Posted by
rycK on Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:23:00 PM
We should not be so alarmed at the base squeaks of the Third World chum chuckers as they work their little parlor tricks on TV after some stale and predictable propaganda episodes at the UN. The best way to humiliate the far left (and their seemingly unlikely ideological allies from the Islamo-Fascisti) is to let them rant. They will tell us what they think of themselves. They always do.
To suppose that Americans, excluding the far left, of course, would take offense at Hugo the Cacalero as he suddenly identifies “El Diablo” for the world and waves a copy of Noam Chomsky’s incoherent screeds at the camera is pushing the reality of the situation beyond nap time. Did Hugo cross himself before opening that rag? El Diablo may have written it. Here we have a typical, ghoulish Marxist who now subsidizes old sick Fidel Castro with oil revenues and drones on about American Imperialism with Great War rhetorical themes cartoonishly animated by proffering a book by some bozo who said: “You never need an argument against the use of violence, you need an argument for it” or “Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media.” And the media does express adulation considering their unlimited praise of Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad along with the banal Bill Clinton suggestion that President Bush ‘talk’ to this turkey, a classic piece of Clintoonery. Just check out the New York Times and their praise for Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, Castro, Ortega, Chavez, Ho, Kim, etc., and other blood-splattered goons of the Third World. Talk by the left and millions of US tax dollars launched North Korea to the nuclear stage and financed the shooting of dud-like missiles (fizzlers) into the Japanese Sea. Fine work ‘talk’ is. We might wonder why England and Germany didn’t ‘talk’ a bit and prevent two world wars. Who failed to ‘talk’ Napoleon out of going to Moscow? All that ‘talk ’with the PLO did wonders for Gaza and Lebanon at Camp David. Billy missed the Nobel Peace Prize however. Arafat got rich—he was talking to the talkers about talking!
Then, we have this nattering little personality from Iran who looks suspiciously like one of the guests in the Primate Facility at the Washington, DC Zoo. I think I have seen him rush the cage top with a hand full of fresh, sticky terrorist logic and attempt to chuck some of this magic on the tourists below. His bobbing head and facial contortions may be familiar to many who study the lower primates. His notion that suicide bombers are “not all bad” seems to ring smartly with Chavez’s readings of Chomsky. What could be ‘all bad’ about bombing children on school buses? The liberals seem to think they can wrest some votes from the fallout of such actions and ‘get back’ Congress. They deserve each other.
The ‘leaders’ of Iran and Venezuela were so nasty at the UN podium that Charlie Rangel hastened to point a finger at some of this fun in the most mildest of terms and assert that only Americans can criticize the President. Charlie would not think of insulting or admonishing a Marxist or Islamo-Fascist. He owes them too much. Charlie was as polished a shill as could be prepared given his history. The handlers were at serious work on this one.
We need to put a bit of this into the appropriate perspective: Why not envision a cartoon scene where Hugo Chavez grinds away on a hurdy-gurdy playing the Hate America Song while Mahmoud is the chattering monkey groping for alms in all directions and Bill Clinton is the wood nickel in the bottom of the tin cup?? We can all have a good laugh and take solace in the fact that this is the best they have to offer since Arafat died.
All this seems to fit within the customary carnival atmosphere of the current leftist political scene. We can expect more as the political season heats up.