Success is a fleeting and unsteady existence for many in life. There are risks, hardships, drudgery and more in the long march toward social and economic independence. America is a place where most can be successful with moderate effort. We have to put up borders to keep people from trying to live the American Dream. Africa, the old USSR and its broken parts, China, most parts of South American and the Middle East are pits of unhappy souls boiling in a soup of failure, despair, disease and leftist politics. As an alternative to success a place where a person can sink to the very depths of despair, chaos, drug addiction, sloth, depravity and the liberals can show you just how to do this, particularly if you vote for them. It works for them. They run a sort of patroon social system where the masses do their bidding in poverty and the elites live well. The liberal elites do not have to follow their own rules.

Many element of success involve avoiding obvious potholes in the road to success—other elements are necessary or highly desired. These negative elements include, as a partial list:

[1] Drug addiction

[2] Sloth

[3] Criminal activity

[4] Failure to get an education

[5] Association with losers

[6] Neglect of family

[7] Praise of losers and failed social programs

[8] Being a social misfit.

We might think it obvious that one should avoid elements [1-7] above, but that is not necessarily so. Many think that the more negative the element above the better. We can talk to the left about drug addiction and only find approval. Not only do they want to legalize drugs of all forms, but they also want taxpayers to pay for the rehab, the associated crime, smuggling across the borders and such. They detest the concept of the nuclear family and inscribe strange tomes about requiring a village to effect education. This just means that the government should educate your children to be good leftist victims.

It ought to be more than  obvious that a criminal record is a detriment to getting a decent job, but that is not so for the left. They want to suppress criminal records. Druggies who crawl from rehab facility to rehab facility have no fear now that their medical records will follow, thanx to medical privacy acts. They want to let felons go. Clinton pardoned 175 criminals. They also go so far as to suggest that many crimes are really not crimes [pedophilia, selling drugs, illegal immigration, tax evasion, sex with children, child pornography] along with spreading venereal diseases. Many dopers, drunks and thieves are considered to be revered icons of the left such as the Kennedy Klan, Timothy Leary, Ernest Hemmingway, The Clintons, Jerry Garcia, a few of the Beatles, and their disgusting personal habits are often illuminated as praiseworthy models of conduct. They are important to the liberal causes because they are degenerates of one sort or another.

Education is paramount in the road to success as it provides a basis from which to pivot and turn and act on opportunities while monitoring the current status of the markets, taxes and expenses. The ignorant and cognitively disnimble are just not going to make it to the top levels in our society. That is obvious. Yet, the liberals want to promote students from grade level to grade level without an assessment of their relative skill base at each step. They don't want to give out grades! They know that people are not equally gifted with cognitive skills so they want to either dumb down the tests, which actually do sort out folks by IQ and other factors, ignore the test results, implement affirmative action methods to make up for the slower performers and fix quotas to force a more equitable outcome. And, this is the key: they want not equality but equality of outcomes. True quality is unachievable and they know it. Given a free choice to decide how people would get jobs in this country they would first assign jobs on a political basis then on race. They would block good jobs for the offspring of the successful, read capitalists in their mangled lexicon. They would welcome a national lottery to decide just who would go to medical school and become brain surgeons. It is not enough for the liberals, jealously guarding their enormous education apple by political means, to sponsor those who do not have the necessary skill set to compete in the arena of success but they want to create counterfeit jobs in industry and government to place their social victims. Education today is one big job mill for the left. Many businesses are forced to employ losers and our schools are full of incompetents posing as teachers, but try to fire an incompetent teacher and watch the legal and union fires burn. Inefficiency is essential to the liberal social system as it ensures failure thus enabling the need for more tax monies to fix their ongoing problems. Failure is self-sustaining in liberal societies. They love to lose.

Liberals delight in taunting religious people, unless they can derive some political advantage as they do from Islamo-Fascism. They give no verbal abuse to terrorists or criminals—but do they dump on the religious right! Here, the thrust is to teach and promote Islam and other faiths along with voodoo and worse in our schools to rebuff our society and morality and vehemently prevent any Christian education. Multiculturalism means: anything but white males and Christianity—anything else! There have been many lawsuits where the only religions groups excluded from using facilities on state property were Christians or Boy Scouts, an obvious Christian organization. They need atheists or others for their voter base. So, they want to teach children to hate religious people.

All this proceeds, of course, on the ongoing need for money. Success means that you can practically ignore the petty government rules and notions—but not laws—handed down ex cathedra from the social pariahs who would dictate to you their preferred rules for your social conduct, and more, and decide for yourselves what you want to do with your earned monies. Many like Howard Dean think that people are ignoramuses for not begging to have their taxes doubled. Hillary Clinton wants to hike taxes for your own good. As if you are too stupid to not see the obvious benefit of crushing tax burdens. This is where the major social system collides with leftist politics. They have no other source of money than your tax dollars. Think about where the government gets it money from: tax revenues. Nearly all taxes are collected by law from business in the form of payroll taxes, payroll deductions for FICA and FICA and direct corporate taxes and fees. There is almost no other source of income for the government. Here, the local, state and federal governments dole out tax dollars many at the behest of liberals to fund their phony social programs. Since 1950 they have wasted 5,000,000,000 (5 trillion) dollars on phony social programs and would have spent ten times that much if they could have. The only limit they have is 100% of the wealth of the US citizens. They would gleefully take it all and redistribute your wealth according to their political views. They thus act like functional parasites. Parroting the ugly and misshapen Communist Manifesto, they drone on about progressive taxes, confiscatory inheritance taxes, taxes, taxes and more taxes. They do not like private property. Given the opportunity the French Revolution radicals had they would execute many of our most famous and successful people as an example to the people. The Bolshevik Revolution, the Cuban Revolution and what happens daily in Africa are but models of liberalism carried to the end point. Left-liberals are just Marxists with low test scores.

