http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/10/6/92827.shtml?s=ic

Democrats have a pamphlet that lists all their promises and have run through several slogans in the past year or so as they test campaign messages. In recent days, Pelosi said, their prospects have improved by the discovery that former Republican Rep. Mark Foley of Florida had sent sexually explicit computer messages to teenage male pages.

Really?? Pelosi, whose constituents in San Francisco run the world’s largest Children for Sex business outside of Sweden??

Sure Nancy.

Pelosi IS the Swamp!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1711835/posts?page=33

Gerry Studds was a known sexual pervert in 1983 and had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page in 1973. Representatives Dan Crane and were Gerry Studds censured by the House of Representatives. It seems that the good people of Massachusetts re-elected Studds for five more terms. Were the Dems in control of the House then?? We already know about MA politicos: the Kennedy Klan, Backside Barney, Studds, Vinegar John Kerry and more.

Here is what Nancy, Drain the Swam, and her Marxist lackeys said and did about sexual perverts in MA: Nothing, and Nancy wished to be on the committee headed by Studds. No outrage here?? Okay for Studds and not okay for Foley?? How does a Democrat spell hypocrisy?? M-o-r-e- v-o-t-e-s??

And the Condit Affair:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/12/18/MN112275.DTL

I endorsed Gary for re-election a long time ago," Pelosi of San Francisco said in a statement released by her office yesterday. "However, I have not spoken to any member encouraging them to support Gary or to discourage them from supporting his opponent (state Assemblyman Dennis Cardoza)." She called the election "a matter between Gary and his constituents.

Well, Nancy, would you then suggest that Foley is a matter for Florida constituents? I didn’t think so. Hypocrisy.

Swamp Demon on Studds:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15117630/

Should future Speaker Nancy Pelosi really be passing judgment on GOP leaders when her Democratic Party rewarded Congressman Studds with a congressional chairmanship years after he had sex with that young male page? I ask Ms. Pelosi because she was one of five Democrats who asked to sit on that committee under the guidance of Chairman Gerry Studds.

Gee, do we have separate standards here for Dems? We should ask the Swamp Drainer if she could drain her own swamp. Here is more of her demands:

Part of the Pelosi Swamp includes [link above]:

All the days after that: "Pay as you go," meaning no increasing the deficit, whether the issue is middle class tax relief, health care or some other priority.

To do that, she said, Bush-era tax cuts would have to be rolled back for those above "a certain level." She mentioned annual incomes of $250,000 or $300,000 a year and higher, and said tax rates for those individuals might revert to those of the Clinton era. Details will have to be worked out, she emphasized.

That means tax hikes and a balanced budget?? Sure. This just means tax increases, which works politically for the slothful, lazy, drug-addicted, lazy, welfare careered, mentally ill and Marxist Wannabee  types who only pay 4% of the Federal Tax Revenues.

Perhaps if Foley had been a Democrat the DC police would have just driven him home like they did for Patrick Kennedy, drug-addict. Different rules for Democrats it seems.

Democrats should recall the fine works of Dan Rostenkowski and Wilbur [Face the Fanny at the Tidewater] Mills. Those are icons of the left and as revered as Ted Kennedy is today despite his murder of an aid in MA. MA is an interesting place it seems!

The word[s] for Pelosi is[are]: Swamp Parasite or Communist or Left-Liberal. Pick one or two.

rycK

 

There was a time when liberal Democrats were still frantically trying to preserve a modicum of morality in their ranks. I can recall the times of Stevenson and JFK where moderates in both parties were firmly in control. We can recollect those moderates and others who were left-leaning, but not fanatical in their caustic haste to make the Party of Democrats the party of Stalin, Castro and, worse, Jane Fonda.

The major shift toward disaster began with the phony Free Speech Movement in 1965 and gained momentum during the turbulent transition from the LBJ to the George McGovern Eras. Here, the break with reality, the frantic discarding of morality, abrogation of the basic elements of truth and a normal society, and trends toward proffering propaganda, were the fatal sightless thrusts that wrenched the party away from its intrinsic labor support and cast the carcass into the claws of the far left. Nixon certainly helped this effort. Drugs were preferred to patriotism. Nixon was a crook and proof that Republicans cannot run a society.

