Brown v. The Board and Liberal Racism Revisited

The demise of democracy, at least as it might be imagined from a reading of the Constitution, was nearly consummated yesterday in the Senate when our learned elected representatives tried to secretly craft a slimy deal to do who knows what, but, certainly, to feather the nest of these vultures, who roost in the Congress and White House. Amidst an uproar from the public they tried their best to pass some phony Immigration Bill that did nothing but allow illegals to remain here, not sign up for anything but welfare and freebies and continue to work or sell dope at their pleasure. There was blanket amnesty everywhere in the bill. Usually, such anti-democratic posturing and law-bending is reserved for other elements of government, way out of their original power base, like the Warren Court of the United States Supreme Court[SCOTUS ] and certain agencies like EPA and FDA.

The bill died missing several votes needed to form even a simple majority from Democrats who defected as the roar of the polis heightened. The eyes were upon them and they faded. On the same day, the SCOTUS tore away a bit of Brown v Board, as it should have. The retorts were loud and clear as the Party of Democrats, having little to do with democracy when they get their way, were as such:

"There is so much left to be done and for anyone to assert that race is not a problem in America today is to deny the reality in front of our very eyes."—Hillary Clinton 6.28.07[1]

Liberalism survives only on their racist mechanism. They want race to be a determining factor in jobs, hiring, contracts, schools and anything else that will appease their victims and give them more votes. This comment from a Saul Alinsky Communist.

"Let me just put this in perspective: If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34 there would be an outraged, outcry in this country."—Hillary Clinton 6.28.07[2]

Let me just put this in perspective: Why not substitute the words black African-American males for HIV and put in that 1/3 of them will go to prison and then talk about that outcry Hillary? This already happens. More die in gun battles in our 20 largest cities than all the lost soldiers in Baghdad since the start of the War on Terrorism, which the liberals never fail to defeat piece by piece.

Racism, of course is the heart and soul of the left-liberal movement in America and elsewhere.[3],[4],[5] They have little else but to implement their phony social programs, financed by the taxpayers, of course, and then to blame the rest of us for the failure of their ill-conceived and dangerous social programs. They spent 5 trillion dollars on phony social programs since 1950, murdered 20,000,000 babies in the womb and want more and more and more.

So, today we need to look at the left-wing’s maneuvers to circumvent the Constitution and body of laws and use the back room deals and courts to get at the tax base, the central target of all socialists, Communists and related parasites. The Immigration fiasco is over until 2009, but they will still not close the borders or enforce the current laws. They will do nothing and just pout.

The case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) [6] is linked to the Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson. Here the earlier law supported the notion of separate but equal in several cases. Brown I reversed this saying, in effect, that separate was NOT equal and so on and so forth. The details are uninteresting and tiresome to review.

Fine. Now, let us ask: are people really equal? The much bashed Bell Curve[7] merely tabulated test scores that showed, and still do, that many minorities just cannot compete on standardized tests and busing, howling, set-asides, race-norming, quotas, sleaze and more cannot produce an equal outcome. No overblown and flowery oratory from any Eastern Liberal can change the test scores that were covered in the book, and they were abysmal. They still are. What the liberals wanted in affirmative action measure was not equality , but forced outcomes that were achieved at the expense of white males, who were not exactly their constituents, especially if the were Christians and had blue eyes and blond hair.

Now, the question is how to change the laws. A brief reading of the Constitution shows us that the Congress has the sole privilege of making laws and the SCOTUS is not endowed with that power, after the British or Roman system we suppose. But, after Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) [8], the SCOTUS carved out of nothingness such a right. Not only that, but they also conjured up the right to veto laws and usurp some executive privilege in administering civil actions to correct previous errors in law and to corral the miscreants who defied their own actions. This is anarchy in the making. The proof of this is shown by counting the number of lawyers who roam the land looking for fees while they ‘correct’ the law.

The SCOTUS, the only court that counts, is split on this, for an instance, with Chief Justice Rehnquist opining against Plessy v. Ferguson. He was not alone.