The left liberals are in an ongoing contest with honest citizens for all of their wealth and the futures of everyone’s offspring. They would do anything that history has shown necessary to grab the US wealth as they did in Russia, China, Cuba, most of Africa, South America, Asia and elsewhere. They will try to do this at the ballot box and the court bench.

So, if you want to be a loser and get paid for it you should throw in with the liberals. They have developed a subculture of sloth, drug addiction, crime and immorality that has no parallel outside of where rodents live and die. If you want free sex, drugs, a life of crime and more then one of the blue cities is your obvious choice: Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore, Detroit, Atlanta or one of the Five Boroughs of NYC will be more than suitable.

These parasites are after your whole life and the lives of your kids and grandchildren. Beware.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=412172&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&expand=true#StartComments

Hospital admits to burning aborted babies in waste incinerator

Addenbrooke's Hospital, in Cambridge, said it was no longer able to afford the dignified disposal at a local crematorium of foetuses from unwanted pregnancies.

Instead, they are being burnt in the hospital's main incinerator - which is normally used for rubbish and clinical waste.

Well, now San Francisco ought to be able to save millions using this novel technique. Life is cheap in Cambridge, UK [too many professors?] and Berkeley is near by. I bet they toast each incinerator smoke episode at the Cross Keys  Pub with some porter or maybe some Ol Spec Hen. Got to keep the population down. Why not start up some kind of Satanic Worship in San Francisco, again, since the Satanic Church seems to have gone out of style, and do some meaningful sacrifices?? This would be a little more elegant than just dumping the remains in the dumpsters in the Mission District or at the Embarcadero.

Code Pink could supply a cheer section and Nancy Pelosi could put on one of her red gowns and lead the ceremonies.

What a novel and caring way to save money.

How progressive!

Remember Global Cooling?

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15391426/site/newsweek

In 1975, this hopeless political rag ran an article of the Doom and Gloom Political Class that “…Citing "ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have begun to change dramatically," ... the magazine warned of an impending "drastic decline in food production." Political disruptions stemming from food shortages could affect "just about every nation on earth." Scientists urged governments to consider emergency action to head off the terrible threat of . . .”

So, what else is new?? A Prediction of Doom that failed to happen??

The problem here is this is not science—it is politics. Pseudo science types like Carl Sagan have an outstanding history of having their ‘scientific conclusions’ magically coincide with their political views to the wild applause of political activists and their associated druggies. That is one way you can tell the phonies from the common radical Marxist fluff. Sagan (big time pot smoker) was the guy who was refused AAAS membership because of his sloppy, inaccurate, sophomoric and juvenile articles about the “Nuclear Winter” he submitted in the respected scientific journal Science. His ‘computer model’ was analyzed and show to be a farce by respected scientists. Any high school algebra student could have defeated Sagan’s phony hypothesis. It was found that very small changes in parameters and numbers into his math model would convert the winter into an instant sauna. It went hot and cold like a flopping fish on the pier. It is numerically unstable. Any undergrad math student would be given an F on this rubbish by any respective university except, perhaps, for Cornell and Harvard. There was a political point to be made so they could afford to neglect the defects.

Demonstrating that the phony screechings of some left-liberal ‘scientist’ are worthless, and are little more than pathetic blubberings from a simpering dupe, has little effect on the scare message as received by the anxious left. Rachel Carson did much of the same thing with her phony anthropology was ‘accepted’ for decades until they found out how she created her interviews and such. She was a fraud. Those who are fear mongers are also frauds. Unfortunately such spurious notions are accepted by many.

The satellites show no significant temperature rise above the noise levels in the last 30 , but we have maudlin testimonials from ‘experts’ who cite the rise in skin cancers in New Mexico and other precise measurements. No controls with sun screens or correlations with the use of booze or bikinis??

The fastest way to attack this phony baloney is to ask: Well, why did you ‘scientists’ get it backward last time? After all, the earth is 4 billion years old and that is not much in geological time, a mere 31 years! What happened?? Oh, and then we might look into history and wonder just what melted the Kansas glacier 8000 years ago or why the Vikings were frozen out of Iceland and Greenland in the 10th century. Gee. Are we guessing, or are we just political stooges possessing not much more intelligence that Charlie McCarthy’s wood doll?

Tell us what we might be prepared to believe from such blunders. Oh! We are to assume that such predictions are ‘difficult’ to asses. Why, thanks! As long as it is difficult we can just wait until one of their sloppy guesses coincides with some observation and they can hail themselves as howling successes. We can then be persuaded to vote with the left. Sure.

One wild guess that turns out right and they can claim to be scientists and deserve world acclaim with bells and lights.

Much of Science is now the Tawdry Tart of the Left.

Check out this reference:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20061019-115634-1828r.htm

Pelosi no shoo-in for job as speaker

By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's prospects for becoming the nation's first female House speaker depend not only on a Democratic victory in November but also on her ability to prevent any Democrats from voting against her -- primarily centrists opposed to her liberal stances.

Possibles are: Democrat Charlie Stuart and former Rep. Ken Lucas, Kentucky. This is a thin list.

Rep. John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania thinks he will get #2 spot and is reputed to be a ‘conservative.”

We have to wonder just what the psychotic political labelling system can be when Murtha [Withdraw our troops to Okinawa] is thought to be a conservative. He has done little else than undermine our military and support the terrorists, as most liberal Democrats are prone to do. The deaths of our military persons are obvioius from such internal propaganda, but not a concern to those who wildly supported Susan Sontag, Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda during the Viet Nam era. They were so progressive.

