payments to Espy; $1 million-plus fine

     (Associated Press: "A Look at Mike Espy Investigation" August 27,

     1997)

     26) Crop Growers Corporation: $2 million fine for money laundering

     to Henry Espy's campaign (Associated Press: "A Look at Mike Espy

     Investigation" August 27, 1997)

     27) Brook Keith Mitchell Sr. (with his company Five M Farming

     Enterprises: four counts) for fraud (Associated Press: "A Look at

     Mike Espy Investigation" August 27, 1997)

     28) Five M Farming Enterprises (with owner Brook Keith Mitchell:

     four counts) for fraud (Associated Press: "A Look at Mike Espy

     Investigation" August 27, 1997)

     29) John J. Hemmingson, former head of Crop Growers Corporation:

     three counts relating to illegal campaign contributions to Henry

     Espy (Associated Press: "A Look at Mike Espy Investigation" August

     27, 1997)

     30) Alvarez T. Ferrouillet, Jr., Louisiana lawyer and Henry Espy

     campaign finance head: ten count conviction (Associated Press: "A

     Look at Mike Espy Investigation" August 27, 1997)

     31) Municipal Healthcare Cooperative: Ferrouillet-related company;

     perjury, bank fraud, money laundering convictions (Washington

     Post: "Tyson Foods Admits Illegal Gifts to Espy" December 30,

     1997)

     32) Ferrouillet & Ferrouillet: Ferrouillet-related company;

     perjury, bank fraud, money laundering convictions (Washington

     Post: "Tyson Foods Admits Illegal Gifts to Espy" December 30,

     1997)

     CAMPAIGN FINANCE:

     33) Michael Brown (Ron Brown's son): money laundering; misdemeanor

     conviction (Los Angeles Times, "Ron Brown's Son Pleads Guilty to

     Illegal Donation" August 29, 1997)

     34) Eugene Lum: Clinton/Gore campaign contributor and colleague;

     felony conviction; money laundering (Los Angeles Times, "First

     Fund-Raising Sentences Meted Out" September 10, 1997)

     35) Nora Lum: Clinton/Gore campaign contributor and colleague;

     felony conviction; money laundering (Los Angeles Times, "First

     Fund-Raising Sentences Meted Out" September 10, 1997)

     36) Johnny Chung: Clinton/Gore campaign contributor and colleague;

     many visits to Clinton White House and Oval Office with mainland

     Chinese associates; several illegal campaign contributions, money

     laundering, tax fraud, and bank fraud guilty pleas (Associated

     Press: "Democrat Fund-Raiser Pleads Guilty" March 17, 1998)

     37) Roger Tamraz: Clinton/Gore campaign contributor and colleague;

     many visits to Clinton White House and Oval Office; fugitive from

     Lebanon embezzlement convictions; target of French government

     financial investigation; BCCI connections (The Wall Street

     Journal: "Integrity of the Institutions" March 20, 1997, et. al.)

     CISNEROS:

     38) Linda Jones: Henry Cisneros mistress; conspiracy, bank fraud,

     money laundering, and obstruction of justice federal felony guilty

     pleas; sentenced to three and one-half years in prison (Associated

     Press: "Cisneros Ex-Mistress Sentenced" March 25, 1998)

     39) Patsy Jo Wooten: Linda Jones sister; one conspiracy guilty

     plea (Associated Press: "Cisneros Ex-Mistress Sentenced" March 25,

     1998)

     40) Allen Wooten: Linda Jones brother-in-law; one conspiracy

     guilty plea (Associated Press: "Cisneros Ex-Mistress Sentenced"

     March 25, 1998)

rycK

Here is the latest episode  of the Tax Whoring Syndrome that keeps too many socialists and Crypto-Marxists in office in the US.

 

“Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 "baby bond" from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.”

 

"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that down payment on their first home," she said.

Clinton said such an account program” would help Americans get back to the tradition of savings “that she remembers as a child, and has become harder to accomplish in the face of rising college and housing costs. [1]

Note two items here:

 

[1] ‘Every child’ means illegal aliens and any others who might be flying in from France or the Ukraine all will get a clean 5000 bucks. Notice there is no restriction on this.

 

[2] This ‘gift’ will somehow ‘teach or  encourage’ the low class to save money.

These two comments are so filled with marijuana smoke, crack fumes and NYT PinchPus propaganda that we can hardly stand up after the laughing episodes. So, what if some crack baby is born to an illegal alien in the parking lot adjacent to some Calexico street near the border and mamma now wants to get to the ‘gift’ in advance? Is mama going to have to wait 18 years or so for the loot?? What if the child dies from drugs?  Who gets the money now?  Do these gift recipients need a birth certificate as proof or can they just get some paper from the Mexican Legation and fill in the name in Spanish or whatever.  Do we get to spend $300,000 in intensive natal care for this ‘new citizen?’ How much do crack babies cost taxpayers now? Not enough in the parlance of the liberals.

