A Wonder of the World: The Liberal Mechanism of Racism

All political parties must compete for votes from selected groups identified or self-identified in many ways. Usually, a majority of 51% of the votes is necessary to win although pluralities in some elections allow wins with less than half the total. Liberalism is a critical component of the Democratic Party as it provides most of the necessary marginal percentage points necessary to win elections both nationally and locally. Liberals do not constitute more than 4% of the population, but they seem to be in dominion over the general political direction of the Democratic Party, at least since 1968. The Democrats have no hope of winning without this faction.

Given the usual party distributions among Republicans, Independents and Democrats, both traditional parties need a large fraction of this independent, non-aligned, voter base to vote for their causes and also to simultaneously hold dear to their core constituencies. Perhaps a quarter or more of the traditional parties members might cross over and vote against their own party for numerous reasons, most based on pocket book considerations. It is important to keep core constituencies intact and loyal by giving them what they want. The Independent Party, interestingly, is not really a party, but an option to register and vote as nonaligned with other parties. It has no affiliation to the parties of Henry Wallace, George Wallace or H Ross Perot. As such, it has no core cadre of candidates. Because there is nobody to vote for and members can either stay home or vote accordingly for a traditional party.

One critical core constituency for the Democrats is the rather ill-defined group of minorities consisting of many people sometimes including women. The biggest minority group here is the African Americans some 11% of the legal US population. Their vote, some 90% voting Democrat, or so, as Afro-Americans did in the 2006 elections provides 2-3 essential percentage points in national elections and ensure many or most of the big cities go blue in the modern political lexicon. . The suburbs and country regions appear to be the red reserve of the Republicans. The independents are scattered about. This small fraction is essential in winning close races and fits in well wit the traditional splinter party group theories of politics. Ronald Reagan, as we recall, split both the black and union votes in a roughly 40/60 manner for a solid win. In order for the Democrats to capture and maintain this voter base, it is necessary to reach out to that group and supply them with what ever politicians can offer in order to secure votes. In this respect, this group is no different from others such as corporations, farmers, gun owners, teachers’ unions, yacht owners, business groups, insurance companies, arms dealers, cotton growers and so on and so forth and is not atypical of any political strategy. All political parties operate in this manner. This is the way our country and many others like ours has operated for many decades and is not unexpected to see as it was observed even in ancient Rome by trade guilds and associated groups. The science of politics is very old indeed and the theory of political science is well known.

For the Democrats the question becomes: What do the minorities want in return for their votes and how do the politicians supply their needs and requests? Minorities want to participate in the American ‘good life’ as do many others living abroad or living here. The allure of the US lifestyle attracts a billion people, or more, from all over the globe who would leave their current lands for a chance in the US in a heartbeat. There are few ‘good life’ places to live outside the US and is limited to only certain parts of Europe or reserved for the very rich in third world. It is well known that the US is the place to live and many thousands, perhaps millions, have died trying to scale the Berlin Wall, run the blockade from Cuba, escape the Cambodian killing fields or fled the European armies and dictators and get away to safety in America as proof. The millions of illegal aliens who reside here are proof of this magnetic character of our society.

The good life scenario is not without requirements and in point of fact places strict demands upon the individual. These demands are no in the law books. The US is now, at least in the present, is a gift for several unfit millions. It would seem that minorities could simply play the old, stable, highly proven and often copied American game of:

[1] Getting A Good Education.

[2] Staying Away From Crime.

[3] Avoiding Drugs.

[4] Being A Good Employee Or Business Owner.

[5] Being Generally A Good Citizen.

Most of us were immigrants or the offspring of such in one form or another in the last 30 decades and have struggled with language, customs, temporary poverty and other factors to become successful in America. Some, however, are not successful and cannot seem to fully participate in the capitalist system that we offer. Obviously, following all the guidelines above can be considered as the paramount chance to enjoy the life of prosperity here. The converse is obviously true as well. It is a rare occurrence to see sociologists seriously suggest that minorities or new immigrants might choose the diametric opposite of items [1..5] above and embrace crime, sloth, drug addiction or degeneracy. That social avenue would be absurd and argue against attaining success. However, in the passive sense, we see exactly that scenario frequently offered to many minorities, immigrants or not, citizens or not, by the left-liberal faction of the Party of Democrats. Liberals offer several ways around struggling to be a good citizen by practicing the guidelines above and obeying the laws. They offer a short cut for a free ride with no obligations. A vote is, apparently, a small price to pay for this. Having the taxpayer pay for these votes costs the Democrats nothing at all.