It is difficult to find a Democratic political stance that does not feature the following elements:

[1] A Hate America Stance where Americans are blamed for everything from AIDS to global warming.

[2] A warm regard and strong political support for the likes of: Stalin, Brezhnev, Castro, Ho, Ortega and now Kim in North Korea and Chavez, the new leftist darling.

[3] A willingness to spend US tax dollars on Marxist dictators such as in Haiti, most anywhere in Africa, Cuba and, again, North Korea.

[4] A strong political movement to feature and provide wild adulation for any critic of American values such as Islamo-Fascism, Communism, Atheism, Sophia Worship, New Age antics, and other follies.

We should all clearly understand that the Democrats based their future hopes on two items: [a] a failed economy and [b] a bungled war in Iraq. Although the economy is doing very well, the best in decades, the Democrats seem to find places where children are starving, old folks are forced to eat plague food, medical care is absent, and illegal aliens are denied free medical care and the opportunity to exist in the shadows while ignoring their crimes such as entering the country illegally, failing to file state tax returns, failing to file federal tax returns and more.

The Democrats have lost their bid to weaken the economy so they can retaliate for the Jimmy Carter Era Malaise. But, the liberal Democrats still savor their victory over freedom with their defunding of the Republic of South Viet Nam which insured their defeat the victory of Communists over US forces.

Let us be clear on some points: The liberal Democrats will do anything they can to follow the Communist Manifesto in all its forms and wreck our society if they can. Read the part on taxes and inheritances. Christianity is now under attack by the left, which includes many so-called ‘christians’ in the United Methodist Church and other main line organizations that were once Christian in word and deed. The left have already set up their Cultural Relativism and Sophia Worship and other political movements to displace traditional religious movements in the US. Isalmo-Fascism is now taught in schools in the US while any parallel study of Christianity is forbidden. They can perform 20,000,000 abortions and call that ‘choice.’

Let us focus in on their intentions and defeat them in November. They have nothing but the destruction of our society as their goal.

Vote accordingly

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/10/19/120807.shtml?s=ic

Ordinance: Don't Rent to Illegal Immigrants

OH? But, why not?? The liberals need the votes so desperately that they are encouraging these illegals to vote. But, where is the Rule of Law we heard so much about when the left-liberals want some political assets??

Where is the Rule of Law in the cases of:

Cinthia McKinney and her illegal use of campaign funds to get Issac Hayes to come to one of her parties??

The Dingy Harry Reid and his illegal use of campaign funds to tip security at his condo and his slimy land deals??

The Hillary Clinton felonious acts of [1] lying under oath about Castle Grande and [2] withholding billing records subpoenaed by the court?

The criminal acts by Rep Jefferson of Louisiana when he stuffed dirty money in his freezer. Frozen dirty money and other assets are above the law??

The left liberal Democrats are frantic and sick to the point of being committed to the rubber rooms and must break any law, tell any lie, support any criminal to hope to win a few more seats in Congress. There is little they will not do. They will willingly support the Islamo-Fascists in Iran, Iraq, Lebanon and their allies such as Cindy Sheehan.

The left liberal Democrats will also support North Korea if it will give them any more votes.

Democrats, steered into the latrines by the far left, will, again trade American lives in our military for votes so they can pervert the law, release criminals and hike the taxes.

Democrats, mere Marxist Wannabees with low test scores, want the lives of our soldiers and our tax money so they can pollute our society with drugs, criminals and terrorists. The votes of illegal aliens will help them out immensely.

Just vote NO when you see a Dem on the ballot.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2575219

NEW YORK Oct 16, 2006 (AP) A firebrand civil rights lawyer who has defended Black Panthers and anti-war radicals was sentenced Monday to nearly 2 1/2 years in prison far less than the 30 years prosecutors wanted for helping an imprisoned terrorist sheik communicate with his followers on the outside.

U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl pronounced the sentence of 28 months.

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/archives/whitehouse-papers/1994/Apr/1994-04-27-President-Nominates-Seven-US-District-Court-Judges

Clinton appointee:

John G. Koeltl, 48, is currently a partner at Debevoise & Plimpton

in New York City, where he has spent the bulk of his professional

career. After attending Georgetown University and Harvard Law School,

Koeltl served as a law clerk to Judge Edward Weinfeld of the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York and to Justice

Potter Stewart. Koeltl also served for two years on the Watergate

Special Prosecution Force at the Justice Department.

Clinton stooge who wanted to get Nixon, but lets off a terrorist on a minimum sentence.

The judge said Stewart was guilty of smuggling messages between her client and his followers that could have "potentially lethal consequences." He called the crimes "extraordinarily severe criminal conduct."

But, she is a good liberal who tried to get Black Panthers off. Give her a break.

But in departing from federal guidelines that called for 30 years behind bars, he cited Stewart's more than three decades of dedication to poor, disadvantaged and unpopular clients.

Big deal. I wonder if the Boston Strangler was kind to his cat? Typhoid Mary was probably fond of flowers. I wonder if the judge will be at the party as one was when Angela Davis was let off. Many of the jury were there too. Nice liberal celebrations.

"Ms. Stewart performed a public service, not only to her clients, but to the nation," Koeltl said.

Here we see the slimy left pervert the law. We convict some aid-to-terrorism and give them a slap on the bunny because they were kind to orphaned lice or some other phony excuse. I am surprisided the phony judge didnt let her go because she was too fat or too ugly and would suffer behind bars. Maybe she can remain free until she gets her teeth fixed.