William Rehnquist wrote a memo called "A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases" when he was a law clerk in 1952, during early deliberations that led to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In his memo, Rehnquist argued that "I realize that it is an unpopular and unhumanitarian position, for which I have been excoriated by 'liberal' colleagues but I think Plessy v. Ferguson was right and should be reaffirmed." He continued, "To the argument... that a majority may not deprive a minority of its constitutional right, the answer must be made that while this is sound in theory, in the long run it is the majority who will determine what the constitutional rights of the minority are." [9]

Not if the liberals can help it! Minority rule, very much favored by the rabid left is known as authoritarianism and they have sacred icons who are heroes of this political sector such as Stalin, Mao and Ho and about 150 examples in Africa. No Marxist dictator has ever been asked to resign by a left liberal and, with no surprise expected, Castro is the Darling of the Progressives. They want to close Guantanamo[10], which will rate rave applause and wet sloppy bravoes from Castro, Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega, just to name a few dictators with blood on their hands . Heroes of the left like [Vinegar] John Kerry[11], a known Communist sympathizer, who aided the enemy in time of war and voted against nearly every major weapons program during his sorry tour in the Senate, was selected to run for President and wildly endorsed by the left here in the US, in Mexico and among Marxists around the world. Jimmy Carter[12] is another example of a Marxist Stooge. World wide, he could have secured nearly a billion votes. The entire base structure of the Democrats controlled and wagged by their leftist-most elements would use a Star Chamber to make decisions as they tried to do in the Kennedy offices on Capitol Hill in the Immigration Bill disaster. It matters not to a dedicated liberal or any of their lackeys who use narcotics to ‘feel good’ that they cannot tolerate laws based on majority rule. They have no qualms nor sacrifice the least significant of any scruples when they celebrate as some whiskey-soaked Kazoo-tooter[13] conjures law in the back room along with a pack of Hispanic racists from La Raza[14] and some fingerlings from the White House, the Progressive Caucus[15] or even Code Pink. They have no objection to Rep Jefferson from LA sitting on important committees when he just served with a 16 count indictment for bribery and worse. Then, there is the case of John Murtha of Abscam fame.

Now, none of the mumblings make any sense unless you believe that the courts really can make law from the bench, as some have done. Why try to use Congress, as the ACLU always reminds us, when you can get some crooked judge to rule your way and get another whack at the tax base? The jejune chants in our current ‘law system’ are just that: so much blather by advocates and stooges who try to bend the law.

So, that is where it lies: Can we allow the Marxist-trained cadres and their sycophants to corrupt our system of government?? I say no. We need to defeat these parasites, dumping some Republicans like Trent Lott along the way, and place real Americans on SCOTUS where they can administer the law and vacate most or all of the legal activism since 1950. The next presidential election in 2008 is critical as the next two justices to rot away in their chars are a pair of the most leftist persons ever to be called judges. They must be replaced with people who can interpret what the Constitution means and vacate spurious rulings and dispatch judges who cannot follow the law. George Bush can carry away the errors on his back and see if there is anything left of his ‘legacy.’

These leftist parasites will ruin our country if they can and tax the rest of us out of existence. They will not be satisfied until we are compelled to give up our homes to the ‘poor’ and stand for hours in food lines as they did in Moscow in the late 1980s. California will be the first to go down; Oregon second.

rycK ryckki@gmail. com

On Political Dupes and Our Form of ‘Democracy.’

Politics is the tangled and nefarious process of decisions made by groups. The persons who would take one or more sides in an issue are frequently emotional, direct and forceful in their desires to force a decision toward their persuasion and frequently have no idea what they are talking about. The process of culturing up votes or advocates for some group decision has its toots buried in inane actions commonly attributed to all of us. An example is the ubiquitous array of tempting diets as shown it the news rags at the supermarket near the checkout stand. I cannot recall a single week in my five decades of shopping that I have not seen a ‘miracle diet’ outlined with fanfare and fluff where the believer can lose one hundred pounds or more, look like Jane Mansfield in only three weeks or sooner, not be hungry and the weight stays off. There are always miracle cures for cancer too. One wonders, then, why so many people are over weight or gratuitously obese in America in light of these modern miracles and we can also marvel why the cancer rate has not dropped to zero.

Similar phenomena are noticed for eager witnesses to see magicians and freak shows. It seems that the a priori awareness that the performance is rigged is not a retarding factor in attendance for the simple. People want to see the featured freak show seven fingers or two heads or try to guess how the magical trick is done, since they do not believe in wizardry. Politicians have often sought solutions by attempting to penetrate the dark regions of wizardry, but have failed to get much for their efforts with the possible exceptions of Henry VIII, Nancy Pelosi and H. Ross Perot.