McGovern lost with the most terrible and humiliating performance in US election history. He earned this incomparable distinction with several attributes, the most effective being his negative income tax proposal of $10,000 per person inviting the modern socialist-welfare state in America. No work, just money from Uncle Sugar. Your votes bought with tax monies—free! The later Jimmy Carter election, made possible by Nixon, threw much of the leftist camp into turmoil (LBJ was their guy) and a frantic and unsuccessful search for a suitable candidate, but offered opportunities for the invasion of our government by the newly-distorted legal community by those trained in activism and sleaze. Carter was a humiliating, maudlin failure with some incongruously kind views of Communism, but, like McGovern, left a searing void in the Democratic Party power spectrum leading to the need to further ignore labor and groom Neo-Marxists and worse for office.

It was Ronald Reagan, strangely, that challenged and repelled the far left in nearly facet of their now-disgusting existence and actually help fashion the zeal and anxiety for another strong attempt to elect a major left-liberal to high office. He destroyed all their hopes. They still chant hate songs about him. His conservative precepts infuriated the left and his grand personal manner, patriotism, moralist views, and more, encouraged the Democrats to move even farther to the left. They have been frozen in such a psychotic stupor ever since. This will bury them. No hint of morality here.

Clinton now appears on the scene, a sick (but slick), twisted, amoral sexual predator from some incomprehensible local political latrine in some even more obscure aperture in dismal Arkansas, just in time to benefit from the hapless interventions of one H. Ross Perot, a third party spoiler with substantial monetary muscle, unexcelled leadership attributes and soaring intellectual assets, at least in the political world. A person with his talents has no place in politics. As the fortunes might have it, the contemporary Republican candidates, Elder Bush and Old Droll Dole, perhaps two of the biggest spender advocates in the history of organized government since Octavian and other persons who had earned their chance, made messes of their campaigns and let Clinton slither in as a minority winner a couple of times. The Bush blunder was his watch my lips performance on not raising taxes, along with the recession. Two major blunders: a lie and reneging on tax increases. This series of events was based mainly on luck rather than on sophisticates planning on the influential factions of any of the respective political parties. Perot bungled his runs and left the Oval Office open to the far left for eight years. Newt Gingrich was able to flatten Clinton on the tax issues in a mere two years later and regained Congress. The popularity of Clinton was mainly based on halting tax hikes and spending controls by Republican House members. Look out for tax hikes. Seek rewards for tax cuts.

The George W. Bush episodes, thanks duly offered to the new spoiler Green Party and stubborn Naderites, infected with Perots Disease, quashed the limited intervention of the far left and subsequent tax cuts spurred on the economy to greatness. The Al Gore manifold ineptitudes are too silly to discuss here in detail so they will be omitted. Kerry was swift boated into nonexistence. He vanished. The Dow just set a new high! Watch those taxes. Especially watch the offers to put high taxes on gas prices and abolish the internal combustion engine. Do not look like a yo yo on TV when you want to get votes.

The key elements of the decisive political victories above are actually based on the economy and the tax cuts that bring growth and prosperity. The Democrats tried to exploit the Ronald Reagan SP 500 boom (check out the curve starring in 1982) as their own creation, but these arguments dim when compared to the probable costs of Hillary Care and more tax hikes to pay for more Great Society failures. Dont be a fool or liar about Purple Hearts or military spending. Do not flip-flop.

The 2008 election depends on who the Republicans can get to replace Bush and how to maintain the growth and good times while dealing with terrorism. We lost 400,000 in WW2 and accepted the price. Now, 3000 is unacceptable for the price of freedom? The left liberals have done everything they could to defeat the economy, spread dissent and discontent and aid terrorism in every quarter from Detroit to Damascus. It seems that the public are asleep when they see terrorists civil rights being vaulted above those of average Americans. The illegal alien voter recruitment efforts by Ted Kennedy and those on the Left Coast may have caused extensive blowback in the faces of political planners. Watch taxes and the economy. Please give special legal rights and retroactive tax breaks to terrorists and illegal aliens!

The twisted left may gain a close majority in the House in 2006 barring the possible crossover of some Dixiecrats thus potentially reversing their House victory, but their chief concern is 2008 where the power of veto and newly defined Presidential powers rest. The Executive Branch grows stronger since Eisenhower let it slip.