Disgusting

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/16/D8KPV9KG0.html

Apparently, Dingy Harry, the Professor of Perfidy has now soiled his reputation with yet another Non Ethics Issue of non ethical behavior. It seems he used campaign money to tip the poor who grovel below his feet and guard his abode at the Ritz Carlton. What does that cost a month?

How does a liberal spell hypocrisy?? Campaign cash for walking around money??

How can we reconcile the ugly fact that many Democrats are poor when they enter office and millionaires when they leave?? Dingy makes a cool 1.1 million dollars off the books. This is almost as impressive as the Clinton Dynasty, now valued at 20,000,000 in cash plus the loot in the Clinton Liebrary, a funnel of dirty money from terrorists, criminals and, as always, Communists—all paying Slick Willie back for his favors.

Will we now hear from Nancy Pelosi about the Culture of Corruption that includes some Democrats??

Of course not. When liberals lie, steal, use drugs, abuse little boys and cheat the tax payers it is all progressive and part of the concern for the poor.

How much are the Clintons, Nancy Pelosi and Dingy Harry worth together? 50,000,000?? Double that. Throw in the Kennedy Klan and you hit 400,000,000 real fast. Feinstein might add a few more pesos to that pot and then there is another 300,000,000 from Vinegar John Kerry. Gee! Does that get to a billion yet? Yup. How far does this go?

We need to educate the voters on the nefarious deeds of the sordid left and how they are elites and well above the rules in their lofty towers far above the stench of the unwashed simpletons who believe their propaganda. They will call for tax hikes to redistribute the money to the poor while enriching themselves and serving Islamo-Fascism, Communism, as usual, and criminals

What a disgusting cabal of parasites. And they want a change in government?

This post is to complement the recent posts of grampus and others with my views.

http://grampus.townhall.com/g/c82672a4-e4b9-436c-887a-16086a4c779c&comments=true#comments

We have to look carefully at the goals and aims and outcomes of Liberal Democrats and others when they talk about the poor and how they should be handled.

[1] The Marxists never cared about the poor unless they could be persuaded to die for one of their sorry causes in war. In peace, the poor are useless mouths left to starve or marginalized in places where they cannot vote. North Korea does not care if their poor starve and nether do the Liberal Democrats. Millions starve in Africa and the Liberal Democrats give no criticism of the dictators there. Liberals praise Castro and Kim as they did Stalin and Mao.

[2] If you want to look at the poor of the world then begin by sorting out the poorest countries by the form of government they will tolerate. The Marxists are ones who can easily be identified as having the poorest of the poor. Look at PRC and about 30 selected garden spots in Africa for proof. North Korea is a prime example of what the far left, adored by the Clintons, can produce without interference from capitalism. Cuba is another example. Mexico is an example of 100% corruption. Mexico only exists as a state because of the money illegal aliens send back home. No wonder they want to put in their case before the UN to block the building of the fence along the US border with Mexico. Their political and social existences are threatened by minimizing crime from their citizens.

[3] Now, the socialist countries, for the most part, have few poor compared to India or China or Indonesia, but they also have removed any hope of owing property, a car or any way to escape the minimal living conditions supplied. No poor person in Sweden or Holland will be able to own property, become an entrepreneur or other or make it up to the upper middle class. This goes for most of Europe. Most socialist states have very high taxes approaching 70%, the subsidized housing they are given and public transportation. The options for attainment of wealth have been completely removed not because of hate, but because of economic reasons. When you have high taxes, the expense of keeping the economy going makes everyone subject to moderate or substandard living standards. There is no economic future in such places. Those with talent tend to leave. Unemployment in Europe is much higher than the US so many try to leave to have a better life. Liberals would reduce the US to the same pitiful social position as Europe. Socialism tends to produce a low class society.

[4] In places in the Middle East, where poverty runs rampant and is the norm, the poor and rich both tolerate dictatorial government in the forms of monarchies and such. Religious factors and totalitarian government make beggars out of their citizens. The vast bulk of the wealth in such countries is held by the leaders. Saddam Hussein owned everything and the state Bank of Iraq was his private bank account. A very few own everything in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, and other kingdoms in the Middle East.

[5] The Russian poor are amongst the most pitiful in the world and Marxism did exactly nothing for them in the last 90 years except get them killed in wars or murdered by the KGB. Today, Russia is hopelessly poor with little or no chance of advancement to the middle classes. There are 100 millionaires in Moscow today thanks to the Russian Mafia and government corruption. Crime syndicates now run Russia.

[6] There are a billion poor Chinese. There is no money for anything for them. The other 300,000,000 are now well off due to the curious admixture of Marxism and capitalism. There are 700,000,000 poor Indians, a great fraction thereof who starve annually. Out of a billion Muslims, 950,000,000 are very poor.

So, how would a US Democrat make use of this information?? Why to use the same tactics as the Marxists do!