Now, you can mix the two in politics. Consider the John Edwards incident where he channeled the soul of a dead baby or when he offered to talk to anyone about his dead son. This is all some creepy stuff, but buffoonery made Edwards millions off some medical malpractice suit, as an ensemble of ignoramuses paneled briefly as a jury gave out the huge award. He tantalized the jury with this:

Edwards said, "I have to tell you right now — I didn't plan to talk about this — right now I feel her [Jennifer], I feel her presence...[Jennifer's] inside me and she's talking to you." [1]

Edwards was now rich. His wife, a victim of cancer, but not too humble to taunt the voters with sympathy in the Hollywood Manner of Michael J. Fox, recently attacked Ann Coulter for her remarks about the phony Edwards.[2],[3] Cindy Sheehan worked a similar trick with the memories of her dead son who disagreed with her leftist politics. It seems there is now an instant and a major fund-raising campaign going on, since Edwards is losing contributions [I wonder why?] and slipping down the poll ladder and has hoisted up a donation ad called “The Right Wing Attacks” on his website. [see below] Grubbing for money is the ultimate political achievement and poking hot buttons and hyping the voters on emotional issues is a Kennedy-approved apparatus.

The voter is taunted and cajoled from every quarter in an effort to maneuver their ballot box preferences. The process of political puppeteering works very well with the ignorant and imbecilic voters who are not paying much attention. The recent case where the Immigration Bill was squashed in the middle of a traditional maudlin Kennedy Breakdown.

The US voters appear to be similar to cognitively-challenged chickens in a ground coop with thin walls and too much water. They peck and wander around while the owner fixes the feed costs and secures the doors. They cannot seem to react unless the fox appears visibly inside with bloody feathers in his mouth. They are ‘living the good life’ and we must all marvel why our phony form of democracy has produced such prosperity. The good times and wealth are more astonishing in light of the Marxists who infested nearly every political election since 1918. The alcohol-propelled demagogues like Ted Kennedy do have some effect but can be exposed and their antics defeated, as happened today with the phony Immigration Bill.

rycK ryckki@gmail.com

References

______________________________________________-

The Right Wing Attacks!

Tuesday evening Elizabeth Edwards called Ann Coulter live on Hardball to ask for an end to her personal attacks on John and other candidates. Coulter's response? More personal attacks.

It's up to us to raise the dialogue by taking our message straight to voters. Let's show that Ann Coulter style politics will never carry the day. We have 4 days to reach $9 million. Please donate today:

$25 $50 $100 Other

http://www.johnedwards.com/rightwing/

_______________________________________________________________

A comment on Edwards

Pretending to channel the souls of dead babies in court in order to convince stupid jurors to give you money other people earned is about as low and depraved as you can get, but now we find out he politicizes the memory of his dead son by running around telling anyone who is of political benefit to him this gruesome, creepy story. And he's lied to so many people about never telling it that he can't remember who he lied to.

http://therightrant.blogspot.com/search/label/Democrats

___________________________________________________-

Coulter’s actual comments

I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I'm - so, kind of at an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards, so I think I'll just conclude here and take your questions."[99]

"C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean."[101]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter#2007_John_Edwards_controversy

___________________________________________________________

Edwards quotes:

Edwards said, "I have to tell you right now — I didn't plan to talk about this — right now I feel her [Jennifer], I feel her presence...[Jennifer's] inside me and she's talking to you."

Edwards won a $6.5 million settlement for his client, but five weeks later, the presiding judge sustained the verdict but overturned the award as being "excessive" and that it appeared "to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice," adding that in his opinion "the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict." He offered the plaintiffs half of the jury's settlement, but the child's family appealed the case and settled for $4.25 million.[12]

Winning this case established the North Carolina precedent of physician and hospital liability for failing to determine if the patient understood risks of a particular procedure.[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_edwards#Legal_career

The Immigration Bill is Being Secretly Crafted by Kennedy and Liberals

I think it was Sir Winston Churchill, perhaps not yet knighted and honored, who said that the making of laws and the making of sausages were to be kept from the public. This hints at the slimy business of the power struggle in Washington.

