According to  Morris the ugly liberal beast has risen from its primordial pool of political polychesia and joins with the Islamic Terrorists in their acidic retorts of everything Republican, conservative and decent. This must be a sign that the Olympian liberal mandate to grab back their share of power in the US government now seems to decay and oozes a whiff or two of abromidrosis. Some new form of smear tactic must be employed to persuade the true believers to modify their votes and vote for some party that hails two crooked lawyers as their leaders and icons. Senator Allen is now a preferred target.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/26/154154.shtml

To wit:

From Morris, who should know:

There he was on live television, the man those who have worked for him have come to know – the angry, sarcastic, snarling, self-righteous, bombastic bully, roused to a fever pitch. The truer the accusation, the greater the feigned indignation.

We have lived through a dozen years of this circus atmosphere and nobody seems to remember the similarity to malaria here.

And more:

Clinton told Wallace, "There is not a living soul in the world who thought that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with Black Hawk Down." Nobody said there was. [emphasis mine]

Off topic! A typical misdirection by the rabid left: denounce people for things they didn’t say. Did Wallace say that or inquire about this subject? Just find the exception of the non-exception and chuck it in the faces of the voters as proof that Bill Clinton is, again, a pitiful victim of the fascist left. Poor Billy, as he pockets his millions. I assume he took care of Susan McDougal; she saved him from jail it seems.

Bill Clinton, a twisted, psychotic liar, perjurer and sexual predator, is the proper choice to chuck meaningless and false epithets at an interviewer in the hopes for new sufferings in victim hood. He was a casualty of Newt Gingrich, Linda Tripp and Paula Jones as they spoke openly about his disgusting conduct, lies and more. They should not have exposed Bill with the evil truth. He deserved much more than that. Not truth but blind outbursts of spontaneous adulation were in order. The truth is too ugly. He couldn’t stop proffering his monstrous lies until Monica’s keepsake turned up with his DNA in plain site stuck on the front of her ceremonial gown. How did White House security miss that one?

And, even more:

The president told Wallace, "I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill bin Laden." But actually, the 9-11 Commission was clear that the plan to kidnap Osama was derailed by Sandy Berger and George Tenet because Clinton had not yet made a finding authorizing his assassination.

This sounds like the hollow bravado we suffered with from Vinegar John Kerry as he asserted that he was ‘reporting for duty’ and would hunt down Osama bin Laden and blot out his life. He would not; that would have been a philosophical betrayal. In leftist hands, OBL would be as safe and comfortable as Fidel Castro if he could be used as a political asset, which he certainly is. The Democrats need bin Laden at this desperate time. Where is Walter Duranty to clarify the situation?

The truth behind such phony rhetoric is defined by the notion that both these far-left political parasites would commemorate the fine work of Islamo-Fascism, as they did for the communists of View Nam, Cuba and the USSR, if it helped oust the nasty Republicans. They believe it will. They can always blame America for any ugly consequences as they did in Cambodia. Their votes can always be reconciled because they were victims of lies. Switcheroo! These two clowns were face-to-face and slobber-to-slobber with some of the ugliest Marxists in known history and returned with bright glows on their faces. Revisionism lives, as usual, in the Democratic Party leadership. They had seen greatness and they were humble. Lap dogs feature such wimpy gleams on their faces as they are stroked by their masters.

It is a mystery to many why the voting public seems to fail to respond to such political parasites as we approach our solemn voting duties in November. Fifty years ago such slimy and un-American conduct by Leahy, Reid, the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi would have been denounced by the general media. Today, sadly, the drive-by media is striving to defeat the conservative government, the one that gives us such a great economy, low taxes, freedom from more terrorist attacks, fewer elected Democrats and more. The Dan Rather Scandal clearly exposed the so-called impartial media as feverishly biased, hopelessly corrupt and intellectually bankrupt thus willing to concoct any phony story to help change some votes. Dan Rather is now a hero, along with his victimized aid Mary Mapes and they deserve praise and applause as they have suffered the slings and arrows of Vice President Cheney and his bandits.

How much more of this can we stand? Is our society so far gone that we can even believe the torrid rants of Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the Clintons??

I hope not. As twisted as liberalism? Not yet.