When it comes to good jobs, which lead to prosperity, there is little substitute for a sound and pertinent education. With good jobs, this liberal counter notion cannot be successfully argued with any force of reason or evidence as the consequences are usually grim. Yet, that is exactly what many in the minority groups are encouraged to do. There is no pressure from liberal Democrats for minorities to perform in schools or society. Money is offered; passing courses and graduating is not. Education cannot be a very high priority since many minorities have a 50%, or higher, dropout rate and are the major part of the ‘education gap.’ The solution to ‘closing the gap’ is always: “more money, more teachers and more time…” although the gap has been large since 1950 or earlier and is not closing very fast. The funds and resources for education success are clearly offered to all at this time, but ignored for several reasons. A criminal record is an assured way to obstruct even the prospects of getting a good job or entering a first-rate profession as all will attest, but crime rates among blacks and Hispanics are much higher in proportion to their fraction of the total population. Together, they account for nearly all the prison population. Drug addiction abounds in prison. Most prison inmates are Democrats or should be. Drug use and alcoholism are seen to be prime factor in ‘feeling good,’ despite the evident consequences in disease and death. Lives are ruined by drugs like crack, crystal meth, angel dust and others, many after but a single dose. Death and near-death episodes from drug overdoses are common in every city hospital in the nation on every day of the year. Yet, the choice of drugs over education and having fun over working is very evident in our society for many who act like victims. They choose to lose. Drugs have a detrimental and terminal effect on all of society as the Chinese found out from the British opium sales in the mid 20^th century. Drugs were ruining their society hence became the starting point for the Opium Wars. Hard-core drug addicts are lost to society and only exist as an expensive burden. Few, if any, drug addicts who take the new high-intensity and super-addictive drugs will ever recover.

Despite the disastrous aspects of the absence of a proper education and participation in drug addiction, the left-liberals present several promises, solutions and options to their loyal constituents who fit in this category:

We will attempt to legalize drugs for you and get jail terms and penalties reduced wherever possible from criminal violations of drug sales and personal drug use. Vote for Democrats.

We will ‘fix’ the educational barriers for you with quotas, race norming or specific social programs along with race norming and other measures to allow you to get an ‘equivalent certification’ of education or even a PhD from an Ivy League School or a job with minimal effort on your part. Vote for Democrats.

We will prevent employers from employing IQ testing for employees or job candidates that discriminates against minorities and we will create laws that minimize or prevent minorities from being discharged from all government jobs and most corporate jobs. Vote for Democrats.

We will find employment for minorities in government positions and prevent their termination even though the employees may be criminals, drug addicts, have little or no education and cannot perform their job functions. You will have permanent jobs regardless of your performance and the government will be the employer of last resort. Vote for Democrats.

You are offered a free ride! There is no penalty for dropping out of school, drug addiction and crime, unless you are caught. Then, we will get the taxpayers to pay to get you out of jail or get your sentence reduced or abrogated. Vote for Democrats.

Now, this list purports to offer viable solutions to a host of essential aspects of citizenship but the liberals need a primary excuse to provide the ‘good life’ to loyal voters despite many social problems and deficiencies: racism is that excuse. Your problems are not your fault—they are the legacy of white racism. Vote for Democrats.

Racism has now become the universal justification for all those minorities who cannot, for any of many assorted reasons, compete for jobs and income in capitalist societies. This is seen in Europe also, particularly France. If some minority fails to pass standardized tests that whites or Asians can easily pass, then the test must be racist and ‘unfair.’ If there are IQ tests or exams highly weighted in the central cognitive tendency g, it must be an ‘unfair’ test if certain minorities cannot get good scores. If other minorities, such as Asians, get superior scores on the same tests it is still unfair. Race norming[1] was applied as an obvious solution to the problem until it was outlawed in the US. Why not just add points to test scores for minorities? One should wonder at this juncture what an IQ test would do other than sort out people according to intelligence. Why don’t we just select our brain surgeons or pilots by lot or from lists supplied by politicians?

Racism is defined as the exploitation of others based on race or skin color. Racism is actually encouraged, tacitly tolerated by most Democrats and usually dismissed as something else but definitely not attacked by the left-liberals unless it can be blamed on political opponents. Loyal racists who support the Democratic Party are immune from attack by Democrats or the media, obviously by some form of political reciprocity. Many racists can even publicly call for such disgusting notions as the extermination of white people such as one so-called professor Kamau Kambon who said on live TV: “[He]..…said blacks must "exterminate white people off the face of the planet." [2] Who among the Democrats has criticized this proclamation?? Nobody. They need the votes.

Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, bell hooks and others can say whatever they want and are not placed under any scrutiny or any restrictions for overt racism by the liberals who desperately need the votes they obviously supply.[3] Al did his best to make the lies of Tawana Brawley into a political action mechanism and maintained that ‘she told the truth.’ A message appears on the red brick wall in the Spike Lee film Do The Right Thing as “Tawana told the truth.” Even the lies of black racists are preserved in some archival form to be told and retold to support the racist causes of liberals.

Author bell hooks hooks states that she is "sitting beside an anonymous white male that [she] long[s] to murder" in the first chapter of her book Killing Rage.[4] Eldridge Cleaver wrote of the joy of raping a white girl in Soul on Ice[5].

.

There is, indeed, institutional or institutionalized racism and the institution that created this is the Party of Democrats. The racist blacks and others who employ overt racism with the obvous sanction and approval of liberal Democrats are immune from being labeled as racists since they are protected by some strange form of power myth .[6]

And this is a remarkable achievement in politics. Here, the political party can howl and rail against some social offense and blame others for exploiting certain citizens based on racism while employing exactly the same tactics as they condemn. Race-baiting is not a form of racism for them. Even ignoring or being ‘insensitive’ to their constitutents equates with racism.

The 9^th Wonder of the World has been created: Lilberal Racism.