Senator Cornyn (R-TX) has some comments on this:

``This is a bill that was written behind closed doors by a small group of senators, and now it's being brought to the floor again without an opportunity to offer, freely offer, amendments and to have the kind of debate that I think this topic deserves,'' the senator said.

Cornyn said the congressional debate on what to do with the 12 million immigrants illegally in the U.S. has ``fallen short'' because it has focused only on whether to give them citizenship or deport them.

The current proposal, which would let undocumented immigrants gain legal status after paying a fine, isn't sufficient punishment for people in this country illegally, the senator said. ``It looks like we're selling American citizenship,'' he said.

Cornyn said the U.S. would be in ``big trouble'' if failure to pass immigration legislation blocked an increase in the number of visas for skilled workers, as sought by technology companies including Google Inc., owner of the most popular Internet search engine, and Microsoft Corp., the world's largest software maker.[1]

These are all excellent points. Why should we think we need unskilled workers of the lowest class in North America to populate our lands?? Can we not outsource tomatoes, lettuce and such to Mexico or Taiwan or The Sudan and have the produce shipped over here? Apparently not, according to Ted Kennedy of Chappaquiddick Fame. Apparently, we must learn how to make laws under the table, where the good Senator frequently resides after his valiant bouts with sobriety and bawling episodes about his brothers and nephews and such who are prison, or should be.

Most societies are pulled down by the low class. The Third World has numerous cases where failure is directed intently by bad government while being wildly supported by the criminal class from places like High-Anus, Massachusetts.

Most of the trendy howling about making citizens out of criminals or letting them vote [Clinton Bill to let felons vote] arises from the need to stuff ballots for liberals. A visit to the La Raza site gives a list of those states that require IDs while stating that only citizens can vote. What is the point if they cannot vote anyway?? The point is votes as Senator Kennedy howled “Help us out!”

We urgently need other things than the fractured structure of this bill, to wit:

[1] We need a national ID system where every person must have one or commit a felony. All citizens would get one free. All others would have to get one upon entering the US or if they are already here and not citizens.  Summary deportation  as a minimum penalty for not applying for a national ID.  The ID would be connected with the Social Security System information.

[2] We need a National Work Permit that permits any person to work in any manner, including self-employment. Free  and automatic only for  citizens who are non felons.  Fees and reviews for non citizens. Summary deportation for not applying for a national ID, heavy fines for employers  for hiring persons without a Work Permit and revoking of employer Work License.

[3] We need a National Work License for anybody to employ any worker for any reason. Citizens would get one free.   Any person with a National Wrok Permit would be eligible to work. Heavy fines for employing anyone without a National ID and a National Work Permit.


All information in the IDs and Permits would be in national database accessable by all goverment agencies, city, county, state and federal and any persons with valid IDs. Heavy fines, jail and deportataion , where appropriate for any person who steals an ID or Permit from another person.

Every person in the US should have an ID, which is linked to Social Security and such, and a Work Permit with work information such as the employer License ID number. Failure to obtain such permits by non citizens, a felony, would be instant grounds for deportation.

Of course, the left will never go for this because it would allow tracking of all citizens to see just who is working for who. The selling of drugs would then carry two felonies: sale of an illicit substance and absence of a permit to sell. The liberals need criminals to supply them with creature comforts like dope, sexual favors and cheap labor, but most importantly: votes for more liberals and tax hikes.

The left-liberals, still groaning and fuming about Ronald Reagan and his crushing of the USSR want to get some wealth by stuffing the ballot box. They are for the most part Anti-anti-Communists, or simply Communist Stooges. They cannot survive on their own ideological means as their preferential forms of government [Mostly Marxist dictatorships and such] are utter failures.

Urge your Senators to vote down this stupid bill and vote, instead, for a National License and Permitting Act that would let us identify and track who lives here.

rycK ryckki@gmail.com

On Suppression of Criticism

Silencing the opposition, by any convenient means, hopefully forever, satisfies a basic political tenet for all players in the game save those who are too chauvinistic to realize their pawn-like position. Masters at the game usually round up the opposition and space them equally against the nearest brick wall and introduce some new variations on the zany Jackson Pollack art work. Stalin was unusually adept at the game as he managed to cut off criticism by a variety of novel methods and coined the word liquidation as a tribute to his personal lexicon. Apparently, the left-liberal wing of the Party of Democrats [nothing Democratic about them anymore] has blown a main circuit fuse over talk radio and its impact on leftist elections. They have lost control of this part of the media.