The liberal Democrats, again, resist any form of border control with their delays and talking points and mumblings. Here, we learn that when proper, tamper-proof identification is obviously required to cross our land boarders, that Democrats need to block the legislative process and feather bed other jobs into other cushy slots around chemical plants and such by stuffing the bills with fluff. They still believe that the federal government is the employer of last resort. Do we need to hear that railroad engineers need to be relieved every 100 miles again or that the coal stoker is now some kind of safety engineer? Why not hire illegal aliens to monitor illegal aliens and guard ports against attack by illegal aliens? That makes sense to a big-government liberal. Let taxpayers subsidize their much-needed voters and also be rewarded handsomely for their loyalty. We can recompense them retroactively from their social security guesstimates. Just hike taxes to cover the costs.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/26/222107.shtml?s=ic

We must focus on the obvious fact that Democrats can only ultimately win in political terms from millions of illegal aliens swarming over our borders as their political futures apparently depend on future votes from their alien allies. The US middle class shrinks away from the parasitism of the left. Today we march—tomorrow we vote with Vicente Fox and Fidel and Hugo. Upgraded slogans from the 60s are conveniently recycled by merely replacing the names of Ho, Ortega, Mao and other contemporary heroes of the left.  It is not clear whether Democrats will openly urge aliens to vote as they did in the Sanchez Case in Orange County, CA. They are desperate. Maybe they will hand out stacks of absentee ballots on the street corners where day workers congregate at dawn.

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kouri/060605

Here is a case where some frantic, foaming left-liberal Democrat openly called for illegal aliens to vote and said that citizenship was really unnecessary:

The story came to light last Thursday, when Busby told a Latino crowd that "everybody" can help her campaign. She is heard on a recording saying, "Everybody can help, yeah, absolutely, you can all help. You don't need papers for voting, you don't need to be a registered voter to help.

Stripped of the obfuscational trappings, this is a direct call for illegal voting made urgent by the frantic political position of the sordid left. Allied with Hugo Chavez, sympathetic to Hamas and the PLO the left-liberal Democrats will stuff ballots by any means. Read Man of the House by Tipsy O’Neal about hardball politics and ballot box stuffing in Chicago in the 60s. JFK was probably illegally elected by this left-liberal technique. The ACLU will be an ally here in any future voter fraud. Why can't they vote from prison or from Mexico? Unfair!

The precise excuse follows:

House and Senate lawmakers agreed to push back the program by 17 months, saying they want to make sure new ID cards being developed by the Bush administration will better secure borders against terrorists without slowing legitimate travelers from Canada and Mexico. The new ID's will be required for Americans and all others entering the U.S.

Apparently they have no problem strip searching old ladies in US airports while ignoring the age and physicla descriptions of young Middle Eastern Islamic terrorists because that would be profiling. Dope peddlers, the source of ecstasy for many leftists, can cart across the frontier a ton of dope but they seem to need to confiscate Ann Coulter’s silver dagger earrings at some airport and never return them. That makes sense to a left liberal.

The illogic becomes more convoluted as the fury of the Democrats rise.

Of course, Europe, Asia and the Middle East all require IDs and visas and all sorts of things. No American can just walk across some border or off a boat into France. They would freak out. Your passport must remain at the hotels in most European cities so the government can track you. Spying on visitors?? Fine for Chirac—not acceptable for illegal aliens crossing the US land borders. No liberal would blame the French or Germans for demanding good identification.

The political slogan secure borders used here by the liberals is another case of obfuscation. Here the actual intent is to do the opposite of what they call for and allow facile entry of illegals into the US. This silly notion ranks down there with the idea the ACLU looks after all American’s rights. That is not so.

Vote out these parasites.

The Tale of Vinegar John, a Play in One Act.

Scene 1, A carnival stage with free popcorn, food stamps and tinsel.

The Scene: Imagine a clown with two faces like Baucus, long donkey faces with John Kerry’s eyebrows, eyes and chin. He wears a chic tutu of white festooned satin decorated with sequins and with Hammers and Sickles, North Vietnamese Flags, Peace signs, and the garment is gathered at the knees like a balloon. There are numerous hidden pockets to stuff campaign contributions.