The Democrat in the US firstly uses racism and invites a corresponding attack on the ‘rich’ and corporations to place blame. The rich and corporations, we learn, are spending the future of the poor. They preach justice. The problem here is that the Liberal Democrats actually subsidize the poor and ensure their ongoing status as being subservient to the parts of government in firm control of the Liberal Democrats. They cause poverty with misdirected social programs that tend to work for more poor, as intended in their strategy. Welfare and its associated programs are the biggest single source of votes for the left in the US. The teachers unions are next and the Liberal Democrats view the medical community as their next victim. They have no hopes with the military or the corporate world, whom they have alienated. The Liberal Democrats have no problem with flunkout rates in schools, low grades, crime in schools and more. They never complain about low test scores or school grade averages for minorities. They do complain that whites have higher scores on standardized tests. They are less vocal when it is learned that Asians have better scores than whites. The only response the liberal teachers unions have is: give us more time, more money and more teachers and aids and counselors and on and on. When confronted with the dismal academic performances of certain schools or teachers, they will not accede to dismiss a single incompetent teacher. Academic performance of minorities is not in their best interest. They cannot tolerate standardized tests for teachers that would prompt many to call for their dismissal for incompetence. That would lead to a loss of votes. Knowing that their black victims cannot compete for reasons that are mostly inflicted by Liberal Democrats, the left openly confirms that affirmative action programs, set-asides, quotas and civil rights laws, rules and jobs must be given to non-whites as political rewards. They stigmatize their victims and erode their future achievements but accuse others of doing so. They are parasites upon society.

The Liberal Democrats encourage racism and racial hatred by agitating the black communities of the US with all sorts of social programs. It is obvious that they would lose nearly all power if the black vote would be split as the unions have.

The liberal Democrats openly encourage illegal aliens to ignore the tax laws and wish to make them instant citizens with no penalties for their crimes of not filing state and federal tax returns. They subsidize crime in this way. Illegal aliens can supply sorely need votes in the future. “Today we march; tomorrow we vote!!”

The Liberal Democrats encourage drug addiction, sloth and crime by their continual use of the taxpayer’s monies to try to legalize drug use, minimize law enforcement of drug crimes through use of evidence rules, lower or suspend prison sentences, and give out pardons to know criminals. They continually fight for lower drug crime penalties, decriminalizing drugs and the need for programs such as needle exchanges. They foster endless appeals in the courts to free criminals. Social workers are not allowed to report crimes. In many cities, Illegal aliens are not stopped by the police by law.

We bunch all this in with the adulation of Marxism and the continual harping for laws that follow the Manifesto such as confiscatory inheritance taxes, high progressive taxes, state ownership or control of more land and businesses, socialized medicine, complete control of education, the media and transportation.

We can then add the adulation and constant support for the enemies of the US such as the Communists in Cuba, South America, North Korea, Africa and elsewhere. They support Islamo-Fascism and terror in any form they can by using the ruse that is protecting our rights.

Given the chance, the left will raise taxes as high as they can, destroy as many corporations as possible, encourage immorality, encourage and supply drugs and addiction and phony rehabilitation programs and more. All this happens with other people’s tax money. They spend tax money to buy votes.

Let us all recognize how the left-liberal politicians work the poor in this country for votes and political powers. Nobody but a loser would willingly submit to their phony economics and job programs. Only a dunce would truly believe in the liberal Democrats and their propaganda.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2006/oct/12/101210281.html

S[l]ick Willie speaks:

"This is an election unlike any other I have ever participated in," Clinton told Democratic supporters at a fundraiser in Las Vegas. "For six years this country has been totally dominated - not by the Republican Party, this is not fair to the Republican Party - by a narrow sliver of the Republican Party, its more right-wing and its most ideological element."

You are not in this election. So, we try to convince the Republicans that those tax cuts, booming economy, good times, roaring stock market and such are to be blamed on Karl Rove and VP Cheney and a few of their friends?? Several dozen of Clinton’s close friends went to jail in the 90s. More escaped justice. I suppose that series of convictions must have cleansed the DNC? Howard Dean says he hates Republicans and everything they stand for. Hate, it seems, is the lynchpin of the left. Durbin thinks we send Nazi soldiers to Iraq. Nancy Pelosi looks for the Culture of Corruption in other parties and cannot see crooks like Harry Reid, Cynthia McKinney and Rep Jefferson from LA. No ideological elements or corruption there? No corruption in the Kennedy camp? Daley bunch? Where are the good old guys like Rostenkowski, Wilbur Mills, Tipsy O'Neal and Jim Wright?

This, from the guy who [1] lied about the Middle Class Tax Cut to get elected, [2] tried to force socialized medicine on all of us, [3] acted out his adolescent perversions on stage and on the rug in the Oval Office, [4] murdered children at Waco, [5] started a senseless war in Kosovo,[6] ignored terrorism, [7] sold hot sheets in the Lincoln Bedroom and graves at Arlington, [8] incessantly lied and [9] and tried to make gay activism, sloth, degeneracy, drug addiction and street crime all respected and progressive activities of our society. Now he wants to add 12 million Democrat voters to the voting lists and give them retroactive Social Security benefits and ignore those criminals who failed to file state and federal tax returns. Another tax on American Billy? Thanx. We are all just thrilled to pay the medical expenses, criminal legal and prison expenses and more for new illegal aliens who you want to vote for your party.

"When the chips are down, this country has been jammed to the right, jammed into an ideological corner, alienated from its allies, and we're in a lot of trouble," he said.

I suppose we were not jammed into a leftist ideological corner by a wrinkled, sour old Saul Alinsky Communist and her crooked friends? Maybe that dirty money from Red China helped even out things. What did North Korea send? Contributions to the Clinton Liebrary?

We suffered a lot of perversions under this loathsome parasite (and some of his relatives) and finally managed to reverse 30 years of mindless tax hikes from the perverted, Marxist-oriented Democratic Elites. I wonder how many criminals need to be pardoned at this time. Hillary might pardon all criminals in our prisons as political prisoners abused and tortured by the conservatives.

We took out the trash then; we can do it again. All these left-liberal Dems have is our tax money. Do not let them have it!

Just think about Nancy Pelosi, Rep Conyers, Teddy Kennedy, Vinegar John Kerry, Maxine Waters, Chuck Schumer and Charlie Rangel dreaming up all sorts of new taxes to soak the citizens while passing new laws celebrating degeneracy. Free needles and drugs!! Abortions and free sex change operatons for everybody!!