Control of the media is probably the most important control factor of an impending dictatorship or revolution next to the collapse of the enemy military forces. The first thing many revolutionaries do is seize the local radio and TV stations and start broadcasting that they have won so the time for peace and justice is now at hand. No revolutionary would allow an outlet to go unsupervised. An example is the Aljazeera site[1], which provides superb propaganda and rude political hints and talking points to the liberal Democrats as they attack the ‘right-wing’ on the War on Terrorism, just a bumper sticker [2]as some noisily assert.

Then, there is the problem of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and the crew at Fox News, mostly Bill O’Reilly. The obvious way to counter such a series of pundits with millions of viewers is to put up your own shows, with opposing views, of course, and offer a tussle on the issues. Unfortunately, or perhaps the reverse of this fortune, radio talk shows of the leftist persuasion like those envisioned by Mario Cuomo, Al gore, Air America and others have flopped and disgraced their noble hosts with sour ratings and disinterest from the masses. I wonder why?

Now, what is a good radical with extensive Marxist training to do?? Well, Hillary Clinton, a known Saul Alinsky Radical and adherent of far left-wing radical politics and a member of the Sisterhood from California, one Barbara Boxer have started a quiet legislative effort to muzzle Rush and his friends, who are having too much effect [and fun] with the left. Rush has been on now for about 12 years and is on the brown list, near the top or the penultimate position, of media types, pundits, elected officials, judges and such for a long time. He is a major problem despite the reverse psychological ruse of telling the masses that he is a heap of lies and lacks any persuasive power. If that be true, and truth is not exactly the first weapon a leftist knight would select for battle, then he should have been left to fail by poor ratings and little or no advertising. Surprise! Surprise! Rush and Sean Hannity [3]and Monica Crowley[4], the infamous and stunning Ann Coulter[5] and Laura Ingraham[6] [except for Sean we have three knock-down drop-dead gorgeous blonds here, something to contrast with Barbara Boxer and Maxine Waters!?] have been doing a bang up job of banging the rabid left and exposing their tricks and tricksters and johns. Ann Coulter, another blond bombshell, has the distinction of fighting with as gigantic a set of bloody-eyed zombies as her enemies since Joan D’Arc or Cleopatra.

The center of this issue, of course, is suppression of criticism, something the left just cannot stand. So, the notion of the Fairness Doctrine becomes of interest, which was “present such issues in what was deemed an honest, equal and balanced manner[7]” and the particulars look like this:

Two corollary rules of the doctrine, the "personal attack" rule and the "political editorial" rule, remained in practice until 2000. The "personal attack" rule was pertinent whenever a person or small group was subject to a character attack during a broadcast. Stations had to notify such persons or groups within a week of the attack, send them transcripts of what was said and offer the opportunity to respond on the air. The "political editorial" rule applied when a station broadcast editorials endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, and stipulated that the candidates not endorsed be notified and allowed a reasonable opportunity to respond.[8]

Now, just who would want to bring this back?? Well, let us guess: liberals? You guessed right or actually left. Here is a list of those who support this: Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Representatives Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), and Louise Slaughter (D-NY)[9]. Well, how did we guess this??

Recently, Senator Inhof (R-) recalled a conversation he overheard by Senators Clinton and Boxer as :” "I was going over to vote the other day, and I was walking with two very liberal gals that didn’t pay any attention to me being with them," Inhofe told Ziegler. "They said, 'We have got to do something about this, these are nothing but far-right-wing extremists. We’ve got to have a balance, there’s got to be a legislative fix to this.”[10]

The two most liberals Senators deny this. But, then, what is the value of truth in anyting Senator Clinton has ever said? A known liar, crooked lawyer, perjurist and a person who ignored a judge’s subpeona to relase her Rose Law Firm Billing Records, Mrs Bill Clinton has everything to gain from such a supression measure and nothing to lose by lying about it. That is a fact.

Following the Communist Manifesto and other sacred documents frequently studied by the far left, we cans see the obvious need to squelch criticism from the right wing. And, as ALL the players above are far left-wing types, we can safely dump the notion that they are not working on this or something worse. They need to stop Rush and others or he might just cost them another election or two.

All this follows with the leftist ideolog of lies, legislative methods to attack opponents, high taxes and other measures. They will do or say anything to grab power, so what do we believe here?? The left will try to say that this was ‘old news’ or three years old or out of context or other clumsy retort.