His slinky dress has a broad yellow stripe down the back side with freqduent clusters of three tiny purple hearts in a group scattered here and there and quaint little puff sleeves. He wears skinny pink pixie boots curved up and back down at the toe with a little corroded brass peace sign dangling on one and a bright red Hammer and Sickle glittering in the spotlight on the other. He juggles dozens of little balls with both hands with the words Yes, No, Yes then No, Maybe no. Maybe Yes and other variants. The balls bounce everywhere but to stage right.

He sings and dances to the tune of an old French Bawdy House Song:

I am Vinegar John the Flip Flop Man,

I will hike yer taxes with a wave of my hand,

I must change my mind as oft as I can,

I am Flip Flop John the Vinegar Man

I am Flim Flam John the Vinegar Man,

I peddle my lies and I peddle my Spam,

I wheel and deal with a Flim and a Flam

I am Flip Flop John the Vinegar Man,

I am Vinegar John with the Flim-Flam Boots,

I will buy my votes with taxpayer’s Loot,

For the Army and the Navy I don’t give a hoot.

So, the Flip-Flop Man he needs yer Toot.

I am Hanoi John the Can-di-date,

My own two faces will decide yer fate,

I will honk my Donkey at a faster rate,

I am Phlegm Flam John the Gigolo Rake.

I am Vinegar John the High Tax Man

I ignore yer future and ignore yer Fate.

I love my Donkey and I love my Hate,

I will ruin yer wealth at an awful rate.

So, vote for Me John the Vinegar Man

I will waste yer money and I don’t give a Darn,

I will tax yer water and tax yer yams,

Let’s wreck our Nation for the Flip Flop Man!

The scene ends with roaring applause from the crowd and a shower of apartment keys and coins scatter the stage in a glittering array. Vinegar John bows and scoops up the loot.

Scene 2, the polls:

CBS: Vinegar John is projected to win the 2000 US Presidential Race! He was ahead 8% in one pole!!! Long Live the Revolution!! Peace in Our Time! Justice by Taxation!!

Scene 3, Iowa and New Hampshire……….2007

Keep yer seats for this Final Act!! This may be the ultimate George McGovern style political Gift.

We can listen to the banal whines and low-grade murine chortling from the left about all the myriad of things we should have done about terrorism, automobile fuel costs, immigration of illegal aliens, incarceration of sexual perverts, Iraq and more and wonder where their support might be for any of these issues. We need to understand their objectives for the tough positions they take and the intended consequences of their ideas, notions and actions. Obfuscation is the main goal. They want to garble their messages and veil them in some form of  concern for the working class and poor. What they really want is the radical destruction of our society.

The only firm, clear and noisy stance the liberal Democrats proffer, acknowledging that the far left wing is visibly in control of the party, is the unconditional decree to reverse the Bush tax cuts and raise taxes. That much is obvious and pierces the political fog. They seem to think that taking away a tax cut is not actually raising taxes, being as ignorant, devious or deceitful in lectures on economics and elementary accounting as they are in politics. The left-liberals are also fairly firm about giving illegal aliens a quickie path to citizenship (three million votes hang in the balance there—enough to win a state or two in the next general election) with no penalties, a social security check for life for illegal work, free medical services, tuition breaks, no penalties for traffic crimes, tax filing deficiencies and other felonies and the general need to increase the size of government by checking out all the packages that enter the US in the many ports. Automatic voter registration follows with applause. We have seen their fine work in the airports as their newly hired union meso-morphs grope the undergarments of old ladies and children in the frantic search for tactical nuclear weapons. Maybe they can hire the aliens to patrol out the borders with more high-paying jobs, union status and  top-level benefits. After all, they are considered experts in several of these criminal areas.

The left liberals of the Revered Tom Hayden Era are too embarrassed to admit that tax cuts spur economic growth. They actually hope for a massive depression, and worse, to use to blame the Republicans and declare capitalism a failure as they did in the 30s. Is the ACLU still against private property? That worked well against President Hoover and the Republican Congress; the liberals experienced their best political times during the Great Depression, which was only really great for the far left and their Soviet allies. Tax hikes must be instituted for justice. More tax means more justice.