Clinton needs to move to North Korea where he can get a room full of Monicas and enough dope to keep his spirits high for decades.

Just say No to perverts and Tax Maggots. Vote against the left.

Dingy Harry Swims in the Muck

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR2006101200129.html

Well, now, let us hear about the Culture of Corruption from Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Rep Jefferson from LA and Cynthia McKinney about Senate Minority Leader’s ‘business dealings.”

Gee. Do we just let this pass and allow the Ethics Committee to sort through these allegations or do we yell crook?

If this were a Republican then the Drive-by Media would be howling for their skins. How much of a call for a ‘full investigation ‘do we hear from the NYT?? I think somebody on the AP staff needs to be fired for bringing up this matter near election time. It makes Harry Reid look like a possible criminal. How politically incorrect!!

Let us all be calm, and quiet, of course, about this and let the investigation proceed assuming, as always, that the man in innocent until proven guilty.

Sure.

Dingy Declares:

Everything I did was transparent, Reid told a Las Vegas news conference Wednesday after the AP story was published. "I paid all the taxes. Everything is fully disclosed to the ethics committee and everyone else. As I said, if there is some technical change that the ethics committee wants, I'll be happy to do that.

The facts apparently are [AP link]:

After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale.

The complex dealings allowed Reid to transfer ownership, legal liability and some tax consequences to Brown's company without public knowledge, but still collect the payoff nearly three years later.

So, Dingy gets his cronies to change the rules and laws for Harry so he can make nearly 300% on his crooked deal?? This is just quarter-pitching stuff. Hillary made %1000 per cent.

Dingy Harry is a criminal micro midget compared to seasoned crooks with high-level contacts like Hillary Clinton.

Another crooked Democrat? What other kinds are there??

We need to properly address the diplomatic problem with North Korea. Looking back on our distinguished history on this subject, I can suggest some appropriate diplomats that can, I am confident, handle this delicate task with elegance and aplomb. Peace is at hand.

The Sterling Moment in diplomacy for the US was when Jimmy Carter’s brother Billy Roger, acting as a highly-paid consultant to the Libyan Islamo Terrorists, deftly urinated on the wall at the airport in Libya. This is the kind of liberal talent we need to sit down and debate with the North Korean Communists. Such a touch of class. There have been other notable moments such as when Jimmy Carter kissed Leonid Brezhnev on the cheek [wrong one… 3.5 feet too high..] and made him smile and made him a devoted friend. We saw Carter’s sincere interest in humanity, broad fairness in social and military matters and how he was interested in offering anything he could give from the US taxpayers as he wept after learning that Daniel Ortega lost the election the election in Nicaragua. Jimmy never met a Communist he didn’t love. This will be his second trip!

Jimmy is our man!!

Jimmy could lead a Four Star, blue label diplomatic mission to the People’s Republic of North Korea. As assistants, we could suggest Bill Clinton’ half-brother Roger, a known expert on drugs and other matters that might be attractive to Chairman Kim. They would need to include some Bay Area consults with expertise on the availability of little girls as a special gift in honor of Kim’s personal preferences and in line with San Francisco’s most exotic offerings and expertise. Nancy Pelosi can suggest a few. Then there are well-qualified aids such as Squeaky From and Patrick Kennedy to provide advice on drugs, political activism and alcohol abuse and we must not overlook the celebrated conflict-resolution talents of Cynthia McKinney on behalf of the Islamo terrorists for balance. That august group could assemble a magnificent aid package with a few billion dollars (be generous—20 billions…) that would dazzle even the toughest hard-core Marxist. Jimmy could bring along some hot legal talent such as DUI Sandy (stuff yer pants with stolen papers) Berger and maybe Hugh Rodham Clinton to the panel. Dan Rather could come along, sing high praises to Communism as no other has ever done and write the conclusion of the meeting before it took place to remove any obtuse wrinkles in the dialogue and outcomes. Then Dan could oversee several CBS Specials on the stunning new Peace Initiative.

From the House we could add high-level Democratic key political assets as Representative John Conyers the Democrat Congressman from Detroit Michigan, an expert on racism and massive reparations along with Congressman Charles Rangel Democrat from New York, who may have significant inputs in how new taxes might be structured to repay the North Koreans for the insults suffered from the tactics of President Bush, and abuse to the Republic from Presidents Ronald Regan and Eisenhower.

Assemble the Team!! Peace is at hand.

Now that North Korea has nuclear weapons it is time to, again, talk. The Clinton Administration method, involving endless talks, was to bribe their sick, twisted Dearest Leader into keeping silent about developing his weapons business for a load of US tax dollars. Silence for dollars--the Clinton victory

Clinton was always generous with other people’s money. He could talk a lot and shovel out bribes to perverts and others and then walk away.

How cheap are promises to buy?? Probably a few hundred million dollars. What are they worth? Nothing.

We will now hear shouts for the need for diplomacy and how talking will solve problems. The problem with the history of diplomacy, treaties and various foreign affairs is that diplomacy never works. If diplomacy had any major impact on the conduct of nations we might wonder just why we fought two world wars with 80,000,000 dead and played around in Korea, Viet Nam, Somalia, Iraq and other places. What happened to diplomacy? We didn't talk enough? I wonder where diplomacy worked in our, what, seven or eight times we sent US Marines to the Dominical Republic.