The plan to recapture the House and get a Neo Marxist like Nancy Pelosi as speaker where she can coo and faun at Conyers and Rangel as major committee chairpersons is the best recipe for political disaster since Hoover. Everything is on the table! The plan to run Hillary Clinton, a well-known Saul Alinsky Communist, is fatal to the future of the Democrats, mostly not left-liberals, as her morph into a moderate is not convincing. The far left must be smoking or snorting more dope than they would normally disclose if they think they can try to make instant citizens out of 12, 000,000 illegal aliens, hike taxes to the roof, increase social spending on new and expensive and inefficient Great Society programs and abruptly terminate the War on Terrorism while simultaneously trashing the economy. Watch crime, illegal aliens and their crime, inner-city crime and terrorism and even higher taxes, again. Does anybody see a trend here? Fortunately, the liberals do not. They are politically blind.

That plan is an excellent scenario that might get the liberals voted out of key offices for one or two dozen years if even partially implemented. The far left is apparently unaware that one third of the voters are independents. The far left is apparently unaware that two thirds of the Democrats are not left-liberals. All the liberals have to fear is education of the voter. That will happen as Rush and Sean and Ann have shown.


Their insane current thrust is apparently one of drug-induced fatalism mixed with hate and frustration and the frenzied imperative to lose again. They may well just achieve this result at their peril as a lasting political party. The interesting thing about history is the fact that is never seems to end or even hint toward a final conclusion. Begging the voters for offices while offering crime, more terrorism and higher taxes in certainly on the political fringe.

Keep up the good work liberals!

Hugo Chavez http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=businessNews&storyid=2006-10-04T043439Z_01_B427558_RTRUKOC_0_US-ENERGY-VENEZUELA-PRICE.xml&src=rss&rpc=23 a disgusting Marxist parasite from Venezuela, now calls for ‘a price support level’ for oil. Of course, the falling price of oil per barrel is money lost for his ‘revolution’ and also support for Cuba’s military, which is broke.

To wit:

Chavez said he had ordered Venezuela's cut of 50,000 barrels per day because oil prices had fallen to $65 a barrel, in an apparent reference to world crude prices -- as opposed to Venezuela's own cheaper crude.

Venezuela's own crude, which is generally below-average quality, has fallen toward $50 a barrel in recent weeks.

Crude crude?!

We can laugh and laugh and laugh at this mangy mouse that roared. This is tantamount to some Berkeley sidewalk peddler trying to convince his victims that his slightly green weenies should sell for the same price as tenderloin or poached trout at Chez Panisse down the street. Same protein and fat content! Be fair!

The liberal Democrats join Hamas, the PLO and al Qaeda in their moments of sorrow as oil falls, stocks rise and the economy booms. What is the US unemployment rate now? There is no more proof than this example of churlish celebration of ignorance that capitalism has crushed the sorry Marxists and their left-liberal sycophants in California and other political and social dungeons. Maybe they can howl louder about Rep. Foley and boost the price? Degenerates like Castro with their limited electricity and food rationing and proffering the obvious myth that they have ‘excellent health care’ while not being able to pay for the cost of clinical diagnostics tests for their citizens at $80 per capita, wholesale cost, now depend on indirect oil revenues from parasites like Hugo. The Biangular Trade: cigars for gasoline on a weight for weight basis? The USSR, which supplied oil at one-fourth the world price and bought sugar at four times the world price (a zero sum transaction?) during the 60s to the 80s, has crashed, being rightly punished for stubbornly ignoring basic economics. If this dunce tries to hold out on the Spot Market there will be no buyers for his oil at such obtuse prices.

And, we laugh and we laugh and we laugh. Sometimes, the self-inflicted demise of petty little utopias is funnier than Abbott and Costello.

We note, with some joking, that the drooling left can infrequently actually understand supply and demand economics, which ran over Marxism-Leninism, FDRism and other follies like a juggernaut, and attempt to fix prices by supply adjustments. Adam Smith would be impressed. The California solution to this should be to add another dollar  or two in tax to the pump sales to help out Hugo. Tax the economy and make it greater!! Yeah!

All this merriment comes at the moment of all time highs on the Dow!! This also comes at a time when Nancy Pelosi seemingly wants to hunt down gays in the Republican ranks!! Are they for real?

It must be election time—current events are now just too hilarious to cope with with a full cup of coffee hovering over the keyboard. Vote against Democrats, the simple drooling stooges of the Marxist left.

rycK