While blaming Bush for numerous things taken from a long litany of evils, the liberals and their Marxist-inspired ACLU subversives will struggle to prevent the terrorists from being interrogated, incarcerated, shamed, treated in some insensitive manner or killed in battle. Legislation must be through litigation in the absence of votes in Congress! Let sexual predators go free if they are too short! They will whine on about their friendly, allied and grateful terrorist’s rights as defined by the liberal wing of the United States Supreme Court on the meaning of the Geneva Convention while ignoring the ugly facts that US service personnel have been murdered by beheadings and worse and most of these are available on video tape. On this murder and torture of US citizens, they remain defiantly silent. I have never heard a liberal condemn the Islamo-Fascisti, but they will invite them to travel over here and condemn the US and conservative views of government. Obfuscation is their game. Have they ever condemned suicide bombings of school buses in Israel? No. That is a vote loser.

They spend a quarter century blocking oil exploration by series of filibusters in the Senate, preventing the building of new refineries, blocking starts of new nuclear power plants (while hailing France’s successes and aiding North Korea in their military adventures) while nosily whining about high energy costs and grubbing for money for phony alternative fuel studies. They drone on about windmills while preventing these devices being installed along the New England coast along Nantucket, one of the very few places (about 1% of the U.S. landmass is useful for wind machines) where they could be efficient. They pooh pooh wave machines along the Atlantic coast. They apparently want to build or research such things in the South or Left Coast where there are  little or no wind and few waves. They have routinely advocated tax increases on gasoline in many and probably all states. They fail to note that the governments make more money off automobile fuel taxes than the profits of Exxon and Shell together. Perhaps they think that raising taxes will lower gas prices.

Ex President Clinton can angrily wag his finger citing the political notions of wagging the dog and howl and blame President Bush for every evil from global warming to being insensitive about the plight of detainees and their ‘religion’ at Guantanamo Bay as he leads the attack on US security, our moral position, the economic future and more. The liberals have much to gain from another terrorist attack before November. The Islamo-Fascists have no better ally in North America than radical communist activists from the 60s. Hillary Clinton is a former devoted Saul Alinsky communist adherent and Bill Clinton spent three weeks in Moscow in1969, presumable undergoing intensive Soviet mole training. Apparently some of the USSR’s political schemes bore fruit. Did they obfuscate on these issues? Silence? You can be a traitor and shriek about tax hikes and balance the political score it seems. A liberal in good standing will accept a terrorist if they mouth the authorized  right -- sorry, I meant left words.

The left-liberals will attempt to block or dismantle any social, political or economic factor that maintains or improves the morality, economic status, educational outlook, military success or criminal justice in America. Obfuscation is the byline for the left. Slick Willie was a little less slick the other night on Fox News as he lost control over valid questions and criticisms about his obfuscational themes. That is all they have left (pun intended). Vote out the far-left obfuscationists.

We hear more from the parasite William Jefferson Clinton who echoes the standard whines of the fallen left as they moan about their loss of power. It must be election time and the Black President has some nasty grams for the Republicans. Here is some of the latest blow:

"But at least I tried. That's the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now," Clinton said when asked whether he had failed to fully anticipate bin Laden's danger. "They had eight months to try, they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed."

The only thing this sexual predator, liar, perjurer and habitual prevaricator  tried was to seek more sexual conquests on the Oval Office rug and make money from selling whatever he could from his position of power like hot sheets in short shifts in the Lincoln Bedroom.

He lied about everything he ever did and we still wonder if he had Soviet Mole training while in Moscow for three weeks in 1969. Who paid for that? The KGB?

This toad ought to keep silent since he was the one who did nothing about terrorism in his sloppy terms, refused to arrest bin Laden and did nothing about the USS Cole, embassy bombings and other matters. His position was always to  loath the military and support our enemies as he did in his fine work in North Korea by financing their nuclear bomb projects with taxpayer monies.  Clinton is wrestling with the probable preemptive  transformation of his legacy by   the technical politial process of apocolocyntosis, roughtly translated as  pumpkinification. He never  tried, but always failed. That is the general record of the left-liberal elites who think they know  what America wants.

We should not be so alarmed at the base squeaks of the Third World chum chuckers as they work their little parlor tricks on TV after some stale and predictable propaganda episodes at the UN. The best way to humiliate the far left (and their seemingly unlikely ideological allies from the Islamo-Fascisti) is to let them rant. They will tell us what they think of themselves. They always do.