Believe U.S. Senator James Inhofe, as the other two are slick liars and propoents of the worst sort of Tax Maggotry.

rycK

The History of Phony Advice from Leftist

We watch, mostly with wonder and surprise, at the dire predictions and frenetic advice bestowed upon us by our elder statesman and certain celebrities who transcend history, economics and foreign policy. We all remember the media circus when Meryl Streep[1],[2] was seated as some kind of witness or ‘expert’ on the contested Alar growth hormone trial, used by the apple industry to enhance picking time, and we were privileged to reel and wheeze under the implied weight of her pharmacological expertise and lofty oratory. She had no reason to be there. We are constantly invited to join in with little dangling bells and loud song as we celebrate some political notion contrived on some notion of morality or justice, as if these terms were clearly defined anywhere. By some process, understandable only to carnie barkers, slick sleeve grifters and North Beach panhandlers, we are given to believe that some mutual benefit shines down from the cosmos if we just accept the notion that those who are out to attack [and bury] us all really have our good intentions in mind. We must heed the warnings. Mesomorphs who have made a few movies or drove by Harvard a time or two seem to have surpassed all political barriers, simplified the problems, experienced Nirvana, recurrently with drugs, and can now predict the future for us. They have the solutions. Escalating taxes is always one of these mandatory options. We should listen to Streep or Michael Moore, we must suppose, given the blather and steam, because they had some face time on the tube and could be recognized outside Nathan’s. They are our self-anointed guardians and will advise us in our conduct and voting habits if the tax revenues are high enough and we legalize abortion and narcotics and allow illegal aliens to vote without showing identification.

We need to scrutinize a few examples of this strange conduct from celebrities and analyze the prediction, advise, content and outcomes.

First Example:

We have been invited to read, colorfully, the poetry of Ho Chi Minh strongly advocated by Jane Fonda[3] that, doubtless, contains jewels of wisdom. Here is my favorite:

AUTUMN NIGHT by H. C. M.

Before the gate, a guard

with a rifle on his shoulder.

In the sky, the moon flees

through clouds.

Swarming bed bugs,

like black army tanks in the night.

Squadrons of mosquitoes,

like waves of attacking planes.

I think of my homeland.

I dream I can fly far away.

I dream I wander trapped

in webs of sorrow.

A year has come to an end here.

What crime did I commit?

In tears I write

another prison poem. [4]

What does this mean Jane? Are bed bugs parts of his imaginary army? What is needed here to set the stage for an intermezzo that will jerk the tears or honk your horn or galvanize you to political action is some fear, a sad story, some fortune teller and a couple of clowns to blow the kazoos and play stupid. Hello Jane, we missed the message.

Another Example:

Jane Fonda granted Chris Matthews an interview opportunity in which she ‘apologized’ for her conduct in praise of North Viet Nam in Hanoi in time of war. She is apparently immune to treason charges. Apparently US soldiers were concerned that she was performing some elementary propaganda duties for the enemy in time of war and lowering morale and commented in the negative against her and Susan Sontag. Jane, basking in the glow of Chris Matthews, burst forth in a stunning and poetic starburst of redaction and Marxist revisionism when she said: "“... Ho Chi Minh "was essentially a nationalist," but "many people, I think rightly have said he was really more like Tito, the Yugoslav president, Marshal Tito," the man generally seen in the 1970s and 1980s as a less doctrinaire communist tyrant. Matthews was eating it up”.[5]:

Quoth the Chris: "I understand exactly. You know your stuff!"[6]

Sure. Play the stooge and wax enchanted for us Chris.

The wild applause by Chris was instructive. He acted as if he was attending some kind of history lesson as a neophyte. Ho was a Marxist, chose and implemented Marxism, accepted money and war material from Marxists, chanted Marxist songs and was the darling of the far left in the US. Chris Matthews is essential to such political theater and functions as a leftist political chum-chucker who can recycle the stale, stilted propaganda action items of the New York Times. He lends some form of credibility to screeds against American society and capitalism. We wonder what “[a]..less doctrinaire communist tyrant.” might look like. Can we have a half or quarter Nazi or a 2% Presbyterian? Maybe Osama bin Laden is not a 100% terrorist. Are prison inmates 90% Democrats?