North Korea, still a darling of the Berkeley Crowd, Cuba and several disgusting terrorist organizations, is a major exporter of missiles and bombs. Now, their demonstrated nuclear capability will attract state-sponsored terrorists who can afford to get a car-sized device to detonate in the US, England or maybe even France. France will cave into terrorist demands as they always have with a pitiful bootlicking performance. They always do. Italy let Abu Nidal go thus escaping the US forces because he threatened to bomb Italy’s subways and trains. The Spanish went nuts and shrieked like yellow-striped cowards and fell prostrate when a small bomb went off in their transit system. France let some terrorist go who had shot an American military attaché in the last decades because of threats to light off more bombs in Paris. The French know how to display cowardice and the outward appearance of being some kind of advocate for international politics. They wanted atomic weapons to be used in Indo china in the early 50s but Eisenhower and more likely Harold Wilson, a known Communist, vetoed the idea.

So, they talked and talked and France lost another of its many wars and they talked. I wonder when the Republic of Viet Nam will get their nuclear weapons?? How much would it take to bribe Somalia not to develop nuclear weapons? The Clintons know.

The net effect here is that there is no way to prevent state-sponsored terrorists from getting nuclear weapons from places like North Korea. The pumpkin-sized little dictator of North Korea will now use his new toy to attempt to extort money from the US while ignoring any promises to halt development of newer bombs. Iran is in exactly the same situation to troll for bribes although they have more credibility than the Marxists do. Iran can probably produce a suitcase size bomb within in a few years.

Now, we can await the possible election of a Democrat to the White House and they can talk, talk and talk and offer bribes to North Korea. But, when a nuclear bomb goes off in some US port we can wonder how much talk there will be and how much action. There will be talk and some tedious examination while we wonder why people hate us.

For Americans now it is time  to: offer bribe money, talk, take the bomb blast that is the planning stages of several terrorist groups, talk, whine and moan about the tragedy of the blast, talk and offer more bribes. Works for Democrats; works for the French. Let us talk some more. There will be peace in our time; we can buy it with bribes funded with US tax dollars.

Let us talk about talking and form some talking points about which we can talk.

I thank Ed Choate for his comments on my blogs and here is my reply to him and others:

As a life-student of politics [from my frosh year of California HS in the government class of the Constitutionist Party (Give Tax the Ax) state chairperson (John E. Castle, III, 1961), then on to history class taught by a cousin of Richard Nixon [Howard Marshburn] then to College of Sequoias during the Cuban Missile Crisis, then on to UCLA and off again via the LBJ draft, then the streets of SF in 1965-1966, then SUNY in New York State 1970-1972, then Yale 1972-1976 and more]. Read my bio for more.

I find that the appeal of a politician has to match what the voters want to hear. This is not a new observation, but still must be the first consideration of those who would lead. Eric Hoffer said that new leaders do not create the new movements but simply fall in with the new direction as it builds and ask for leadership. The mass of voters are split into many factions and a favorable mix must be assembled that meets your morality, outlook and economics and what the mix will tolerate as a group. The successful politico knows how to appeal to a collective group of special interests that form a winning majority. The liberals generally get 41% in national elections and need to garner the missing 10 points from the center. They can get 6% just by howling and need a solid 4% to win. The right can get about 45% or so. The winner is the one who captures the 5% of the center.

Losers have a narrower or single-issue oriented campaign, such as anti war. This frequently limits their ability to win. This country is still mostly moderate in most states except the Left Coast and NE. This theory works for all forms of politics. Caesar knew this, Pompey did not. Huey Long knew this. Napoleon knew this. FDR worked this well. Lenin, Stalin and Brezhnev could ignore all but their narrow 5% of the population. Nixon practiced this too, but fell from grace due to his own crimes. His election was a landslide due to the tax, anti-war and social issues of George McGovern. Thank you George. We need you back. The political campaigns of Humphrey, McGovern, Stevenson, Dukakis and most particularly Walter Mondale are worth studying in the negative sense. Walter lost big on the tax issue. The Al Gore run was an anomaly with insufficient Republican voters coming out of their fog. It won’t happen again. This strategic fact must be remembered as the key to beating liberals. Use the liberal weaknesses in planning a campaign.

Voters have limited memories so keep up the message. The liberals will help out with their phony calls for more taxes and change and absurd court cases generated by activist judges. Liberals are devoted to degeneracy and that must be emphasized every day.

One good way to attack the left is to simply quote them: Find some quotes by Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, and Nancy Pelosi and quote them verbatim and then state that you do not agree with their morality, tax notions or whatever. There is an ocean of quotes out there from safe seats that can be used to highlight the far left position for nearly all Democrat candidates. There is no such thing as a moderate Democrat. They challenge the party’s liberal line, remain silent or howl. Quote Ted  and Nancy and Howard Dean frequently as examples of unAmerican conduct and outlook.

The general weaknesses of the Democrats are based on the fact that they hate capitalism [see ACLU history for their Marxist founder’s history and their call for state ownership of property and all that Maoist fluff], want to control everything though massive government, control of education, high taxes, etc. They are the elites and can safely ignore their own rules. They would flip Commie-in Red in a heart beat as Joseph P. Kennedy did  when he switched from being a Nazi sympathizer to a USSR stooge in a few  hours. Those two groups were both socialist and totalitarian  in nature. Note that Teddy’s money stems from Old Joe and Sam Giacanna and other Mafiosi and illegal smuggling. They hate Christians and will support Islamo-Fascism, Marxism and even Voodoo in school courses, legislation and more while suppressing Christians and the expression of their beliefs in all forms. Liberals have no sense of morality. Attack them on this issue. Ask liberals why they hate Christians and American values.