To suppose that Americans, excluding the far left, of course, would take offense at Hugo the Cacalero as he suddenly identifies “El Diablo” for the world and waves a copy of Noam Chomsky’s incoherent screeds at the camera is pushing the reality of the situation beyond nap time. Did Hugo cross himself before opening that rag? El Diablo may have written it. Here we have a typical, ghoulish Marxist who now subsidizes old sick Fidel Castro with oil revenues and drones on about American Imperialism with Great War rhetorical themes cartoonishly animated by proffering a book by some bozo who said: “You never need an argument against the use of violence, you need an argument for it” or “Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media.” And the media does express adulation considering their unlimited praise of Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad along with the banal Bill Clinton suggestion that President Bush ‘talk’ to this turkey, a classic piece of Clintoonery. Just check out the New York Times and their praise for Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, Castro, Ortega, Chavez, Ho, Kim, etc., and other blood-splattered goons of the Third World. Talk by the left and millions of US tax dollars launched North Korea to the nuclear stage and financed the shooting of dud-like missiles (fizzlers) into the Japanese Sea. Fine work ‘talk’ is. We might wonder why England and Germany didn’t ‘talk’ a bit and prevent two world wars. Who failed to ‘talk’ Napoleon out of going to Moscow? All that ‘talk ’with the PLO did wonders for Gaza and Lebanon at Camp David. Billy missed the Nobel Peace Prize however. Arafat got rich—he was talking to the talkers about talking!

Then, we have this nattering little personality from Iran who looks suspiciously like one of the guests in the Primate Facility at the Washington, DC Zoo. I think I have seen him rush the cage top with a hand full of fresh, sticky terrorist logic and attempt to chuck some of this magic on the tourists below. His bobbing head and facial contortions may be familiar to many who study the lower primates. His notion that suicide bombers are “not all bad” seems to ring smartly with Chavez’s readings of Chomsky. What could be ‘all bad’ about bombing children on school buses? The liberals seem to think they can wrest some votes from the fallout of such actions and ‘get back’ Congress. They deserve each other.

The ‘leaders’ of Iran and Venezuela were so nasty at the UN podium that Charlie Rangel hastened to point a finger at some of this fun in the most mildest of terms and assert that only Americans can criticize the President. Charlie would not think of insulting or admonishing a Marxist or Islamo-Fascist. He owes them too much. Charlie was as polished a shill as could be prepared given his history. The handlers were at serious work on this one.

We need to put a bit of this into the appropriate perspective: Why not envision a cartoon scene where Hugo Chavez grinds away on a hurdy-gurdy playing the Hate America Song while Mahmoud is the chattering monkey groping for alms in all directions and Bill Clinton is the wood nickel in the bottom of the tin cup?? We can all have a good laugh and take solace in the fact that this is the best they have to offer since Arafat died.

All this seems to fit within the customary carnival atmosphere of the current leftist political scene. We can expect more as the political season heats up.

Today, the Eternal Whine of the Tax Maggots is heard in new garb: tax the rich!

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-09-18T212718Z_01_N18271786_RTRUKOC_0_US-ENVIRONMENT-GORE.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore on Monday suggested taxing carbon dioxide emissions instead of employees' pay in a bid to stem global warming.

What else is new?

"Penalizing pollution instead of penalizing employment will work to reduce that pollution," Gore said in a speech at New York University School of Law.

The pollution tax would replace all payroll taxes, including those for Social Security and unemployment compensation, Gore said. He said the overall level of taxation, would remain the same.

Socialism beckons from the back of the old White Whale. “Come join us as we sink.”

Under the Kyoto global warming treaty, 35 industrialized nations -- but not the United States -- have agreed to cut carbon dioxide emissions to below 1990 levels.

But, what would algore do with the money from taxes? This is a zero-sum game? Sure!

PRC and India were exempt. Most nations ignored the quotas. Many, like Germany, had to do nothing. The other nations failed to actually cut or meet their goals.  So, the US, alone, would be penalized. Business would rush to PRC and India to escape penalties. Such is the mission of the liberal lackey: make the US pay and give the ‘poor’ a free ride.

This is so silly it is a great reason to vote for algore in the primary elections in 08. He can run again!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5346480.stm

Pope's speech stirs Muslim anger

“The emperors [during the Byzantine era] words were, he said: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

Religious leader Ali Badda Kolu said the Pope's comments represented what he called an "abhorrent, hostile and prejudiced point of view".