“Matthews pressed her on whether the left actually shortened the war. When Fonda replied that yes, she and "tens of thousands of others" succeeded,…”[7]

Quoth the Raven Once more: "I think you’re right!...if that war was supported by the American people, we might have stayed in there a lot longer and still lost." [8]

We can fight Fascism and lose 400,000 dead, but Marxism is allowed? Marxists murdered 100,000,000 in the last century and we might inquire where the activist left were hiding. Another example is needed to contrast to the piddling fluff and petty sophomoric grind house mumblings of Jane and her pet But-Monkey Chris Matthews. But, ..but but.

Example:

George Kennan warned President Truman and many others of the danger of the Soviets and issued: “American anti-communism and general suspicion of Soviet aspirations was George Kennan's famous Long Telegram of 1946.”[9] He sounded the alarm and predicted much of what the Soviets were up to and offered a containment policy accordingly, finally leading to success. I doubt that FDR would have rebelled against his allies in such a crude fashion, but we cannot test that. We need to look at the threat and see what happened and decide whether we should have followed Kennan’s advice.

Kennan writes:

“Thus the decision [to fight Communism] will really fall in large measure in this country itself. The issue of Soviet-American relations is in essence a test of the overall worth of the United States as a nation among nations. To avoid destruction the United States need only measure up to its own best traditions and prove itself worthy of preservation as a great nation.”[10]

Of course, the left, policies fashionably divided into Trots and Stallies at the time, were furious with Kennan and the Cold War policy he advocated. Stalin was our Uncle Joe. But, Kennan was absolutely right about the virulent disease of Marxism using any assorted flavor as the Soviets might select. The Communist Manifesto text and speeches by Soviet leaders clearly predicted and demanded the end of capitalism by revolution if necessary. Fact. Ronald Reagan took up the challenge for most of his life and became the most targeted anti-Communist in history. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick continued on with the Kennan pressure and alerted us to the dangers of people like Jimmy Carter and his adoration of Marxism and Islamo-Fascism.[11] Her appearance on TV was enough to cause spontaneous cerebral aneurisms in the rabid left and their lap dogs. It was Jimmy Carter who thought the Ayatollah would be a ‘stabilizing’ force in Iran. Jimmy kissed Brezhnev on the cheek as he groveled in the presence of one of his intellectual heroes and bawled when Daniel Ortega lost the election in Nicaragua. He bawled after his own unsuccessful reelection attempt.

Jim Wright, Jimmy Carter and other Democrats, ennobled by the New York Times for their efforts, formed the Anti-anti-Communists, to attack Ronald Reagan and his allies, who were armed with facts and copies of speeches, by association, and ultimately became the Crypto Communists of the left in America. Anti-anti-Communists are simple preceptors of Marx and Lenin [read pedestrian communists] with some up-to-date slogans and access to the US tax base. Carter was a failure as a person, father, President and in foreign affairs. His emotional embrace of Marist propaganda as wanting ‘peace and stability’ is almost as phony as the wording of his Nobel Prize, given in churlish defiance by the enemies of George Bush in Sweden and Norway. President Reagan crushed the hapless Marxists and the Soviet Union crashed like a rotten melon in a shallow ditch. The People’s Republic has retained certain remnants of Maoism, none of them in the economic category—that costs money from trade. The remaining dedicated Marxists on the planet, mostly in Africa, are still beggars upon the national stage with little to offer but spite, genocidal tendencies and sore memories of decades of failure.

The singular differences among these examples were not dependent upon some lack of the media talent, or the Hollywood experience, but the dedication of the people involved and the message. The premises in the leftist cases were functionally false, the messages stilted with radical political noises and unbridled propaganda, and the economic platforms were unsound. Marxism and its assorted congeners are a farce and defiantly reject success wherever touted. Fonda, Matthews and Streep robotically embraced some stale phony political constructs that somebody might have absently scraped off their shoes while the Anti-Communists were correct in every measure of their enemies. They did form the Evil Empire as President Reagan taught us. George Kennan, Ronald Reagan and Jeane Kirkpatrick worked with the facts and used much of the USSR’s revolutionary rhetoric and open bold threats as a basis for their work to enlist a movement to destroy Communism. That worked.