They will NOT HESITATE to employ lies as they learned this fundamental lesson from watching the wild successes of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Ho, Fidel Castro and Daniel Ortega. They will always lie about the fact that tax cuts generate growth. They call this a cost. They create monsters such as the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and other demons to justify their comments and assume the mantle of victim hood.

Nancy Pelosi can howl and condemn Foley and cannot reconcile this stance with what she said about the Gerry Studds case and Condit, in her own state. She speaks with a forked tongue. Hypocrisy is working well for the left, and always has. The independents and conservatives, however, are still sensitive to this. Hypocrisy and lies are strong features of the left because their constituents care little for the truth: they want stimulation, a chance to be scared and a place to bawl. Hypocrisy and lies provide a solution for  this urgent need in liberals. Read the True Believer by Eric Hoffer. http://www.erichoffer.net/  Call Nancy on her hypocrisy and blame the whole Democrat party for her words and deeds.

Ronald Reagan was successful because he was honest, faithful to God, even and balanced in his politics and had only a few solid stances on the issues. HE DELEGATED THE DETAILS. He wrote many letters a day to his constituents and friends and maintained his morality and outlook--NO MATTER WHAT. George Bush is much like Ronald Reagan, except he talks too much. Minimize details. When you talk to the press use documented quotes from liberals and state that these are not exactly American in content and belong with other societies. Recite the failed history of liberal social programs as proof.

A successful strategy for any new politician might be to reverse everything Ted Kennedy ever stood for or voted for provided, of course, that the newcomer runs a political race outside a Dark Blue State. Light blue is fine. Reversing anything Nancy Pelosi stands for probably helps too. She is the far-left solution to getting back power. Her messages are too strong for many  moderates and she might help  lose the national liberal cause because of this. Ted made a lot of big mistakes in his career and they are all valid to quote from.

The liberals are weakest on taxes. Given their sorry history on tax hikes of the Jimmy Carter Era, they MUST continue on with taxes because this is their ONLY source of power. RR said 'defund the left' and they freaked. The best pitch against the tax maggots of the left is to suggest to voters that they can manage their money better than the government. Cite DoD, Welfare, HHS, Dept of Ed., HUD, War on Poverty, Great Society and more to show how the left squandered 5 trillion dollars since 1950. The liberals are addicted to tax money. Ask the voters if they really want Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Conyers to direct the spending of your money.

The liberals are second weakest on crime and illegal  immigration, also a crime. They would do or say anything to get 12 million illegal aliens to the ballot box if they could. Ted Kennedy says: “Can you help us out?” They want to release criminals for any reason, such as they are too short or the pile of dope was not treated according to evidence rules  or for being political prisoners. They would cut and run from Iraq and talk, talk and more talk. TALKING IS THE SOLUTION  for liberals—just talk. They talk and they are finished. They would offer North Korea more money if they were in office. More funds for their nuclear program! Jimmy Carter wept when Daniel Ortega lost in Nicaragua. Illegal aliens do not file state and federal tax returns, but the liberals seem to think that they pay taxes and need Social Security benefits. Ask the liberals why they want to tax US citizens and not illegal aliens.

The liberals are third weakest on the War on Terrorism. They cannot operate in this arena due to their penchants for talking, appeasement and shoveling money to our enemies after a few talking episodes. North Korea, Viet Nam, Cuba and Nicaragua are examples of their prior work. The frantic effort to assist Islamo-Fascism by legislation, court actions, ACLU, etc., are transparent efforts to oppose conservatives at the willing expense of US soldiers. Liberals  will gladly trade US dead soldiers for more votes and attempt to block votes from service persons abroad as they did in the 2000 race. Ask the liberals why they support terrorism in every case.

The liberals are strongest on racism. They maintain their edge in politics in many races by agitating blacks and howling about slavery, an institution dating back a mere 5000 years or more and highly profitable in Africa during the last century. MD is the best example of this. 90% of the black vote gives them 3-4 million votes. Racism keeps them in office in many states. Black Republicans are hated in every case and called all sorts of nasty names. No racism here?. They look the other way as Al Sharpton, Donna Brazile, Cynthia McKinney, Minister Louis Farrakhan  and others trash  Republicans and  others [but never Democrats] with their ugly comments and acts. Racism  still exists in the Sudan and the liberals never comment on this. They preach that the US created slavery. They will howl and label anyone they can as a racist for any reason, and it works for them. They are the racists. They exist on racism. They depend on racism. The liberal solution to racism, of course, beside the votes, is more taxes to fund reparations, create new civil rights legislation [Illegal aliens!]. That would cost  500 billion dollars or more. The upper half would pay for that—not the so-called poor. How about quotas for illegal aliens? Ask the liberals what they think about the comments of Al Sharpton, Sen. Byrd and others and how their notions fit into the Democratic party.

The liberals are second strongest on global warming, a phony political construct based on harried and emotional speeches devoid of sound science. They have no firm data to present and cannot come up with a reasonable counter to the point that the weather is cyclic. The satellites do not show the  upper atmosphere is rising, Iceland froze the Vikings out in the 11^th century, that glacier in Kansas was not melted by Oldsmobile exhaust fumes. http://junkscience.com/ Ask why they cannot come up with firm data. Ask them why they support Kyoto Treaty when China and India are exempt and two of the  biggest polluters on the planet.

The liberals are strong on abortion. They worked hardest on this issue for decades and have 20,000,000 abortions to their credit. Point out that the ability to choose is like a mugger being able to choose the weakest old lady to rob.

The best strategy for dealing with liberals is to expose their political weaknesses with solid references  and recommend a rational and conservative alternative. This tack attracts the right and much of the center. It has no effect on the far left. Ignore their howls and retorts. Avoid details, let the message get through to the undecided.

rycK.