Let us look for sermons on infidels........... Oh! Looky here:


http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR01002

Well, I wonder if these are "abhorrent, hostile and prejudiced point[s] of view”

“Sheikh Abd Al-Muhsin Al-Qadhi said: "Today we will talk about one of the distorted religions, about a faith that deviates from the path of righteousness… about Christianity, this false faith, and about the people whom Allah described in his book as deviating from the path of righteousness. We will examine their faith, and we will review their history, full of hate, abomination, and wars against Islam and the Muslims."

“Sheikh Mustafa Bin Said Aytim in a sermon given at a mosque in Mecca. "[The nation] has made the offspring of apes and pigs its stars; the hangers-on of the apes and pigs have become the centers of influence and power… The Jews, Christians, and the hypocrites gnaw away at the body of the nation and then carry out raids on it with the knights of the destructive media and with the deadly weapon of globalization…"

Al-Nour mosque in Al-Khobar: "Humiliation and misery will be the lot of the ones who anger Allah, who cursed them and turned them into apes and pigs… There is no solution to this problem, and to any problem to which the infidel enemy is party, except by waving the banner of Jihad."

Gee, no bigotry or hate here.  All we have to do here, similar with dealing with rabid liberals,  is just quote their own words. It worked well in the Kerry Defeat in 2004. Given an open microphone, the hate-twisted types will preach hypocrisy and hate and show the world just who and what they are.

Let the liberals now celebrate Hezboadulation and Hamasimianism. That could generate several million absentee ballots from the Middle East, good in California at least.

Liberals May Be Identified By:

[1] Constant attention to decent people’s tax liability and personal assets for re-distribution to the masses according to some stale old Marxist platitudes (egalitarianism, communism, socialism, or otherwise failed government programs (Pick one from the list at random: Great Society, War on Poverty, Head Start, HUD, HHS, Land Reform, Revolution ....).

[2] Incessant insistence that big government(s) can solve social or economic problems coupled with a perfect record of never suggesting to reduce the size of any government entity, lower taxes or cancel or abridge expensive social programs. This includes an eager willingness to accept any proposed or previously defined-as-worthless government social program [like Global Warming, or pick one from the current list above or merely substitute something insane] that will deliberately damage our society or to reject any others if they are based on hard work, thoughtfulness, ethics and decency. What is encouraged are government-funded social programs that foster: crime, sloth, drug addiction, sedition, abortion, treason and failure.

[3] A refusal to acknowledge the damaging effects of social diseases such as violent crime, welfare, drug abuse, high school flunkouts, drug smuggling, street crime, gangs, refusal to enforce gun laws, and other forms of social leprosy.

[4] A willingness to open the jail doors and let free the the Willie Hortons, Dan Rostenkowskis, Sandy Burgers, Clintons, Tookie Williams types, the Red Dogs, violent criminals, Islamo-Fascists held in Guantanamo Bay and other dedicated-but-liberal-leaning criminals loose. This is justice. Their incarcerations must be society’s fault. These are ‘political prisoners.’

[5] Preaching on any street corner about the evil fascists that are hoarding the wealth of the country, greedily starving the poor and exploring new ways to make people miserable. The liberals will tax these nasty people until penniless and give the money to the poor. Justice. All this while ignoring the numerous crimes committed by the liberals in the government who openly support terrorism, sloth, racism and bigotry and who invariably retire rich from ‘lengthy careers in public service.’ Both Clintons are now rich and never held a non-political job in their lives. The Clinton Liebrary is now a fountain of dirty money that floods into the pockets of criminals.

[6] A penchant for personal drug abuse, a warm regard for deviant sexual practices, shoplifting, and other petty crimes that are justified as ‘normal’ by the liberal outlook. Such minor crime is dismissed as a ‘tax’ on the rich thus justified under some obscure notions of a social contract that was buried two centuries ago before the French Revolution.

[7] A total contempt and utter disdain and revulsion for success in the business community or stock market coupled with a flat, irrevocable insistence that our economy is failing. They sky is always falling.

[8] Constant fawning, cooing and adoration for Communists and Islamo-Fascisti like Fidel Castro, Che, Ho, Daniel Ortega, Hamas, Osama Bin Laden, PLO, the PRC and their attendant goons.