Today, similar Hollywood puppets and other self-anointed luminaries hop and clap on the fringes of leftist political stage as they accuse the United States of being the aggressor in Iraq, Iran and the Middle East. Islamo-Fascism is a matter-of-fact political reality that is fourteen centuries old and has ruined societies in dozens of states. Millions have died in religious wars and purges in the name of Islam. The future of Islamo-Fascism is contingent on the current and ultimate effects of Tribalism and unfathomable religious divides, which signal continual failure. Either of these social defects could destroy an average society [as anywhere in Africa] but practicing both simultaneously guarantees destruction. Fanatical religious activists issue insane and irrational religious mandates [jihads, fatwas and called “calls Jews "scum of the earth" and "monkeys and pigs" who should be "annihilated."[12][13]] in the hope that some deity will smile upon them and sweep their enemies off the map, as in the case of Israel. That has yet to happen, which brings up other serious questions: How many times do we have to suffer from some inevitable complete destruction before something happens? What happened to the AIDS Pandemic in the US? Are some of us still alive?

We can sort out much of the political struggles today by first looking at the facts and the history of successful and unsuccessful economic systems. When they lose after following their silly Marxism, fanatic religious crusades and other follies, the hackneyed excuse is to blame capitalism and demand money so they can restructure their society and prepare to lose again and again. The US is to blame for most of the world’s troubles and many leftists in the US are willing to testify to this any old day. Many make there living acting out noisy screeds against capitalism.

Global Warming, or Cooling as it may be, is now the premier topic of political activism although the science is hazy and sunspots appear to have more influence over the surface temp than carbon dioxide. [14] Any cracker who got extra brown spots on his skin in the Arizona Desert can offer solemn testimony to our ultimate destruction, to the songs and dance of Al Gore and his puppets.

Here you go again.

rycK

Are We Getting Through to the Slugs in Congress??

We must suspect that the hallowed halls of Congress must sequester some form of brain-destroying mold, or other organism, that robs our elected leaders of most of their cognitive skills save those needed for hygiene, booze and stuffing money into jacket pockets. The air must ring with musty spheroids of pollen or viruses that can extinguish any sense of morality, faith or decency while sanctifying sloth, prevarication and indolence. Eventually all so-called Senators, a vile and cruel insult to the Roman Republic, can be bribed with this or that and vote as if they were born and educated in Mexico, East Timor or Timbuktu.

But, they seem to retain sufficient neurons and other essential cranial matter to sense when the voters are about to throw their greazy carcasses back into the streets. An example springs to mind, this week, as we think about the Immigration Bill now resurrected from the Rotted and Gone. There are some 14 lousy lawlettss in this horrible bill that seeks to reward criminal activity with special tax breaks and amnesty and most Senators have at least heard whispers of voter unrest and need to be wary of their future jobs in government service.

One slimy point, apparently written by La Raza [The Race, the Spanish racist digest] or some inebriated imbecile in the Kennedy camp was going to allow, for obvious reasons, criminals to be eligible for citizenship although they had committed serious felonies like rape, murder and such. Many our elected officials have done as much, although not convicted, and have sympathy and empathy for felons. Most of these crooks are Democrats, who stand to gain many votes from this bill.

The details are in limbo now, but the game might be rigged. Amendments hang in the air like so much marijuana smoke in the Senate.

Here is an analysis:

“This is despite the fact that the conservative leaders of the anti-amnesty movement are refusing to cooperate, and won't give Mitch McConnell a list of amendments that they want considered. My source tells me that the reason for this is that the game has now been rigged. McConnell is essentially promising to bring the amendments up in exchange for cloture votes, but Trent Lott is publicly saying that they will strip any problematic amendments out in committee.

“In other words, if the bill gets through the Senate and the House, the Democrats and the open borders Republicans will work together when the bills have to be reconciled in committee to strip out any amendments that the "grand bargainers" don't like. Therefore, at this point, it doesn't matter what amendments pass, because any tough enforcement provisions that slip through will be rendered toothless when the bills are reconciled”

What a slimy deal.

I think we need for a Senator to step forward and just filibuster the whole gig unless certain amendments are put in the bill that prevent the outrages mentioned above. Trent Lott is acting like a Democrat now with his slim 1 vote majority as minority leader. He should lose that and be given a job he can do.

“I asked my source to speculate on why Lott was pushing so hard, and he said that Lott may be naive enough to think that this bill might help John McCain's presidential ca