Hillary Clinton leads the Tax Whore Brigades as she had already advocated and secured the biggest tax increases in history with her Hillary Care and the 1993 Clinton Tax Hike. She tried to essentially nationalize a $990 bln insurance-based private system  in 1993 that was three times bigger than the Department of Defense for that year. It was phenomenally complicated, offered to cost estimates and could have cut out many medical services. [2]

John Kerry and other liberals routinely preach about taxing the ‘rich’ but it seems that these taxes seem to broaden and drift way down to the middle class. Kerry “… told his audience that he plans to follow Bill Clinton’s model and do, “the same thing that we set out to do in 1993…[3]” The reason for the spread is that the rich don’t have enough money to supply the voracious appetite for somebody else’s money that the Socialists, Marxists and Liberal Democrats need to fund their follies.

 

“Senator DanielPatrick Moynihan (D-NY) called the [1993]  “biggest tax increase in history.”

 

“I[John Kerry] wish that we did not need to raise taxes (on the middle class), but …this budget cannot be balanced without increasing taxes.”[4]

Note that growth from tax CUTS is never factored in here on anywhere else in leftist calcualtions. Bush2 and Reagan and JFK-Johnson tax cuts generated more revenue. Tax increases frequently cut revenue.

Clinton trundles down the same stale old Bolshevik Ditch where the only political power increases in the leftist ranks come from taking somebody else’ money. Here, the cheesy offer to ‘give’ $5000 to everybody born is a cheap rip off of the taxpayers.

It is always important to keep on the liberal theme: They have to raise taxes or lose power in Congress. They willingly lie about what they will tax and use the sordid bait-and-switch tactics increase the tax increase later on.

Parasites operate on their hosts in such a manner.

The central point here: is that the left can never cut taxes because they could never increase the size of government, the only source of their power base.  T tax cut takes money away from them and offers individualism and opportunities to create wealth and be thus  impendent of most slippery liberal social programs. The liberals could  just give away money for ‘births’ and create some more reasons to expand government in the future. Somebody has to administer such a program.

The Immigration Issue is a vital and essential project for leftist future where liberals can import poverty into the US and then expand our social services using tax monies. This is the only growth area remaining to liberals unless they try to annex Mexico.  Mexico is 50% Communist and would be more than willing to take taxpayer’s monies for their support. Mexico does not believe their borders stop at the US border, statement hailed by liberals who need more poverty and votes.

Stop tax increases and stop the rabid left.

rycK

Sleaze, Propaganda, the New York Times and the Jena Six

We again must revisit the Propaganda Machine know as the New York Times and sift through outwardly words that attempt of fructify the slimy political bowl of offal that is  fundamentally  laced with bigotry, political bias and racism.  The New York Times knows no boundaries that might proscribe any of the bizarre elements of Marxism, racism and sleaze.

Here is the NYT version[1] of the Jena Six Follies:

The protest concerned the so-called Jena Six, six black students who were charged with attempted murder in the beating of a white classmate in December 2006. Civil rights advocates, who have called the punishment of the arrested youths disproportionate, say the case has raised the questions of how much race still plays a part in the workings of the legal system in the South.

 

One the six, Mychal Bell, 17, was convicted of aggravated second-degree battery, but the conviction was thrown out in Septmeber[sic]  2007 by a Louisiana appeals court, which ruled that he had been mistakenly tried as an adult. Mr. Bell’s request to be freed on bail while awaiting a retrial was denied. — Maria Newman, Sept. 24, 2007

This is the half or partial truths from the NYT, typical of cheap propagandistic tactics.

The alleged attacker, Mychal Bell, 17, was convicted because he acted like  a cheap thug and has, apparently, been arrested several times for gratuitous physical violence. Justice is now being undone for political reasons. We cannot see his priors. The issue here is that a minor is allowed protection from a public inspection of criminal records and can participate in a hate crime in gruesome, but politically important race riots and expect to escape punishment on the basis of a technicality.  The truth, an enemy of the left is thus supressed. This is a grand political signal to racists, muggers, carjackers and others who commit felonies as teens and can be assured that they will get minimal jail time. This is liberalism in its finest moments. A group of angry blacks beat a white person senseless and all will probably escape punishment for the simple reasons of racism and politics. We can not be surprised that nearly 1/3 of all black males will face stiff prison terms, apparently to the delight of liberal social engineers who desperately need the votes. The liberals work diligently to keep these metrics high and preserve the votes. Hillary needs them badly.

This is the process of the new liberal racists like Al Sharpton and their servile enablers at the New York Times. Whenever an opportunity arises with the slightest legal imbalance the NYT and others media sausage machines jump into their Political Racism Party suits and celebrate a new victory. This is a standard propaganda move that keeps their ignorant constituents heated up and willing to vote, blindly, for ‘justice,’ which means that they allow [and nurture] such hate crimes, since this makes political sense. The New York Times regularly enables racists, terrorists, drug addicts, Marxists, Islamo-Fascists  and worse, to enjoy their deeds with media praise and allows liberal Democrats to attack and corrupt our quality of life and Grunt and Grab for our earnings.

Parasites operate in this fashion.

rycK