[9] Offering concessions and praise to those enemies of America (North Koreans, Iranians, Syrians, HAMAS, PLO, Al Q’uaida. Etc. ), while offering free life memberships in the Hate America League.

Conclusion:

Liberals are merely parasites that willingly inject forms of social and economic leprosy into society anytime they can. And their leader? What is Hillary Clinton but a sour, wrinkled old 60s era radical Communist who reputedly slept with the President? Why she is their leader!

That does makes sense in a certain way, in a certain sense. Voting for them makes no sense.

When we critically inspect the cultures of the planet we are struck by the existence of many cultural ‘leaders’ who find ways to treat their own people or subjects like so much dirt and reap wild praise for their efforts. Hamas is a political organization within a political organization and is, as such, a form of social lump within a social tumor. Such diseases finally kill off the host.

Of all the coercions of the political world it is difficult to find a more efficient method of getting to the brutal finale of political objectives than convincing some ‘other dumb s.o.b.’ to die for your cause, sordid as it might be. A promise of glory in the afterlife is cost-effective in military expense terms. No medical bills or retirement or old sailor’s homes for Hamas. Their simian-like followers have all the bases covered. Check out in a pink mist and be scrubbed off the walls a few days later.

Hamas, representing the Hamasimian Nation, now named for the ignorance and menial cognitive skills of their hapless victims, is now celebrating the ‘defeated’ Israel in some form of war that nobody can recognize outside of the usual leftist political fogs, the scattered debris of suicide bombers or the dismal chants of the Islamo-Fascisti. Perhaps they join with the phony causes and claims of the Hezbollah and their rooters (Hezboadulation). The liberal Democrats celebrate as these two forms of terrorist groups put aside their differences in the pursuit of martyrdom.

Only the mentally disnimble can work effectively within such a True Believer’s Political Paradise and expect some form reward for dying like a three-legged mangy mule in the heat of the Wadi Sirhan. Drug-crazed liberals in San Francisco flophouses are similar in outlook, but lack the communication skills necessary to gather in the dedicated for action.

Liberals ought to acquire political instruction from the Hamasimians as they seem to have something working that is more effective than to merely recruit neophytes with the current tenets of: sloth, drug addiction, Marxist political theories and welfare. Their simian brethren have documented success on their side. The liberals have nothing at the present but hopes and revenge. November may crush some more expectations as it did in Novembers past.

Simple Reasons to reject Democrats in November:

Without getting into the noxious fluff, dissection of the mindless Marxist rhetoric and sordid history of what the left-liberals have done to my 3-time X party, we need to only consider a few simple things and then decide to promptly vote against them for any (or all) of the following reasons.

[1] We have a great economy, ‘full spectrum’ as it were, and the liberals hate it. They flourish during depressions and such. FDR is a reminder.

[2] We have a very poor border security situation and the liberals want to make citizens out of every illegal alien they can find. “Can you help us out?” wonders Ted Kennedy. These people will show flags of Che, ‘March today and vote tomorrow’ and support liberalism for their rewards. How about a mandatory hiring quota for Mexicans?? What about the drugs, crime and the Portal for Islamo-Fascists??

[3] We are, almost alone, fighting a war on Islamo-Fascism and are essentially going it alone. Somehow the 911 Tragedy has not prevented the liberals from supporting terrorism at every conceivable point: the courts, Geneva Convention rules, wiretaps, jails, military engagement rules and more. Clearly, the liberals want us to encounter another 911 level attack and welcome the chance to blame President Bush for the events.

[4] We have low taxes, which is the reason our society is the greatest in the world. The liberals would hike the taxes to the Jimmy Carter levels and attempt to squash the American entrepreneurial spirit.

VOTE OUT DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER

Hezboadulation!! The New Political Slogan of the Left

Can we be more disgusted in the current fawning adulation of the Islamo-Fascist terrorists than we saw with Susan Sontag and Jane Fonda in the Viet Nam era?? I wonder. They left will seek new lows to regain the power to increase taxes.

Here, we see the left-liberals in a ghoulish feeding frenzy as they see votes hang in the balance in November and are ready to sacrifice our soldiers, reputation and honor in Iraq and elsewhere for the chance to put Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House. How disgusting.

The Fox News sound bite:

"If my Democrat colleagues spent half the time helping us fight this war on terror as they do attacking the administration, we'd be a lot closer to winning this war," said Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. "They are united in the idea of retreat and defeatism."

is on course. The Democrats follow with more cowardice from Carl Levin, Harry Reid and other proven losers whose gaping maws cry out for a new bite on taxes.

We heard this same form of Hate America First rhetoric in the 30s with Marxist Democrats like Walter Duranty, then in Korea , then Viet Nam with Fonda, Hayden and Sontag and now in the War on Terrorism. They know that a US victory over terrorism demands a loss of political allies to them. Left-liberals need the hate to stimulate their base. They need to proudly show pictures of our dead service personnel [Code Pink] and shattered bodies form terrorist suicide bombers to make their case. They praise terrorism as they frame their new Hezboadulation Slogans and songs. Perhaps they can arrange for Osama bin Laden to get an honorary doctor’s degree at Brown! Maybe they can free the 'political prisoners' at Gitmo.

Let us counter these social parasites at the polls: Vote out Democrats who side with Levin, Reid, Pelosi and Kennedy. Vote out any Republicans who sing the same sordid song.

Those who sing the songs and praises of Hezboadulation are traitors.

rycK

Conservatives: Take Control of Debt and Government Growth Issues.

If we listen to the whines and shuddering howls of both the Democrats and conservative Republicans we constantly hear the complaints about the national debt and growth of big government. Who knows what the moderates think? They have no power and apparently don’t want any. The left condemns President Bush for deficit spending pointing out that President Clinton ran a huge surplus, one he refused to refund giving the excuse that “…they wouldn’t spend it right.” Conservatives join in the chorus about debt and government size.

A realistic approach to dealing with these political problems must begin with a rational assessment of the current financial status of the US economy and not collide with rigid, non-uniform and outdated ideological notions. The first consideration is the debt, debt service and deficits. There is no way the Democrats would consider reducing the debt given the spending levels currently in effect. To think that they would cancel the War on Terrorism, a realistic political approach for them, and then use that money to pay down the debt is sheer folly. To suppose that they would raise taxes, which they certainly will do if they get into power, merely to ease the debt service is more than fanciful. They would raise taxes for more overstuffed, disorganized government given the chance.

Given the 1992/1993 efforts to nationalize the US healthcare industry, thus attempting to form a behemoth four times the level of the Department of Defense, we have to wonder about the accusations from the left on ‘big government.’ Hillary Care would have cost each taxpayer other $300-500 (1993) dollars per month based on this fiasco after accounting for the inefficiency, sloth and welfare-oriented designs universally inherent in socialism and ingrained in this program in particular. The liberals would pass the Conyers ‘pay everything for everybody’ healthcare law in a nanosecond notwithstanding the cost of the tax burden. They would ‘tax the rich’ to pay for it. The problem is that there aren’t enough ‘rich’ to tax. The middle class gets whacked again.

The liberals would quickly cancel the War on Terrorism, celebrate defeat, sing the praises of our enemies as they did Ho and Fidel and divert millions in tax revenues to militant Islamo Fascists to ‘solve’ their short-term problems as they spend more millions trying to understand why they hate us. They demonstrated this marvelous political technique with North Korea. Such a piece of statesmanship and diplomacy!

No. The Republicans must use the following approach: The must preempt the left and take away their options. There is no reason why if government must increase due to items like Homeland Security, Katrina and other matters that the new departments should be structured by the Democrats. There is no reason why the National Debt would need to be reduced when the liberals would just use that a benchmark to spend more saying that ‘the Republicans did that too.’ Raise taxes!

Wrong. We need to spend more on necessary domestic programs and the War on Terrorism and Immigration in such a manner that it blocks the left by limiting how much the taxpayers can stand. We need to increase government in conservative terms thus preventing the left from creating new, outrageous, phony programs like the War on Poverty, The Great Society, HUD, and more. Just elbow them out.

Keep the deficit high, build bigger government in necessary quarters and get to the proper programs first. The left can be squeezed out and left (pun intended) with no options. With low taxes and continued growth we Americans can handle the costs, debt and social problems and marginalize the rabid left who want to see the US fail in the War on Terrorism and in economic terms. We can and must do this.

Lower taxes; spend more on the war and structure new, well-tailored government programs and encourage economic growth. Find a cost-effective healthcare program. Seal off the borders. That wins several ways.

rycK